Register      Login
Microbiology Australia Microbiology Australia Society
Microbiology Australia, bringing Microbiologists together
RESEARCH ARTICLE

History and eradication of smallpox in Turkey

Osman Şadi Yenen
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

İstanbul University
İstanbul Medical Faculty
Department of Medical Microbiology
Çapa, İstanbul, Turkey
Email: yenen@istanbul.edu.tr

Microbiology Australia 35(3) 156-164 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA14054
Published: 8 September 2014

Turkey has played a prominent role for the Western World in the prevention of disease from two different angles. The first is the İstanbul connection from where the variolation originated. The Ankara connection, on the other hand, provided the source for the modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara (MVA) as both the third generation smallpox vaccine and the recombinant vector for modern day vaccine development. In this article, the history of disease and eradication efforts both in the Ottoman Empire and in the Republic era of Turkey will be discussed with an emphasis on the worldwide significance of İstanbul and Ankara connections in the history of smallpox.


During the 600 years of Ottoman history smallpox was ever-present alongside other epidemics such as plague and cholera. The proximity of the Anatolian plateau to South-western Asia and major trade routes where it is believed to have originated from was probably the reason for its presence in Asia Minor since ancient times. Written records before the 15th Century are scarce and details of the disease in the Empire remain under-documented. Even after the 15th Century, record-keeping was inadequate due to a lack of understanding of infectious disease control and its importance in public health. The Ottoman Empire was represented at the First International Sanitary Conference in Paris (1851), which ended without any successful resolution to disease control. At the 13th International Sanitary Conference (1926), smallpox and typhus were recognised as diseases to be controlled with quarantine measures1. Most documents related to the disease in the empire date back to 19th Century. While disease prevention and Jenner type vaccination started during the collapse of the empire, full eradication occurred only after the foundation of the Republic of Turkey.


Causative agent and short history

The causative agent of smallpox is the variola virus (Orthopoxvirus) within the family Poxviridae. Genomic studies indicate the presence of two or three different clades of the virus2. The date of origin of the virus is unknown. Although disease-indicating scars were detected on Egyptian mummies, the virus itself has never been identified3. So far the only molecular evidence for the existence of the virus was detected in 300-year-old Siberian mummies. Further analysis indicated the roots of the virus date back to 928 AD4; however, some historians take the origin back to 10,000 BC, speculating on its possible relationship with the cowpox virus5. On the other hand, Gubser and Smith6, following their studies on the DNA analysis of the virus, revealed a relationship between the virus and the camelpox virus: possibly these two viruses originated from the same ancestor. Babkin and Babkina7 suggested that the taterapox, camelpox and variola viruses originated from the same ancestor around the Horn of Africa and spread to East Africa through camel movements dating back 3500 years.

Manifesting itself with fever and flaky skin, the disease has four different clinical types: ordinary; (vaccine) modified; flat; and hemorrhagic smallpox2. Strains resulting in varying degrees of manifestation have been identified as (i) the variola major resulting in 10–30% in death and (ii) the variola minor that results in <1% in death. Historical records show diseases similar to smallpox were transmitted by ancient Egyptians to Hittites (1350 BC), from there to Iran (430 BC), to Sicily (395 AD) and to China (48–49 AD), from Mesopotamia to Rome (165 AD) and from China to Korea (583 AD) and finally from Korea to Japan in 585 AD8. However, difficulties encountered in those days in distinguishing between diseases showing similar symptoms render the records vague in relation to smallpox. The first clinically valid record for distinguishing between smallpox and measles was achieved by the Iranian physician El-Razi (910 AD)9 (Box 1), who considered smallpox as a form of coagulation in children’s blood.

Box 1. Excerpts from Rhazes’ Smallpox and Measles Treatise9


Smallpox repeatedly arrived in Anatolia through the crusades (1096–1291) and spread through trade routes crossing the great Sahara and reaching East and West African ports10. In the early 16th Century, it became widespread in most European cities and with the first explorers it spread to Americas, Australia and Africa. With the Spanish conquistadors it was transmitted to the native population of Cuba and Hispaniola (today’s Dominican Republic) resulting in the extermination of the Aztecs and Incas. These epidemics also resulted in the loss of work-force and subsequent introduction of African slaves in Americas11. The Spanish and Portuguese, respectively, introduced the disease to Chile in 1554 and to Brazil in 1555. It was introduced to North America by the British in 1617 with serious consequences to American Indian populations. The disease was reported in South Africa in 1713, in Australia in 1872, New Zealand and Pacific Islands from 1872 onwards, thus becoming a problem worldwide8,12,13.

Following the 1953 proposal of Dr Brock Chisholm, General Secretary, WHO and the 1958 call by USSR delegation member Victor Zhdanov, WHO initiated a global eradication campaign in 1967. With the last case reported in October 1977 it was declared eradicated (reviewed in Fenner et al.8 and Henderson14) and the final report of the Global Commission, WHO for the Certification of Smallpox Eradication confirmed these results (1979). The final declaration was made by the World Health Assembly at the Geneva Meeting (1980) to the health ministers of all participant countries. Today limited amounts of variola strains are kept in two different WHO collaborative reference centres: (i) Centre for Diseases Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA, USA); and (ii) The State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology (moved from Moscow to Novosibirsk, Russia after 1994)8,15.


Smallpox prevention: variolation and vaccination

Variolation (or inoculation; during the 18th Century these two terms were used interchangeably) technique was based on the observation that the patients had gained immunity against a second infection. In ancient China, powdered variola crusts were used to infect healthy individuals via nasal inoculations or insufflations. In ancient India, intradermal inoculations of lesion material were practised. Although information prior to 1550 was reported to be speculative by Boylston16, in the Ottoman Empire similar practices to those in India were used (see below). Vaccination, on the other hand, was derived from the observation that human beings gained immunity against smallpox after exposure to cowpox. Materials taken from cowpox lesion were inoculated intradermally to healthy people. Similar administrations were carried out in England on a popular level, which was later given a scientific basis by Edward Jenner in 1796 (reviewed in Boylston16 and Bazin17).


Smallpox and variolation in Ottoman times

The evidence of disease existence near Anatolia dates back to the Elephant War (570 AD). The arrival of the disease in Constantinople dates back to 12th Century and important evidence can be found in the poem of Theodore Prodromos:

The body is heated violently through with extraordinary torches from the fever… little by little [the pimples] gradually on the seventh day become murderous pustules. Have you ever seen a violent shower of rain coming down on a lake, how the entire surface of the lake swells up on account of the closely packed bubbles? (cited in Hopkins18, p. 27)

Evidence of the application of inoculation technique in Ottoman Empire can be found in the letters of two Greek Physicians. These two letters written by Emanuel Timonis (born in Chios, Greece of Italian parents; family physician to the British Ambassador to the Porte, Sir Robert Sutton, and to his successor, Lord Edward Wortley Montagu); and Jacob Pylarini (a native of Cephalonia and a graduate of Padua in both law and medicine, previously, physician to Tsar Peter the Great in Russia, practised in İstanbul and served as Venetian Consul at Smyrna) were presented to the British Royal Society19. Both physicians witnessed the application of inoculation technique, and also administered it themselves during the smallpox outbreak in Constantinople in 1701. Also, Timonis later sent a communication to the Royal Society for the meeting in May 1714, describing in detail how to collect variola crust, when to sample, how to preserve and apply20 (Box 2).

Box 2. Excerpts from Emanuel Timonis’ Communication read by John Woodward20


According to Pylarini, the inoculation technique was introduced to Constantinople by a Greek lady in 1660 that was welcomed by the Christian population, yet declined by the Moslem population of the city due to their belief21:

The Turks alone, so addicted are they to their predestinarian notions, and so riveted to ancient prejudices, neglect to reap any advantage from it.

Despite these early communications, European interest in the inoculation technique in Ottoman Empire was achieved after the efforts of Lady Montagu, Dr Charles Maitland and Sir Hans Sloane in Britain (see below). On the other hand, the technique was used to apply partly in the Empire by the Moslem population22 (Box 3). The Ottoman Court also endured the disease including the sultans themselves as did their children and wives. Sultans Ahmet I (1604), Ahmet III (1708) and Abdülmecid (before 1839) all had the disease23. Daughters of Murad III (1599) and Abdülhamid I (1782) and the sons of Mustafa III (1771) and Mahmut (1825) both died of the disease although the sons of Abdülhamid I and Mahmut both survived the infection (including the crown prince Mehmet Nusret)18,23,24. Such information indicates the lack of any inoculation practice in the Ottoman Court although it was practised in other parts of the Empire.

Box 3. Excerpts from Patrick Russel’s communication22


Smallpox was experienced in İstanbul as an epidemic in 1701, 1706, 1825 (extension of the European pandemic between 1824–1829), 1845, 1871 and 1877–1878 as well as small outbreaks of 1881, 1887, 1890, 1891, 1894, 1908, 1809 and 1923. Istanbul had always been the most crowded city of the Empire and most epidemics hit this city first, although outbreaks occurred haphazardly in provincial towns from time to time (e.g. 1847–1887)25. The first records of inoculation practice in the Ottoman Court derives from the palace physician İsmail Pasha’s lithographic book Menafiül’etfal (Benefits for Children)23,25. In this book, an Anatolian man arrives in İstanbul in 1679 and applies the inoculation technique to children.

