Fifty years of criteria development for selecting wetlands of international importance
David A. Stroud A D and Nick C. Davidson B CA Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Monkstone House, City Road, Peterborough PE1 1JY, UK.
B Nick Davidson Environmental, Queens House, Ford Street, Wigmore HR6 9UN, UK.
C Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: david@dastroud.uk
Marine and Freshwater Research 73(10) 1134-1148 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF21190
Submitted: 24 June 2021 Accepted: 6 October 2021 Published: 9 November 2021
Abstract
The Ramsar Convention’s criteria for the identification of wetlands of international importance (Ramsar sites) and its associated guidance have been widely influential, not only in the selection of Ramsar sites, but also in the development of similar criteria to identify internationally or nationally protected areas for biodiversity through other processes. Over 50 years there has been a conceptual broadening of the scope of the criteria from an initial focus on waterbirds, as well as progressive development of interpretive guidance, allowing meaning and interpretation to develop to support criteria that have been unchanged since 2005. However, establishing criteria based on the provision of cultural or socioeconomic ecosystem services for humans, although regularly discussed at recent conferences of parties, remain unresolved, with opposing views among contracting parties. A pragmatic way forward may be to establish a status ‘badge’ or attribute that acknowledges the value of a Ramsar site to human communities, distinct from the site selection criteria. Allowing parties themselves to ‘award’ this status to appropriate sites would give flexibility for differential national uptake, perhaps being more frequently applied by some parties than others.
Keywords: cultural values, ecosystem services, protected areas, Ramsar Convention, site selection criteria.
References
Abell, R., Thieme, M. L., Revenga, C., Bryer, M., Kottelat, M., Bogutskaya, N., Coad, B., Mandrak, N., Balderas, S.-C., Bussing, W., Stiassny, M. L. J., Skelton, P., Allen, G. R., Unmack, P., Naseka, A., Ng, R., Sindorf, N., Robertson, J., Armijo, E., Higgins, J. V., Heibel, T. J., Wikramanayake, E., Olson, D., López, H. L., Reis, R. E., Lundberg, J. G., Pérez, M. H. S., and Petry, P. (2008). Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for 19 freshwater biodiversity conservation. Bioscience 58, 403–414.| Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for 19 freshwater biodiversity conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds (2005). Resolution 3.6. Developing an international partnership for support of waterbird population estimates. Available at https://www.unep-aewa.org/sites/default/files/document/res3_6_partnership_wpa_0.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Amano, T., Székely, T., Sandel, B., Nagy, S., Mundkur, T., Langendoen, T., Blanco, D., Soykan, C. U., and Sutherland, W. J. (2018). Successful conservation of global waterbird populations depends on effective governance. Nature 553, 199–202.
| Successful conservation of global waterbird populations depends on effective governance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29258291PubMed |
Anderson, S. (2002). ‘Identifying Important Plant Areas.’ (Plantlife International: London.)
Atkinson-Willes, G. L. (1976). The numerical distribution of ducks, swans and coots as a guide in assessing the importance of wetlands in midwinter. In ‘Proceedings of the international conference on the conservation of wetlands and waterfowl’, 2–6 December 1974, Heiligenhafen, Federal Republic of Germany. (Ed. M. Smart.) pp. 199–254. (International Waterfowl Research Bureau: Slimbridge, UK.)
Atkinson-Willes, G. L., Scott, D. A., and Prater, A. J. (1982). Criteria for selecting wetlands of international importance. In ‘Proceedings of the Conference on the Conservation of Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat’, 24–29 November 1980, Cagliari, Italy. (Ed. M. Spagnesi.) Supplemento alle Ricerche di Biologia della Selvaggina, vol. 81, pp. 1017–1042. (Istituto Nazionale di Biologia della Selvaggina: Bologna, Italy.)
Barthelmes, A., Couwenberg, J., Risager, M., Tegetmeyer, C., and Joosten, H. (2015). ‘Peatlands and Climate in a Ramsar context. A Nordic-Baltic Perspective.’ (Nordic Council of Ministers: Copenhagen, Denmark.)
BirdLife International (2001). ‘Important Bird Areas and Potential Ramsar Sites in Europe.’ (BirdLife International: Wageningen, Netherlands.)
Bruton, M. N. (1996). The importance of fishes and fisheries in wetlands: the need for an additional Ramsar Criterion for the designation of sites of international importance based on their fish and fisheries. In ‘Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Wetlands’, 19–27 March 1996, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. Technical Sessions E and F, pp. 19–28. (Ramsar Convention Bureau: Gland, Switzerland.)
Convention on Biological Diversity (2004). Decision VII/4. Biological diversity of inland water ecosystems. Available at https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-07/cop-07-dec-04-en.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Convention on Biological Diversity (2010). Decision X/2. The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Available at https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-10/cop-10-dec-02-en.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Convention on Biological Diversity (2021). First draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. CBD/WG2020/3/3.
Davidson, N. C., Dinesen, L., Fennessy, S., Finlayson, C. M., Grillas, P., Grobicki, A., McInnes, R. J., and Stroud, D. A. (2020). A review of the adequacy of reporting to the Ramsar Convention on change in the ecological character of wetlands. Marine and Freshwater Research 71, 117–126.
| A review of the adequacy of reporting to the Ramsar Convention on change in the ecological character of wetlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
de Groot, D., Brander, L., and Finlayson, M. (2016). Wetland Ecosystem Services. In ‘The Wetland Book I: Structure and Function, Management and Methods’. (Eds C. M. Finlayson, M. Everard, K. Irvine, R. J. McInnes, B. A. Middleton, A. A. van Dam, and N. C. Davidson.) pp. 1–11. (Springer Publishers: Dordrecht, Netherlands.)
| Crossref |
Delany, S., and Scott, D. A. (2002). ‘Waterfowl Population Estimates’, 4th edn. Wetlands International Global Series number 12. (Wetlands International.)
Delany, S., and Scott, D. A. (2006). ‘Waterfowl Population Estimates’, 5th edn. (Wetlands International.)
Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J. R., Arico, S., Báldi, A., Bartuska, A., Baste, I. A., Bilgin, A., Brondizio, E., Chan, K. M., Figueroa, V. E., Duraiappah, A., Fischer, M., Hill, R., Koetz, T., Leadley, P., Lyver, P., Mace, G. M., Martin-Lopez, B., Okumura, M., Pacheco, D., Pascual, U., Pérez, E. S., Reyers, B., Roth, E., Saito, O., Scholes, R. J., Sharma, N., Tallis, H., Thaman, R., Watson, R., Yahara, T., Hamid, Z. A., Akosim, C., Al-Hafedh, Y., Allahverdiyev, R., Amankwah, E., Asah, S. T., Asfaw, Z., Bartus, G., Brooks, L. A., Caillaux, J., Dalle, G., Darnaedi, D., Driver, A., Erpul, G., Escobar-Eyzaguirre, P., Failler, P., Fouda, A. M. M., Fu, B., Gundimeda, H., Hashimoto, S., Homer, F., Lavorel, S., Lichtenstein, G., Mala, W. A., Mandivenyi, W., Matczak, P., Mbizvo, C., Mehrdadi, M., Metzger, J. P., Mikissa, J. B., Moller, H., Mooney, H. A., Mumby, P., Nagendra, H., Nesshover, C., Oteng-Yeboah, A. A., Pataki, G., Roué, M., Rubis, J., Schultz, M., Smith, P., Sumaila, R., Takeuchi, K., Thomas, S., Verma, M., Yeo-Chang, Y., and Zlatanova, D. (2015). The IPBES Conceptual Framework – connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14, 1–16.
| The IPBES Conceptual Framework – connecting nature and people.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Environment Australia (2001). ‘A Directory of important wetlands in Australia’, 3rd edn. (Environment Australia: Canberra, ACT, Australia.)
European Commission (1979). Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex:31979L0409 [Verified 7 June 2021].
Fennessy, M. S., and Beers, L. (2021). The contributions of blue carbon ecosystems to climate change mitigation. Ramsar Briefing Note number 11, Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Gland, Switzerland.
Finlayson, C. M., Davidson, N. C., Pritchard, D., Milton, G. R., and MacKay, H. (2011). The Ramsar Convention and ecosystem-based approaches to the wise use and sustainable development of wetlands. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 14, 176–198.
Firouz, E. (1971). Text of address. In Ramsar Convention 1971. In ‘International Conference on the conservation of wetlands and waterfowl. Final Act and Summary Record’. pp. 43–46. (International Waterfowl Research Bureau: Slimbridge, UK.)
Giménez-Dixon, M. (1993). The Ramsar Convention and the conservation of non-waterfowl species. In ‘Proceedings of the fifth meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention’. Volume II, Annex 17 pp. 449–467. (Ramsar Convention Bureau: Gland, Switzerland.)
Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P., and Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics 69, 1209–1218.
| The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grimmett, R. F. A., and Gammell, A. B. (1989). Inventory of important bird areas in the European community. Report for the Directorate-General for the Environment, Consumer Protection and Nuclear Safety of the European Community, Study contract B6610–54–88.
Grimmett, R. F. A., and Jones, T. A. (1989). Important bird areas in Europe. ICBP Technical Publication number 9, ICBP, Cambridge.
Heath, M. F., and Evans, M. I. (Eds) (2000). ‘Important Bird Areas in Europe: priority sites for conservation.’ BirdLife Conservation Series number 8, BirdLife International, Cambridge.
Holdgate, M. (1999). ‘The Green Web: A Union for World Conservation.’ (Earthscan: London.)
International Union for Conservation of Nature (1964). ‘Project Mar. The conservation and management of temperate marshes, bogs and other wetlands. Proceedings of the Mar Conference organised by IUCN, ICBP and IWRB’, 12–16 November 1962, Les Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer, France. (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.)
International Waterfowl Research Bureau (1972). ‘Proceedings: International Conference on the Conservation of Wetlands and Waterfowl’, 30 January–3 February 1971, Ramsar, Iran. (International Waterfowl Research Bureau: Slimbridge, UK.)
International Waterfowl Research Bureau (1976). Annex II. Recommendations for criteria to be used in identifying wetlands of international importance. In ‘Proceedings: International Conference on the Conservation of Wetlands and Waterfowl’, 2–6 December 1974, Heiligenhafen, Federal Republic of Germany. pp. 470–471. (International Waterfowl Research Bureau: Slimbridge, UK.)
Joint Nature Conservation Committee (1999). The Birds Directive. Selection guidelines for Special Protection Areas. Available at http://jncc.Defra.gov.uk/page-1405 [Verified 7 June 2021].
Keith, D. A., Rodríguez, J. P., Rodríguez-Clark, K. M., Nicholson, E., Aapala, K., Alonso, A., Asmussen, M., Bachman, S., Basset, A., Barrow, E. G., Benson, J. S., Bishop, M. J., Bonifacio, R., Brooks, T. M., Burgman, M. A., Comer, P., Comín, F. A., Essl, F., Faber-Langendoen, D., Fairweather, P. G., Holdaway, R. J., Jennings, M., Kingsford, R. T., Lester, R. E., MacNally, R., McCarthy, M. A., Moat, J., Oliveira-Miranda, M. A., Pisanu, P., Poulin, B., Regan, T. J., Riecken, U., Spalding, M. D., and Zambrano-Martínez, S. (2013). Scientific foundations for an IUCN Red List of ecosystems. PLoS One 8, e62111.
| Scientific foundations for an IUCN Red List of ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23667454PubMed |
Kuijken, E. (2006). A short history of waterbird conservation. In ‘Waterbirds around the World.’ (Eds G. C. Boere, C. A. Galbraith, and D. A. Stroud.) pp. 52–59. (The Stationery Office: Edinburgh, UK.)
Matthews, G. V. T. (1993). ‘The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: its History and Development.’ (Ramsar Convention Bureau: Gland, Switzerland.)
McInnes, R. J., Simpson, M., Lopez, B., Hawkins, R., and Shore, R. (2017). Wetland ecosystem services and the Ramsar Convention: an assessment of needs. Wetlands 37, 123–134.
| Wetland ecosystem services and the Ramsar Convention: an assessment of needs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003). ‘Ecosystems and Human Well-being: a Framework for Assessment.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC, USA.)
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). ‘Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC, USA.)
Moss, D., Wyatt, B., Cornaert, M.-H., and Roekaerts, M. (1991). ‘CORINE Biotopes. The Design, Compilation and Use of an Inventory of Sites of Major Importance for Nature Conservation in the European Community.’ (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg.)
Nature Conservancy Council (1987). Development of criteria and guidelines for the identification of sites qualifying for Ramsar designation. Contribution to Workshop A. INF. C.3.7. In ‘Proceedings of the third meeting of the Conference of Contracting Parties; Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.’ pp. 318–332. (Ramsar Convention Bureau: Gland, Switzerland.)
Olney, P. J. S., and IWRB/Mar Bureau (1965). Project Mar for the conservation and management of temperate wetlands. List of European and North African wetlands of international importance. IUCN Publications new series number 5, IUCN, Neuchatel, Switzerland.
Popoff, N., Gaget, E., Béchet, A., Dami, L., du Rau, P. D., Geijzendorffer, I., Guelmami, A., Mondain-Monval, J.-Y., Perennou, C., Suet, M., Verniest, F., Deschamps, C., Taylor, N. G., Azafzaf, H., Bendjedda, N., Bino, T., Borg, J. J., Božič, L., Dakki, M., Encarnação, V., Erciyas-Yavuz, K., Etayeb, K., Gaudard, C., Ohad Hatzofe, O., Langendoen, T., Ieronymidou, C., Mikuska, T., Molina, B., Petkov, N., Portolou, D., Qaneer, T., Sayoud, S., Šćiban, M., Topić, G., Uzunova, D., Vine, G., Vizi, A., Zenatello, M., Abdou, W., and Galewski, T. (2021). Gap analysis of the Ramsar site network at 50: over 150 important Mediterranean sites for wintering waterbirds omitted. Biodiversity and Conservation 30, 3067–3085.
| Gap analysis of the Ramsar site network at 50: over 150 important Mediterranean sites for wintering waterbirds omitted.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pritchard, D. E. (2016). Wise use concept of the Ramsar Convention. In ‘The Wetland Book.’ (Eds C. M. Finlayson, M. Everard, K. Irvine, R. J. McInnes, B. A. Middleton, A. A. van Dam and N. C. Davidson.) pp. 477–480. (Springer Publishing: Dordrecht.)
Ramsar Convention (1971). The Convention on Wetlands text, as originally adopted in 1971. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/document/the-convention-on-wetlands-text-as-originally-adopted-in-1971 [Verified 26 May 2021].
