Brucella suis in Australian dogs and pigs
Catherine C. Kneipp A B * , Siobhan M. Mor C and Anke K. Wiethoelter AA
B
C
![]() Catherine Kneipp has been a veterinary clinician since graduating with a Bachelor of Veterinary Science from The University of Queensland. Initially working in Australia and the UK, since 1992 Catherine has lived and worked in regional Queensland as a partner in a mixed animal practice in Goondiwindi. A general veterinary practitioner for over 35 years her chief interests lie in small animal medicine and surgery. She is currently completing research into Brucella suis brucellosis in dogs as a PhD student at The University of Melbourne. |
![]() Siobhan Mor is an interdisciplinary researcher and epidemiologist with a dual background in veterinary medicine and public health. A Fellow of the Australasian College of Tropical Medicine (ACTM), Siobhan has held academic appointments at Tufts University School of Medicine in the US (assistant professor, 2009–11), The University of Sydney School of Veterinary Medicine in Australia (senior lecturer, 2012–18) and The University of Liverpool Institute for Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences in the UK (professor, 2018 to present). She holds a joint appointment with the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) and is based full time in Nairobi, Kenya. |
![]() Anke Wiethoelter is an associate professor in veterinary epidemiology and One Health at the Melbourne Veterinary School with a research focus on infectious diseases at the wildlife–livestock–human interface and determinants of health behaviour. She teaches epidemiology, evidence-based practice, and One Health to both undergraduate and graduate students. |
Abstract
Brucella suis is a zoonotic pathogen of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) that in Australia primarily infects hunters, hunting dogs and veterinary professionals. Endemic in the feral pig populations of Queensland for nearly 50 years, over the past decade B. suis has emerged in feral pigs in New South Wales, the Northern Territory and South Australia. During this time there has been a significant rise in canine brucellosis cases, with nearly 10% of exposed dogs testing seropositive. Transmission to dogs occurs through contact with infected feral pigs, particularly during hunting, and the consumption of raw feral pig meat. Infected dogs commonly present with reproductive or osteoarticular disease, although many remain asymptomatic. The transmission risk from dogs to humans is low, except around whelping, when the bacteria may be excreted in reproductive tissues and fluids. Advances in serological testing and treatment protocols have improved management options for infected dogs, however government policy still often emphasises euthanasia. Evidence-based guidelines are required to balance zoonotic risk management with the effective care and welfare of infected dogs, highlighting the need for a formal review of current government policies.
Keywords: Australia, Brucella suis, brucellosis, feral pigs, hunting dogs, seroprevalence, transmission, zoonosis.
Introduction
Brucellosis, caused by Brucella suis, is an emerging disease in Australia predominantly affecting pig hunters, hunting dogs and veterinary professionals. Primarily a disease of pigs (Sus scrofa), B. suis is a contagious, zoonotic species of bacteria, endemic in feral pig populations of eastern Australia. Hunting and butchering of feral pigs is the major risk factor for human infection.1,2 Over the past decade, however, there has been a significant increase in the diagnosis of B. suis in dogs exposed to feral pigs, most commonly during hunting. This has driven research and subsequent management and policy review on the zoonotic risk posed by these working companion animals.
Brucellosis in Australia
Brucella are Gram-negative, facultative intracellular coccobacilli, of the class Alphaproteobacteria. The bacteria localise in lymphoreticular tissue and primarily cause reproductive pathology and chronic infection in the natural host.3 Infection is transmitted between hosts by contact with infected body fluids and tissue.4 Brucella has a worldwide distribution and there are currently 13 identified species, delineated by microbial characteristics, host preference, genome sequencing and pathogenicity. Most Brucella species have preferred reservoir hosts but can also infect a range of secondary host species, including humans, with five species known to be zoonotic.5
Owing to strict quarantine laws and relative geographical isolation, Australia has remained free of several major Brucella species, namely B. melitensis and B. canis. Although several articles have mistakenly stated that B. canis is endemic in Australia,6–8 it remains exotic to this country.9 Australia is also one of a few countries to have successfully eradicated B. abortus, from both the domestic cattle population and wildlife reservoirs, being declared free of the disease in 1989 after an extensive test and slaughter program.9
Currently there are only three terrestrial species of Brucella present in Australia: the non-zoonotic pathogen Brucella ovis that affects sheep, an atypical species detected in rodents and amphibians,10,11 and B. suis biovar 1.
The latter is the only zoonotic Brucella species endemic to Australia.2,12 It primarily infects pigs, which are its natural host, but can also affect horses, cattle, dogs, and humans. In fact, B. suis is considered second only to B. melitensis in its pathogenicity to humans where it can cause serious and chronic disease.
Brucella suis biovar 1 was first diagnosed in Australian domestic pigs in Queensland (Qld) in 1936. It caused decreased fertility and production loss in commercial piggeries until being eradicated in this state in 1968.13 It was subsequently isolated in feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in Qld in 1976 and has remained endemic in this species, forming a reservoir for infection in other species.13,14 Before 2011, B. suis had not been detected in feral pigs outside of Qld15,16; however, it has since been detected in feral pigs in northern New South Wales (NSW) in 2012,17 in the Top End of the Northern Territory (2022)18 and in north eastern South Australia (2022).19
Recent research has estimated the prevalence of B. suis exposure in feral pigs to be 17% in Qld (one in six feral pigs seropositive) and 11% in NSW (one in nine).20 Additionally, the geographic range has expanded, with detection 450 km further south than previously reported.20 With an estimated 3.2 million feral pigs inhabiting 38–45% of Australia,21 increasing feral pig numbers and their dispersal across eastern Australia22 are considered major factors in the geographical spread of B. suis and the subsequent risk of transmission to humans and dogs. People considered most at risk of contracting brucellosis in Australia include pig hunters, abattoir workers handling feral pig carcasses, and laboratory staff and veterinarians exposed to infectious material from dogs.
Brucella suis in dogs
Before 2011, there was only a single confirmed case of B. suis in an Australian dog.23 However, between 2011 and 2015 there was a 17-fold increase in the number of notified cases of brucellosis in NSW in dogs exposed to feral pigs, primarily through hunting or consuming uncooked feral pig meat.24 This trend has continued in the ensuing years with increasing diagnosis of B. suis infection in dogs that hunt feral pigs not only in Australia but also in the United States of America.25,26 A seroprevalence survey of Qld and NSW dogs with exposure to feral pigs found that nearly one in ten (9.3%) are seropositive for B. suis.27 Furthermore, seropositive dogs were widespread, detected in 26 of 53 Qld local government areas (LGAs) and 37 of 95 NSW LGAs.20 This is due not only to the high levels of participation in the activity, as there are an estimated 100,000–300,000 hunters in Australia, but also hunters often travel and hunt in multiple locations27 making it difficult to identify where transmission occurs. Furthermore, dogs that travelled for hunting were found to be four times more likely to be seropositive than those that only hunted in their home region.27
Dogs infected with B. suis most often present with reproductive (orchitis, abortion or dystocia) or osteoarticular disease (septic arthritis, discospondylitis) as well as variable, non-specific illness (lethargy, anorexia, soft tissue abscessation).24,28 Owing to the cryptic intracellular nature of the bacteria, latent and subclinical infection is also a common feature, reported in up to 60% of cases.24,28 Definitive diagnosis based on isolation of the organism is difficult to obtain and therefore serology remains the cornerstone for the diagnosis of brucellosis, not only in dogs but in all species.4 Brucellosis is a notifiable disease in Australia and all animal testing is performed at the state veterinary laboratories or the Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (ACDP). Recent work has validated livestock serology tests, the Rose Bengal rapid plate agglutination test (RBRPT), the complement fixation test (CFT) and the competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C-ELISA) for use in dogs.29 Research has also shown that there is little correlation between B. suis antibody levels and health status in dogs, with high levels detected in both clinical and asymptomatic animals, as well as the persistence of seropositivity for long periods of time.28
Transmission risks and management
Feral pigs are the primary source of B. suis infection with hunting, dressing carcases and consuming raw feral pig meat, the main transmission routes for both human and canine infections. Humans are considered incidental hosts for Brucella, and human-to-human transmission is described as rare and isolated.30 Human-to-human transmission of B. suis has not been reported in the literature.
The transmission risk of B. suis from dogs to other species, specifically humans and other dogs is low, except at whelping and in the periparturient period28 when bacteria are excreted in fluids and tissue. It has also been detected in milk, semen, joint fluid, infected testis, vertebrae and lymph nodes, and blood; however, as modes of transmission these are much less significant in the context of normal daily contact with dogs. Furthermore, systematic investigation of seropositive dogs, detected the organism only in dogs with clinical signs of disease.28 Although sharing a household with a seropositive dog has been identified as a risk factor for canine infection,27 distinguishing between clustering of cases due to shared exposure to feral pigs or feral pig meat versus actual dog-to-dog transmission is challenging, as both scenarios can produce similar patterns of infection within close-contact groups.
Transmission from dogs to humans through contact with infected reproductive material, although rare, has been reported31 and confirms that whelping and the post-parturient period, represents the highest transmission risk to humans, other dogs and potentially other species. Veterinarians performing invasive procedures and handling infected body fluids and tissues are at greater risk of infection.
Owing to concerns regarding the potential for zoonotic transmission of B. suis biovar 1, the initial government recommendation in NSW was that all test-positive dogs be euthanased. This policy was amended in 2017 to include a treatment option32; however, euthanasia remains a primary government recommendation for dogs in Australia. Multi-antimicrobial treatment regimens, extrapolated from human medicine, combined with specific management protocols, have been formulated for use in dogs and have provided good clinical results.28,33 Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of at-risk dogs, specifically the 4 ‘T’s (teach, test, treat and take precautions) have been published in the veterinary scientific literature.33 However, a review of government policies and guidelines, incorporating evidence-based data, would be beneficial.
Conclusion
Brucella suis is endemic in the feral pig populations of eastern Australia, and eradication of this reservoir species is unlikely. Although humans and other animals remain at risk of infection, current evidence suggests that dogs pose a low transmission risk to humans and other dogs, outside of the breeding and whelping period. Additionally, infected dogs respond well to available treatment protocols. These findings indicate that euthanasia of all seropositive dogs appears unwarranted and although clinically affected dogs require careful handling and appropriate treatment, they can be managed without undue risk to humans. Formal updates to management guidelines and policies based on recent research, would improve both animal welfare and public health outcomes.
Data availability
The data that support the studies are either available in published articles and accompanying online supplementary material, cannot be publicly shared due to ethical or privacy reasons, or will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Declaration of funding
Areas of research reported here received funding from the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Game Licensing Unit, the Australian Companion Animal Health Foundation, Grant/Award number: 013/2020 and The University of Melbourne, in the form of a graduate research scholarship to the first author.
References
1 Irwin MJ et al. (2009) Feral pig hunting: a risk factor for human brucellosis in north-west NSW? NSW Public Health Bull 20, 192-194.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
2 Robson JM et al. (1993) Brucellosis: re‐emergence and changing epidemiology in Queensland. Med J Aust 159, 153-158.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Castaño MJ et al. (2017) Brucellosis. In International Encyclopedia of Public Health, 2nd edn. (Quah SR, eds). pp. 281–295. Academic Press. 10.1016/B978-0-12-803678-5.00041-2
6 Sebzda MK, Kauffman LK (2023) Update on Brucella canis: understanding the past and preparing for the future. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 53, 1047-1062.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
7 Kneipp C et al. (2019) Commentary: Retrospective and prospective perspectives on zoonotic brucellosis. Front Microbiol 10, 1859.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Santos RL, Souza TD, Mol JPS, Eckstein C, Paíxão TA (2021) Canine brucellosis: an update. Front Vet Sci 8, 594291.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
9 Animal Health Australia (2018) Animal Health in Australia 2018. https://animalhealthaustralia.com.au//wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/Animal-Health-in-Australia-2018_.pdf
10 Latheef S et al. (2020) Atypical Brucella sp in captive Australian green tree frogs (Litoria caerulea): clinical features, pathology, culture and molecular characterization. Aust Vet J 98, 216-221.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
11 Tiller RV et al. (2010) Characterization of novel Brucella strains originating from wild native rodent species in north Queensland, Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol 76, 5837-5845.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
12 Eales KM et al. (2010) Brucellosis in northern Australia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 83, 876-878.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
13 Norton TH, Thomas AD (1976) Brucella suis in feral pigs. Aust Vet J 52, 293-294.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
14 Rogers RJ et al. (1989) An evaluation of three serological tests for antibody to Brucella suis in pigs. Aust Vet J 66, 77-80.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
15 Mason RJ, Fleming PJ (1999) Serological survey for Brucella antibodies in feral pigs from eastern Australia. Aust Vet J 77, 331-332.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
16 Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Agriculture and Food Division (2018) Brucellosis in animals. Government of Western Australia. https://www.agric.wa.gov.au/livestock-biosecurity/brucellosis-animals (retrieved 11 January 2021)
17 Ridoutt C et al. (2014) Detection of brucellosis and leptospirosis in feral pigs in New South Wales. Aust Vet J 92, 343-347.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
18 Stedman E et al. (2022) First detection of Brucella suis in feral pigs in the Northern Territory. Anim Health Surveill Q 27, 7-8.
| Google Scholar |
19 Department of Primary Industries and Regions (2023) Brucella suis. Government of South Australia. https://pir.sa.gov.au/biosecurity/animal_health/animal_species/pigs/brucella_suis#toc_Brucella-suis-in-South-Australia (retrieved 27 September 2023)
21 Hone J (2019) How many feral pigs in Australia? An update. Aust J Zool 67, 215-220.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
22 NSW Department of Primary Industries (2023) Feral pig relative abundance 2023 and distribution change 2020–2023. Government of New South Wales. https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/1491828/Feral-pig-relative-abundance-and-distribution-change-2020-2023.pdf (retrieved 27 March 2024)
23 Aldrick SJ (1968) Typing of Brucella strains from Australia and Papua New Guinea received by the regional WHO Brucellosis Centre. Aust J Zool 44, 130-133.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
24 Mor SM et al. (2016) Emergence of Brucella suis in dogs in New South Wales, Australia: clinical findings and implications for zoonotic transmission. BMC Vet Res 12, 199.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
25 McNeill B et al. (2016) Prevalence of Brucella suis in hunting dogs in Hawai’i. J Anim Sci 94, 81.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
26 Landis M, Rogovskyy AS (2022) The brief case: Brucella suis infection in a household of dogs. J Clin Microbiol 60, e0098421.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
27 Kneipp CC et al. (2021) Brucella suis seroprevalence and associated risk factors in dogs in eastern Australia, 2016 to 2019. Front Vet Sci 8, 727641.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
28 Kneipp CC et al. (2023) Clinical investigation and management of Brucella suis seropositive dogs: a longitudinal case series. J Vet Intern Med 37, 980-991.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
29 Kneipp CC et al. (2024) Evaluation of three serological tests for the diagnosis of Brucella suis in dogs using Bayesian latent class analysis. Prev Vet Med 233, 106345.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
30 Tuon FF et al. (2017) Human‐to‐human transmission of Brucella – a systematic review. Trop Med Int Health 22, 539-546.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
31 Nicoletti PL et al. (1967) Canine to human transmission of brucellosis. NY State J Med 67, 2886-2887.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
32 NSW Department of Primary Industries (2017) Brucellosis (Brucella suis) in dogs- guidelines for veterinarians. Government of New South Wales. https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/biosecurity/animal/humans/brucellosis-in-dogs/guidelines/brucellosis-in-dogs-vets (retrieved 24 April 2024)
33 Kneipp CC et al. (2023) Brucella suis in three dogs: presentation, diagnosis and clinical management. Aust Vet J 101, 133-141.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
![]() Catherine Kneipp has been a veterinary clinician since graduating with a Bachelor of Veterinary Science from The University of Queensland. Initially working in Australia and the UK, since 1992 Catherine has lived and worked in regional Queensland as a partner in a mixed animal practice in Goondiwindi. A general veterinary practitioner for over 35 years her chief interests lie in small animal medicine and surgery. She is currently completing research into Brucella suis brucellosis in dogs as a PhD student at The University of Melbourne. |
![]() Siobhan Mor is an interdisciplinary researcher and epidemiologist with a dual background in veterinary medicine and public health. A Fellow of the Australasian College of Tropical Medicine (ACTM), Siobhan has held academic appointments at Tufts University School of Medicine in the US (assistant professor, 2009–11), The University of Sydney School of Veterinary Medicine in Australia (senior lecturer, 2012–18) and The University of Liverpool Institute for Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences in the UK (professor, 2018 to present). She holds a joint appointment with the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) and is based full time in Nairobi, Kenya. |
![]() Anke Wiethoelter is an associate professor in veterinary epidemiology and One Health at the Melbourne Veterinary School with a research focus on infectious diseases at the wildlife–livestock–human interface and determinants of health behaviour. She teaches epidemiology, evidence-based practice, and One Health to both undergraduate and graduate students. |