Estimating benefits and costs: a case of fish passages in Lao PDR and the development of the Lower Mekong Fishway Support Tool
Bethany Cooper
A C , Lin Crase A and Lee J. Baumgartner B
A University of South Australia, School of Business, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
B Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: bethany.cooper@unisa.edu.au
Marine and Freshwater Research 70(9) 1284-1294 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF19156
Submitted: 6 May 2019 Accepted: 20 June 2019 Published: 18 July 2019
Abstract
Fishways are often presented as a parsimonious way of assisting water infrastructure development in developing countries while preserving some ecosystem values. More specifically, fishways help preserve migratory freshwater fish species, which are often a main source of protein and other nutrients for many rural communities. To date, much of the literature regarding fishway development focuses on increasing understanding of the interaction between the fish populations and engineering interventions. Accordingly, there is limited analysis that considers fishway construction relative to the specific benefits and costs that subsequently accrue to humans. In this study we outline the development of a decision support tool designed to assist officials in the Lower Mekong evaluate the merits of constructing fishways to address barriers to fish passage. Arguably, the tool can also be modified to assess the avoided cost of building additional barriers that constrain fish migration. The Lower Mekong Fishway Support Tool (LMFST) is underpinned by economic notions and populated with input from experts involved in fishway construction. The LMFST is intended to provide indicative monetary estimates and does not replace comprehensive engineering and social analysis; rather, it guides users in assessing those locations and structures that are more likely to deliver a positive outcome for local communities. The LMFST is buttressed in benefit–cost analysis and encourages decision making to be more transparent and this is one of the major contributions of this work.
Additional keywords: benefit–cost analysis, decision support tool, nutrition.
References
Asian Development Bank (2016). Northern rural infrastructure development sector project – additional financing: Nam Beng irrigation subproject initial environmental examination. ADB report for Project 42203-025, 42203-022, Ministry of Agriculture, Vientiane, Lao PDR.Baumgartner, L. J., Deng, Z., Thorncraft, G., Boys, C. A., Brown, R. S., and Singhanouvong, D. (2014). Perspective: towards environmentally acceptable criteria for downstream fish passage through mini hydro and irrigation infrastructure in the Lower Mekong River Basin. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 6, 012301.
| Perspective: towards environmentally acceptable criteria for downstream fish passage through mini hydro and irrigation infrastructure in the Lower Mekong River Basin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baumgartner, L. J., Marsden, T., Millar, J., Phonekhampeng, O., Thorncraft, G., Singhanouvong, D., Homsombath, K., Robinson, W., McPherson, J. W., Martin, K., and Boys, C. A. (2016). Development of fish passage technology to increase fisheries production on floodplains in the Lower Mekong and Murray–Darling River basins. Project Code FIS/2009/041. (ACIAR: Canberra, ACT, Australia.) Available at http://aciar.gov.au/project/fis/2009/041 [Verified 30 June 2019].
Baumgartner, L. J., Barlow, C., Mallen-Cooper, M., Boys, C., Marsden, T., Thorncraft, G., Phonekhampheng, O., Singhanouvong, D., Rice, W., Roy, M., Crase, L., and Cooper, B. (2018). Achieving fish passage outcomes at irrigation infrastructure; a case study from the Lower Mekong Basin. Aquaculture and Fisheries , .
| Achieving fish passage outcomes at irrigation infrastructure; a case study from the Lower Mekong Basin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Boardman, A., Greenberg, D., Vining, A., and Weimer, D. (2018). ‘Cost–Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice.’ (Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA.)
Chen, A., Ho, C.-H., Chen, D., and Azorin-Molina, C. (2019). Tropical cyclone rainfall in the Mekong River Basin for 1983–2016. Atmospheric Research 226, 66–75.
| Tropical cyclone rainfall in the Mekong River Basin for 1983–2016.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clay, C. (1995). ‘Design of Fishways and Other Fish Facilities.’ (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.)
Daly, H., and Farley, J. (2004). ‘Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC, USA.)
Dehnhardt, A. (2013). Decision-makers attitudes towards economic valuation – a case study of German water management authorities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 2, 201–221.
| Decision-makers attitudes towards economic valuation – a case study of German water management authorities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Eckstein, O. (1958). ‘Water-Resource Development: The Economics of Project Evaluation.’ (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.)