Ramsar Convention (1980). Recommendation 1.4. Criteria for identifying Wetlands of International Importance. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/key_rec_1.04e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (1984). Recommendation 2.3. Action points for priority attention. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/key_rec_2.03e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (1987). Recommendation 3.1. Criteria for Identifying Wetlands of International Importance and guidelines for their use. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/key_rec_3.01e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (1990a). Recommendation 4.2. Criteria for Identifying Wetlands of International Importance. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/key_rec_4.02e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (1990b). Recommendation 4.7. Mechanisms for improved application of the Ramsar Convention. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/key_rec_4.07e.pdf [Verified 22 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (1993a). Recommendation 5.9. Establishment of Ramsar guidelines on Wetlands of International Importance as fish habitat. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/key_rec_5.09e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (1993b) Resolution 5.9. Application of the Ramsar Criteria for Identifying Wetlands of International Importance. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/resolution_5.9.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (1996a). Resolution VI.2. Adoption of specific criteria based on fish for identifying wetlands of international importance. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/res/key_res_vi.02e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (1996b). Resolution VI.3. Review of the Ramsar criteria for identifying wetlands of international importance and their accompanying guidelines. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/res/key_res_vi.03e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (1996c). Resolution VI.4. Adoption of population estimates for operation of the specific criteria based on waterfowl. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/res/key_res_vi.04e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (1996d). Resolution VI.13. Submission of information on sites designated for the Ramsar list of wetlands of international importance. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/res/key_res_vi.13e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (1999). Resolution VII.11. Strategic framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/key_res_vii.11e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (2002a). Resolution VIII.10. Improving implementation of the Strategic Framework and Vision for the List of Wetlands of International Importance. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/res/key_res_viii_10_e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (2002b). Resolution VIII.38. Waterbird population estimates and the identification and designation of Wetlands of International Importance. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/res/key_res_viii_38_e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (2005a). Resolution IX.1 Annex B. Revised Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/res/key_res_ix_01_annexb_e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (2005b). 9th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971), Report of the Meeting, 8–15 November 2005, Kampala, Uganda. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/cop9_conf_rpt_e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (2005c). Resolution IX.1 Annex A. A Conceptual Framework for the wise use of wetlands and the maintenance of their ecological character. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/res/key_res_ix_01_annexa_e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (2005d). Rationale for the proposed changes to the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the selection of Ramsar sites. COP9 Doc. 17, Information Paper. 15 pp. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/document/cop9-doc-17-rationale-for-the-proposed-changes-to-the-strategic-framework-and-guidelines [Verified 24 September 2021].
Ramsar Convention (2008). Resolution X.20. Biogeographic regionalization in the application of the Strategic Framework for the List of Wetlands of International Importance: scientific and technical guidance. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/res/key_res_x_20_e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (2012a). Resolution XI.8 Annex 2. Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance of the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) – 2012 revision. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/cop11-res08-e-anx2_revcop13.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (2012b). Resolution XI.8 Annex 1. Ramsar Site Information Sheet (RIS) – 2012 revision. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/cop11/res/cop11-res08-e-anx1.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (2015). Resolution XII.11. Peatlands, climate change and wise use: Implications for the Ramsar Convention. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/cop12_res11_peatlands_e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (2018a). Resolution XIII.12. Guidance on identifying peatlands as Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Sites) for global climate change regulation as an additional argument to existing Ramsar criteria. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/xiii.12_identifying_peatlands_ramsar_sites_e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Ramsar Convention (2018b). Resolution XIII.12. Promoting conservation, restoration and sustainable management of coastal blue-carbon1 ecosystems. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/xiii.14_blue_carbon_e.pdf [Verified 24 September 2021]
Ramsar Convention (2018c). ‘Global Wetland Outlook: State of the World’s Wetlands and their Services to People.’ (Ramsar Convention Secretariat: Gland, Switzerland.)
Ramsar Convention Bureau (1987). Criteria for identifying wetlands of international importance. Overview paper for Workshop A. Doc. C.3.10. In ‘Proceedings of the Third Meeting of the Conference of Contracting Parties’, 27 May–5 June 1987, Regina, SK, Canada. pp. 255–259. (Ramsar Convention Bureau: Gland, Switzerland.)
Rasmussen, J. F. (1999). ‘Birds of Danish SPAs: Trends in Occurrence.’ (Miljø- og Energiministeriet, Skov- og Naturstyrelsen: Copenhagen, Denmark.)
