Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MF > MF06096
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 58(2)

Mercury in king mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, and Spanish mackerel, S. maculatus, from waters of the south-eastern USA: regional and historical trends

Douglas H. Adams A C and Robert H. McMichael Jr B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, 1220 Prospect Ave, #285, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA.

B Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, 100 Eighth Ave SE, St Petersburg, FL 33701, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: doug.adams@myfwc.com

Marine and Freshwater Research 58(2) 187-193 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF06096
Submitted: 31 May 2006  Accepted: 7 December 2006   Published: 8 February 2007

Abstract

Mackerels and other piscivorous marine fishes can contain significant levels of mercury. To monitor and better understand mercury levels in mackerel populations, total mercury concentrations were analysed in dorsal muscle tissue from 279 king mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, and from 580 Spanish mackerel, S. maculatus, collected from offshore and coastal waters of the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico in the south-eastern USA. Mercury levels in king mackerel ranged from 0.19 to 3.6 ppm (mean = 0.94 ppm; median = 0.65 ppm) on the Atlantic coast and from 0.18 to 4.0 ppm (mean = 1.51 ppm; median = 1.3 ppm) on the gulf coast. Total mercury levels for Spanish mackerel ranged from 0.04 to 1.3 ppm (mean = 0.32 ppm; median = 0.27 ppm) on the Atlantic coast and from 0.09 to 3.2 ppm (mean = 0.53 ppm; median = 0.44 ppm) on the gulf coast. Data from the present study suggest that Gulf of Mexico king and Spanish mackerel contain significantly higher levels of mercury than those from the Atlantic coast. Total mercury levels and fish length were positively related in both species and in both regions. A positive relationship between total mercury levels and king mackerel age was also detected. No differences in mercury levels were observed between males and females within either species. Comparisons of pre- and post-1996 mercury levels indicated a short-term historical decline in total mercury levels of Spanish mackerel from gulf-coast waters between 1990 and 2002. Further, mercury levels of these species were higher than those recorded in the 1970s.

Additional keywords: fisheries, heavy metals, marine contaminants, Scombridae.


Acknowledgements

We thank T. Chandrasekhar and the staff of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for the laboratory analyses that made this study possible. We greatly appreciate the efforts of staff from the FWC-FWRI Fisheries-Independent Monitoring Program and Fisheries-Dependent Monitoring Program for their assistance in collecting fish and processing samples. Many thanks to D. DeVries and C. Palmer for providing king mackerel age data. D. Axelrad, J. Leiby, R. Paperno, F. Price, J. Quinn and A.Willis offered helpful suggestions that improved the manuscript. This study was supported in part by funding from the Department of the Interior, USA Fish and Wildlife Service, Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration, Project F-43, and by State of Florida Saltwater Recreational Fishing Licence monies.


References

Adams, D. H. (2004). Total mercury levels in tunas from offshore waters of the Florida Atlantic coast. Marine Pollution Bulletin 49, 659–663.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Adams D. H., and McMichael R. H., Jr (2001). ‘Mercury Levels in Marine and Estuarine Fishes of Florida.’ Florida Marine Research Institute Technical Report TR-6. (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute: St Petersburg, Florida).

Adams, D. H. , and Onorato, G. V. (2005). Mercury concentrations in red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus, from estuarine and offshore water of Florida. Marine Pollution Bulletin 50, 291–300.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Adams D. H., McMichael R. H., Jr, and Henderson G. E. (2003). ‘Mercury Levels in Marine and Estuarine Fishes of Florida: 1989–2001.’ Florida Marine Research Institute Technical Report. TR-9. 2nd edn. Available at http://research.myfwc.com/publications/publication_info.asp?id=43959 [Verified 4 January 2007].

Balthis, W. L. , Voit, E. O. , and Meaburn, G. M. (1996). Setting prediction limits for mercury concentrations in fish having high bioaccumulation potential. Environmetrics 7, 429–439.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Booeshahgi F., Witt M., and Cano K. (1995). ‘Analysis of Total Mercury in Tissue by Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption.’ (Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Technical Services: Tallahassee, FL.)

Broughton, R. E. , Stewart, L. B. , and Gold, J. R. (2002). Microsatellite variation suggests substantial gene flow between king mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, in the western Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico. Fisheries Research 54, 305–316.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bryan G. W. (1984). Pollution due to heavy metals and their compounds. In ‘Marine Ecology, Vol. 5’. (Ed. O. Kinne.) pp. 1289–1431. (Wiley: London.)

Choy, C. M. Y. , Lam, C. W. K. , Cheung, L. T. F. , Briton-Jones, C. M. , and Haines, C. J. (2002). Infertility, blood mercury concentrations and dietary seafood consumption: a case-control study. BJOG: International Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology 109(10), 1121–1125.
DEP (Florida Department of Environmental Protection) (2003). ‘The Everglades Mercury TMDL Pilot Study: Final Report. A Modeling Analysis of Mercury Emissions, Transport, and Deposition, and Aquatic Cycling and Bioaccumulation in the Florida Everglades.’ (Florida Department of Environmental Protection: Tallahassee, FL.)

DeVries, D. A. , and Grimes, C. B. (1997). Spatial and temporal variation in age and growth of king mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, 1977–1992. Fishery Bulletin 95, 694–708.
DOH (Florida Department of Health) (1996). ‘Heath Advisory for King Mackerel.’ (Florida Department of Health: Tallahassee, FL.)

DOH (Florida Department of Health) (2000). ‘Four Southeast States issue Joint Health Advisory-King Mackerel.’ (Florida Department of Health: Tallahassee, FL.)

DOH (Florida Department of Health) (2006). ‘Florida Fish Consumption Advisories.’ (Florida Department of Health: Tallahassee, FL.)

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (1991). ‘Determination of Mercury in Tissues by Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrometry: Method 245.6 (Revision 2.3).’ (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, OH.)

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (1997). ‘Mercury Study Report to Congress. Office of Air Quality, Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development. EPA-452/R-97-009.’ (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC.)

FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) (2004). FDA and EPA announce the revised consumer advisory on methylmercury in fish. PO4-33. 2 pp.

Frick T. (1996). ‘Digestion of Fish Tissue Samples for Total Mercury Analysis.’ (Florida Department of Environmental Protection: Tallahassee, FL.)

FWC (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) (2007). ‘Florida Fishing Regulations, Saltwater Edition.’ (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Division of Marine Fisheries Management: Tallahassee, FL.)

Godcharles M. F., and Murphy M. D. (1986). ‘Species Profiles: Life Histories and Environmental Requirements of Coastal Fishes and Invertebrates (South Florida). King mackerel and Spanish mackerel.’ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 82 (11.58). (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Washington, DC.)

Gold J. R., Kristmundsdottir A. Y., and Richardson L. R. (1996). ‘Genetic Structure of King Mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, in the Gulf of Mexico.’ (American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists: New Orleans, LA.) [Abstract]

Grieb, T. M. , Driscoll, C. T. , Gloss, S. P. , Schofield, C. L. , Bowie, G. L. , and Porcella, D. B. (1990). Factors affecting mercury accumulation in fish in the upper Michigan peninsula. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 9, 919–930.
Hall R. A., Zook E. G., and Meaburn G. M. (1978). ‘National Marine Fisheries Service Survey of Trace Elements in the Fishery Resource.’ NOAA Technical Report NMFS SSRF-721. (NOAA: Washington, DC.)

Hightower, J. M. , and Moore, D. (2003). Mercury levels in high-end consumers of fish. Environmental Health Perspectives 111(4), 1–6.
Meaburn G. M. (1979). Heavy metal contamination of Spanish mackerel, Scomberomorus maculatus, and king mackerel, S. cavalla. In ‘Proceedings of the Mackerel Colloquium’. (Eds E. L. Nakamura and H. R. Bullis, Jr.) pp. 61–66. (Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission: Brownsville, TX.)

Naughton, S. P. , and Saloman, C. H. (1981). Stomach contents of juvenile king mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, and Spanish mackerel, S. maculatus. Northeast Gulf Science 5, 71–74.
NRC (National Research Council) (2000). ‘Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury.’ (National Academy Press: Washington, DC.)

Palmer C. L., and DeVries D. A. (2003). ‘A Pictorial Guide to Ageing King Mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, and Spanish Mackerel, S. maculatus, using Whole and Sectioned Otoliths.’ (Atlantic States Cooperative Statistics Program: Panama City, FL.)

Rodgers, D. W. , and Beamish, F. W. H. (1982). Dynamics of dietary methylmercury in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri. Aquatic Toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2, 271–290.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | SAFMC (South Atlantic Fishery Management Council) (1988). ‘Summary of the Gulf of Mexico/South Atlantic Coastal Migratory Pelagic Fishery Management Plan, Amendment 2.’ (South Atlantic Fishery Management Council: Charleston, SC.)

SAFMC (South Atlantic Fisheries Management Council) (2003). ‘Complete Stock Assessment Report of SEDAR 5 (Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review). South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico King Mackerel.’ SEADAR Assessment Reports 1–5. (South Atlantic Fishery Management Council: Charleston, SC.)

SCDHEC (South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control) (2005). ‘South Carolina Fish Consumption Advisories, Atlantic Ocean.’ (South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control: Columbia, SC.)

Skow, L. C. , and Chittenden, M. E. (1981). Differences in hemoglobin phenotypes among Spanish mackerel, Scomberomorus maculatus. Northeast Gulf Science 5, 67–70.
Sutherland D. F., and Fable W. A., Jr (1980). ‘Results of a King Mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, and Atlantic Spanish mackerel, S. maculatus, Migration Study, 1975–79.’ NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFC-12. (NOAA: Panama City, FL.)

Sutter, F. C. , Williams, R. O. , and Godcharles, M. F. (1991). Movement patterns and stock affinities of king mackerel in the southeastern United States. Fishery Bulletin 89, 315–324.
TDH (Texas Department of Health) (1997). ‘Fish Advisory ADV-14, Gulf of Mexico.’ (Texas Department of Health: Austin, TX.)

Trent L., and Anthony E. A. (1979). Commercial and recreational fisheries for Spanish mackerel, Scomberomorus maculatus. In ‘Proceedings of the Mackerel Colloquium’. (Eds E. L. Nakamura and H. R. Bullis, Jr.) pp. 17–32. (Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission No. 4.: Brownsville, TX.)

Trudel, M. , and Rasmussen, J. B. (1997). Modeling the elimination of mercury by fish. Environmental Science & Technology 31, 1716–1722.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Trudel, M. , and Rasmussen, J. B. (2001). Predicting mercury concentrations in fish using mass balanced models. Ecological Applications 11, 517–529.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wang, W. (2002). Interactions of trace metals and different marine food chains. Marine Ecology Progress Series 243, 295–309.