Defining and using ‘best available science’: a policy conundrum for the management of aquatic ecosystems
Darren S. Ryder A D , Moya Tomlinson A , Ben Gawne B and Gene E. Likens CA School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.
B Murray Darling Freshwater Research Centre, Latrobe University, PO Box 991, Wodonga, Vic. 3691, Australia.
C Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Box AB, Millbrook, NY 12545-0129, USA.
D Corresponding author. Email: darren.ryder@une.edu.au
Marine and Freshwater Research 61(7) 821-828 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF10113
Submitted: 25 May 2010 Accepted: 24 June 2010 Published: 23 July 2010
Abstract
Integrative research has been the dominant theme in this Special Issue, demonstrated by contemporary examples of effective collaborations and solutions for the successful engagement of scientists in the policy and management arena. Evident in these papers is the increasing use of the term ‘best available science’ (BAS) as a basis for well-informed resource management decisions. The term is used to engender credibility and trust among stakeholders and promotes greater awareness, communication, involvement, transparency and understanding among research, policy and management communities. However, there remains no clear statement of the properties of BAS or guidance on its practical application in the decision-making process. We define the attributes that underpin BAS and examine the issues of uncertainty, risk and communication as key challenges to successful integrative management. We advocate an interdisciplinary process that facilitates understanding of discipline-based knowledge structures, articulates uncertainty and risk about the scientific information, and promotes engagement and trust among the generators and users of information. Ultimately, successful management of aquatic ecosystems will rely on scientists, managers and decision makers who have the skills and courage to apply the best science available and not wait for the best science possible.
Additional keywords: environmental risk, interdisciplinary, knowledge exchange, scientific uncertainty, water resource management.
Acknowledgements
G.E.L. acknowledges support from the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies and a CERF Fellowship at the Australian National University. We acknowledge all authors contributing to this Special Issue for their efforts in increasing our knowledge on the wise management of aquatic ecosystems. The thoughtful comments on earlier versions by the Editor, Dr Daniel McGarvey and an anonymous reviewer have greatly improved this manuscript. Finally, we acknowledge the late Peter Cullen for providing the inspiration for our manuscript and this Special Issue.
Allan, C. , and Curtis, A. (2005). Nipped in the bud: why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming. Environmental Management 36, 414–425.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Benda, L. E. , Poff, N. L. , Tague, C. , Palmer, M. A. , and Pizzuto, J. , et al. (2002). How to avoid train wrecks when using science in environmental problem solving. BioScience 52, 1127–1136.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brennan, M. J. , Roth, D. E. , Feldman, M. D. , and Greene, A. R. (2003). Square pegs and round holes: Application of the “best available scientific data available” standard in the Endangered Species Act. Tullane Environmental Law Journal 16, 386–444.
Clark, M. (2002). Dealing with uncertainty: adaptive approaches to sustainable river management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine & Freshwater Ecosystems 12, 347–363.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cullen, P. (1990). The turbulent boundary between water science and water management. Freshwater Biology 24, 201–209.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cullen, P. , Norris, R. H. , Resh, V. H. , Reynoldson, T. B. , and Rosenberg, D. M. , et al. (1999). Collaboration in scientific research: a critical need for freshwater ecology. Freshwater Biology 42, 131–142.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gawne, B. , Crase, L. , and Watson, A. S. (2010). Can a collaborative focus on solutions improve our capacity to achieve sustainable water management? Marine and Freshwater Research 61, 814–820.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243–1248.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |
Holmes, J. , and Clark, R. (2008). Enhancing the use of science in environmental policy-making and regulation. Environmental Science & Policy 11, 702–711.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Likens, G. E. , Walker, K. F. , Davies, P. E. , Brookes, J. , and Olley, O. , et al. (2009). Ecosystem science: toward a new paradigm for managing Australia’s inland aquatic ecosystems. Marine and Freshwater Research 60, 271–279.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Poff, N. L. , Allan, J. D. , Palmer, M. A. , Hart, D. D. , and Richter, B. D. , et al. (2003). River flows and water wars: emerging science for environmental decision making. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1, 298–306.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reed, M. S. , Dougill, A. J. , and Baker, T. R. (2008). Participatory indicator development: what can ecologists and local communities learn from each other? Ecological Applications 18, 1253–1269.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Robson, B. J. , and Mitchell, B. D. (2010). Metastability in a river subject to multiple disturbances may constrain restoration options. Marine and Freshwater Research 61, 778–785.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roux, D. J. , Ashton, P. J. , Nel, J. L. , and MacKay, H. M. (2008). Improving cross-sector policy integration and cooperation in support of freshwater conservation. Conservation Biology 22, 1382–1387.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Watts, R. J. , Ryder, D. S. , Allan, C. , and Commens, S. (2010). Using river-scale experiments to inform variable releases from large dams: a case study of emergent adaptive management. Marine and Freshwater Research 61, 786–797.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Webb, J. A. , Stewardson, M. J. , Chee, Y. E. , Schreiber, E. S. G. , and Sharpe, A. K. , et al. (2010). Negotiating the turbulent boundary: the challenges of building a science–management collaboration for landscape-scale monitoring of environmental flows. Marine and Freshwater Research 61, 798–807.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |