Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
COMMENT AND RESPONSE

Reply to the comment by Crook and Koster (2006) ‘Temporal change in fish assemblages in the lower Goulburn River, south-eastern Australia’

Carmel A. Pollino A C , Pat Feehan B , Michael R. Grace A and Barry T. Hart A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Water Studies Centre, Monash University, Vic. 3800, Australia.

B Goulburn-Murray Water, PO Box 165, Tatura, Vic. 3616, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: carmel.pollino@sci.monash.edu.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 57(3) 309-311 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF05145
Submitted: 26 July 2005  Accepted: 17 January 2006   Published: 27 April 2006

Abstract

In an earlier paper, multivariate statistics were used on historic fisheries data sets to show spatial differences between fish communities in the Goulburn Catchment (Victoria, Australia). In this reply paper, some further statistical analyses are presented to provide evidence for the assertion that fish communities at each site were stable over the temporal scale of the data was valid. Indeed, evidence for the stabilisation and persistence of fish communities after a major disturbance has also been recognised in other studies. Furthermore, in making judgements about the stability and persistence of fish communities, the scale of a study is an important factor, with patterns at the catchment scale often not being the same as those at smaller spatial scales.


References

Bonner, T. H. , and Wilde, G. R. (2000). Changes in the Canadian river fish assemblage associated with reservoir construction. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 15, 189–198.
Poole R. W. (1974). ‘An Introduction to Quantitative Ecology.’ (McGraw Hill Scientific Publications: New York.)

Quinn, J. W. , and Kwak, T. J. (2003). Fish assemblage changes in an Ozark River after impoundment: a long-term perspective. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132, 110–119.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rahel, F. J. , Lyons, J. D. , and Cochran, P. A. (1984). Stochastic or deterministic regulation of assemblage structure? It may depend on how the assemblage is defined. American Naturalist 124, 583–589.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reid, S. M. (2004). Post-impoundment changes to the Speed River fish assemblage. Canadian Water Resources Journal 29, 183–194.


Ross, S. T. , Matthews, W. J. , and Echelle, A. A. (1985). Persistence of stream fish assemblages: effects of environmental change. American Naturalist 126, 24–40.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Santoul, F. , Cayrou, J. , Mastrorillo, S. , and Cereghino, R. (2005). Spatial patterns of the biological traits of freshwater communities in south-west France. Journal of Fish Biology 66, 301–314.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Voelz, N. J. , and Ward, J. V. (1991). Biotic responses along the recovery gradient of a regulated stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48, 2477–2490.


Yant, P. R. , Karr, J. R. , and Angermeier, P. L. (1984). Stochasticity in stream fish communities: An alternative interpretation. American Naturalist 124, 573–582.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |