Molecular data sheds light on the classification of long-legged flies (Diptera : Dolichopodidae)
Christoph Germann A , Marc Pollet B , Corinne Wimmer A and Marco Valerio Bernasconi A CA Zoological Museum, Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
B Research Group Terrestrial Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University (UGent), K.L.Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium and Department of Entomology, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences (RBINS), Vautierstraat 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.
C Corresponding author. Email: marco.bernasconi@access.uzh.ch
Invertebrate Systematics 25(4) 303-321 https://doi.org/10.1071/IS11029
Submitted: 1 July 2011 Accepted: 26 September 2011 Published: 22 December 2011
Abstract
Dolichopodidae (long-legged flies) is the world’s fourth largest dipteran family, but a phylogeny based on a broad global taxon sample is still lacking. We present here a first molecular phylogenetic hypothesis for Dolichopodidae, based on 157 dolichopodid species in 68 genera and 15 subfamilies from the Old and New World, and seven empidoid species (Empididae, Hybotidae) as outgroups. Both relatively fast-evolving mitochondrial markers (COI, 12S, 16S) and a more conserved nuclear marker (18S) were used, the latter being widely employed to study the phylogeny at higher taxonomic levels. We present strong evidence for Microphorinae as sister group to Dolichopodidae sensu stricto, and for the monophyletic Parathalassiinae as part of Dolichopodidae sensu stricto. Monophyly of Achalcinae, Dolichopodinae, and Sciapodinae is supported and Stolidosomatinae are placed within Sympycninae. Diaphorinae, Medeterinae, Neurigoninae, Rhaphiinae, and Sympycninae are paraphyletic, and Hydrophorinae and Peloropeodinae polyphyletic. Our broad taxon sample allows us to gain new insights into the complex systematics of Dolichopodidae. Our results highlight several problems with the traditional classification, which have considerable consequences for the systematic status of some taxa. The poor resolution observed in deep divergences supports previous hypotheses suggesting a rapid early radiation of Dolichopodidae.
Additional keywords: Empidoidea, evolution, molecular phylogeny, mitochondrial DNA, systematics, 18S.
References
Becker, T. (1917). Dipterologische Studien. Dolichopodidae. A. Paläarktische Region. Nova Acta Academiae Caesareae Leopodinisch-Carolinae Germanicae Naturae Curiosorum 102, 113–361.Becker, T. (1921). Dipterologische Studien. Dolichopodidae. B. Nearktische und Neotropische Region. Abhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 13, 1–394.
Bernasconi, M. V., Pollet, M., Varini-Ooijen, M., and Ward, P. I. (2007a). Phylogeny of European Dolichopus and Gymnopternus (Diptera, Dolichopodidae) and the significance of morphological characters inferred from molecular data. European Journal of Entomology 104, 601–617.
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFaltLjI&md5=789e79ac74294a20e64ada59c0748ee3CAS |
Bernasconi, M. V., Pollet, M., and Ward, P. I. (2007b). Molecular systematics of Dolichopodidae (Diptera) inferred from COI and 12S rDNA gene sequences based on European exemplars. Invertebrate Systematics 21, 453–470.
| Molecular systematics of Dolichopodidae (Diptera) inferred from COI and 12S rDNA gene sequences based on European exemplars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlSmu7zI&md5=51c43e85b7c9c058116e7a8752148023CAS |
Bernasconi, M. V., Berger, D., and Blanckenhorn, W. U. (2010). Systematic ambiguity in the well-established model system insect Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scathophagidae): sister species S. soror revealed by molecular evidence. Zootaxa 2441, 27–40.
Bickel, D. J. (1986). Australian species of Systenus (Diptera: Dolichopodidae). Records of the Australian Museum 38, 263–270.
| Australian species of Systenus (Diptera: Dolichopodidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bickel, D. J. (1987). Babindellinae, a new subfamily of Dolichopodidae (Diptera) from Australia, with a discussion of symmetry in the dipteran male postabdomen. Entomologica Scandinavica 18, 97–103.
| Babindellinae, a new subfamily of Dolichopodidae (Diptera) from Australia, with a discussion of symmetry in the dipteran male postabdomen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bickel, D. J. (1994). The Australian Sciapodinae (Diptera: Dolichopodidae), with a review of the Oriental and Australasian faunas, and a world conspectus of the subfamily. Records of the Australian Museum 21, 1–394.
| The Australian Sciapodinae (Diptera: Dolichopodidae), with a review of the Oriental and Australasian faunas, and a world conspectus of the subfamily.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bickel, D. J. (2009). 49. Dolichopodidae (long-legged flies). In ‘Manual of Central American Diptera’. (Eds B. V. Brown, A. Borkent, J. M. Cumming, D. M. Wood, N. E. Woodley and M. Zumbado.) pp. 671–694. (National Research Council Canada: Ottawa.)
