Register      Login
Microbiology Australia Microbiology Australia Society
Microbiology Australia, bringing Microbiologists together
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The interplay between viruses and the immune system of bats

Stacey Leech A and Michelle L Baker A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia

B Tel: +61 3 5227 5052, Email: Michelle.Baker@csiro.au

Microbiology Australia 38(1) 30-32 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA17010
Published: 9 February 2017

Bats are an abundant and diverse group of mammals with an array of unique characteristics, including their well-known roles as natural reservoirs for a variety of viruses. These include the deadly zoonotic paramyxoviruses; Hendra (HeV) and Nipah (NiV)1,2, lyssaviruses3, coronaviruses such as severe acute respiratory coronavirus (SARS-CoV)4 and filoviruses such as Marburg5. Although these viruses are highly pathogenic in other species, including humans, bats rarely show clinical signs of disease whilst maintaining the ability to transmit virus to susceptible vertebrate hosts. In addition, bats are capable of clearing experimental infections with henipaviruses, filoviruses and lyssaviruses at doses of infection that are lethal in other mammals612. Curiously, the ability of bats to tolerate viral infections does not appear to extend to extracellular pathogens such as bacteria, fungi and parasites13. Over the past few years, considerable headway has been made into elucidating the mechanisms responsible for the ability of bats to control viral replication, with evidence for unique differences in the innate immune responses of bats1420. However, many questions remain around mechanisms responsible for the ability of bats to co-exist with viruses, including their ability to tolerate constitutive immune activation, the triggers associated with viral spillover events and the sites of viral replication. Although bats appear to have all of the major components of the immune system present in other species, their unique ecological characteristics (including flight, high density populations and migration) combined with their long co-evolutionary history with viruses has likely shaped their immune response resulting in an equilibrium between the host and its pathogens.


The availability of bat genome and transcriptome datasets from a number of bat species has accelerated the identification of key components of the immune system17,19,2125. These studies have also provided evidence for a link between flight and immunity with the inadvertent selection on key immune genes and pathways as a consequence of the evolution of flight19. Functional studies in vitro have demonstrated that differences in the innate immune system of bats play a key role in controlling viral replication. In particular, components of the interferon (IFN) system, including IFN-alpha (IFNα), IFN signalling molecules and IFN stimulated genes are constitutively expressed in unstimulated pteropid bat tissues and cells15,17. Although the IFN system provides the first line of defence against infection, bats are the only species known that constitutively activate their IFN response in the absence of infection, providing evidence that the baseline activation of the innate immune system of bats is considerably higher than that of other mammals. Presumably, the constitutive expression of IFN allows bats to avoid the lag time between infection and immune activation, thus providing a more immediate response. However, prolonged exposure to IFN is generally associated with pathological side effects in other species26. Elucidating how bats maintain IFNα expression in the absence of inflammation could therefore have important implications for treating viral infections in humans and other species. Clearly, much remains to be learned about the unique innate immune response of bats.

Much of what we know about the kinetics of the immune response of bats to viruses in vivo has been obtained from experimental infections. With the exception of rabies and lyssavirus infections, these experiments have demonstrated that bats rapidly clear infection with no clinical disease69,11,12,27,28. Experimental infections of bats with the henipaviruses; HeV and NiV have provided the most information to date regarding the kinetics of infection. Pteropid bats (Figure 1) infected with henipaviruses have detectible viral RNA in rectal and throat swabs from 2–7 days post infection (dpi) and in urine and blood samples collected after 7 dpi8. However, viremia is typically short and viral antigen is generally undetectable in tissues by 21 dpi8,11. Although antibody responses have been the only immune parameter measured (due partly to the lack of bat specific reagents) these studies have provided important evidence for the ability of bats to rapidly clear viral infections. Virus specific antibodies have been detected in wild caught bats indicating that they are capable of generating an antibody response2933. However, evidence from experimental infections have shown the development of neutralising antibodies is often delayed and some animals fail to generate an antibody response within the timeframe of the experiment8,11,12,27,28. This coupled with the constitutive activation of components of the innate immune system may mean that the adaptive immune response in bats is less critical. Much less is known about T cell mediated immunity in bats and no studies have examined T cell responses in experimentally infected bats. However, differences in the repertoire of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules and the self and HeV peptides they present already point to differences in T cell mediated responses to infection34,35. Thus, like the innate immune response, the cell mediated response may also have undergone changes associated with the long co-evolutionary history of bats with viruses.


Figure 1. Captive Pteropus alecto. (Photo courtesy of Susanne Wilson, CSIRO.)
F1

The fine balance between the immune system of bats and their viruses has presumably achieved an equilibrium that is able to support both the survival of the host and low level replication of the pathogen. Despite the seemingly high activation of the bat’s innate immune system, viruses have been isolated from naturally infected wild caught bats and spillover of viruses from bats to other susceptible species on an ongoing basis3,4,3638. Thus, viruses appear to be constantly circulating in bat populations at some level, either as a consequence of ongoing infections of naïve individuals, through oscillating herd immunity or though episodic shedding from persistently infected individuals39. Natural cycles driven by environmental (e.g. climate, food availability, human activity) and internal triggers (e.g. mating, birthing, lactation) have been hypothesised to dampen the bat’s immune response, leading to increased viral replication and consequently to increased spillover events3941. However, evidence to link specific physiological or ecological triggers with changes in immune responses and viral replication is currently lacking and considerable work is still required to fully understand the relationship between viruses and the ability of the immune response of bats to control replication. This information will lead to new insights for the prediction and prevention of spillover events and for the treatment of infectious diseases in humans and other species.



References

[1]  Eaton, B.T. et al. (2006) Hendra and Nipah viruses: different and dangerous. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 23–35.
Hendra and Nipah viruses: different and dangerous.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtlSqu7jE&md5=f3e7db3ba7cf2b86725ae2caa595a220CAS |

[2]  Anderson, D.E. and Marsh, G.A. (2015) Bat paramyxoviruses. In Bats and Viruses, pp. 99–126, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[3]  Kuzmin, I.V. and Rupprecht, C.E. (2015) Bat lyssaviruses. In Bats and Viruses, pp. 47–97, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[4]  Ge, X.-Y. et al. (2015) Bat coronaviruses. In Bats and Viruses, pp. 127–155, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[5]  Maganga, G.D. et al. (2015) Bat filoviruses. In Bats and Viruses, pp. 157–175, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[6]  Jones, M.E. et al. (2015) Experimental inoculation of Egyptian rousette bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) with viruses of the Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus genera. Viruses 7, 3420–3442.
Experimental inoculation of Egyptian rousette bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) with viruses of the Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus genera.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhslOqt7vO&md5=e4ecb174284ff96183a0a68a21ff1cc8CAS |

[7]  Middleton, D.J. et al. (2007) Experimental Nipah virus infection in Pteropid bats (Pteropus poliocephalus). J. Comp. Pathol. 136, 266–272.
Experimental Nipah virus infection in Pteropid bats (Pteropus poliocephalus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s3ovVWjsQ%3D%3D&md5=217ead7283446859807716ba754fa677CAS |

[8]  Halpin, K. et al. (2011) Pteropid bats are confirmed as the reservoir hosts of Henipaviruses: a comprehensive experimental study of virus transmission. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 85, 946–951.
Pteropid bats are confirmed as the reservoir hosts of Henipaviruses: a comprehensive experimental study of virus transmission.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[9]  Amman, B.R. et al. (2015) Oral shedding of Marburg virus in experimentally infected Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) J. Wildl. Dis. 51, 113–124.
Oral shedding of Marburg virus in experimentally infected Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus)Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Sétien, A.A. et al. (1998) Experimental rabies infection and oral vaccination in vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus). Vaccine 16, 1122–1126.
Experimental rabies infection and oral vaccination in vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Williamson, M.M. et al. (1998) Transmission studies of Hendra virus (equine morbilli-virus) in fruit bats, horses and cats. Aust. Vet. J. 76, 813–818.
Transmission studies of Hendra virus (equine morbilli-virus) in fruit bats, horses and cats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7jvVersg%3D%3D&md5=c433375e131a5f43e544ca60e1a9a6e5CAS |

[12]  Williamson, M.M. et al. (2000) Experimental Hendra virus infection in pregnant guinea-pigs and fruit bats (Pteropus poliocephalus). J. Comp. Pathol. 122, 201–207.
Experimental Hendra virus infection in pregnant guinea-pigs and fruit bats (Pteropus poliocephalus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ltVWjtA%3D%3D&md5=6c1d813c305376d52c7aebf7c39ec57dCAS |

[13]  Brook, C.E. and Dobson, A.P. (2015) Bats as ‘special’ reservoirs for emerging zoonotic pathogens. Trends Microbiol. 23, 172–180.
Bats as ‘special’ reservoirs for emerging zoonotic pathogens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXltVehug%3D%3D&md5=7923a438e35c409ff42faf171940ee32CAS |

[14]  Zhou, P. et al. (2013) Bat Mx1 and Oas1, but not Pkr are highly induced by bat interferon and viral infection. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 40, 240–247.
Bat Mx1 and Oas1, but not Pkr are highly induced by bat interferon and viral infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXosFOntLk%3D&md5=46be9f1e3c91730eea42ed608dbe04d3CAS |

[15]  Zhou, P. et al. (2014) IRF7 in the Australian black flying fox, Pteropus alecto: evidence for a unique expression pattern and functional conservation. PLoS One 9, e103875.
IRF7 in the Australian black flying fox, Pteropus alecto: evidence for a unique expression pattern and functional conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  He, X. et al. (2014) Anti-lyssaviral activity of interferon κ and ω from the Serotine bat, Eptesicus serotinus. J. Virol. 88, 5444–5454.
Anti-lyssaviral activity of interferon κ and ω from the Serotine bat, Eptesicus serotinus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXovVyiu74%3D&md5=58d644d70d0fc66d2ecc32499e5f6743CAS |

[17]  Zhou, P. et al. (2016) Contraction of the type I IFN locus and unusual constitutive expression of IFN-α in bats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2696–2701.
Contraction of the type I IFN locus and unusual constitutive expression of IFN-α in bats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XivVKjs74%3D&md5=a7ea507734793e042d456255e30440dbCAS |

[18]  Zhou, P. et al. (2011) Type III IFN receptor expression and functional characterisation in the Pteropid bat, Pteropus alecto. PLoS One 6, e25385.
Type III IFN receptor expression and functional characterisation in the Pteropid bat, Pteropus alecto.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtlCjsrzF&md5=3129ccaeb1cf43a25b04ded1f8c1307dCAS |

[19]  Zhang, G. et al. (2013) Comparative analysis of bat genomes provides insight into the evolution of flight and immunity. Science 339, 456–460.
Comparative analysis of bat genomes provides insight into the evolution of flight and immunity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtFyntLg%3D&md5=af54ea175aa3086aeeabb1377cc39cf6CAS |

[20]  Cowled, C. et al. (2011) Molecular characterisation of Toll-like receptors in the black flying fox Pteropus alecto. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 35, 7–18.
Molecular characterisation of Toll-like receptors in the black flying fox Pteropus alecto.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXht12ksbjN&md5=bd1d6cda8c5b37b0678c36dd5c616ba5CAS |

[21]  Papenfuss, A.T. et al. (2012) The immune gene repertoire of an important viral reservoir, the Australian black flying fox. BMC Genomics 13, 261.
The immune gene repertoire of an important viral reservoir, the Australian black flying fox.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xhslamu77O&md5=31d5513bde952797864fd659a153d2e0CAS |

[22]  Shaw, T.I. et al. (2012) Transcriptome sequencing and annotation for the Jamaican fruit bat (Artibeus jamaicensi). PLoS One 7, e48472.
Transcriptome sequencing and annotation for the Jamaican fruit bat (Artibeus jamaicensi).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhvVShs7vL&md5=aa185da150f4a0f89ec8df6aef4e1878CAS |

[23]  Glennon, N.B. et al. (2015) Transcriptome profiling of the virus-induced innate immune response in Pteropus vampyrus and its attenuation by Nipah virus interferon antagonist functions. J. Virol. 89, 7550–7566.
Transcriptome profiling of the virus-induced innate immune response in Pteropus vampyrus and its attenuation by Nipah virus interferon antagonist functions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhtFyntrfL&md5=b212d74ba627f2063fd51c384830f341CAS |

[24]  Wynne, J.W. et al. (2014) Proteomics informed by transcriptomics reveals Hendra virus sensitizes bat cells to TRAIL mediated apoptosis. Genome Biol. 15, 532.

[25]  Wynne, J.W. and Tachedjian, M. (2015) Bat Genomics. In Bats and Viruses, pp. 315-326, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[26]  Hertzog, P.J. and Williams, B.R. (2013) Fine tuning type I interferon responses. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 24, 217–225.
Fine tuning type I interferon responses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXot1Cit7k%3D&md5=701350fc286a81bcbbab68bc7a6e86c6CAS |

[27]  Turmelle, A.S. et al. (2010) Host immunity to repeated rabies virus infection in big brown bats. J. Gen. Virol. 91, 2360–2366.
Host immunity to repeated rabies virus infection in big brown bats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtF2rtbjK&md5=cea91cae885a5481e3f5ffa51896167bCAS |

[28]  McColl, K.A. et al. (2002) Pathogenesis studies with Australian bat lyssavirus in grey-headed flying foxes (Pteropus poliocephalus). Aust. Vet. J. 80, 636–641.
Pathogenesis studies with Australian bat lyssavirus in grey-headed flying foxes (Pteropus poliocephalus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jgtl2gsg%3D%3D&md5=882578e69495598d992aa30065d6b791CAS |

[29]  Li, W. et al. (2005) Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses. Science 310, 676–679.
Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtFChsLjO&md5=2f3ab2fa831dc1abfa767e4791a1848aCAS |

[30]  Halpin, K. et al. (2000) Isolation of Hendra virus from pteropid bats: a natural reservoir of Hendra virus. J. Gen. Virol. 81, 1927–1932.
Isolation of Hendra virus from pteropid bats: a natural reservoir of Hendra virus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXlsFOhtLo%3D&md5=bd671cee0260ddf9fdb92b1382328605CAS |

[31]  Leroy, E.M. et al. (2005) Fruit bats as reservoirs of Ebola virus. Nature 438, 575–576.
Fruit bats as reservoirs of Ebola virus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXht1GqsrfL&md5=5cc4e0b830510fc55cb7b1e55b64dd21CAS |

[32]  Machain-Williams, C. et al. (2013) Serologic evidence of flavivirus infection in bats in the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico. J. Wildl. Dis. 49, 684–689.
Serologic evidence of flavivirus infection in bats in the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[33]  Peel, A.J. et al. (2012) Henipavirus neutralising antibodies in an isolated island population of African fruit bats. PLoS One 7, e30346.
Henipavirus neutralising antibodies in an isolated island population of African fruit bats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhsFWjtbY%3D&md5=50c3a7ff6564a22a82668cf75ad3c31aCAS |

[34]  Ng, J.H.J. et al. (2016) Evolution and comparative analysis of the bat MHC-I region. Sci. Rep. 6, 21256.
Evolution and comparative analysis of the bat MHC-I region.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XisFWhsrg%3D&md5=8aee26dd1580c7bfcb0a57943c20a07bCAS |

[35]  Wynne, J.W. et al. (2016) Characterization of the antigen processing machinery and endogenous peptide presentation of a bat MHC class I molecule. J. Immunol. 196, 4468–4476.
Characterization of the antigen processing machinery and endogenous peptide presentation of a bat MHC class I molecule.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28Xot1ersrY%3D&md5=262915f6024dc7684e42b54fe65d05c3CAS |

[36]  Clayton, B.A. et al. (2013) Henipaviruses: an updated review focusing on the Pteropid reservoir and features of transmission. Zoonoses Public Health 60, 69–83.
Henipaviruses: an updated review focusing on the Pteropid reservoir and features of transmission.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38jislGqtg%3D%3D&md5=698365c40a44f99ce449b543d60917d5CAS |

[37]  Luby, S.P. et al. (2009) Recurrent zoonotic transmission of Nipah virus into humans, Bangladesh, 2001–2007. Emerg. Infect. Dis. J. 15, 1229.

[38]  Amman, B.R. et al. (2012) Seasonal pulses of Marburg virus circulation in juvenile Rousettus aegyptiacus bats coincide with periods of increased risk of human infection. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002877.
Seasonal pulses of Marburg virus circulation in juvenile Rousettus aegyptiacus bats coincide with periods of increased risk of human infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[39]  Plowright, R.K. et al. (2016) Transmission or within-host dynamics driving pulses of zoonotic viruses in reservoir–host populations. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 10, e0004796.
Transmission or within-host dynamics driving pulses of zoonotic viruses in reservoir–host populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[40]  Plowright, R.K. et al. (2008) Reproduction and nutritional stress are risk factors for Hendra virus infection in little red flying foxes (Pteropus scapulatus). Proc. Biol. Sci. 275, 861–869.
Reproduction and nutritional stress are risk factors for Hendra virus infection in little red flying foxes (Pteropus scapulatus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[41]  Baker, K.S. et al. (2014) Viral antibody dynamics in a chiropteran host. J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 415–428.
Viral antibody dynamics in a chiropteran host.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |


Biographies

Dr Michelle Baker is a Research Scientist at CSIRO’s Australian Animal Health Laboratory. Her research interests are in the area of host-pathogen interactions to emerging infectious diseases, with a focus on antiviral immunity in bats.

Dr Stacey Leech is a post-doctoral scientist within the comparative immunology team working at CSIRO Geelong where her current research utilises genome engineering tools to investigate the innate immunity of the Australian black flying fox (Pteropus alecto).