Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Short-term variability of intertidal microphytobenthic production using an oxygen microprofiling system

Lionel Denis A B and Pierre-Emmanuel Desreumaux A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Université Lille Nord de France, Unité Mixte de Recherche Université Lille 1 Sciences et Technologies – Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 8187 Laboratoire d’Océanologie et de Géosciences, Station Marine de Wimereux, 28, Avenue Foch, 62930 Wimereux, France.

B Corresponding author. Email: lionel.denis@univ-lille1.fr

Marine and Freshwater Research 60(7) 712-726 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF08070
Submitted: 1 March 2008  Accepted: 6 March 2009   Published: 28 July 2009

Abstract

Despite their high productivity and their key role in coastal processes, intertidal areas remain poorly documented because alternating conditions of sediment-water and sediment-air interfaces result in inaccurate temporal estimations of interfacial carbon exchanges. This study describes the short-term variability of microphytobenthic production in an estuarine mudflat (the Canche estuary of the English Channel) by using an autonomous acquisition system for oxygen microprofiles. More than 240 profiles were measured at low and high tide during three deployments performed within a 3-week period (April–May 2007). Additional measurements characterised the surficial sediments (granulometry, porosity, chlorophyll a, temperature, salinity) and incident light. Depth-integrated gross production values were correlated with light intensity and reached up to 146 mg C m–2 h–1, while the turbidity of the overlying water prevented any primary production during immersion. Photosynthesis–irradiance curves were highly variable between field campaigns. Indeed, we have recorded a drastic reduction in microphytobenthic production, which might result from a pulse input of polychaete juveniles (Lanice conchilega). Ephemeral structures, such as invertebrate tubes, are seldom considered as factors that may influence the variability of benthic primary production. Monitoring oxygen microprofiles may be a useful tool for understanding and quantifying the impact of short-term temporal changes on the budgets of microphytobenthic production.

Additional keywords: English Channel, estuarine mudflats, macrofauna, oxygen miniprofiler.


Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the IASWS 2008 organising committee for accepting their paper for presentation at the Symposium. The authors thank the Guest Editor, the Editor, and two anonymous reviewers for their detailed comments, which greatly improved the quality of this manuscript. We are also grateful to L. Wild for her help with correcting the language, J.-M. Dewarumez and A. Foveau who helped in the determination of juvenile polychaetes, V. Spika, S. Lesourd and A. Hequette for granulometric analyses, and N. Spilmont and F. Gevaert for enriching discussions. This project was funded by the Contrat de Plan Etat-Région projects ‘Phaeocystis Bloom’ and ‘Ecosystèmes Perturbés du Littoral’, as well as the Bonus Qualité Recherche ‘Production primaire et dégradation de la matière organique dans les sédiments intertidaux: mesures in situ automatisées’ of the University Lille 1.


References

Alongi D. M. (1998). ‘Coastal Ecosystem Processes.’ (CRC Press: Boca Raton, USA.)

Barranguet, C. , and Kromkamp, J. (2000). Estimating production rates from photosynthetic electron transport in estuarine microphytobenthos. Marine Ecology Progress Series 204, 39–52.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Blanchard G. F., Agion T., Guarini J. M., Herlory O., and Richard P. (2006). Analysis of the short-term dynamics of microphytobenthos biomass on intertidal mudflats. In ‘Functioning of Microphytobenthos in Estuaries’. (Eds J. C. Kromkamp, J. de Brouwer, G. F. Blanchard, R. M. Forster and V. Créach.) pp. 85–98. (The Academy of Arts and Sciences/The University of Chicago Press: Amsterdam/Chicago, The Netherlands/USA.)

Boon, A. R. , and Duineveld, G. C. A. (1998). Chlorophyll a as a marker for bioturbation and carbon flux in southern and central North Sea sediments. Marine Ecology Progress Series 162, 33–43.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | de Jonge V. N. (1995). Wind-driven tidal and annual gross transport of mud and microphytobenthos in the Ems Estuary, and its importance for the ecosystem. In ‘Changes in Fluxes in Estuaries: Implications from Science to Management’. (Eds K. R. Dyer and R. J. Orth.) pp. 29–40. (Olsen and Olsen: Fredensborg, Denmark.)

de Jonge, V. N. , and Colijn, F. (1994). Dynamics of the microphytobenthos biomass in the Ems estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 104, 185–196.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Fauvel P. (1927). ‘Faune de France: Polychètes Sédentaires. Vol. 16.’ (Librairie de la Faculté des Sciences Paul Lechevalier: Paris.)

García, H. E. , and Gordon, L. I. (1992). Oxygen solubility in seawater: better fitting equations. Limnology and Oceanography 37, 1307–1312.
Kromkamp J. C., and Forster R. M. (2006). Developments in microphytobenthos primary productivity studies. In ‘Functioning of Microphytobenthos in Estuaries’. (Eds J. C. Kromkamp, J. de Brouwer, G. F. Blanchard, R. M. Forster and V. Créach.) pp. 165–183. (The Academy of Arts and Sciences/The University of Chicago Press: Amsterdam/Chicago, The Netherlands/USA.)

Lorenzen, C. J. (1967). Determination of chlorophyll and phaeopigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnology and Oceanography 12, 343–346.
McLusky D. S. (1989). ‘The Estuarine Ecosystem.’ (Chapman and Hall: New York.)

Migné, A. , Davoult, D. , Spilmont, N. , Menu, D. , and Boucher, G. , et al. (2002). A closed-chamber CO2-flux method for estimating intertidal primary production and respiration under emersed conditions. Marine Biology 140, 865–869.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sabbe K. (1997). Systematics and ecology of intertidal benthic diatoms of the Westerschelde estuary (The Netherlands). PhD Thesis, University of Ghent, Belgium.

Scherrer B. (1984). ‘Biostatistiques.’ (Gaëtan Morin: Boucherville, Canada.)

Serôdio, J. , and Catarino, F. (2000). Modelling the primary productivity of intertidal microphytobenthos: time scales of variability and effects of migratory rhythms. Marine Ecology Progress Series 192, 13–30.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Spilmont N. (2004). Métabolisme benthique intertidal en milieu marin et estuarien: mesures in situ de la production et de la respiration, variabilité spatio-temporelle et bilans. PhD Thesis, Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale, France.

Spilmont, N. , Migné, A. , Lefebvre, A. , Artigas, L. F. , Rauch, M. , and Davoult, D. (2005). Temporal variability of intertidal benthic metabolism under emersed conditions in an exposed sandy beach. Journal of Sea Research 53, 161–167.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Wollast R. (1991). The coastal organic carbon cycle: fluxes, sources and sinks. In ‘Ocean Margin Processes in global Change’. (Eds R. F. C. Mantoura, J. M. Martin and R. Wollast.) pp. 365–381. (Wiley and Sons: Chichester, UK.)

Yallop, M. L. , de Winder, B. , Paterson, D. M. , and Stal, L. J. (1994). Comparative structure, primary production and biogenic stabilization of cohesive and non cohesive marine sediments inhabited by microphytobenthos. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 39, 565–582.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yallop, M. L. , Paterson, D. M. , and Wellsbury, P. (2000). Interrelationships between rates of microbial production, exopolymer production, microbial biomass, and sediment stability in biofilms of intertidal sediments. Microbial Ecology 39, 116–127.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |