The role of laboratories in mitigating the threat of Security Sensitive Biological Agents to animal health and agriculture
Debbie EaglesCSIRO Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, 5 Portarlington Road, East Geelong, Vic. 3219, Australia. Tel.: +61 3 5227 5067, Email: debbie.eagles@csiro.au
Microbiology Australia 41(3) 136-138 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA20036
Published: 19 August 2020
Abstract
The aim of Australia’s Security Sensitive Biological Agents (SSBAs) Regulatory Scheme is to limit opportunities for acts of bioterrorism or criminal acts using harmful biological agents. The scheme is based on a two-tiered list of agents, of which many can cause disease in animals and thereby have the potential to significantly impact Australian agricultural industries and the economy. Laboratories handling these agents have clear responsibilities for their biocontainment, biosafety and biosecurity. Importantly, through research and ongoing improvements to diagnostic assays and techniques, these facilities also play an integral role in threat preparedness, mitigation, diagnosis and control of natural, accidental or deliberate outbreaks of disease.
References
[1] Australian Government (2007) National Health Security Act 2007. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2016C00847[2] Australian Government (2018) National Health Security Regulations 2018. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2018L01247
[3] Australian Government, Department of Health (2013) SSBA Standards. https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/ssba.htm#standards
[4] World Organisation for Animal Health (2015) OIE Biological Threat Reduction Strategy. https://www.oie.int/scientific-expertise/biological-threat-reduction/
[5] Naden, C. (2020) Improving biosecurity with First International Standard for Biorisk Management. https://www.iso.org/news/ref2472.html
[6] United Nations. Biological & Toxins Weapons Convention https://www.unog.ch/80256EE600585943/(httpPages)/77CF2516DDC5DCF5C1257E520032EF67?OpenDocument
[7] Tian, X. and von Cramon-Taubadel, S. (2020) Economic consequences of African swine fever. Nature Food 1, 196–197.
| Economic consequences of African swine fever.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Dixon, L.K. et al. (2019) African swine fever. Antiviral Res. 165, 34–41.
| African swine fever.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30836106PubMed |