The inoculation technique spread with the Seljuks (1055) from the Caucasus region to Asia Minor and subsequently passed on to Ottomans23. The technique was mostly applied by house women who dried samples of variola crusts inside walnut shells, which were applied to healthy individuals inter-dermally after re-suspension using rose water in May (Figure 1). Inoculation needles and implements have also been through series of changes, used also for vaccination, and the current design bifurcated needle was introduced in 1965 (reviewed in Baxby26).


Figure 1. (a) Vaccinator’s bag of collection for vaccine material, rosewater bottle and walnut shells used to hydrate dried vaccine material, (b) ivory vaccination needle, or vaccine pen (19th Century) (Courtesy of Prof. Dr İlter Uzel).
Click to zoom


The İstanbul Connection

British interest in the inoculation technique dates back to the appointment of Lord Edward Wortley Montagu as the Extraordinary Ambassador to Constantinople in 1716. His wife Lady Montagu was already a victim and carried scars on her face (1715): she had also lost his brother to the disease (1713). A keen observer and a writer, Lady Montagu first mentioned the inoculation technique to her friend Sarah Chiswell (who later died of the disease in 1726), in her letter posted from Adrianople on the way to Constantinople (1717)18,27 (Box 4). Following her observations in Constantinople, she got her 5-year-old son inoculated with the support of the Embassy doctor Maitland (1718)28. On her return to England, she also got her 3-year-old daughter inoculated during the 1721 epidemic in England. This application was the first example of the inoculation technique in Britain, generating interest widely among aristocrats. To test the safety of the inoculation technique before it was given to the daughter of Prince of Wales, Princess Caroline, six prisoners from Newgate were inoculated with the virus and the success of the application led to the release of these prisoners2830.

Box 4. Excerpts from Lady Montagu’s letters27


Upon these trials, and several others in private families, the late queen, then princess of Wales… sent for me to ask my opinion of the inoculation of the princesses. I told her Royal highness, that by what appeared in the several assays, it seemed to be a method to secure people from the great dangers attending that distemper in the natural way. (Sloane and Birch31)

Princess Caroline, following her successful inoculation, also had her 11- (Amelia) and 9- (Caroline) year-old daughters inoculated.


Smallpox and vaccination in Ottoman and Republic era of Turkey

Due to lack of interest in the inoculation technique at the Ottoman Court applications were conducted regionally. Jenner’s definition of vaccination (An Inquiry into the Causes and Effects of the Variolae Vacciniae, or Cow-pox, 179832) was generated in the western medical environment of inoculation17,33. His book titled Inquiry was printed in England in multiple copies from 1798 and new copies were also produced in Geneva, Hannover and Wien. Reprints of the original article were in free circulation as well translations in various languages allowing the method to be introduced in many countries17. The Ottomans first read Inquiry in 1801, as Giuseppe Marchal’s Italian text was translated into Turkish by Mustafa Behçet Efendi with the title Risale-i Telkih-i Bakari25,34. Subsequently, in 1811, Şanizade Ataullâh Efendi conducted a series of tests on his farm animals at Ayasağa and made a number of recommendations to Sultan Mahmut II such as a new vaccination centre and mass vaccinations while dedicating a chapter of his book to this practice23. Vaccination might have been known to the Ottomans since 1810, however, Sultan Abdülmecid (born 1823, died 1861) had caught smallpox in infancy and this was probably the reason why caution was exercised in his administration. According to Walsh35, the first instance of vaccination was at the time of Sultan Mahmut II, who allowed it to be administered to his children (by a French physician) after the death of his the eldest son in 1825, hence its acceptance by the rest of his subjects. Initially, imported vaccines were used throughout the empire however small amounts from Europe were insufficient to meet the demand and vaccination teams preserved quality lesion material after successful vaccinations of upper class children25. In fact, the first vaccination took place at the British Embassy in İstanbul, as a Swiss man, Jean de Carro, had secured a small amount of Italian vaccination material, which was taken to İstanbul by some friends of the British Ambassador (Thomas Bruce; Lord Elgin) and administered to the children at the Embassy in December 180028. Vaccination material supplied by de Carro reached as far as Bombay via Greece and Bagdad17.

The first imperial decree regarding smallpox vaccine was issued on 20 May 184023. Religious concerns expressed in Europe earlier36,37 were also voiced in İstanbul at this time and only after a fatwa by the Şeyhülislam declaring vaccination permissible according to the Islamic law, large-scale vaccination campaigns started at no cost to the public23. Regardless, vaccine production did not start until 1872, and imported vaccine material was administered only on critical population segments such as military cadets or in cases of emergency, by vaccination teams from İstanbul25. Vaccination professionals were trained at the School for Vaccinators within the vaccine production centre from 17 May 1898, which graduated 319 professional vaccinators until 190323. By 1910 village school teachers and midwives were also admitted to this school and its name was later changed to Minor Health Officers School as minor surgery operations also became part of the school’s curriculum. Despite interruptions to the program, the school stayed in existence until 1950s and trained countless vaccinators23.

The Ottoman Empire made it an obligatory vaccine for children of school age and the Regulation on Smallpox Vaccination of 8 July 1885 denied school registration to those unable to produce any proof of vaccination. The second Regulation on Smallpox Vaccination of 21 July 1894 also dictated that newborns be vaccinated within six months of birth23. Updates to the regulation were incorporated in 1904 and 1915 increasing the number of vaccinations for an individual to 3 by age 19. The common practice of human to human vaccination (variolation) also became strictly prohibited23. Despite regulatory effort, the administration of smallpox vaccine hardly reached all corners of the empire, and a report titled Reconstruction in Turkey by the American Committee of Armenian and Syrian Relief in 1918 confirms the lack of systematic campaigns: ‘Vaccination is practised in larger towns and cities and in the army. Only in the army is it systematically carried out.’35 (cited in Özdemir38, p. 224). After the foundation of the Republic, the Public Health Bill came into force (24 April 1930) and made smallpox vaccination obligatory for all citizens23.

The Ottoman production of smallpox vaccine started with the reopening of The Imperial Vaccine Production Centre (Telkihane) in 1892 in 1892 and domestic production was distributed all over the country bringing an end to imported vaccines25. An inspectorate was established in 1890–1891 and Colonel Hüseyin Rahmi Bey became the first vaccine inspector (Figure 2). Later in 1894, the vaccine production centre was allocated a proper building during senior Inspector Remzi Bey’s time (1895–97). After his death in 1896, the production centre directors were Dr Hasan Zühtü Nazif Bey (1896–1897) and Dr Rifat Hüsamettin Pasha (1897–1913) respectively24.


Figure 2. Cover page of the Servet-i Fünun magazine published on 17 November 1892. Hüseyin Remzi Bey (in the middle) and Telkihane staff are seen together with the calf used at the centre for vaccine production (courtesy of Volkan Gülçek).
F2

After the Young Turk Revolution of 1908, it became the ‘Ottoman Vaccination Centre’23. In the years following, the centre directors were Dr Kemal Muhtar Bey (1913–1920), Dr Rifat Hüsamettin Pasha again (1920–1922), Dr Kemal Muhtar Bey again (February 1922 to September 1922), Dr Şerafettin Mustafa (in the Republican era Dr Şerafettin Mustafa Kam) (1923–1934). Between 1892 and 1913 a total of 7,260,784 tubes; and between 1914 and 1919 a total number of 27,688,449 tubes of vaccine were produced at this centre. During the War of Independence, The Red Crescent transported vaccines from this production centre to Anatolia; 566,000 in 1920, 1,770,000 in 1921 and 1,283,000 tubes in 1922 respectively. Between 1892 and 1923 inoculation viruses for vaccines were imported from Paris39 even though information regarding the doses contained is unavailable. Vaccine standardisation until the 1960s was unknown; and in this period, 10-dose-tubes or 250 (5 mL) and 500 (10 mL) dose bottles were in circulation39.

The Vaccine Production Centre moved to Ankara in 1934 and the production continued under supervisions of Dr Şerafettin Mustafa Kam (1934–1936), Dr Niyazi Erzin (1936–1942), Dr Nusret Fişek (1942–1947), Prof. Dr Zühdi Berke (1947–1962), Dr Elhan Özlüarda (1962–1977) and virologist Çiğdem Artuk until the production ended in 1981 (Mustafa Hacıömeroğlu, personal communication, 2004)24. Vaccine production occurred also elsewhere in the empire such as Mecca, Basra, Sana’a, Bagdad and Damascus, and in Sivas, a production centre for rabies and smallpox vaccine was also established24. However, these centres were short-lived and the main centre for production remained İstanbul. After the foundation of the Republic in 1923, records regarding smallpox improved considerably: the official number of infected cases and resulting deaths are provided in Table 1.


Table 1. The number of infected cases and resulting deaths during Republican Era.
T1

As a result, between 1925–1957 a total of 27,755 infected cases and 4039 deaths were reported38,40,41. No smallpox infection was seen in Turkey after 1957 and the vaccine production came to an end in 1981 (Çiğdem Artuk, personal communication, 2004).


