Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Spatial distribution and substrate preferences of the non-indigenous amphipod Gammarus roeselii Gervais, 1835

Daniele Paganelli A B , Alessandra Pandolfi A , Renato Sconfietti A and Agnese Marchini A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Via S. Epifanio 14, I-27100 Pavia, Italy.

B Corresponding author. Email: daniele.paganelli@unipv.it

Marine and Freshwater Research 71(7) 723-728 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF19193
Submitted: 25 May 2019  Accepted: 29 July 2019   Published: 22 October 2019

Abstract

Gammarus roeselii is one of the successful non-indigenous species recently established in the Ticino River basin (Northern Italy). G. roeselii is not usually considered to be a real threat to native gammarids because no evidence has been reported so far on its effects on biodiversity and habitats. In this study, we assessed the spatial distribution of G. roeselii in the secondary hydrographic system of the southern part of the sub-lacustrine Ticino River basin and examined substrate preferences on the basis of laboratory experiments. We found that G. roeselii is well established in this area, occurring in almost all the seminatural streams, reaching high densities. Furthermore, we found that this species has a preference for two distinct types of substrate: empty shells of the bivalve Corbicula fluminea, which provide a suitable shelter for the introduced amphipod, and aquatic plants, which provide food resources. Conversely, preference for inorganic substrates, such as stones, was lower. In addition, the results indicate that G. roeselii easily inhabits the water column. The high adaptability of G. roeselii, combined with its capacity to exploit different niches and its swimming ability, are ecological characteristics that can favour its colonisation of new areas.

Additional keywords: freshwater, habitat selection, non-native species, Ponto-Caspian amphipods, Ticino River.


References

Becker, J., Ortmann, C., Wetzel, M. A., and Koop, J. K. (2016). Metabolic activity and behavior of the invasive amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus and two common Central European gammarid species (Gammarus fossarum, Gammarus roeselii): low metabolic rates may favor the invader. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology – A. Molecular & Integrative Physiology 191, 119–126.
Metabolic activity and behavior of the invasive amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus and two common Central European gammarid species (Gammarus fossarum, Gammarus roeselii): low metabolic rates may favor the invader.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bij de Vaate, A., Jazdzewski, K., Ketelaars, H. A., Gollasch, S., and Van der Velde, G. (2002). Geographical patterns in range extension of Ponto-Caspian macroinvertebrate species in Europe. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59, 1159–1174.
Geographical patterns in range extension of Ponto-Caspian macroinvertebrate species in Europe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bruijs, M. C., Kelleher, B., Van der Velde, G., and Bij de Vaate, A. (2001). Oxygen consumption, temperature and salinity tolerance of the invasive amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus: indicators of further dispersal via ballast water transport. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 152, 633–646.
Oxygen consumption, temperature and salinity tolerance of the invasive amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus: indicators of further dispersal via ballast water transport.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Casellato, S., La Piana, G., Latella, L., and Ruffo, S. (2006). Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894) (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Gammaridae) for the first time in Italy. The Italian Journal of Zoology 73, 97–104.
Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894) (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Gammaridae) for the first time in Italy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Copp, G. H., Russel, L. I. C., Peeler, E. J., Gherardi, F., Tricarico, E., Macleod, A., Cowx, I. G., Nunn, A. D., Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A., Savini, D., Mumford, J., and Britton, J. R. (2016). European non-native species in aquaculture risk analysis scheme – a summary of assessment protocols and decision support tools for use of alien species in aquaculture. Fisheries Management and Ecology 23, 1–11.
European non-native species in aquaculture risk analysis scheme – a summary of assessment protocols and decision support tools for use of alien species in aquaculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cummins, K. W., and Klug, M. J. (1979). Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10, 147–172.
Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Devin, S., and Beisel, J. N. (2007). Biological and ecological characteristics of invasive species: a gammarid study. Biological Invasions 9, 13–24.
Biological and ecological characteristics of invasive species: a gammarid study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Devin, S., Piscart, C., Beisel, J. N., and Moreteau, J. C. (2004). Life history of the invader Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in the Moselle River, France. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie 89, 21–34.
Life history of the invader Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in the Moselle River, France.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gergs, R., and Rothhaupt, K. O. (2008). Effects of zebra mussels on a native amphipod and the invasive Dikerogammarus villosus: the influence of biodeposition and structural complexity. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27, 541–548.
Effects of zebra mussels on a native amphipod and the invasive Dikerogammarus villosus: the influence of biodeposition and structural complexity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grabowski, M., Jazdzewski, K., and Konopacka, A. (2007). Alien Crustacea in Polish waters – Amphipoda. Aquatic Invasions 2, 25–38.
Alien Crustacea in Polish waters – Amphipoda.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gutierrez, J. L., Jones, C. G., Strayer, D. L., and Iribarne, O. O. (2003). Mollusks are ecosystem engineers: the role of shell production in aquatic habitats. Oikos 101, 79–90.
Mollusks are ecosystem engineers: the role of shell production in aquatic habitats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hesselschwerdt, J., Necker, J., and Wantzen, K. M. (2008). Gammarids in Lake Constance: habitat segregation between the invasive Dikerogammarus villosus and the indigenous Gammarus roeselii. Fundamental and Applied Limnology 173, 177–186.
Gammarids in Lake Constance: habitat segregation between the invasive Dikerogammarus villosus and the indigenous Gammarus roeselii.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Karaman, G. S., and Pinkster, S. (1977). Freshwater genus Gammarus species from Europe, North Africa and adjacent regions of Asia (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Gammarus roeselii-group and related species. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 47, 165–196.
Freshwater genus Gammarus species from Europe, North Africa and adjacent regions of Asia (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Gammarus roeselii-group and related species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kley, A., Kinzler, W., Schank, Y., Mayer, G., Waloszek, D., and Maier, G. (2009). Influence of substrate preference and complexity on co-existence of two non-native gammarideans (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Aquatic Ecology 43, 1047–1059.
Influence of substrate preference and complexity on co-existence of two non-native gammarideans (Crustacea: Amphipoda).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kobak, J., Jermacz, Ł., and Dzierżyńska-Białończyk, A. (2015). Substratum preference of the invasive killer shrimp Dikerogammarus villosus. Journal of Zoology 297, 66–76.
Substratum preference of the invasive killer shrimp Dikerogammarus villosus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacNeil, C., Dick, J. T. A., Elwood, R. W., and Montgomery, W. I. (2001). Coexistence among native and introduced freshwater amphipods (Crustacea); habitat utilization patterns in littoral habitats. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 151, 591–607.
Coexistence among native and introduced freshwater amphipods (Crustacea); habitat utilization patterns in littoral habitats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nicolini, L., and Lodola, A. (2011). Densità di popolazione e biometria di Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774), bivalve alloctono invasivo nel fiume Ticino (Pavia). Acta Biologica 89, 145–147.

Novais, A., Souza, A. T., Ilarri, M., Pascoal, C., and Sousa, R. (2015). Facilitation in the low intertidal: effects of an invasive species on the structure of an estuarine macrozoobenthic assemblage. Marine Ecology Progress Series 522, 157–167.
Facilitation in the low intertidal: effects of an invasive species on the structure of an estuarine macrozoobenthic assemblage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Paganelli, D., Gazzola, A., Marchini, A., and Sconfietti, R. (2015). The increasing distribution of Gammarus roeselii Gervais, 1835: first record of the non-indigenous freshwater amphipod in the sub-lacustrine Ticino River basin (Lombardy, Italy). BioInvasions Records 4, 37–41.
The increasing distribution of Gammarus roeselii Gervais, 1835: first record of the non-indigenous freshwater amphipod in the sub-lacustrine Ticino River basin (Lombardy, Italy).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Paganelli, D., Caronni, S., Marchini, A., Gazzola, A., and Sconfietti, R. (2016). Dynamics and population structure of native Echinogammarus stammeri (Karaman, 1931) (Crustacea: Amphipoda) and non-native Gammarus roeselii Gervais, 1835 (Crustacea: Amphipoda) occurring in sympatry in Northern Italy. The Italian Journal of Zoology 83, 563–570.
Dynamics and population structure of native Echinogammarus stammeri (Karaman, 1931) (Crustacea: Amphipoda) and non-native Gammarus roeselii Gervais, 1835 (Crustacea: Amphipoda) occurring in sympatry in Northern Italy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Paganelli, D., Gazzola, A., Rodolfi, M., Sconfietti, R., and Picco, A. M. (2017). Trophic preference and preliminary indication of phylloplane fungal influence on the diet of the non-native Gammarus roeselii Gervais 1835 (Amphipoda, Gammaridae) in the sub-lacustrine Ticino river basin (Lombardy, Northern Italy). Italian Journal of Mycology 46, 37–47.

