Climate sensitivity revisited
G. P. AyersA Visiting Scientist Emeritus, Bureau of Meteorology, 700 Collins Street, Docklands, Melbourne, Vic. 3001, Australia. Email: greg.ayers@bom.gov.au
Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science 70(1) 151-159 https://doi.org/10.1071/ES19031
Submitted: 27 November 2018 Accepted: 20 December 2019 Published: 17 September 2020
Journal Compilation © BoM 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
The commonly used energy balance model from Gregory et al. (2002) that underlies many published estimates of Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS) and Transient Climate Response (TCR) to anthropogenic forcing requires only four parameters for calculation of ECS and three for TCR. Both estimates require a value for the increase in global mean surface air temperature (ΔT) over a period of time, the increment in forcing driving the temperature change over that period (ΔF), and knowledge of the radiative forcing resulting from a doubling in CO2 concentration (F2×CO2). For ECS a value for the associated global heating rate (ΔQ) is also required. Each of these parameters has a best estimate available from the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report, but the authors did not provide best estimates for ECS and TCR within the broad uncertainty ranges quoted, 1.5–4.5 K for ECS and 1.0–2.5 K for TCR. Best estimates for ECS and TCR consistent with AR5 best estimates for ΔF and F2×CO2 are provided here. A well-known heuristic model was modified and applied to seven observation-based global temperature datasets to isolate temperature trend due to anthropogenic forcing from confounding effects of variability due to volcanism, cycles in solar irradiance and internal climate variability. The seven estimates of ECS and TCR were remarkably similar despite very large differences in time-base of the datasets analysed, yielding best estimates of 2.36 ± 0.13 K and 1.58 ± 0.09 K respectively at 95% confidence based on the AR5 best estimates for ΔF, F2×CO2 and ΔQ from Wijffels et al. (2016). The ECS and TCR best estimates here are tied to those AR5 and ΔQ best estimates, but can be simply scaled were those best estimate values to be refined in the future.
Keywords: air temperature, anthropogenic forcing, climate change, climate sensitivity, CO2 concentration, energy balance model, equilibrium climate sensitivity, global air temperature, IPCC, transient climate response.
References
Armour, K. C. (2017). Energy budget constraints on climate sensitivity in light of inconstant climate feedbacks. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 331–335.| Energy budget constraints on climate sensitivity in light of inconstant climate feedbacks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ayers, G. P. (2017). Lower Tropospheric Temperatures 1978–2016: The role played by anthropogenic global warming. J. South. Hemisph. Earth Sys. Sci. 67, 2–11.
| Lower Tropospheric Temperatures 1978–2016: The role played by anthropogenic global warming.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chylek, P., Klett, J. D., Lesins, G., Dubey, M. K., and Hengartner, N. (2014). The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation as a dominant factor of oceanic influence on climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 1689–1697.
| The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation as a dominant factor of oceanic influence on climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Forster, P. M. (2016). Inference of climate sensitivity from analysis of Earth’s energy budget. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 44, 85–106.
| Inference of climate sensitivity from analysis of Earth’s energy budget.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Foster, G., and Rahmstorf, S. (2011). Global temperature evolution 1979–2010. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 044022.
| Global temperature evolution 1979–2010.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Frankcombe, L. M., England, M. H., Mann, M. E., and Steinman, B. A. (2015). Separating internal variability from the externally forced climate response. J. Climate 28, 8184–8202.
| Separating internal variability from the externally forced climate response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gregory, J. M., Stouffer, R. J., Raper, S. C. B., Stott, P. A., and Rayner, N. A. (2002). An observationally based estimate of the climate sensitivity. J. Climate 15, 3117–3121.
| An observationally based estimate of the climate sensitivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grose, M. R., Colman, R., Bhend, J., and Moise, A. F. (2017). Limits to global and Australian temperature change this century based on expert judgment of climate sensitivity. Clim. Dyn. 48, 3325–3339.
| Limits to global and Australian temperature change this century based on expert judgment of climate sensitivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Haustein, K., Allen, M. R., Forster, P. M., Otto, F. E. L., Mitchell, D. M., Matthews, H. D., and Frame, D. J. (2017). A real-time global warming index. Sci. Rep. 7, 15417.
| A real-time global warming index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29133863PubMed |
IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (Eds T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp.