The Ankara Connection

As mentioned above, following the eradication of smallpox, only two collaborative reference centres recognised by WHO are officially entitled to hold live variola strains, however it is not known whether unauthorised laboratories have any holdings. Since the 1980s, smallpox vaccination has come to a stop but the majority of the world population is not immune to smallpox, nor to cross-infection with animal orthopoxviruses and concerted efforts to specifically develop vaccines against smallpox and all poxviruses have intensified42. Limitations of space do not allow further details here but the Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara (MVA), which led to the development of (Imvamune®), a third generation vaccine will be explained. The origin of MVA dates back to the CVA dermovaccinia strain43, which was the cross strain of those obtained from donkeys and calves. Dr Şerafettin Mustafa (Kam) claimed to have produced these specific strains (maintained between donkeys and calves) first at İstanbul Vaccine Production Centre in 193244. For the maintenance of the vaccine strain donkeys and calves were used and during the eradication campaigns seed cultures were obtained from WHO (Elhan Özlüarda, personal communication, 2005). Fenner et al.8 indicates the use of the Paris strain for vaccine production in Turkey between 1968 to 1971. German researchers took the CVA dermovaccinia strain to Germany and started its passage in 1958 using chicken embryo fibroblast cultures43,45. After 300 passages changes in the plaque morphology of the strain were observed and at its 516th passage it was named MVA to differentiate it from other attenuated vaccine strains. The strain MVA was created as result of 574 dilution passage of the attenuated strain43,45.

Complete genomic sequence analysis of the strain has been carried out revealing circa 15% gene loss compared to the original genome46,47. MVA fails to replicate in human cells, which sets it apart from vaccinia virus. Thus, it poses no risk of spreading in or among the carriers, and gains importance in vaccine research as well as a vector delivery system48,49. In the 1970s, MVA was used in clinical trials and regardless of minor local or general reactions, the resulting standard vaccinia virus reduced the diameter of skin lesions proving to be safe for human use50. However, it should be stressed that this vaccine has not been tested against a major outbreak of smallpox so far. According to some writers5153 MVA vaccine was tested on over 100,000 individuals in Germany and in Turkey without any complications, yet information about its use in Turkey is awaiting confirmation (Elhan Özlüarda, personal communication, 2005)54,55. In Bayern, Germany, Gerner et al.56 also mention the administration of this vaccine to around 140,000 children in the mid-1970s but there is no confirmation that this vaccine, produced by the Bavarian Vaccine Institute, reached Turkey.


Conclusions

In her review of the Ottoman Physicians and Medical Sciences, Historian of Medicine, Sarı mentions the lack of data on the capabilities of the Ottomans in generating theory and their interest in the generation of new knowledge via research57. Most medical reports produced in the Ottoman era were based on medical practice rather than the philosophical background or clinical observations, which was also the case in dealing with smallpox throughout the empire. Ottoman medical circles had no interest, even at the level of intellectual curiosity, in inoculation that was applied widely among the Sultan’s subjects. Necessity led them to resort to vaccination as a novel technique in the 19th Century. Finally, due to the global quest for a better understanding of the nature of what causes the disease, they distanced themselves from Islamic traditions (Divine Wisdom) and Galenic understanding of diseases and for the first time in 1885 the vaccine was only applied to children23 whereas it was compulsory in many other countries long before it was applied in the Ottoman Empire (Bavaria, 1807; Denmark, 1810; Norway, 1811; Russia 1812)18. Although it is still unclear how German scientists obtained the strain that resulted in the development of the MVA, the Republican era of Turkey used contemporary scientific principles for disease prevention and eradication.



Acknowledgements

The author thanks Prof. Dr Zayre Erturan (İstanbul University, İstanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Microbiology) for translations from German to Turkish.


References

[1]  Schepin, O.P. and Yermakov, W.V. (1991) International Quarantine. (Translated from Russian by B. Meerovich and V. Bobrov). Connecticut, International Universities Press, Inc., pp. 1–344.

[2]  Damon, I.K. (2013) Poxviruses. In: Knipe, D. M. and Howley, P. M. (eds), Fields Virology, 6th edn. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 2160–2184.

[3]  McClain, C.S. (1997) A new look at an old disease: smallpox and biotechnology. In: Inhorn M. C. and Brown, P. J. (eds): The Anthropology of Infectious Disease. International Health Perspectives. Australia, Gordon and Breach Publishers, pp. 97–117.

[4]  Biagini, P. et al. (2012) Variola virus in a 300-year-old Siberian mummy. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 2057–2059.
Variola virus in a 300-year-old Siberian mummy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhslOitrnM&md5=bbeb561bdec9fd7d2b0566979ff29920CAS | 23171117PubMed |

[5]  McNeill, W.H. (1998) Plagues and Peoples. (Third edn) New York, Anchor Books Doubleday, pp. 35–93.

[6]  Gubser, C. and Smith, G.L. (2002) The sequence of camelpox virus shows it is most closely related to variola virus, the cause of smallpox. J. Gen. Virol. 83, 855–872.
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XislGhsLo%3D&md5=197e828208a4b2d213dae0394ab0a872CAS | 11907336PubMed |

[7]  Babkin, I.V. and Babkina, I.N. (2012) A retrospective study of the orthopoxvirus molecular evolution. Infect. Genet. Evol. 12, 1597–1604.
A retrospective study of the orthopoxvirus molecular evolution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22878096PubMed |

[8]  Fenner, F. et al. (1998) Smallpox and its eradication. Geneva, World Health Organization, pp. 209–244.

