Register      Login
Invertebrate Systematics Invertebrate Systematics Society
Systematics, phylogeny and biogeography
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Taxonomic revision of the Taractrocera ilia (Waterhouse) complex (Lepidoptera : Hesperiidae) from north-western Australia and mainland New Guinea based on morphological and molecular data

Michael F. Braby A C and Andreas Zwick B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.

B The Australian National Insect Collection, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: michael.braby@anu.edu.au

Invertebrate Systematics 29(5) 487-509 https://doi.org/10.1071/IS15028
Submitted: 23 June 2015  Accepted: 4 September 2015   Published: 30 October 2015

Abstract

The taxonomy of the Taractrocera ilia complex is revised based on evidence from multiple sources, including phenotypic characters (wing colour pattern elements, morphology of adult and immature stages), ecology and molecular data. Three species are recognised in the complex: T. psammopetra Braby, sp. nov. is restricted to north-western Australia where it has a disjunct distribution (Kimberley and the central Arnhem Land plateau); T. ilia (Waterhouse, 1932) sensu stricto is endemic to the central Arnhem Land plateau where it is narrowly sympatric with T. psammopetra; while T. beta Evans, 1934, stat. nov. is allopatric and endemic to mainland New Guinea. Each species is illustrated and diagnosed based on comparative morphology of the adult stage, including androconia and male and female genitalia, and information on type material, biology, distribution and habitat is summarised and discussed. A phylogenetic hypothesis of the Australian species of Taractrocera based on combined analysis of molecular data (2.6 kb: mitochondrial COI and nuclear CAD, MDH, wingless) revealed that T. psammopetra is monophyletic and sister to T. ilia, with an overall mean divergence of 3.4% between the two species; the genus Taractrocera, however, emerged as polyphyletic. For T. psammopetra and T. ilia, the life history, including details of larval food plant specialisation and morphology of the immature stages, is described for the first time. Larvae of T. psammopetra and T. ilia specialise on ‘resurrection’ grasses, Micraira spp. (Poaceae), which typically grow as moss-like, mat-forming pioneer plants on shallow rock surfaces comprising open sandstone pavements or on rock ledges and under rock overhangs of sandstone cliffs. These food plants, together with the butterflies that they support, are a characteristic element of the sandstone plateaux of the Kimberley and central Arnhem Land, and they exemplify patterns of diversification, endemism and adaptation to these unique environments within the Australian monsoon tropics. Facultative larval diapause is recorded for both T. psammopetra and T. ilia in which larvae (all instars, but particularly the final instar) may suspend feeding for up to six months during the dry season when the food plants typically dehydrate. It is hypothesised that larval diapause may be the most flexible strategy to ameliorate seasonal adversity of the dry season and the onset, duration and inter-annual cycle of monsoon rainfall during the wet season, which is highly variable and unpredictable, given that Micraira can revive rapidly from a desiccated state after rainfall.

http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:51438A5E-048C-4C72-AD22-3FD176ECBA55

Additional keywords: Hesperiinae, general lineage concept, resurrection plants, skipper butterfly, Taractrocerini, Wallacea.


References

Andersen, A. N., Humphrey, C., and Braby, M. F. (2014). Threatened invertebrates in Kakadu National Park. In ‘Kakadu National Park Landscape Symposia Series. Symposium 7: Conservation of threatened species, 26–27 March 2013, Bowali Visitor Centre, Kakadu National Park. Internal Report 623, June’. (Eds S. Winderlich and J. C. Z. Woinarski.) pp. 48–57. (Supervising Scientist: Darwin.)

Bowman, D. M. J. S., Brown, G., Braby, M. F., Brown, J., Cook, L., Crisp, M. D., Ford, F., Haberle, S., Hughes, J. M., Isagi, Y., Joseph, L., McBride, J., Nelson, G., and Ladiges, P. Y. (2010). Biogeography of the monsoon tropics. Journal of Biogeography 37, 201–216.
Biogeography of the monsoon tropics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Braby, M. F. (1995). Reproductive seasonality in tropical satyrine butterflies: strategies for the dry season. Ecological Entomology 20, 5–17.
Reproductive seasonality in tropical satyrine butterflies: strategies for the dry season.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Braby, M. F. (2000). ‘Butterflies of Australia. Their Identification, Biology and Distribution.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Melbourne.)

Braby, M. F. (2004). ‘The Complete Field Guide to Butterflies of Australia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Melbourne.)

Braby, M. F. (2008). Biogeography of butterflies in the Australian monsoon tropics. Australian Journal of Zoology 56, 41–56.
Biogeography of butterflies in the Australian monsoon tropics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Braby, M. F. (2010). The merging of taxonomy and conservation biology: a synthesis of Australian butterfly systematics (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea) for the 21st century. Zootaxa 2707, 1–76.

Braby, M. F. (2012). The butterflies of El Questro Wilderness Park, with taxonomic remarks on the Kimberley fauna, Australia. Records of the Western Australian Museum 27, 161–175.

Braby, M. F., Eastwood, R. G., and Murray, N. (2012). The subspecies concept in butterflies: has its application in taxonomy and conservation biology outlived its usefulness? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 106, 699–716.
The subspecies concept in butterflies: has its application in taxonomy and conservation biology outlived its usefulness?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clark, L. G., Wendel, J. F., and Craven, L. A. (1995). A new species of Micraira (Poaceae: Micraireae) from northern Western Australia. The Beagle. Records of the Museums and Art Galleries of the Northern Territory 12, 1–7.

Common, I. F. B., and Waterhouse, D. F. (1972). ‘Butterflies of Australia.’ (Angus & Robertson: Sydney.)

Common, I. F. B., and Waterhouse, D. F. (1981). ‘Butterflies of Australia.’ (Angus & Robertson: Sydney.)

Common, I. F. B., and Waterhouse, D. F. (1982). ‘Butterflies of Australia.’ (Angus & Robertson: Sydney.)

Cracraft, J. (1991). Patterns of diversification within continental biotas: hierarchical congruence among the areas of endemism of Australian vertebrates. Australian Systematic Botany 4, 211–227.
Patterns of diversification within continental biotas: hierarchical congruence among the areas of endemism of Australian vertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de Jong, R. (1990). Some aspects of the biogeography of the Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) of Sulawesi. In ‘Insects and the Rain Forests of South East Asia (Wallacea)’. (Eds W. J. Knight and J. D. Holloway.) pp. 35–42. (Royal Entomological Society: London.)

de Jong, R. (2001). Faunal exchange between Asia and Australia in the Tertiary as evidenced by recent butterflies. In ‘Faunal and Floral Migrations and Evolution in SE Asia-Australia’. (Eds I. Metcalfe, J. M. B. Smith, M. Morwood and I. Davidson.) pp. 133–146. (A.A. Balkema Publishers: Lisse, Netherlands.)

de Jong, R. (2004). Phylogeny and biogeography of the genus Taractrocera Butler, 1870 (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae), an example of Southeast Asian-Australian interchange. Zoologische Mededelingen, Leiden 78, 383–415.

de Queiroz, K. (1998). The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: a conceptual unification and terminological recommendations. In ‘Endless Forms: Species and Speciation’. (Eds D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher.) pp. 57–75. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

de Queiroz, K. (2007). Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology 56, 879–886.
Species concepts and species delimitation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18027281PubMed |

Dunn, K. L., and Dunn, L. E. (1991). ‘Review of Australian Butterflies: Distribution, Life History and Taxonomy. Parts 1–4.’ (Published by authors: Melbourne.)

Edwards, E. D., Newland, J., and Regan, L. (2001). ‘Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea. Zoological Catalogue of Australia. Vol. 31.6.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Evans, W. H. (1934). Indo-Australian Hesperiidae: descriptions of new genera, species and subspecies. The Entomologist 67, 33–234.

Evans, W. H. (1949). ‘A Catalogue of the Hesperiidae From Europe, Asia, and Australia in the British Museum (Natural History).’ (British Museum (Natural History): London.)

Gaff, D. F., and Latz, P. K. (1978). The occurrence of resurrection plants in the Australian flora. Australian Journal of Botany 26, 485–492.
The occurrence of resurrection plants in the Australian flora.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gouy, M., Guindon, S., and Gascuel, O. (2010). SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27, 221–224.
SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXntlGgtw%3D%3D&md5=c304ddec8dc70ec022d83c416f685011CAS | 19854763PubMed |

International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999). ‘International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth Edition.’ (The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature: London.)

Jones, R. E. (1987). Reproductive strategies for the seasonal tropics. Insect Science and Its Application 8, 515–521.

Katoh, K., and Standley, D. M. (2013). MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30, 772–780.
MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXksFWisLc%3D&md5=0716f2c67f199534e79840f2d15a8d4bCAS | 23329690PubMed |

Lanfear, R., Calcott, B., Kainer, D., Mayer, C., and Stamatakis, A. (2014). Selecting optimal partitioning schemes for phylogenomic datasets. BMC Evolutionary Biology 14, 82.
Selecting optimal partitioning schemes for phylogenomic datasets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24742000PubMed |

Lazarides, M. (1984). New taxa of tropical Australian grasses (Poaceae). Nuytsia 5, 273–303.

Lazarides, M. (2005). Micraira. In ‘Flora of Australia, Volume 44B, Poaceae 3’. (Ed. K. Mallet.) pp. 120–131. (ABRS/CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

McCubbin, C. (1971). ‘Australian Butterflies.’ (Nelson: Melbourne.)

Meyer, C. E., Weir, R. P., and Wilson, D. N. (2006). Butterfly (Lepidoptera) records from the Darwin region, Northern Territory. Australian Entomologist 33, 9–22.

Orr, A. G., and Kitching, R. L. (2010). ‘The Butterflies of Australia.’ (Allen & Unwin: Sydney.)

Parsons, M. J. (1991). ‘Butterflies of the Bulolo-Wau Valley.’ (Bishop Museum Press: Honolulu, HI.)

Parsons, M. J. (1998). ‘The Butterflies of Papua New Guinea. Their Systematics and Biology.’ (Academic Press: London.)

Pepper, M., and Keogh, J. S. (2014). Biogeography of the Kimberley, Western Australia: a review of landscape evolution and biotic response in an ancient refugium. Journal of Biogeography 41, 1443–1455.
Biogeography of the Kimberley, Western Australia: a review of landscape evolution and biotic response in an ancient refugium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Peters, J. V. (1971). ‘A catalogue of the type specimens of the Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea (Lepidoptera) in the Australian Museum.’ (Australian Entomological Press: Sydney.)

Regier, J. C., and Shi, D. (2005). Increased yield of PCR product from degenerate primers with nondegenerate, nonhomologous 5ʹ tails. BioTechniques 38, 34–38.
Increased yield of PCR product from degenerate primers with nondegenerate, nonhomologous 5ʹ tails.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXptV2mtA%3D%3D&md5=622d01e172b97f58b97c12a6cfb4177dCAS | 15679081PubMed |

Regier, J. C., Shultz, J. W., Ganley, A. R. D., Hussey, A., Shi, D., Ball, A., Zwick, A., Stajich, J. E., Cummings, M. P., Martin, J. W., and Cunningham, C. W. (2008). Resolving arthropod phylogeny: exploring phylogenetic signal within 41kb of protein-coding nuclear gene sequence. Systematic Biology 57, 920–938.
Resolving arthropod phylogeny: exploring phylogenetic signal within 41kb of protein-coding nuclear gene sequence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXis1WntLs%3D&md5=a57223cd301a11eddb8c0fcb119dac7eCAS | 19085333PubMed |

Sukumaran, J., and Holder, M. T. (2010). DendroPy: a python library for phylogenetic computing. Bioinformatics 26, 1569–1571.
DendroPy: a python library for phylogenetic computing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXnsVOltb0%3D&md5=1a2fa20c12ea16c78289c31c6305924dCAS | 20421198PubMed |

Wahlberg, N., and Wheat, C. W. (2008). Genomic outposts serve the phylogenomic pioneers: designing novel nuclear markers for genomic DNA extractions of Lepidoptera. Systematic Biology 57, 231–242.
Genomic outposts serve the phylogenomic pioneers: designing novel nuclear markers for genomic DNA extractions of Lepidoptera.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsVymsr%2FL&md5=25cb680661dd1a176d9314050fcf79fcCAS | 18398768PubMed |

Warren, A. D., Ogawa, J. R., and Brower, A. V. Z. (2008). Phylogenetic relationships of subfamilies and circumscription of tribes in the family Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea). Cladistics 24, 642–676.
Phylogenetic relationships of subfamilies and circumscription of tribes in the family Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Warren, A. D., Ogawa, J. R., and Brower, A. V. Z. (2009). Revised classification of the family Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea) based on combined molecular and morphological data. Systematic Entomology 34, 467–523.
Revised classification of the family Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea) based on combined molecular and morphological data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Waterhouse, G. A. (1932a). Australian Hesperiidae. II. Notes and descriptions of new forms. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 57, 218–238.

Waterhouse, G. A. (1932b). ‘What Butterfly is That?’ (Angus & Robertson: Sydney.)

Waterhouse, G. A. (1933). Australian Hesperiidae. IV. Notes and descriptions of new forms. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 58, 461–466.

Winderlich, S., and Woinarski, J. C. Z. (2014). Kakadu National Park Landscape symposia series. Symposium 7: conservation of threatened species. 26–27 March 2013, Bowali Visitor Centre, Kakadu National Park. Internal Report 623. (Supervising Scientist: Darwin.)

Woinarski, J. C. Z., Hempel, C., Cowie, I., Brennan, K., Kerrigan, R., Leach, G., and Russell-Smith, J. (2006). Distributional pattern of plant species endemic to the Northern Territory, Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 54, 627–640.
Distributional pattern of plant species endemic to the Northern Territory, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woinarski, J. C. Z., Mackey, B. G., Nix, H. A., and Traill, B. (2007). ‘The Nature of Northern Australia. Natural Values, Ecological Processes and Future Prospects.’ (ANU E Press: Canberra.)

Zwickl, D. J. (2006). Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. PhD thesis, The University of Texas.