Paganelli, D., Pandolfi, A., Sconfietti, R., Marchini, A., and Vilizzi, L. (2018). Potential invasiveness by non-indigenous macrozoobenthos in the secondary hydrographic system of a temperate-climate river catchment. Ecological Indicators 88, 274–281.
Potential invasiveness by non-indigenous macrozoobenthos in the secondary hydrographic system of a temperate-climate river catchment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pöckl, M. (2007). Strategies of a successful new invader in European fresh waters: fecundity and reproductive potential of the Ponto-Caspian amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus in the Austrian Danube, compared with the indigenous Gammarus fossarum and G. roeselii. Freshwater Biology 52, 50–63.
Strategies of a successful new invader in European fresh waters: fecundity and reproductive potential of the Ponto-Caspian amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus in the Austrian Danube, compared with the indigenous Gammarus fossarum and G. roeselii.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sacchi, C. F. (1964). Problemi di ecologia e di evoluzione negli ambienti di marea. Bollettino di Zoologia 31, 147–238.
Problemi di ecologia e di evoluzione negli ambienti di marea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sala, O. E., Chapin, F. S., Armesto, J. J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Huenneke, L. F., Jackson, R. B., Kinzig, A., Leemans, R., Lodge, D. M., Mooney, H. A., Oesterheld, M., Poff, N. L., Sykes, M. T., Walker, B. H., Walker, M., and Wall, D. H. (2000). Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287, 1770–1774.
Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10710299PubMed |

Sousa, R., Gutiérrez, J. L., and Aldridge, D. C. (2009). Non-indigenous invasive bivalves as ecosystem engineers. Biological Invasions 11, 2367–2385.
Non-indigenous invasive bivalves as ecosystem engineers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Strayer, D. L. (2012). Eight questions about invasions and ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters 15, 1199–1210.
Eight questions about invasions and ecosystem functioning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22694728PubMed |

Thiébaut, G., and Gierlinski, P. (2008). Gammarid (Crustacea: Amphipoda) herbivory on native and alien freshwater macrophytes. In ‘Plant Invasions: Human Perception, Ecological Impacts and Management’. (Eds B. Tokarska-Guzik, J. K. Brock, G. Brundu, L. Child, and P. Pyšek.) pp. 333–340. (Backhuys Publishers: Leiden, Netherlands.)

Truhlar, A. M., and Aldridge, D. C. (2015). Differences in behavioural traits between two potentially invasive amphipods, Dikerogammarus villosus and Gammarus pulex. Biological Invasions 17, 1569–1579.
Differences in behavioural traits between two potentially invasive amphipods, Dikerogammarus villosus and Gammarus pulex.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Underwood, A. J. (1997). ‘Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

van Riel, M. C., Healy, E. P., Van der Velde, G., and Bij de Vaate, A. (2007). Interference competition among native and invader amphipods. Acta Oecologica – International Journal of Ecology 31, 282–289.
Interference competition among native and invader amphipods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wijnhoven, S., Riel, M. C., and Velde, G. (2003). Exotic and indigenous freshwater gammarid species: physiological tolerance to water temperature in relation to ionic content of the water. Aquatic Ecology 37, 151–158.
Exotic and indigenous freshwater gammarid species: physiological tolerance to water temperature in relation to ionic content of the water.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wisheu, I. C. (1998). How organism partitions habitats: different types of community organization can produce identical patterns. Oikos 83, 246–258.
How organism partitions habitats: different types of community organization can produce identical patterns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |