Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Microbiology Australia Microbiology Australia Society
Microbiology Australia, bringing Microbiologists together
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Microbial diversity and activity in caves

Eric M Adetutu and Andrew S Ball
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

School of Applied Sciences
RMIT University
PO Box 71
Vic 3083, Australia
Tel: +61 3 9925 7122
Fax: +61 3 9925 7110
Email: eric.adetutu@rmit.edu.au

Microbiology Australia 35(4) 192-194 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA14062
Published: 30 October 2014

In recent times, there have been renewed interests in cave ecosystems for both economic and scientific reasons. This is because caves can contain fossils, artifacts, Palaeolithic paintings, ancient markings in form of finger flutings and beautiful speleothems (mineral deposits). These features are attractive and their presence has led to an increase in the number of people visiting caves (tourism) with associated economic benefits to the cave management authorities and the communities in which these caves are located. Unfortunately some of these cave features are susceptible to microbial damage by indigenous and foreign microorganisms, with this risk being exacerbated by unregulated human visitation. Therefore understanding microbial diversity and activities in caves is essential for cave conservation, restoration, safe and sustainable cave tourism.


Why study cave microorganisms?

Different groups of microorganisms such as bacteria, archaea, viruses and fungi are found in caves. However, increased human access (tourism) and cave modifications for tourism purposes (pavements and lighting systems’ installation) can alter the natural microbial dynamics, introduce new microorganisms and change the caves’ microclimatic conditions1,2. These changes can result in extensive damage of cave features such as Palaeolithic paintings and finger flutings over time. High numbers of human visitations can lead to increased health risks to cave visitors and workers via increased microbial load and exposure to opportunistic cave pathogens3. Caves can also be sources of novel microorganisms and biomolecules such as enzymes and antibiotics that may be suitable for biotechnological purposes.


Tools for studying cave microorganisms

Different culture dependent and independent methods have been used to study cave microorganisms. Culture dependent methods involve the use of either normal or oligotrophic or specialised culture media. Samples obtained from sediments, walls, atmosphere and other cave surfaces can be plated directly, or from diluents, on oligotrophic media such as 1/100 strength nutrient agar (bacteria) or media such as Potato Dextrose Agar (fungi)4,5. Counting, purification and identification of microbial isolates can then be carried out. Direct counting of microorganisms without plating is also possible using microscopic techniques.

Culture independent tools used for cave microbiology (taxonomy and metabolism) include polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based fingerprinting methods (DGGE and T-RFLP), clone library construction, quantitative PCR assays (including those targeting functional genes of interest), sequencing and the use of stable isotope probing methods46. In recent times, next generation sequencing tools (NGS) on a variety of platforms such as Illumina, SOLiD, Ion Torrent PGM and Roche FLX 454 and associated bioinformatics have been applied to the study of cave microorganisms7. NGS Data are of greater depth and higher quality than those obtained with other methods, although database limitations (poorly curated and annotated with regards to cave microorganisms such as fungi) may limit their usefulness.


Microbial diversity of caves

Caves can be terrestrial or aquatic and are usually oligotrophic in nature (nutrient limited) although some may be rich in specific minerals naturally or due to exposure to nutrient-laden sources. Therefore, different caves will have different groups of microorganisms occupying varying ecological niches and alongside cave fauna and environmental factors such as CO2, temperature and organic matter content, define caves’ biotic activities (formation/alteration of cave structures and nutrient cycling) (Figure 1). Microorganisms found in caves can be indigenous to the caves or introduced by humans, animals, water flow and wind action.


Figure 1. Ecosystem sketch of the evolution of a cave wall. Note that the inner zone refers to the endokarst, the outer zone to the karstic massif and exokarst, and the black circle to the shared parameters22.
F1


Bacteria in caves

Caves contain a broad variety of bacteria belonging to the Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria. Proteobacteria appeared to be the major group detected through the use of PCR based molecular and NGS tools while most isolates from culture dependent assays belonged to Actinobacteria3,7,8. In open caves such as show caves, bacteria belonging to different genera such as Cyanobacter, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Micrococcus, Arthrobacter, Staphylococcus and Mycobacterium have been identified4. Some, like Cyanobacter are photoautotrophs found at the cave entrance or around light installations9. Others such as Pseudomonas and Bacillus are heterotrophs, degrading organic matter in the form of insects and animal droppings and extraneous matter. While these heterotrophic activities contribute to the biogeochemical cycle in caves, they can be a disadvantage in caves with Palaeolithic paintings (Figure 2). For example, the growth of bacterial species from genera such as Aminobacter, Erythrobacter and Norcardioides10 on pigments from Palaeolithic paintings and cave walls may damage these paintings over time.


Figure 2. Horse panel from the Hillaire chamber of the Chauvet Cave in Vallon-Pont-d’Arc, France showing a rhinoceros drawn 30,000 years ago (a)23, intact (b) and faded finger flutings (c) in Australian caves.
F2

In flooded or underwater caves, many bacterial groups playing different ecological roles have been detected. Bacterial activities in such caves range from organotrophic to chemolithotrophic activities. For example, in aquatic caves such as Nullarbor Caves (Australia) different bacteria genera such as Pseudomonas, Nitrospira, Cytophaga, Thioalcalovibrio and Flavobacterium have been detected11. Some of these microorganisms (Pseudomonas, Cytophaga and Flavobacterium spp) are organotrophs while others such as Thioalcalovibrio and Nitrospira spp are chemolithotrophs11. Chemosynthesis is especially prevalent in sealed caves with chemotrophs such as methanotrophs, methylotrophs and metal (iron, manganese and sulphur) oxidisers or reducers with species belonging to genera such as Thiobacillus, Sulfurospirillum, Methylomonas, Pantoea and Hyphomicrobium being detected12.


Fungi in caves

Although cave systems such as terrestrial caves are usually nutrient poor biotopes, they contain different groups of heterotrophic fungi that exist in the form of mycelia or spores. Over 500 genera of fungi, slime moulds and fungus-like taxa have been reported in caves worldwide13. These belong to different taxa such as Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Zygomycota, Mycetozoa, Oomycota and Chytridiomycota13. Ascomycota appears to be the most dominant group irrespective of whether culture dependent or independent tools have been used5,7. Commonly encountered genera include Aspergillus, Penicillium, Mucor, Fusarium and Cladosporium. In terms of pathogens, Histoplasma capsulatum (causes histoplasmosis in cavers) and Pseudogymoascus destructans14, which was formerly known as Geomyces destructans (causes the devastating white nose disease in bats) are famous examples although other opportunistic pathogens such as Trichosporon spp. and Microsporum gypseum (dermatophytes) are known3.

Cave fungi such as Trichurus, Fusarium and Cladosporium can function as decomposers of dead cave insects, fauna, animal, droppings and extraneous organic matter5,15. Some fungi such as Isaria farinosa are parasites of cave insects16 while others are food sources to cave invertebrates and protozoa. Fungi growing on cave surfaces alongside bacteria and archaea may be involved in speleothem formation13. Fungal solubilisation of the rocky substrata contributes to the caves’ inorganic nutrient pool17 and this process can severely damage rock art or Palaeolithic paintings. Fungal species such as Fusarium solani and Ochroconislascauxensis18 have being implicated in rock art damage; F. solani, colonisation of the famous Lascaux Cave Palaeolithic art being a good example9,17.


Other cave microbial groups

Archaea are also found in caves (although in lesser numbers) with members of the Euryarchaeota, Crenarchaeota, Thaumarchaeota, Korachaeota and Nanoarchaeota being detected. Either Euryarchaeota or Crenarchaeota appear to be the most dominant phyla in molecular (DGGE and NGS) assay results19,20. Some members of the Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota groups are heterotrophs while others are thought to be chemolithotrophs involved in the formation of iron and manganese oxides in mineral rich caves20. Some members of these groups alongside with bacteria and fungi are also involved in speleothem formation19.

Viruses are also found in caves and have become important given the recent outbreak of Ebola virus in some parts of the world. Most cave viruses of health concern are borne by bats (as reservoir hosts) from which these viruses can spread to cave visitors (animals and humans). Fruit bats are natural hosts of Marburg viruses (deadly haemorrhagic fever) while some African bats are hosts of the lethal Ebola virus with no known cure. Bat guano is rich in other viruses such as Adenoviruses, Astroviruses and herpesviruses21.

