Register      Login
Functional Plant Biology Functional Plant Biology Society
Plant function and evolutionary biology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A simple dynamic model of photosynthesis in oak leaves: coupling leaf conductance and photosynthetic carbon fixation by a variable intracellular CO2 pool

Steffen M. Noe A B and Christoph Giersch A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institut für Botanik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstr. 3-5, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany.

B Present address: Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Riio 23, EE 51010 Tartu, Estonia.

C Corresponding author. Email: snoe@ut.ee

Functional Plant Biology 31(12) 1195-1204 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP03251
Submitted: 19 December 2003  Accepted: 27 October 2004   Published: 8 December 2004

Abstract

Modelling the diurnal course of photosynthesis in oak leaves (Quercus robur L.) requires appropriate description of the dynamics of leaf photosynthesis of which diurnal variations in leaf conductance and in CO2 assimilation are essential components. We propose and analyse a simple photosynthesis model with three variables: leaf conductance (gs), the CO2 partial pressure inside the leaf (pi), and a pool of Calvin cycle intermediates (aps). The environmental factors light (I) and vapour pressure deficit (VPD) are used to formulate a target function G(I, VPD) from which the actual leaf conductance is calculated. Using this gs value and a CO2 consumption term representing CO2 fixation, a differential equation for pi is derived. Carboxylation corresponds to the sink term of the pi pool and is assumed to be feedback-inhibited by aps. This simple model is shown to produce reasonable to excellent fits to data on the diurnal time courses of photosythesis, pi and gs sampled for oak leaves.

Keywords: leaf conductance, numerical model, oak, photosynthesis, Quercus robur.


Acknowledgments

We thank an anonymous referee for suggesting eqn 2 for the dependence of stomatal response on VPD. The photosynthesis model presented here was developed as part of a process-based model of isoprene emission by trees, which was initiated by Wolfgang Zimmer some time ago. He passed away in August 2002. Stimulating discussions with Wolfgang Zimmer during the earlier stages of this project are gratefully acknowledged.


This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in context of BEWA2000 (Biogenic emissions of volatile organic compounds from forest ecosystems) which is a subproject of the national joint research project AFO2000 (Atmosphären-Forschungsprogramm 2000).


References


Assmann SM (1999) The cellular basis of guard cell sensing of rising CO2. Plant, Cell and Environment 22, 629–637.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ball, JT (1987). Calculations related to gas exchange. In ‘Stomatal function’. pp. 445–476. (Stanford University Press: Stanford)

Cai T, Dang Q-L (2002) Effects of soil temperature on parameters of a coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model. Tree Physiology 22, 819–827.
PubMed |
open url image1

Cohen, SD ,  and  Hindmarsh, AC (1994). ‘CVODE user guide’. (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory report: UCRL-MA)

Dewar RC (1995) Interpretation of an empirical model for the stomatal conductance in terms of guard cell function. Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 365–372. open url image1

Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD (1982) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 33, 317–345.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Farquhar GD, Wong SC (1984) An empirical model of stomatal conductance. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 11, 191–210. open url image1

Gross LJ, Kirschbaum MUF, Pearcy RW (1991) A dynamic model of photosynthesis in varying light taking account of stomatal conductance, C3-cycle intermediates, photorespiration and Rubisco activation. Plant, Cell and Environment 14, 881–893. open url image1

Heizmann U, Kreuzwieser J, Schnitzler J-P, Brüggemann N, Rennenberg H (2001) Assimilate transport in the xylem sap of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) seedlings. Plant Biology 3, 132–138.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jarvis PG (1976) The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 237, 593–610. open url image1

Katul GG, Ellsworth DS, Lai CT (2000) Modelling assimilation and intercellular CO2 from measured conductance: a synthesis of approaches. Plant, Cell and Environment 23, 1313–1328.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kirschbaum MUF, Gross LJ, Pearcy RW (1988) Observed and modelled stomatal responses to dynamic light environments in the shade plant Alocasia macrorrhiza.  Plant, Cell and Environment 11, 111–121. open url image1

