Register      Login
Microbiology Australia Microbiology Australia Society
Microbiology Australia, bringing Microbiologists together
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The obstetrician, congenital cytomegalovirus, clinical and diagnostic approaches to the pregnant woman

Antonia W Shand
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Clinical and Population Perinatal Health Research, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia

Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney, Australia

Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia

Tel: +61 2 9382 6098
Fax: +61 2 9382 6038
Email: Antonia.shand@sydney.edu.au

Microbiology Australia 36(4) 194-196 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA15067
Published: 23 October 2015

Abstract

There is low awareness of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Australia. Routine pregnancy serological screening for CMV is not recommended, but all pregnant women should be given advice about CMV prevention. Obstetricians may be asked to see a pregnant woman when serology suggests CMV infection or when features of fetal infection are present on ultrasound. If maternal CMV infection is confirmed, the timing of infection (pre-pregnancy or gestation of pregnancy), must be determined to predict the fetal risks. In addition, it is important to establish whether maternal infection is primary or reactivation. If there is fetal infection, ultrasound can be used to attempt to establish whether the fetus may have been affected. Serial serology, CMV IgG avidity, maternal viraemia (using serum PCR), amniotic fluid CMV PCR, serial fetal ultrasounds, and possibly fetal MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) are investigations that may be useful to predict neonatal outcomes. Timely and accurate counselling is important to optimise maternal and neonatal management.


References

[1]  Yinon, Y. et al. (2010) Screening, diagnosis, and management of cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 65, 736–743.
Screening, diagnosis, and management of cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21375790PubMed |

[2]  American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2015) Practice bulletin no. 151: cytomegalovirus, parvovirus B19, varicella zoster, and toxoplasmosis in pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 125, 1510–1525.
Practice bulletin no. 151: cytomegalovirus, parvovirus B19, varicella zoster, and toxoplasmosis in pregnancy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26000539PubMed |

[3]  Hui, L. et al. (2015) Perinatal outcome after maternal primary cytomegalovirus infection in the first trimester: a practical update and counseling aid. Prenat. Diagn. 35, 1–7.
Perinatal outcome after maternal primary cytomegalovirus infection in the first trimester: a practical update and counseling aid.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25224270PubMed |

[4]  Picone, O. et al. (2013) A series of 238 cytomegalovirus primary infections during pregnancy: description and outcome. Prenat. Diagn. 33, 751–758.
A series of 238 cytomegalovirus primary infections during pregnancy: description and outcome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3srhvFGrtg%3D%3D&md5=874cc3ec4e8e1db39e392e3144c480fcCAS | 23553686PubMed |

[5]  Lipitz, S. et al. (2013) Risk of cytomegalovirus-associated sequelae in relation to time of infection and findings on prenatal imaging. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 41, 508–514.
Risk of cytomegalovirus-associated sequelae in relation to time of infection and findings on prenatal imaging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3s3ms12quw%3D%3D&md5=31cf58ce5ddc2520f5b6337bc680849cCAS | 23288698PubMed |

[6]  Smithers-Sheedy, H. et al. (2015) Cytomegalovirus-related childhood mortality in Australia 1999–2011. J. Paediatr. Child Health 51, 901–905.
Cytomegalovirus-related childhood mortality in Australia 1999–2011.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25872417PubMed |

[7]  Prince, H.E. et al. (2014) Role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG avidity testing in diagnosing primary CMV infection during pregnancy. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 21, 1377–1384.
Role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG avidity testing in diagnosing primary CMV infection during pregnancy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25165026PubMed |

[8]  Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Routine Antenatal Assessment in the Absence of Pregnancy Complications. College Statement C-Obs 3 (b). Amended April 2015.

[9]  National Health and Medical Research Council (2012) Clinical Practice Guidelines: Antenatal Care - Module I. Department of Health and Ageing. Australian Government.

[10]  Walker, S.P. et al. (2013) Cytomegalovirus in pregnancy: to screen or not to screen. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13, 96.
Cytomegalovirus in pregnancy: to screen or not to screen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23594714PubMed |

[11]  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) Protect your unborn baby or newborn from infections. http://www.cdc.gov/pregnancy/cmv/ (accessed 2015).

