Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MF > MF05067
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 57(4)

Effects of a freshwater canal discharge on an ovoviviparous isopod inhabiting an exposed sandy beach

Juan Pablo Lozoya A and Omar Defeo A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A UNDECIMAR, Facultad de Ciencias. Iguá 4225, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay.

B Corresponding author. Email: odefeo@fcien.edu.uy

Marine and Freshwater Research 57(4) 421-428 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF05067
Submitted: 9 April 2005  Accepted: 21 March 2006   Published: 14 June 2006

Abstract

The present study evaluates the effects of an artificial freshwater discharge (Canal Andreoni) on the ecology of the ovoviviparous isopod Excirolana armata. Bimonthly, 17 environmental variables plus isopod abundance, biomass, fecundity, growth and mortality were compared between three sites: ‘Barra del Chuy’ (undisturbed), at 13 km from the canal, ‘Coronilla’ (moderately disturbed), at 1 km, and ‘Andreoni’ (grossly disturbed), at the canal mouth. Environmental (salinity, slope, beach width, and swash width) and some biological (isopod abundance, biomass and growth rates) variables significantly decreased towards Canal Andreoni. Salinity was the most important explanatory variable of spatial trends in isopod biomass. However, the reproductive output, fecundity, survival and individual weight were not affected, suggesting that E. armata is regulated by density-dependent and abiotic factors operating together: the former were more intense on undisturbed conditions, whereas the latter prevailed in impacted ones. Internal brooding counteracts the effect of fresh water, which explains the lack of effect of environmental harshness on reproductive traits.

Extra keywords: Excirolana, freshwater discharges, internal brooding, Uruguay.


Acknowledgments

This paper is part of the MSc thesis of J.P.L. We wish to express our gratitude to the ‘Benthic Ecology Group’ of UNDECIMAR for field and laboratory assistance. J.P.L. especially thanks Cate, Amelia and Paco for their continuous encouragement. Suggestions by three anonymous referees substantially improved the final manuscript. Financial support from CONICYT (Projects N° 1018 and 4034), PEDECIBA and PDT (Project S/C/OP/07/49) is acknowledged.


References

Brown, A. C. , and McLachlan, A. (2002). Sandy shore ecosystems and the threats facing them: some predictions for the year 2025. Environmental Conservation 29, 62–77.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Caddy J. F., and Defeo O. (2003). Enhancing or restoring the productivity of natural populations of shellfish and other marine invertebrate resources. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 448. (FAO: Rome.)

Charmantier, G. , and Charmantier-Daures, M. (1994). Ontogeny of osmoregulation and salinity tolerance in the isopod crustacean Sphaeroma serratum. Marine Ecology Progress Series 114, 93–102.
Dexter D. (1983). Community structure of intertidal sandy beaches in New South Wales, Australia. In ‘Sandy Beaches as Ecosystems’. (Eds A. McLachlan and T. Erasmus.) pp. 461–472. (Dr Junk W. Publishers: The Hague.)

Emery, K. O. (1961). A simple method of measuring beach profiles. Limnology and Oceanography 6, 90–93.
Gayanilo F. C.Jr., and Pauly D. (1997). ‘FAO–ICLARM Stock Assessment Tools (FISAT).’ FAO Computerized Information Series (Fisheries) 8. (FAO: Rome.)

Gómez, J. , and Defeo, O. (1999). Life history of the sandhopper Pseudorchestoidea brasiliensis (Amphipoda) in sandy beaches with contrasting morphodynamics. Marine Ecology Progress Series 182, 209–220.
Haddon M. (2001). ‘Modeling and Quantitative Methods in Fisheries.’ (Chapman and Hall: New York.)

Jeffrey, S. W. , and Humphrey, G. F. (1975). New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochemie und Physiologie Pflanzen 167, 191–194.
Leenknecht D., Szuwalski A., and Sherlock A. (1992). ‘Automated Coastal Engineering System: User’s Guide.’ (US Army Corps of Engineers: Washington, DC.)

Lemos de Castro, A. , and da Silva Brum, I. N. (1969). Sobre as especies de Excirolana Richardson do litoral atlántico das Américas (Isopoda, Cirolanidae). Boletim do Museo Nacional do Rio de Janeiro 271, 1–21.
Lubchenco J., Allison G. W., Navarrete S. A., Menge B. A., Castilla J. C., Defeo O., Folke C., Kussakin O., Norton T., and Wood A. M. (1995). Coastal systems. In ‘United Nations Environment Programme Global Biodiversity Assessment’. pp. 370–381. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Miller R. G. (1981). ‘Simultaneous Statistical Inference.’ (McGraw Hill: New York.)

Pearce, J. B. , and Wells, P. G. (2002). Key(s) to marine ecology and understanding pollution impacts-a tribute to Dr. Howard Sanders, Marine Benthic Biologist Extra-Ordinaire. Marine Pollution Bulletin 44, 179–180.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Roff D. A. (1992). ‘The Evolution of Life Histories, Theory and Analysis.’ (Chapman and Hall: New York.)

Schoeman, D. S. , and Richardson, A. J. (2002). Investigating biotic and abiotic factors affecting recruitment of an intertidal clam on an exposed sandy beach using a generalized additive model. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 276, 67–81.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | UNESCO (1980). ‘Conservación y mejora de playas.’ UNDP/URU/73/007. (UNESCO: Montevideo.)

Veloso, V. G. , and Cardoso, R. S. (2001). The effects of morphodynamics on the spatial and temporal variation of the macrofauna of three sandy beaches on the Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 81, 369–375.
Wenner A. M. (1988). Crustaceans and other invertebrates as indicators of beach pollution. In ‘Marine Organisms as Indicators’. (Eds D. F. Soule and G. S. Kleppel.) pp. 199–229. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Zar J. H. (1999). ‘Biostatistical Analysis.’ (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.)