Kopp, G., and Lean, J. L. (2011). A new, lower value of total solar irradiance: Evidence and climate significance. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L01706.
| A new, lower value of total solar irradiance: Evidence and climate significance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lean, J. L. (2010). Cycles and trends in solar irradiance and climate. WIREs Clim. Change 1, 111–122.
| Cycles and trends in solar irradiance and climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lean, J. L., and Rind, D. H. (2008). How natural and anthropogenic influences alter global and regional surface temperatures: 1889 to 2006. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L18701.
| How natural and anthropogenic influences alter global and regional surface temperatures: 1889 to 2006.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lean, J. L., and Rind, D. H. (2009). How will Earth’s surface temperature change in future decades? Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L15708.
| How will Earth’s surface temperature change in future decades?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lewis, N., and Curry, J. A. (2015). The implications for climate sensitivity of AR5 forcing and heat uptake estimates. Clim. Dyn. 45, 1009–1023.
| The implications for climate sensitivity of AR5 forcing and heat uptake estimates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Marvel, K., Schmidt, G. A., Miller, R. L., and Nazarenko, L. S. (2016). Implications for climate sensitivity from the response to individual forcings. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 386–389.
| Implications for climate sensitivity from the response to individual forcings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Otto, A., Otto, F. E., Allen, M. R., Boucher, O., Church, J., Hegerl, G., Forster, P. M., Gillett, N. P., Gregory, J., Johnson, G. C., and Knutti, R. (2013). Energy budget constraints on climate response. Nat. Geosci. 6, 415–416.
| Energy budget constraints on climate response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Padilla, L. E., Vallis, G. K., and Rowley, C. W. (2011). Probabilistic estimates of transient climate sensitivity subject to uncertainty in forcing and natural variability. J. Climate 24, 5521–5537.
| Probabilistic estimates of transient climate sensitivity subject to uncertainty in forcing and natural variability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Power, S., Delage, F., Wang, G., Smith, I., and Kociuba, G. (2017). Apparent limitations in the ability of CMIP5 climate models to simulate recent multi-decadal change in surface temperature: implications for global temperature projections. Clim. Dyn. 49, 53–69.
| Apparent limitations in the ability of CMIP5 climate models to simulate recent multi-decadal change in surface temperature: implications for global temperature projections.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Richardson, M., Cowtan, K., Hawkins, E., and Stolpe, M. B. (2016). Reconciled climate response estimates from climate models and the energy budget of Earth. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 931–935.
| Reconciled climate response estimates from climate models and the energy budget of Earth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rohde, R., Muller., R. A., Jacobsen, R., Muller, E., Perlmutter, S., et al. (2013). A New Estimate of the Average Earth Surface Land Temperature Spanning 1753 to 2011. Geoinfor. Geostat.: An Overview 1, 1000101.
| A New Estimate of the Average Earth Surface Land Temperature Spanning 1753 to 2011.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Santer, B. D., Bonfils, C., Painter, J. F., Zelinka, M. D., Mears, C., Solomon, S., Schmidt, G. A., Fyfe, J. C., Cole, J. N., Nazarenko, L., and Taylor, K. E. (2014). Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperature. Nat. Geosci. 7, 85–189.
| Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schwartz, S. E., Charlson, R. J., Kahn, R., and Rodhe, H. (2014). Earth’s climate sensitivity: apparent inconsistencies in recent assessments. Earth’s Future 2, 601–605.
| Earth’s climate sensitivity: apparent inconsistencies in recent assessments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Storelvmo, T., Leirvik, T., Lohmann, U., Phillips, P. C., and Wild, M. (2016). Disentangling greenhouse warming and aerosol cooling to reveal Earth’s climate sensitivity. Nat. Geosci. 9, 286–289.
| Disentangling greenhouse warming and aerosol cooling to reveal Earth’s climate sensitivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tung, K.-K., and Zhou, J. (2013). Using data to attribute episodes of warming and cooling in instrumental records. PNAS 110, 2058–2063.
| Using data to attribute episodes of warming and cooling in instrumental records.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23345448PubMed |
van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., et al. (2011). The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim. Change 109, 5.
| The representative concentration pathways: an overview.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wijffels, S., Roemmich, D., Monselesan, D., Church, J., and Gilson, J. (2016). Ocean temperatures chronicle the ongoing warming of Earth. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 116.
| Ocean temperatures chronicle the ongoing warming of Earth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhou, J., and Tung, K.-K. (2013). Deducing multidecadal anthropogenic global warming trends using multiple regression analysis. J. Atmos. Sci. 70, 3–8.
| Deducing multidecadal anthropogenic global warming trends using multiple regression analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