Fan, S., Yosef, S., and Pandya-Lorch, R. (Eds) (2019). ‘Agriculture for Improved Nutrition: Seizing the Momentum to Reshape Agriculture for Nutrition.’ (International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC, USA.)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2016). ‘The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Contributing to Food Security and Nutrition for All.’ (FAO: Rome, Italy.)
Hortle, K. G. (2007). Consumption and the yield of fish and other aquatic animals from the Lower Mekong Basin. MRC Technical Paper 16, Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Infrastructure Australia (2018). Infrastructure priority list, Australian infrastructure plan: project and initiative summaries. Available at https://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/policy-publications/publications/files/Australian_Infrastructure_Plan_refresh-2018.pdf [Verified 10 June 2019].
Kelman, D. (1981). Cost–benefit analysis: an ethical critique (with replies). AEI Journal on Government and Society Regulation 1981, 33–40.
Mallen-Cooper, M., and Stuart, I. G. (2007). Optimising Denil fishways for passage of small and large fishes. Fisheries Management and Ecology 14, 61–71.
| Optimising Denil fishways for passage of small and large fishes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mekong River Commission (2013). An introduction to the fisheries of Lao PDR. Mekong Development Series number 6. Available at http://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/report-management-develop/Mek-Dev-No6-An-Intro-Fisheries-of-LaoPDR.pdf [Verified 12 June 2019].
Millar, J., Robinson, W., Baumgartner, L. J., Homsombath, K., Chittavong, M., Phommavong, T., and Singhanouvong, D. (2018). Local perceptions of changes in the use and management of floodplain fisheries commons: the case of Pak Peung wetland in Lao PDR. Environment, Development and Sustainability , .
| Local perceptions of changes in the use and management of floodplain fisheries commons: the case of Pak Peung wetland in Lao PDR.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mogensen, M. T. (2001) The importance of fish and other aquatic animals for food and nutrition security in the Lower Mekong Basin. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Human Nutrition, The Royal Agricultural and Veterinary University, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Nam, S., Phommakone, S., Vuthy, L., Samphawamana, T., Son, N., Khumsri, M., Bun, N., Sovanara, K., Degen, P., and Starr, P. (2015). Lower Mekong fisheries estimated to be worth around $17 billion a year. Catch and Culture 21, 4–7.
Neelawala, P., Briggs, M., Robinson, T., and Wilson, C. (2015). The impact of project announcements on property values: an empirical analysis. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 22, 340–354.
| The impact of project announcements on property values: an empirical analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nyborg, K. (2012). ‘The Ethics and Politics of Environmental Cost–Benefit Analysis.’ (Routledge: London, UK.)
Pearce, D. (1998). Cost–benefit analysis and environmental policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14, 84–100.
| Cost–benefit analysis and environmental policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schröter, M., Koellner, T., Alkemade, R., Arnhold, S., Bagstad, K. J., Erb, K., Frank, K., Kastner, T., Kissinger, M., Liu, J., López-Hoffman, J., Maes, J., Marques, A., Martín-López, B., Meyer, C., Schulp, C., Thober, J., Wolff, S., and Bonn, A. (2018). Interregional flows of ecosystem services: concepts, typology and four cases. Ecosystem Services 31, 231–241.
| Interregional flows of ecosystem services: concepts, typology and four cases.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stuart, I., and Marsden, T. J. (2019). Evaluation of cone fishways to facilitate passage of small-bodied fish. Aquaculture and Fisheries , .
| Evaluation of cone fishways to facilitate passage of small-bodied fish.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stuart, I., Baumgartner, L., and Zampatti, B. (2008). Lock gates improve passage of small-bodied fish and crustaceans in a low gradient vertical-slot fishway. Fisheries Management and Ecology 15, 241–248.
| Lock gates improve passage of small-bodied fish and crustaceans in a low gradient vertical-slot fishway.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and United Nations University (2007). Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition, Report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation, WHO Technical Report Series 935. Available at https://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/nutrientrequirements/WHO_TRS_935/en/ [Verified 10 July 2019].