In conclusion, cave microorganisms are metabolically versatile and are able to acquire energy independently through photo- and chemo-autotrophic activities or through heterotrophic activities. Different microbial groups also interact or work co-operatively in the formation of cave features and as part of the biogeochemical cycle. Understanding these interactions in terms of microbial diversity and function is important for the maintenance of this unique ecosystem especially those that contain features of scientific, archaeological and tourist values. This will allow for sound assessment of the impact of human access on caves and health risks associated with cave visitations and is crucial for sustainable management of cave resources.



References

[1]  Pulido-Bosch, A. et al. (1997) Human impact in a tourist karstic cave (Aracena, Spain). Environ. Geol. 31, 142–149.
Human impact in a tourist karstic cave (Aracena, Spain).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Shapiro, J. and Pringle, A. (2010) Anthropogenic influences on the diversity of fungi isolated from caves in Kentucky and Tennessee. Am. Midl. Nat. 163, 76–86.
Anthropogenic influences on the diversity of fungi isolated from caves in Kentucky and Tennessee.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Jurado, V. et al. (2010) Pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms in caves. Int. J. Speleol. 39, 15–24.
Pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms in caves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Adetutu, E.M. et al. (2012) Bacterial community survey of sediments at Naracoorte Caves, Australia. Int. J. Speleol. 41, 137–147.
Bacterial community survey of sediments at Naracoorte Caves, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  Adetutu, E.M. et al. (2011) Phylogenetic diversity of fungal communities in areas accessible and not accessible to tourists in Naracoorte Caves. Mycologia 103, 959–968.
Phylogenetic diversity of fungal communities in areas accessible and not accessible to tourists in Naracoorte Caves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21642344PubMed |

[6]  Hutchens, E. et al. (2004) Analysis of methanotrophic bacteria in Movile Cave by stable isotope probing. Environ. Microbiol. 6, 111–120.
Analysis of methanotrophic bacteria in Movile Cave by stable isotope probing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhvV2rs7o%3D&md5=dcec4ebcb667be764e8af9417e27fe13CAS | 14756876PubMed |

[7]  Gherman, V.D. et al. (2014) An acidophilic bacterial-archaeal-fungal ecosystem linked to formation of ferruginous crusts and stalactites. Geomicrobiol. J. 31, 407–418.
An acidophilic bacterial-archaeal-fungal ecosystem linked to formation of ferruginous crusts and stalactites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhslWhsbbN&md5=2347802aea4090a9fc90e11cd2d22671CAS |

[8]  Groth, P.S. et al. (2001) Geomicrobiological study of the Grotta dei Cervi, Porto Badisco, Italy. Geomicrobiol. J. 18, 241–258.
Geomicrobiological study of the Grotta dei Cervi, Porto Badisco, Italy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXmvFKkurg%3D&md5=38e39754fbea98ef820daf4387401a8eCAS |

[9]  Saiz-Jimenez, C. (2012) Microbiological and environmental issues in show caves. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28, 2453–2464.
Microbiological and environmental issues in show caves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Schabereiter‐Gurtner, C. et al. (2004) Phylogenetic diversity of bacteria associated with Paleolithic paintings and surrounding rock walls in two Spanish caves (Llonin and La Garma). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 47, 235–247.
Phylogenetic diversity of bacteria associated with Paleolithic paintings and surrounding rock walls in two Spanish caves (Llonin and La Garma).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtFWgurs%3D&md5=310c703173a232e72dffff094278c292CAS | 19712338PubMed |

[11]  Holmes, A.J. et al. (2001) Phylogenetic structure of unusual aquatic microbial formations in Nullarbor caves, Australia. Environ. Microbiol. 3, 256–264.
Phylogenetic structure of unusual aquatic microbial formations in Nullarbor caves, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXkt1SisL4%3D&md5=ae9d546f07fd4dc2f127af29e6570b66CAS | 11359511PubMed |

[12]  Kumaresan, D. et al. (2014) Microbiology of Movile Cave—a chemolithoautotrophic ecosystem. Geomicrobiol. J. 31, 186–193.
Microbiology of Movile Cave—a chemolithoautotrophic ecosystem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXitlSjsbY%3D&md5=3ac90863b8b8442ee76a68865c90191dCAS |