[12]  Lazzarotto, T. et al. (2008) New advances in the diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J. Clin. Virol. 41, 192–197.
New advances in the diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXitVensbo%3D&md5=73db54c15b977447096fd7db91108b47CAS | 18054840PubMed |

[13]  Ebina, Y. et al. (2015) Rapid increase in the serum cytomegalovirus IgG avidity index in women with a congenitally infected fetus. J. Clin. Virol. 66, 44–47.
Rapid increase in the serum cytomegalovirus IgG avidity index in women with a congenitally infected fetus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXktVKhsLo%3D&md5=985663f9c01e6973f516cc51fc7bb98bCAS | 25866335PubMed |

[14]  Kadambari, S. et al. (2015) Evaluating the feasibility of integrating salivary testing for congenital CMV into the Newborn Hearing Screening Programme in the UK. Eur. J. Pediatr. 174, 1117–1121.
Evaluating the feasibility of integrating salivary testing for congenital CMV into the Newborn Hearing Screening Programme in the UK.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXkt1OgsL0%3D&md5=02ed61f0944d4ba9dd3c23989b80e47fCAS | 25743117PubMed |

[15]  Benoist, G. et al. (2013) Management of pregnancies with confirmed cytomegalovirus fetal infection. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 33, 203–214.
Management of pregnancies with confirmed cytomegalovirus fetal infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23571413PubMed |

[16]  Enders, G. et al. (2011) Intrauterine transmission and clinical outcome of 248 pregnancies with primary cytomegalovirus infection in relation to gestational age. J. Clin. Virol. 52, 244–246.
Intrauterine transmission and clinical outcome of 248 pregnancies with primary cytomegalovirus infection in relation to gestational age.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21820954PubMed |

[17]  Guerra, B. et al. (2000) Prenatal diagnosis of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 183, 476–482.
Prenatal diagnosis of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvktFChtQ%3D%3D&md5=f64c347ee65c5b25007bbc1db8c00353CAS | 10942490PubMed |

[18]  Picone, O. et al. (2014) Detailed in utero ultrasound description of 30 cases of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Prenat. Diagn. 34, 518–524.
Detailed in utero ultrasound description of 30 cases of congenital cytomegalovirus infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2cvlsVGqsQ%3D%3D&md5=8a5a92c8940d65e44b4bcf8eb79d2b0aCAS | 24532345PubMed |

[19]  Revello, M.G. et al. (2011) Role of prenatal diagnosis and counseling in the management of 735 pregnancies complicated by primary human cytomegalovirus infection: a 20-year experience. J. Clin. Virol. 50, 303–307.
Role of prenatal diagnosis and counseling in the management of 735 pregnancies complicated by primary human cytomegalovirus infection: a 20-year experience.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21277825PubMed |

[20]  Hamilton, S.T. et al. (2014) Prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus complications by maternal and neonatal treatments: a systematic review. Rev. Med. Virol. 24, 420–433.
Prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus complications by maternal and neonatal treatments: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhvVWnsrvF&md5=2bdf687575307ac7bb522f300fae234aCAS | 25316174PubMed |

[21]  Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). A randomized trial to prevent congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01376778.

[22]  de Costa, C. et al. (2015) Abortion law across Australia – a review of nine jurisdictions. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 55, 105–111.
Abortion law across Australia – a review of nine jurisdictions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25871844PubMed |

[23]  Boppana, S.B. et al. (2011) Saliva polymerase-chain-reaction assay for cytomegalovirus screening in newborns. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 2111–2118.
Saliva polymerase-chain-reaction assay for cytomegalovirus screening in newborns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXnt1Cmt7k%3D&md5=a868e6d8f54c902348c13aeb7f684fa4CAS | 21631323PubMed |

[24]  Cannon, M.J. et al. (2014) Universal newborn screening for congenital CMV infection: what is the evidence of potential benefit? Rev. Med. Virol. 24, 291–307.
Universal newborn screening for congenital CMV infection: what is the evidence of potential benefit?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24760655PubMed |

[25]  Goodrum, F. et al. (2012) Human cytomegalovirus persistence. Cell. Microbiol. 14, 644–655.
Human cytomegalovirus persistence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XmsVarur4%3D&md5=6f8fc35dfb578fc32ea8f1aefbed6857CAS | 22329758PubMed |

[26]  Reichman, O. et al. (2014) Preconception screening for cytomegalovirus: an effective preventive approach. Biomed Res Int. 2014, 135416.
Preconception screening for cytomegalovirus: an effective preventive approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25013756PubMed |