Kirschbaum MUF, Küppers M, Schneider H, Giersch C, Noe S (1998) Modelling photosynthesis in fluctuating light with inclusion of stomatal conductance, biochemical activation and pools of key photosynthetic intermediates. Planta 204, 16–26.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kreuzwieser J, Graus M, Wisthaler A, Hansel A, Rennenberg H, Schnitzler J-P (2002) Xylem-transported glucose as an additional carbon source for leaf isoprene formation in Quercus robur. New Phytologist 156, 171–178.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lambers, H , Chapin, FS ,  and  Pons, TL (1998). ‘Plant physiological ecology.’ (Springer: New York)

Lawlor, DW (1990). ‘Photosynthese: Metabolismus-Kontrolle-Physiologie.’ (Thieme Verlag: Stuttgart)

Leuning R (1995) A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C3 plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 339–355. open url image1

Lösch, R (2001). ‘Wasserhaushalt der Pflanzen.’ (Quelle and Meyer Verlag GmbH and Co.: Wiebelsheim)

Marquardt D (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of non-linear parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 12, 591–612. open url image1

Niinemets Ü, Seufert G, Steinbrecher R, Tenhunen JD (2002) A model coupling foliar monoterpene emissions to leaf photosynthetic characteristics in Mediterranean evergreen Quercus species. New Phytologist 153, 257–275.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Schultz HR, Matthews MA (1997) High vapour pressure deficit excerbates xylem cavitation and photoinhibition in shade-grown Piper auritum H.B. & K. during prolonged sunflecks: I relations of plant water relations. Oecologia 110, 312–319.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Snaith PJ, Mansfield TA (1985) Responses of stomata to IAA and Fusicoccin at the opposite phases of an entrained rhythm. Journal of Experimental Botany 36, 937–944. open url image1

Snaith PJ, Mansfield TA (1986) The circadian rhythm of stomatal opening: evidence for the involvement of potassium and chloride fluxes. Journal of Experimental Botany 37, 188–199. open url image1

Streubing, L ,  and  Fangmeier, A (1992). ‘Pflanzenökologisches Praktikum.’ (Ulmer: Stuttgart)

Tenhunen, JD , Pearcy, RW ,  and  Lange, OL (1987). Diurnal variations in leaf conductance and gas exchange in natural environments. In ‘Stomatal function’. pp. 323–351. (Stanford University Press: Stanford)

Thornley, JHM ,  and  Johnson, IR (Eds) (1990). ‘Plant and crop modeling’. (Oxford University Press: New York)

Wong SC, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1979) Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 282, 424–426. open url image1

Yong JWH, Wong SC, Farquhar GD (1997) Stomatal responses to changes in vapour pressure difference between leaf and air. Plant, Cell and Environment 20, 1213–1216.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zimmer W, Brüggemann N, Emeis S, Giersch C, Lehning A, Steinbrecher R, Schnitzler J-P (2000) Process-based modelling of isoprene emission by oak leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment 23, 585–595.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1









Appendix

Consider a rectangular box with area F and thickness d. We assume that there is a flux Vin [mol m–2 s–1] into the box and a flux Vout leaving the box. The change in concentration n within the box, dn / dt, is then given by:

E17

The change in pressure corresponding to that in n is from p = n RT:

E18

so that (A1) may be written as:

E19

with q = RT / d. Identifying the box with a leaf, F takes the role of the leaf surface and d that of leaf thickness (more exactly, that of a fictitious depth available to diffusion of CO2). Multiplying the flux term gs (papi)/ Patm [μmol m–2 s–1] by RT / d [Pa m² μmol–1] gives the unit of Pa s–1. At T = 300 K and d = 0.1 mm, we have:

E20

Alternatively, and more convenient when photosynthesis or respiration rates (mm s–1) are of interest, expressing the ps as concentrations (mol m–3), we have:

E21

where q′ = RT / (d Patm). For standard pressure, T = 300 K and d = 0.1 mm, we have:

E22

Using q or q′, a differential equation for pi may be formulated using the flux terms that are common in gas-exchange studies (e.g. eqn 11).