[9]  Rhazes (Abu Becr Mohammed ibn Zacariya Ar-Razi) (1848) A Treatise on the Small-Pox and Measles. (Translated from the Original Arabic by William Alexander Greenhill). London, Printed for The Sydenham Society 1848 (reprinted in 2013), pp. 29, 94.

[10]  Oldstone, M.B.A. (1998) Viruses, Plagues, & History. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 27–44.

[11]  Watts, S. (1997) Epidemics and History. Disease, Power and Imperialism. New Haven, Yale University Press, pp. 84–121.

[12]  Barquet, N. and Domingo, P. (1997) Smallpox: the triumph over the most terrible of the ministers of death. Ann. Intern. Med. 127, 635–642.
Smallpox: the triumph over the most terrible of the ministers of death.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2svmtVentg%3D%3D&md5=c09d205058e6cb3425b1f0391710ae82CAS | 9341063PubMed |

[13]  Ligon, B.L. (2001) Smallpox: its history and re-emergence as a weapon of biological warfare. Semin. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 12, 71–80.
Smallpox: its history and re-emergence as a weapon of biological warfare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Henderson, D.A. (2009) Smallpox The Death of A Disease. New York, Prometheus Books, pp. 1–334.

[15]  Institute of Medicine (2009) Live Variola Virus: Considerations for Continuing Research. Washington, DC, The National Academies Press, pp. 1–151.

[16]  Boylston, A.W. (2012) Defying Providence Smallpox and the Forgotten 18th Century Medical Revolution. North Charleston, SC, Create Space Independent Publishing Platform, pp. 1–282.

[17]  Bazin, H. (2000) The Eradication of Smallpox. Edward Jenner and The First and Only Eradication of a Human Infectious Disease. London, Academic Press, pp. 1–246.

[18]  Hopkins, D.R. (2002) The Greatest Killer: Smallpox in History. Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–380 (Originally published as Princes and Peasants: Smallpox in History by The University of Chicago Press in 1983)

[19]  Poulakou-Rebelakou, E. and Lascaratos, J. (2003) Emmanuel Timonis, Jacobus Pylarinus and inoculation. J. Med. Biogr. 11, 181–182.
| 12870046PubMed |

[20]  Timonius, E. and Woodward, J. (1714) An account, or history, of the procuring the smallpox by incision, or inoculation; as it has for some time been practised at Constantinople. Being the extract of a letter from Emanuel Timonius, Oxon. & Patav. M.D. S.R.S dated at Constantinople, December, 1713. Phil Trans 29, 72–82.
An account, or history, of the procuring the smallpox by incision, or inoculation; as it has for some time been practised at Constantinople. Being the extract of a letter from Emanuel Timonius, Oxon. & Patav. M.D. S.R.S dated at Constantinople, December, 1713.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Pylarini, J. (1716) A new and safe method of communicating the small-pox by inoculation, lately invented and brought into use. Translated and abridged from the Latin. In: Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. from their commencement, in 1665, to the year 1800, Abridged, Vol. VI from 1713 to 1723. London, L & R Baldwin, 1809: 207–210.

[22]  Russell, P. and Russell, A. (1768) An account of inoculation in Arabia, in a letter from Dr. Patrick Russell, physician, at Aleppo, to Alexander Russell, M.D., F.R.S. proceeded by a letter from Dr. Alexander Russell to the Earl of Morton. P.R.S. Phil. Trans. 58, 140–150.
An account of inoculation in Arabia, in a letter from Dr. Patrick Russell, physician, at Aleppo, to Alexander Russell, M.D., F.R.S. proceeded by a letter from Dr. Alexander Russell to the Earl of Morton. P.R.S.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Yıldırım, N. (2010) A History of Healthcare in İstanbul. Düzey Matbaacılık, İstanbul, pp. 70–77.

[24]  Unat, E.K. (1970) Osmanlı İmparatorluğunda Bakteriyoloji ve Viroloji. İstanbul Üniversitesi Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Yayınları İstanbul, pp. 17–30.

[25]  Ünver, A.S. (1948) An outlook on the history of smallpox vaccination during the last century and a half in Turkey and in the whole world. In: Ünver A. S. (Ed) Türkiye’de Çiçek Aşısı veTarihi [An outlook on the history of smallpox vaccination]. İstanbul Üniversitesi Tıp Tarihi Enstitüsü Yayını Yayın No: 38 İstanbul, pp. 279–288.

[26]  Baxby, D. (2002) Smallpox vaccination techniques; from knives and forks to needles and pins. Vaccine 20, 2140–2149.
Smallpox vaccination techniques; from knives and forks to needles and pins.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11972983PubMed |

[27]  Montagu, M.W. (1717) The Turkish Embassy Letters. Introduction: Dessai A, and Text edited and annotated Jack M. Virago Press, London 2011 (13rd reprinted from 1994’s edition), pp. 1–190.

[28]  Behbehani, A.M. (1983) The smallpox story: life and death of an old disease. Microbiol. Rev. 47, 455–509.
| 1:STN:280:DyaL2c7hslWlsQ%3D%3D&md5=89ec1753a8aa71b7a319dcb466e6e528CAS | 6319980PubMed |

[29]  Huth, E. (2006) Quantitative evidence for judgments on the efficacy of inoculation for the prevention of smallpox: England and New England in the 1700s. J. R. Soc. Med. 99, 262–266.
Quantitative evidence for judgments on the efficacy of inoculation for the prevention of smallpox: England and New England in the 1700s.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16672762PubMed |

[30]  Silverstein, A.M. (2009) A History of Immunology. (Second edn). London, Academic Press, pp. 291–303.

[31]  Sloane, H. and Birch, T. (1755–1756) An account of inoculation by Sir Hans Sloane, Bart. Given to Mr. Ranby, to be published, Anno 1736. Communicated by Thomas Birch, D. D. Secret. R. S. Phil Trans 49, 516–520.
An account of inoculation by Sir Hans Sloane, Bart. Given to Mr. Ranby, to be published, Anno 1736. Communicated by Thomas Birch, D. D. Secret. R. S.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[32]  Jenner, E. (1996) An Inquiry into the Causes and Effects of the Variolae Vacciniae, or Cow-pox 1798. In: Jenner, E (Ed.) Vaccination against Smallpox. New York, Prometheus Books Great Minds Series, pp. 13–40.

[33]  Boylston, A. (2013) The origins of vaccination: no inoculation, no vaccination. J. R. Soc. Med. 106, 395–398.
The origins of vaccination: no inoculation, no vaccination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24097964PubMed |

[34]  Dinç, G. and Ulman, Y.I. (2007) The introduction of variolation ‘A La Turca’ to the West by Lady Mary Montagu and Turkey’s contribution to this. Vaccine 25, 4261–4265.
The introduction of variolation ‘A La Turca’ to the West by Lady Mary Montagu and Turkey’s contribution to this.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17383778PubMed |

[35]  Walsh, R. (1836) A Residence at Constantinople. Vol II, Ch XI. London, Westley, F. and Davis, A. H., 300–302.

[36]  Baldwin, P. (1999) Contagion and the State in Europe 1830–1930. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 244–354.

[37]  Stone, A.F.M. and Stone, W.D. (2002) Lady Mary Wortley Montagu: medical and religious controversy following her introduction of smallpox inoculation. J. Med. Biogr. 10, 232–236.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38njtVGlsw%3D%3D&md5=02892a3b356fbb08c54d05204ba3ac7aCAS |

[38]  Özdemir, H. (2008) The Ottoman Army 1914–1918 Disease & Death on the Battlefield. Salt Lake City, The University of Utah Press, pp. 1–274.

[39]  Özlüarda, E. (1962) Çiçek aşısı istihsalinde kullanılan yeni metod ve aşı tatbikatında dikkat edilmesi gereken hususlar. Turk Hij. Tecr. Biyol. Derg. 22, 206–218.

[40]  Erzin, N. (1952) Türkiye’de çiçek. Turk Hij. Tecr. Biyol. Derg. 12, 138–142.

[41]  Özlüarda, E. et al. (1963) Memleketimizde 1962 yılında yapılan çiçeğe karşı kitle aşılaması ve elde edilen sonuçlar. Turk Hij. Tecr. Biyol. Derg. 23, 179–201.

[42]  Verardi, P.H. et al. (2012) A vaccinia virus renaissance: new vaccine and immunotherapeutic uses after smallpox eradication. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 8, 961–970.
A vaccinia virus renaissance: new vaccine and immunotherapeutic uses after smallpox eradication.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhsF2nsbjO&md5=51db5ceabf83f6678aca69458ca0f923CAS | 22777090PubMed |

[43]  Mayr, A. et al. (1975) Abstammung, Eigenschaften und Verwendung des attenuierten Vaccinia-Stammes MVA Infection 3, 6–14.
Abstammung, Eigenschaften und Verwendung des attenuierten Vaccinia-Stammes MVACrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[44]  Mustafa, Ş. (1948) Müdürü bulunduğum zamanda İstanbul telkihhanesinin kapanışına kadar metod ve çalışmalarımıza ve müessesenin Ankara’ya nakline dair. In: Ünver, A. S. (Ed): Türkiye’de Çiçek Aşısı ve Tarihi [An outlook on the history of smallpox vaccination]”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Tıp Tarihi Enstitüsü Yayını, Yayın No: 38 İstanbul, pp. 190–205.

[45]  Mayr, A. (2003) Smallpox vaccination and bioterrorism with pox viruses. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 26, 423–430.
Smallpox vaccination and bioterrorism with pox viruses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12818626PubMed |

[46]  Meyer, H. et al. (1991) Mapping of deletions in the genome of the highly attenuated vaccinia virus MVA and their influence on virulence. J. Gen. Virol. 72, 1031–1038.
Mapping of deletions in the genome of the highly attenuated vaccinia virus MVA and their influence on virulence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXksVarur8%3D&md5=16815de0b453c7c6b4165cfc4db7d846CAS | 2033387PubMed |

[47]  Antoine, G. et al. (1998) The complete genomic sequence of the modified vaccinia Ankara strain: comparison with other orthopoxviruses. Virology 244, 365–396.
The complete genomic sequence of the modified vaccinia Ankara strain: comparison with other orthopoxviruses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXjtFahsLY%3D&md5=7515b783ddd5942fb9da64f15c92a5aeCAS | 9601507PubMed |

[48]  McCurdy, L.H. et al. (2004) Modified vaccinia Ankara: potential as an alternative smallpox vaccine. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38, 1749–1753.
Modified vaccinia Ankara: potential as an alternative smallpox vaccine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15227622PubMed |

[49]  Gómez, C.E. et al. (2013) Clinical applications of attenuated MVA poxvirus strain. Expert Rev. Vaccines 12, 1395–1416.
Clinical applications of attenuated MVA poxvirus strain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24168097PubMed |

[50]  Stickl, H. et al. (1974) MVA-Stufenimpfung gegen Pocken. Klinische Erprobung des attenuierten Pocken-Leben-dimpfstoffes, Stamm MVA Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 99, 2386–2392.
MVA-Stufenimpfung gegen Pocken. Klinische Erprobung des attenuierten Pocken-Leben-dimpfstoffes, Stamm MVACrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE2M%2FjvVGktA%3D%3D&md5=e5d80ac528350a5d1eb0c8468b588656CAS | 4426258PubMed |

[51]  Blanchard, T.J. et al. (1998) Modified vaccinia virus Ankara undergoes limited replication in human cells and lacks several immunomodulatory proteins implications for use as a human vaccine. J. Gen. Virol. 79, 1159–1167.
| 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXivFOltb4%3D&md5=dfb7eb79a53c6d109d25068991e76bc6CAS | 9603331PubMed |

[52]  Rosenthal, S.R. et al. (2001) Developing new smallpox vaccines. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7, 920–926.
Developing new smallpox vaccines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnpvFWhtw%3D%3D&md5=9a9d0ec48758f5a4f7ebf6053e9f9505CAS | 11747717PubMed |

[53]  Whitley, R.J. (2003) Smallpox: a potential agent of bioterrorism. Antiviral Res. 57, 7–12.
Smallpox: a potential agent of bioterrorism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhs1Cnu7Y%3D&md5=49859a90c0638454cacf8cfbc912061eCAS | 12615298PubMed |

[54]  Onul, B. (1980) İnfeksiyon Hastalıkları. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Yayını, Sayı: 391 Ankara. 6. Basım, pp. 194–222.

[55]  Unat, E.K. (1982) Tıp Bakteriyolojisi ve Virolojisi. Dergâh Yayınları İstanbul, pp. 936–954.

[56]  Gerner, P. et al. (2003) Die Pocken. Prävention, Diagnose und Therapie einer ausgerotteten Erkrankung Monatsschr. Kinderheilkd. 151, 893–907.
Die Pocken. Prävention, Diagnose und Therapie einer ausgerotteten ErkrankungCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[57]  Sarı, N. (1999) Osmanlı hekimliği ve tıp bilimi (Ottoman Medical practice and Science). Yeni Tip Tarihi Arastirmalari 5, 11–68.


Biography

Prof. Osman Şadi Yenen (MD) is a graduate of İstanbul University, Medical Faculty (1974). Until 1997 he served as medical personnel in the Turkish Naval Forces, at Gülhane Military Medical Academy (GMMA), Ankara and at GMMA Teaching Hospital in İstanbul respectively as an expert of Infectious diseases and clinical microbiology. He was appointed as a full professor at the İstanbul University, Medical Faculty in 1997 and currently serves as a teaching academic at the Department of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology of the same faculty. He has over 100 peer-reviewed publications both in Turkish and English. He served as the secretary and the president of the Turkish Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (KLIMIK) and was the co-convener of the 11th European Congress on Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases held in İstanbul (ECMID 1–4 April 2001) as well as being part of the organisation of many international conferences took place in Turkey including the IUMS in 2008.