Hydrocarbon- and metal-polluted soil bioremediation: progress and challenges
Maria Kuyukina A B C , Anastasiya Krivoruchko A B and Irina Ivshina A BA Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Perm, Russia
B Perm State University, Perm, Russia
C Tel: + 7 342 280 8114, Email: kuyukina@iegm.ru
Microbiology Australia 39(3) 133-136 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA18041
Published: 7 August 2018
Abstract
The problem of soil contamination with petroleum hydrocarbons and heavy metals is becoming particularly acute for large oil-producing countries, like the Russian Federation. Both hydrocarbon and metal contaminants impact negatively the soil biota and human health, thus requiring efficient methods for their detoxification and elimination. Bioremediation of soil co-contaminated with hydrocarbon and metal pollutants is complicated by the fact that, although the two components must be treated differently, they mutually affect the overall removal efficiency. Heavy metals are reported to inhibit biodegradation of hydrocarbons by interfering with microbial enzymes directly involved in biodegradation or through the interaction with enzymes involved in general metabolism. Here we discuss recent progress and challenges in bioremediation of soils co-contaminated with hydrocarbons and heavy metals, focusing on selecting metal-resistant biodegrading strains and biosurfactant amendments.
References
[1] Sandrin, T.R. and Maier, R.M. (2003) Impact of metals on the biodegradation of organic pollutants. Environ. Health Perspect. 111, 1093–1101.| Impact of metals on the biodegradation of organic pollutants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Panagos, P. et al. (2013) Contaminated sites in Europe: review of the current situation based on data collected through a European network. J. Environ. Public Health 2013, 158764.
[3] Freije, A.F. (2015) Heavy metal, trace element and petroleum hydrocarbon pollution in the Arabian Gulf. J. Assoc. Arab Univ. Basic Appl. Sci. 17, 90–100.
[4] Stigter, J.B. et al. (2000) Determination of cadmium, zinc, copper, chromium and arsenic in crude oil cargoes. Environ. Pollut. 107, 451–464.
| Determination of cadmium, zinc, copper, chromium and arsenic in crude oil cargoes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Nielsen, M. et al. (2013) Improved inventory for heavy metal emissions from stationary combustion plants. 1990–2009. Aarhus University, DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy. Scientific Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 68. http://www.dce2.dk/pub/SR68.pdf
[6] Khalilova, H. and Mammadov, V. (2016) Assessing the anthropogenic impact on heavy metal pollution of soils and sediments in urban areas of Azerbaijan’s oil industrial region. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 25, 159–166.
| Assessing the anthropogenic impact on heavy metal pollution of soils and sediments in urban areas of Azerbaijan’s oil industrial region.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Yaschenko, I.G. (2011) Heavy oils of Russia, enriched with toxic metals. Proc. IVTN-2011 Conference on Computer Applications in Scientific Research, Moscow, Russia. p. 41. http://www.ivtn.ru/2011/confs/enter/paper_e.php?p=1266
[8] Gondal, M.A. et al. (2006) Detection of heavy metals in Arabian crude oil residue using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. Talanta 69, 1072–1078.
| Detection of heavy metals in Arabian crude oil residue using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Gondal, M.A. et al. (2010) Detection of trace metals in asphaltenes using an advanced laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) technique. Energy Fuels 24, 1099–1105.
| Detection of trace metals in asphaltenes using an advanced laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) technique.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Kuyukina, M.S. et al. (2012) Risk assessment and management of terrestrial ecosystems exposed to petroleum contamination. In Environmental Contamination (Srivastava, J. K., ed.). pp. 177–198. InTech.
[11] Kuyukina, M.S. et al. (2016) Management of crude oil and heavy metal contaminated sites in Russia using a risk assessment approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on Contaminated Sites. Bratislava, Slovakia. pp. 33−36.
[12] AL-Saleh, E.S. and Obuekwe, C. (2005) Inhibition of hydrocarbon bioremediation by lead in a crude oil-contaminated soil. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 56, 1–7.
| Inhibition of hydrocarbon bioremediation by lead in a crude oil-contaminated soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Bell, J.M.L. et al. (2004) Methods evaluating vanadium tolerance in bacteria isolated from crude oil contaminated land. J. Microbiol. Methods 58, 87–100.
| Methods evaluating vanadium tolerance in bacteria isolated from crude oil contaminated land.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Ivshina, I.B. et al. (2013) Adaptive mechanisms of nonspecific resistance to heavy metal ions in alkanotrophic actinobacteria. Russ. J. Ecol. 44, 123–130.
| Adaptive mechanisms of nonspecific resistance to heavy metal ions in alkanotrophic actinobacteria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Ivshina, I.B. et al. (2017) Hydrocarbon-oxidizing bacteria and their potential in eco-biotechnology and bioremediation. In Microbial Resources: From Functional Existence in Nature to Industrial Applications (Kurtböke, I., ed.). pp. 121–148. Elsevier.
[16] Korshunova, I.O. et al. (2016) The effect of organic solvents on the viability and morphofunctional properties of Rhodococcus. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 52, 43–50.
| The effect of organic solvents on the viability and morphofunctional properties of Rhodococcus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Mulligan, C.N. (2005) Environmental applications for biosurfactants. Environ. Pollut. 133, 183–198.
| Environmental applications for biosurfactants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Kuyukina, M.S. and Ivshina, I.B. (2010) Rhodococcus biosurfactants: biosynthesis, properties and potential applications. In Biology of Rhodococcus. Microbiology Monographs (Steinbüchel, A., ed.). V. 16. pp. 292–313. Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, London, New York.
[19] Christofi, N. and Ivshina, I.B. (2002) Microbial surfactants and their use in field studies of soil remediation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 93, 915–929.
| Microbial surfactants and their use in field studies of soil remediation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Agnello, A.C. et al. (2016) Comparative bioremediation of heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons co-contaminated soil by natural attenuation, phytoremediation, bioaugmentation and bioaugmentation-assisted phytoremediation. Sci. Total Environ. 563–564, 693–703.
| Comparative bioremediation of heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons co-contaminated soil by natural attenuation, phytoremediation, bioaugmentation and bioaugmentation-assisted phytoremediation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Rorat, A. et al. (2017) Vermiremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals in sewage sludge composting process. J. Environ. Manage. 187, 347–353.
| Vermiremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals in sewage sludge composting process.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Groudeva, V.I. et al. (2001) Bioremediation of waters contaminated with crude oil and toxic heavy metals. Int. J. Miner. Process. 62, 293–299.
| Bioremediation of waters contaminated with crude oil and toxic heavy metals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Kuyukina, M.S. et al. (2017) Oilfield wastewater biotreatment in a fluidized-bed bioreactor using co-immobilized Rhodococcus cultures. J. Environ. Chem. Engin. 5, 1252–1260.
| Oilfield wastewater biotreatment in a fluidized-bed bioreactor using co-immobilized Rhodococcus cultures. J.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Roane, T.M. et al. (2001) Dual-bioaugmentation strategy to enhance remediation of cocontaminated soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 3208–3215.
| Dual-bioaugmentation strategy to enhance remediation of cocontaminated soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |