Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MF > MF07060
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 58(11)

A fuzzy-logic tool for multi-criteria decision making in fisheries: the case of the South African pelagic fishery

B. Paterson A D , A. Jarre A B , C. L. Moloney A , T. P. Fairweather C , C. D. van der Lingen C , L. J. Shannon C and J. G. Field A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Marine Research (MA-RE) Institute and Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.

B Danish Institute for Fisheries Research, North Sea Centre, PO Box 101, DK-9850 Hirtshals, Denmark.

C Marine and Coastal Management, Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Private Bag X2, Rogge Bay 8012, South Africa.

D Corresponding author. Email: barbara@paterson.alt.na

Marine and Freshwater Research 58(11) 1056-1068 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF07060
Submitted: 23 March 2007  Accepted: 11 October 2007   Published: 3 December 2007

Abstract

The present study presents an electronic decision-support tool that uses a fuzzy-logic model of expert knowledge to assist in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries (EAF). The prototype model integrates the multiple goals and objectives related to the evaluation of the ecosystem performance of the South African sardine Sardinops sagax fishery into a NetWeaver knowledge base and provides intuitive visual outputs to communicate results to managers and stakeholders. The software tool was developed in a consultative process with key experts and follows the hierarchical tree approach recommended in the FAO guidelines for responsible fisheries. Input variables are based both on quantitative data and expert opinion. We evaluated the model in terms of robustness to input changes, influence of system structure, and appropriateness of input scales for parameters based on expert opinion. Results show that the model is robust and conservative. The strength of the approach lies in the ability to include variables that are difficult to measure. It provides a means of rendering value judgements explicit and transparent. The tool synthesises a large amount of information and aims at improving understanding rather than achieving precision. The system has the potential to have wide application in the context of EAF.

Additional keywords: Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries (EAF), fisheries management, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).


Acknowledgements

Theressa Akkers, Steve Kirkman, Herman Oosthuizen, Gloria Sitiki, Anthony Starfield and Dave Japp provided valuable input.


References

Belton V., and Stewart T. J. (2002). ‘Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. An Integrated Approach.’ (Kluwer: Boston.)

Burgman M. (2005). ‘Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Cheung, W. W. L. , Pitcher, T. J. , and Pauly, D. (2005). A fuzzy logic expert system to estimate intrinsic extinction vulnerabilities of marine fishes to fishing. Biological Conservation 124, 97–111.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | de Steiguer J. E., Liberti L., Schuler A., and Hansen B. (2003). Multi-criteria decision models for forestry and natural resources management: an annotated bibliography. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, General Technical Report NE-307. Washington, DC.

du Toit M., Boere G. C., Cooper J., de Villiers M. S., Kemper J., et al. (eds) (2003). Conservation Assessment and Management Plan for Southern African Coastal Seabirds. Avian Demography Unit, Cape Town and Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, Apple Valley.

FAO (2003). Fisheries management. 2. The ecosystem approach to fisheries. Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations, Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries No. 4. Rome.

Fairweather, T. P. , Hara, M. , van der Lingen, C. D. , Raakjær, J. , Shannon, L. J. , Louw, G. G. , Degnbol, P. , and Crawford, R. J. M. (2006a). A knowledge base for management of the capital-intensive fishery for small pelagic fish off South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 28, 645–660.
Finlay P. (1994). ‘Introducing Decision Support Systems.’ (Blackwell: Oxford.)

Fletcher, W. J. (2005). The application of qualitative risk assessment methodology to prioritize issues for fisheries management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 62, 1576–1587.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Fletcher W. J., and Head F. (2006). State of the Fisheries Report 2005/06. [Internet]. Department of Fisheries, Western Australia. Available from <http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/docs/sof/2005/index.php> [Accessed March 2007].

Fletcher W. J., Chesson J., Fisher M., Sainsbury K. J., Hundloe T., Smith A. D. M., and Whitworth B. (2002). National ESD reporting Framework for Australian Fisheries: the ‘How To’ Guide for Wild Capture Fisheries. FRDC Project 2000/145. Canberra, Australia.

Garcia, S. M. , and Cochrane, K. L. (2005). Ecosystem approach to fisheries: a review of implementation guidelines. ICES Journal of Marine Science 62, 311–318.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Goodwin P., and Wright G. (2004). ‘Decision Analysis for Management Judgement.’ 3rd edn. (John Wiley and Sons: Chichester.)

Jarre, A. , Paterson, B. , Moloney, C. L. , Miller, D. C. M. , Field, J. G. , and Starfield, A. M. (in press). Knowledge-based systems as decision support tools in an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries: comparing a fuzzy-logic and a rule-based approach. Progress in Oceanography. ,
Kickert W. J. M. (1978). Fuzzy theories on decision making: a critical review. In ‘Series on Frontiers in Systems Research: Implications for the Social Sciences. Vol. 3’. (Ed. G. J. Klir.) (Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division: Leiden.)

Kiker, G. A. , Bridges, T. S. , Varghese, A. , Seager, T. P. , and Linkov, I. (2005). Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 1, 95–108.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Matthieu-Nicot B. (1994). Determination and interpretation of the fuzzy utility of an act in an uncertain environment. In ‘Multiperson Decision Making Models Using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory’. (Eds J. Kacprzyk and M. Fredrizzi.) pp. 90–97. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.)

McDaniels, T. L. (1995). Using judgment in resource management: a multiple objective analysis of a fisheries management decision. Operations Research 43, 415–426.
Miller B. J., and Saunders M. C. (2002). ‘NetWeaver Reference Manual: a compendium of NetWeaver and NetWeaver related terms, concepts and functions.’ Penn State University and The Heron Group LLC. Available from < http//www.rules-of-thumb.com> [Accessed October 2006].

Nel D. C. (2007). Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) for the South African Small Pelagic Fishery. In ‘Ecological Risk Assessment: A Tool For Implementing an Ecosystem Approach For South African Fisheries’. (Eds D. C. Nel, K. Cochrane, S. L. Petersen, L. J. Shannon, B. van Zyl and M. B. Honig.) pp. 59–81. WWF South Africa Report Series – 2007/Marine/002, Cape Town.

Nel D. C., Cochrane K., Petersen S. L., Shannon L. J., van Zyl B., and Honig M. B. (2007). Ecological Risk Assessment: A Tool for Implementing an Ecosystem Approach for South African Fisheries. WWF South Africa Report Series – 2007/Marine/002, Cape Town.

Paterson B. (2007). Development of a decision support system for monitoring the implementation of an ecosystem approach to fisheries. Report to the Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), August 2007, 37 pp.

Paterson, B. , Stuart-Hill, G. , Underhill, L. G. , Dunne, T. T. , and Schinzel, B. , et al. (in press). A fuzzy decision support tool for wildlife translocations into communal conservancies in Namibia. Ecological Modelling and Software. ,
Stewart T. (2005). Dealing with uncertainties in MCDA. In ‘Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys’. (Eds J. Figueira, S. Greco and M. Ehrgott.) pp. 445–470. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 76. (Springer: New York.)

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8, 338–353.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Zimmermann H.-J. (1987). ‘Fuzzy Sets, Decision Making and Expert Systems.’ (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA.)

Zimmermann H.-J. (1991). ‘Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications.’ 2nd edn. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA.)