Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Functional Plant Biology Functional Plant Biology Society
Plant function and evolutionary biology
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > FP > FP08039
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 35(10)

Integrating simulation of architectural development and source–sink behaviour of peach trees by incorporating Markov chains and physiological organ function submodels into L-PEACH

Gerardo Lopez A B , Romeo R. Favreau A , Colin Smith A , Evelyne Costes C , Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz D and Theodore M. DeJong A E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, 1035 Wickson Hall, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

B Irrigation Technology, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries, 191 Avda Rovira Roure, Lleida 25198, Spain.

C INRA, UMR 1098, Architecture et Fonctionnement des Espèces Fruitières Team, 2 place Pierre Viala, Montpellier 34060, France.

D Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4 Canada.

E Corresponding author. Email: tmdejong@ucdavis.edu

This paper originates from a presentation at the 5th International Workshop on Functional–Structural Plant Models, Napier, New Zealand, November 2007.

Functional Plant Biology 35(10) 761-771 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP08039
Submitted: 29 February 2008  Accepted: 5 August 2008   Published: 11 November 2008

Abstract

L-PEACH is an L-system-based functional–structural model for simulating architectural growth and carbohydrate partitioning among individual organs in peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) trees. The original model provided a prototype for how tree architecture and carbon economy could be integrated, but did not simulate peach tree architecture realistically. Moreover, evaluation of the functional characteristics of the individual organs and the whole tree remained a largely open issue. In the present study, we incorporated Markovian models into L-PEACH to improve the architecture of the simulated trees. The model was also calibrated to grams of carbohydrate, and tools for systematically displaying quantitative outputs and evaluating the behaviour of the model were developed. The use of the Markovian model concept to model tree architecture in L-PEACH reproduced tree behaviour and responses to management practices visually similar to trees in commercial orchards. The new architectural model along with several improvements in the carbohydrate-partitioning algorithms derived from the model evaluation significantly improved the results related to carbon allocation, such as organ growth, carbohydrate assimilation, reserve dynamics and maintenance respiration. The model results are now consistent within the modelled tree structure and are in general agreement with observations of peach trees growing under field conditions.

Additional keywords: architectural modelling, carbon allocation, carbon-based model, functional–structural plant modelling, peach tree growth simulation.


Acknowledgements

We thank Yann Guédon for comments and corrections on the manuscript and for helpful discussions on Markovian models. This research was supported in part by grants from the California Tree Fruit Agreement and the California Cling Peach Board to T.M. DeJong as well as a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant RGPIN 130084-2008 to P. Prusinkiewicz.


References


Allen MT, Prusinkiewicz P, DeJong TM (2005) Using L-systems for modeling source–sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L-PEACH model. The New Phytologist 166, 869–880.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [Verified 3 September 2008].

Karwowski R, Prusinkiewicz P (2003) Design and implementation of the L+C modelling language. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 86, 134–152.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lindenmayer A (1968) Mathematical models of cellular interaction in development, Parts I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 18, 280–315.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Loescher WH, McCamant T, Keller JD (1990) Carbohydrate reserves, translocation, and storage in woody plant roots. HortScience 25, 274–281. open url image1

Lopez G, Girona J, Marsal J (2007) Response of winter root starch concentration to severe water stress and fruit load and its subsequent effects on early peach fruit development. Tree Physiology 27, 1619–1626.
| PubMed |
open url image1

Marini RP, Marini MC (1983) Seasonal changes in specific leaf weight, net photosynthesis, and chlorophyll content of peach leaves as affected by light penetration and canopy position. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 108, 609–613. open url image1

Neales TF, Incoll LD (1968) The control of leaf photosynthesis rate by the level of assimilate concentration in the leaf – a review of the hypothesis. Botanical Review 34, 107–125.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Penning de Vries FWT , Jansen DM , ten Berge HFM , Bakema A (1989) ‘Simulation of ecophysiological processes of growth in several annual crops.’ (Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation (Pudoc): Wageningen)

Pernice F, Solari L, DeJong TM (2006) Comparison of growth potentials of epicormic shoots of nectarine trees grown on size-controlling and vigorous rootstocks. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 81, 211–218. open url image1

Prusinkiewicz P (2004a) Art and science for life: designing and growing virtual plants with L-systems. Acta Horticulturae 630, 15–28. open url image1

Prusinkiewicz P (2004b) Modeling plant growth and development. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7, 79–83.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Prusinkiewicz P , Lindenmayer A (1990) ‘The algorithmic beauty of plants.’ (Springer-Verlag: New York)

Prusinkiewicz P , Karwowski R , Lane B (2007 a) The L+C plant-modelling language. In ‘Functional–structural plant modeling in crop production.’ (Eds J Vos, LFM de Visser, PC Struick, JB Evers) pp. 27–42. (Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Prusinkiewicz P , Allen M , Escobar-Gutiérrez A , DeJong TM (2007 b) Numerical methods for transport-resistance source–sink allocations models. In ‘Functional–structural plant modeling in crop production.’ (Eds J Vos, LFM de Visser, PC Struick, JB Evers) pp. 123–137. (Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Renton M, Guédon Y, Godin C, Costes E (2006) Similarities and gradients in growth unit branching patterns during ontogeny in Fuji apple trees: a stochastic approach. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 3131–3143.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Rosati A, DeJong TM, Esparza G (2002) Physiological basis for light use efficiency models. Acta Horticulturae 584, 89–94. open url image1

Seleznyova AN (2007) Logistic-based growth under resource limitation: equations, analytical solutions and applications. In ‘Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on functional–structural plant models.’ (Eds P Prusinkiewicz, J Hanan, B Lane) pp. 50.1–50.5. (Print Solutions Hawke’s Bay Limited: Napier, New Zealand)

Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964) A quantitative analysis of plant forms – the pipe model theory. I. Basic analyses. Japanese Journal of Ecology 14, 97–104. open url image1

Steinberg SL, Miller JC, McFarland MJ (1990) Dry-matter partitioning and vegetative growth of young peach-trees under water-stress. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 17, 23–36. open url image1

Vivin PH, Castelan M, Gaudillère JP (2002) A source/sink model to simulate seasonal allocation of carbon in grapevine. Acta Horticulturae 584, 43–56. open url image1

Wardlaw IF (1990) The control of carbon partitioning in plants. Transley review No. 27. The New Phytologist 116, 341–381.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wilson B (2000) Apical control of branch growth and angle in woody plants. American Journal of Botany 87, 601–607.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1