Bickel, D. J., and Dyte, C. E. (1989). Family Dolichopodidae. In ‘Catalog of Australasian and Oceanian Diptera’. (Ed. N. Evenhuis.) pp. 393–418. (Bishop Museum Press: Honolulu.)
Brooks, S. E. (2005). Systematics and phylogeny of Dolichopodinae (Diptera: Dolichopodidae). Zootaxa 857, 1–158.
Brooks, S. (2006). Higher classification and phylogeny of Dolichopodidae. Empidoid Resources (Version 26 May 2006). URL: http://www.nadsdiptera.org/Doid/Doliclass/Doliclass.htm [accessed 18 November 2009].
Chvála, M. (1988). Revision of Palearctic Microphoridae (Diptera). 3. Parathalassiinae (Parathalassius Mik and Microphorella Becker). Acta Entomologica Bohemoslovaca 85, 352–372.
Dyte, C. E. (1975). Family Dolichopodidae. In ‘A Catalogue of the Diptera of the Oriental Region. Vol. 2. Suborder Brachycera through Division Aschiza, Suborder Cyclorrhapha’. (Eds M. D. Delfinado and D. E. Hardy.) pp. 212–258. (Honolulu.)
Foote, R. H., Coulson, J. R., and Robinson, H. (1965). Family Dolichopodidae. In ‘A Catalogue of the Diptera of America North of Mexico’. (Eds A. Stone, C. W. Sabrosky, W. W. Wirth, R. H. Foote and J. R. Coulson.) pp. 482–530. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Agriculture Handbook 276.
Germann, C., Pollet, M., Tanner, S., Backeljau, T., and Bernasconi, M. V. (2010). Legs of deception: disagreement between molecular markers and morphology (Diptera, Dolichopodidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 48, 238–247.
Germann, C., Pollet, M., and Bernasconi, M. V. (2011). Molecular systematics of European Argyra (Diptera: Dolichopodidae) mirror morphological assumptions. Entomologica Fennica 22, 5–14.
Goloboff, P. A., Farris, J. S., and Nixon, K. C. (2008). TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24, 774–786.
| TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grichanov, I. Y. (2000). New Afrotropical Sympycninae and redescription of European Peloropeodes acuticornis (Oldenberg) (Diptera: Dolichopodidae). International Journal of Dipterological Research 11, 77–102.
Grootaert, P., and Meuffels, H. J. G. (1997a). Dolichopodidae (Diptera) from Papua New Guinea. XV. Scepastopyga gen. nov. and the establishment of a new subfamily, the Achalcinae. Journal of Natural History 31, 1587–1600.
| Dolichopodidae (Diptera) from Papua New Guinea. XV. Scepastopyga gen. nov. and the establishment of a new subfamily, the Achalcinae.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grootaert, P., and Meuffels, H. J. G. (1997b). Dolichopodidae (Diptera) from Papua New Guinea. XIV. Paramedetera, a new genus in the Medeterinae. Invertebrate Taxonomy 11, 309–319.
| Dolichopodidae (Diptera) from Papua New Guinea. XIV. Paramedetera, a new genus in the Medeterinae.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Källersjö, M., Albert, V. A., and Farris, J. S. (1999). Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure. Cladistics 15, 91–93.
| Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kishino, H., and Hasegawa, M. (1989). Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. Journal of Molecular Evolution 29, 170–179.
| Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL1MXkvFCnsbc%3D&md5=833696fa82f90cfc9df6bba443496959CAS |
Kubota, M., Morii, T., and Miura, K. (2005). In vitro cultivation of parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia in an Aedes albopictus cell line. Entomologia Experimentia et Applicata 117, 83–87.
| In vitro cultivation of parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia in an Aedes albopictus cell line.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kutty, S. N., Bernasconi, M. V., Sifner, F., and Meier, R. (2007). Sensitivity analysis, molecular systematics, and natural history evolution of Scathophagidae (Diptera: Cyclorrhapha: Calyptratae). Cladistics 23, 64–83.
| Sensitivity analysis, molecular systematics, and natural history evolution of Scathophagidae (Diptera: Cyclorrhapha: Calyptratae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kutty, S. N., Pape, T., Pont, A., Wiegmann, B., and Meier, R. (2008). The Muscoidea (Diptera: Calyptratae) are paraphyletic: evidence from four mitochondrial and four nuclear genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49, 639–652.
| The Muscoidea (Diptera: Calyptratae) are paraphyletic: evidence from four mitochondrial and four nuclear genes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlCrtb%2FO&md5=0d37c210b31023b34bef5e9e5d0a19c8CAS |
Kutty, S. N., Pape, T., Wiegmann, B., and Meier, R. (2010). Molecular phylogeny of the Calyptratae (Diptera: Cyclorrhapha) with an emphasis on the superfamily Oestroidea and the position of Mystacinobiidae and McAlpine’s fly. Systematic Entomology 35, 614–635.
| Molecular phylogeny of the Calyptratae (Diptera: Cyclorrhapha) with an emphasis on the superfamily Oestroidea and the position of Mystacinobiidae and McAlpine’s fly.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lim, G. S., Hwang, W. S., Kutty, S., Meier, R., and Grootaert, P. (2010). Mitochondrial and nuclear markers support the monophyly of Dolichopodidae and suggest a rapid origin of the subfamilies (Diptera). Systematic Entomology 35, 59–70.
| Mitochondrial and nuclear markers support the monophyly of Dolichopodidae and suggest a rapid origin of the subfamilies (Diptera).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lundbeck, W. (1912). ‘Diptera Danica. Genera and Species of Flies hitherto Found in Denmark. Part IV. Dolichopodidae.’ (Gad: Copenhagen.) 416 pp.
Masunaga, K. (1999). Phylogenetic relationships of marine-shore dolichopodid flies inferred from morphological data and DNA sequences. The Nature & Insects 34, 30–34.
Meier, R., and Wiegmann, B. M. (2002). A phylogenetic analysis of Coelopidae (Diptera) based on morphological and DNA sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25, 393–407.
| A phylogenetic analysis of Coelopidae (Diptera) based on morphological and DNA sequence data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xosl2gtL8%3D&md5=af76daf7efe433a6eddfa33ccc6fa818CAS |
Moulton, J. K., and Wiegmann, B. M. (2007). The phylogenetic relationships of flies in the superfamily Empidoidea (Insecta: Diptera). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43, 701–713.
| The phylogenetic relationships of flies in the superfamily Empidoidea (Insecta: Diptera).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXlvVOrur8%3D&md5=17e9a70dbf9e76c1fd960600fac44a11CAS |
Negrobov, O. P. (1986). On the system and phylogeny of flies of the family Dolichopodidae (Diptera). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 65, 182–186.
Negrobov, O. P. (1991). Family Dolichopodidae. In ‘Catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera. Vol. 7. Dolichopodidae – Platypezidae’. (Eds A. Soos and L. Papp.) pp. 11–139. (Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest.)
Pape, T., Bickel, D., and Meier, R. (2009). ‘Diptera Diversity: Status, Challenges and Tools.’ (Koninklijke Brill NV: Leiden.) 459 pp.
Parent, O. (1938). ‘Diptères, Dolichopodides.’ (Fauna de France: Paris.)
Petersen, F. T., Meier, R., Kutty, S. N., and Wiegmann, B. M. (2007). Phylogenetic relationships and the evolution of host choice in louse- and batflies (Hippoboscoidea: Diptera). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45, 111–122.
| Phylogenetic relationships and the evolution of host choice in louse- and batflies (Hippoboscoidea: Diptera).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtVCmt7%2FN&md5=b0d83910f1d8cd336b99fd30b5aa8c80CAS |
Pollet, M. (2009). Diptera as ecological indicators of habitat and habitat change. In ‘Diptera Diversity: Status, Challenges and Tools’. (Eds T. Pape, D. Bickel and R. Meier.) pp. 302–322. (Koninklijke Brill NV: Leiden.)
Pollet, M., and Brooks, S. E. (2008). Long-legged flies (Diptera: Dolichopodidae). In ‘Encyclopedia of Entomology. Volume 2’. 2nd edn. (Ed. J. L. Capinera.) pp. 2232–2241. (Springer.)
Pollet, M., Brooks, S. E., and Cumming, J. M. (2004). Catalog of the Dolichopodidae (Diptera) of America north of Mexico. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 283, 1–114.
| Catalog of the Dolichopodidae (Diptera) of America north of Mexico.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pollet, M., Germann, C., Tanner, S., and Bernasconi, M. V. (2010). Hypotheses from mitochondrial DNA: congruence and conflicts with morphology in Dolichopodinae systematics (Diptera: Dolichopodidae). Invertebrate Systematics 24, 32–50.
| Hypotheses from mitochondrial DNA: congruence and conflicts with morphology in Dolichopodinae systematics (Diptera: Dolichopodidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXmtFagtLs%3D&md5=b582a35b09d7422df2b92c1c6a0378d2CAS |
Posada, D., and Crandall, K. A. (1998). Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817–818.
| Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXktlCltw%3D%3D&md5=d2bcfda7a0dd43b2a56458d7a5084483CAS |
Rambaut, A., and Drummond, A. J. (2009). Tracer v1.5. Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/ [accessed 24 February 2011].
Robinson, H. (1967). A revision of the subfamily Stolidosominae (Diptera: Dolichopodidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 60, 892–903.
Robinson, H. (1970). The subfamilies of the family Dolichopodidae in North and South America (Diptera). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 23, 53–62.
Robinson, H., and Vockeroth, J. R. (1981). 48. Dolichopodidae. In ‘Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Vol. I’. (Eds J. F. McAlpine, B. V. Peterson, G. E. Shewell, H. J. Teskey, J. R.Vockeroth and D. M. Wood.) pp. 625–639. (Biosystematics Research Institute: Ottawa.)
Ronquist, F., and Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572–1574.
| MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXntlKms7k%3D&md5=2e3026ffe4fe8a7047647a21d09682feCAS |
Sinclair, B. J., and Cumming, J. M. (2006). The morphology, higher-level phylogeny and classification of the Empidoidea (Diptera). Zootaxa 1180, 1–172.
Sinclair, B. J., Brooks, S. E., and Cumming, J. M. (2008). A critical review of the world catalogs of Empidoidea (Insecta: Diptera) by Yang et al. (2006, 2007). Zootaxa 1846, 61–68.
Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P., and Rougemont, J. (2008). A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Systematic Biology 57, 758–771.
| A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Su Feng Yi, K., Kutty, S., and Meier, R. (2008). Morphology versus molecules: the phylogenetic relationships of Sepsidae (Diptera: Cyclorrhapha) based on morphology and DNA sequence data from ten genes. Cladistics 24, 902–916.
| Morphology versus molecules: the phylogenetic relationships of Sepsidae (Diptera: Cyclorrhapha) based on morphology and DNA sequence data from ten genes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Swofford, D. L. (2002). ‘PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0 b10.’ (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA.)
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., and Kumar, S. (2007). MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24, 1596–1599.
| MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpsVGrsL8%3D&md5=353e41e981e4ccb0f2f9b19980971a0fCAS |
Ulrich, H. (1981). Zur systematischen Gliederung der Dolichopodiden (Diptera). Bonner Zoologische Beiträge 31, 385–402.
Ulrich, H. (2003). How recent are the Empidoidea of Baltic amber? Studia Dipterologica 10, 321–327.
Vaidya, G., Lohman, D. L., and Meier, R. (2011). SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multigene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27, 171–180.
| SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multigene datasets with character set and codon information.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whiting, M. (2002). Mecoptera is paraphyletic: multiple genes and phylogeny of Mecoptera and Siphonaptera. Zoologica Scripta 31, 93–104.
| Mecoptera is paraphyletic: multiple genes and phylogeny of Mecoptera and Siphonaptera.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wiegmann, B. M., Regier, J. C., Mitter, C., Friedlander, T. P., Wagner, D. L., and Nielsen, E. S. (2000). Nuclear genes resolve Mesozoic-aged divergences in the insect order Lepidoptera. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 15, 242–259.
| Nuclear genes resolve Mesozoic-aged divergences in the insect order Lepidoptera.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXjs12qtb8%3D&md5=4df8fcffdbe1020895b8d5dd953829b0CAS |
Xia, X., and Xie, Z. (2001). DAMBE: Data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. The Journal of Heredity 92, 371–373.
| DAMBE: Data analysis in molecular biology and evolution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvptlagtA%3D%3D&md5=a28d4f20effdcf6a6261b695c5a4854fCAS |
Yang, D., Zhu, Y., Wang, M., and Zhang, L. (2006). ‘World Catalog of Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera).’ (China Agricultural University Press.)