Rodríguez, J. P., Rodríguez-Clark, K. M., Baillie, J. E., Ash, N., Benson, J., Boucher, T., Brown, C., Burgess, N. D., Collen, B., Jennings, M., Keith, D. A., Nicholson, E., Revenga, C., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Smith, T., Spalding, M., Taber, A., Walpole, M., Zager, I., and Zamin, T. (2011). Establishing IUCN Red List criteria for threatened ecosystems. Conservation Biology 25, 21–29.
| Establishing IUCN Red List criteria for threatened ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21054525PubMed |
Romão, C., Richard, D., and Jones-Walters, L. (2013). ‘Protected Areas in Europe – an Overview.’ (European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark.)
Rose, P. M., and Scott, D. A. (1994). Waterfowl population estimates. IWRB Special Publication 29, IWRB, Slimbridge, UK.
Rose, P. M., and Scott, D. A. (1997). Waterfowl population estimates. IWRB Special Publication 44, IWRB, Slimbridge, UK.
Rose, P. M., and Stroud, D. A. (1994). Estimating international waterfowl populations: current activity and future directions. Bulletin – Wader Study Group 73, 19–26.
Scientific & Technical Review Panel (2005). Rationale for the proposed changes to the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the selection of Ramsar sites. Information Paper, Ramsar COP9 DOC. 17. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/cop9/cop9_doc17_e.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021]
Scientific & Technical Review Panel (2006a). STRP 2006–2008 Work Plan. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/strp/strp_workplan_2006.pdf [Verified 7 June 2021].
Scientific & Technical Review Panel (2006b). Population estimates and 1% thresholds for wetland-dependent non-avian animal species, for the application of Criterion 9. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/ris/key_ris_criterion9_2006.pdf [Verified 22 June 2021].
Spalding, M. D., Fox, H. E., Allen, G. R., Davidson, N., Ferdaña, Z. A., Finlayson, M., Halpern, B. S., Jorge, M. A., Lombana, A., Lourie, S. A., Martin, K. D., McManus, E., Molnar, J., Recchia, C. A., and Roberston, J. (2007). Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. Bioscience 57, 573–583.
| Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stroud, D. A. (2006). Ramsar adopts a new site-selection criterion: implications for Specialist Groups. Species Newsletter of the Species Survival Commission 46, 28–29.
Stroud, D. A., Pienkowski, M. W., and Mudge, G. P. (1990). ‘Protecting Internationally Important Bird Sites: a Review of the Network of EC Special Protection Areas in Great Britain.’ (Nature Conservancy Council: Peterborough, UK.)
Stroud, D. A., Chambers, D., Cook, S., Buxton, N., Fraser, B., Clement, P., Lewis, P., McLean, I., Baker, H., and Whitehead, S. (Eds) (2001). ‘The UK SPA Network: its Scope and Content.’ (Joint Nature Conservation Committee: Peterborough, UK.)
Stroud, D. A., Bainbridge, I. P., Maddock, A., Anthony, S., Baker, H., Buxton, N., Chambers, D., Enlander, I., Hearn, R. D., Jennings, K. R., Mavor, R., Whitehead, S., and Wilson, J. D. (Eds) (2016). ‘The Status of UK SPAs in the 2000s: the Third Network Review.’ (Joint Nature Conservation Committee: Peterborough, UK.)
Stuart, S. (1990). Applying the Ramsar criteria for species other than birds. In ‘Proceedings of the Fourth Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention,’ Volume II, Annex 4, pp. 124–126. (Ramsar Convention Bureau: Gland, Switzerland.)
United Nations General Assembly (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/Res/70/1. Available at https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf [Verified 27 May 2021]
van Roomen, M., Nagy, S., Foppen, R., Dodman, T., Citegetse, G., and Ndiaye, A. (2015). ‘Status of Coastal Waterbird Populations in the East Atlantic Flyway. With Special Attention to Flyway Populations making use of the Wadden Sea.’ (Rich Wadden Sea: Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Sovon: Nijmegen, Netherlands; Wetlands International: Wageningen, Netherlands: BirdLife International: Cambridge, UK; and Common Wadden Sea Secretariat: Wilhelmshaven, Germany.)
Wetlands International (2012). ‘Waterbird Population Estimates.’ (Wetlands International: Wageningen, Netherlands.)