[13]  Vanderwolf, K.J. et al. (2013) A world review of fungi, yeasts, and slime molds in caves. Int. J. Speleol. 42, 77–96.
A world review of fungi, yeasts, and slime molds in caves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Minnis, A.M. and Lindner, D.L. (2013) Phylogenetic evaluation of Geomyces and allies reveals no close relatives of Pseudogymnoascus destructans, comb. nov., in bat hibernacula of eastern North America. Fungal Biol. 117, 638–649.
Phylogenetic evaluation of Geomyces and allies reveals no close relatives of Pseudogymnoascus destructans, comb. nov., in bat hibernacula of eastern North America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24012303PubMed |

[15]  Jurado, V. et al. (2008) Entomogenous fungi and the conservation of the cultural heritage: a review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 62, 325–330.
Entomogenous fungi and the conservation of the cultural heritage: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Bastian, F. et al. (2009) The impact of arthropods on fungal community structure in Lascaux Cave. J. Appl. Microbiol. 106, 1456–1462.
The impact of arthropods on fungal community structure in Lascaux Cave.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzgsVejug%3D%3D&md5=f124127273ee51cb514865538e75404cCAS | 19210566PubMed |

[17]  Bastian, F. et al. (2010) The microbiology of Lascaux Cave. Microbiology 156, 644–652.
The microbiology of Lascaux Cave.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXktFOks7k%3D&md5=d3c4c7ee817c0610849bcc4e983e5772CAS | 20056706PubMed |

[18]  Martin-Sanchez, P.M. et al. (2012) Use of biocides for the control of fungal outbreaks in subterranean environments: the case of the Lascaux Cave in France. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 3762–3770.
Use of biocides for the control of fungal outbreaks in subterranean environments: the case of the Lascaux Cave in France.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XjtVGhs70%3D&md5=70ca281eea7d0a186e595dbad84075acCAS | 22380699PubMed |

[19]  Legatzki, A. et al. (2011) Bacterial and archaeal community structure of two adjacent calcite speleothems in Kartchner Caverns, Arizona, USA. Geomicrobiol. J. 28, 99–117.
Bacterial and archaeal community structure of two adjacent calcite speleothems in Kartchner Caverns, Arizona, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Northup, D.E. et al. (2003) Diverse microbial communities inhabiting ferromanganese deposits in Lechuguilla and Spider Caves. Environ. Microbiol. 5, 1071–1086.
Diverse microbial communities inhabiting ferromanganese deposits in Lechuguilla and Spider Caves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14641587PubMed |

[21]  Li, L. et al. (2010) Bat guano virome: predominance of dietary viruses from insects and plants plus novel mammalian viruses. J. Virol. 84, 6955–6965.
Bat guano virome: predominance of dietary viruses from insects and plants plus novel mammalian viruses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtVWls7vM&md5=260a572f647588128aac8ceebd77b161CAS | 20463061PubMed |

[22]  Lacanette, D. et al. (2013) A laboratory cave for the study of wall degradation in rock art caves: an implementation in the Vézère area. J. Archaeol. Sci. 40, 894–903.
A laboratory cave for the study of wall degradation in rock art caves: an implementation in the Vézère area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Valladas, H. et al. (2001) Palaeolithic paintings: evolution of prehistoric cave art. Nature 413, 479.
Palaeolithic paintings: evolution of prehistoric cave art.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXnsFyisbs%3D&md5=c4487f0ab9cb88ab8237803d5abc59b6CAS | 11586348PubMed |


Biographies

Dr Eric Adetutu is a Research Fellow at RMIT, University. He obtained his PhD from the University of Essex, UK. His research interests include microbiology of extreme environments (including caves), rumen microbiology, bioremediation and the application of next generation sequencing tools to the study of pristine and disturbed environments.

Professor Ball is a graduate of Liverpool University in the UK (BSc, 1983; PhD, 1986). He has been working in the field of environmental microbiology since 1983 with a focus on biogeochemical cycling and the degradation of pollutants in the environment. Professor Ball currently teaches in the fields of environmental microbiology and biotechnology in the School of Applied Science, RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia. He is also Director of the Centre for Environment, Sustainability and Remediation (EnSuRe) at RMIT University.