Optimising sample volume and replicates using the Bou-Rouch method for the rapid assessment of hyporheic fauna
Samuel Kibichii A B , Jan-Robert Baars A and Mary Kelly-Quinn AA Freshwater Biodiversity, Ecology and Fisheries Research Group, School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
B Corresponding author. Email: Samuel.Kibichii@ucd.ie
Marine and Freshwater Research 60(1) 83-96 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF08172
Submitted: 5 June 2008 Accepted: 15 September 2008 Published: 29 January 2009
Abstract
Despite the widespread use of the Bou-Rouch method in obtaining hyporheic samples in ecological studies, problems persist in comparing data because of differences in volume and number of samples taken in various studies. Towards standardising this method, we conducted a study in the Delour River, Ireland, between March and September 2006. The hyporheic habitat was divided into three lateral zones: the flowing stream (SS); the stream–terrestrial ecotone (EC); and the terrestrial margin (TM). Between 3 and 6 random insertions of the stand pipe were made into the hyporheic habitat at 0.2 m and 0.5 m in each zone. Ten consecutive 1-L samples were pumped at each point to determine an optimum sample volume and replicates needed to estimate taxon richness and abundance. The optimum sample combinations range between 6 and 15 3- to 10-L samples depending on depth and habitat zone. Our results show that both spatial and temporal scales are important factors in considering the optimum combinations of sample volume and number of independent spatial replicates needed to sample stream hyporheos, with the zone closer to the flowing stream requiring many small-volume samples whereas areas further away towards the alluvial groundwater need larger volumes with small numbers of replicates.
Additional keywords: cumulative taxon richness and abundance, groundwater, hyporheos, randomised taxon accumulation curves.
Acknowledgements
This work was possible with the kind help of many people in the Freshwater Biodiversity, Ecology & Fisheries Research Laboratory, School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College, Dublin and we are grateful for their help. Particularly, we thank Maria Callanan, Dr Gustavo Beccera, Joe Kavanagh, Hugh Feeley, Colm O’Keane and Gwendoline Mangwi for their occasional help with fieldwork. This study was funded as part of the ECOTONE PROJECT by Science Foundation Ireland. Prof. Andrew Boulton read and suggested changes to the original draft of this paper and we are very grateful for his help. We also wish to thank our reviewers for their constructive comments that helped to improve our earlier drafts.
Bady, P. , Doledec, S. , Fesl, C. , Gayraud, S. , Bacchi, M. , and Scholl, F. (2005). Use of invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of European large rivers: the effects of sampling effort on genus richness and functional diversity. Freshwater Biology 50, 159–173.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bretschko, G. (1990). The escape reactions on the quantitative sampling of gravel stream fauna. Archiv fuer Hydrobiologie 120, 41–49.
Colwell, R. K. , and Coddington, J. A. (1994). Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 345, 101–118.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
Fowler, R. T. , and Death, R. G. (2001). The effect of environmental stability on hyporheic community structure. Hydrobiologia 445, 85–95.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Malard, F. , Tockner, K. , Dole-Olivier, M.-J. , and Ward, J. V. (2002). A landscape perspective of surface–subsurface hydrological exchanges in river corridors. Freshwater Biology 47, 621–640.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
