Probabilistic CO2 plume modelling
David Tang A *A
Mr David Tang received a BEng in Petroleum Engineering in 2011 and a MEngSc in Project Management in 2016 from the University of New South Wales. He was undertaking a MDataSc at the University of Western Australia before taking a sabbatical to become a father. Prior to joining CO2CRC in 2022, he was an experienced Reservoir Engineer working in the oil and gas industry. He now consults to industry on carbon storage development projects via CO2Tech and is actively involved in carbon and hydrogen storage research. His broad education has helped to develop novel solutions to storage challenges in the subsurface. |
Abstract
The Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006 provides the legal framework for carbon dioxide (CO2) storage projects in Australian Commonwealth waters, with the associated regulations and guidelines requiring that applicants for a ‘declaration of an identified storage formation’ consider ‘all migration pathways of which the probability of occurrence is greater than 10%’. The overseas Society of Petroleum Engineer’s CO2 Storage Resources Management System goes further and discusses the concept of modelling not only the subsurface CO2 plume itself but also the attendant pressure effects and displaced formation water, which, in that scheme, comprise part of a wider ‘containment area’. These collective requirements necessitate that the eligible carbon storage resources be assessed probabilistically, a requirement that can result in sizable static and dynamic models that are computationally heavy to simulate. This computational complexity places inherent, practical limitations on using ‘conventional’ probabilistic workflows, such as Monte Carlo simulation or Latin hypercube sampling. To address this limitation, factorial experimental designs were employed in the modelling workflow. Factorial designs are widely used in settings where individual experiments are costly or require prolonged periods and, when implemented correctly, can uncover underlying uncertainty distributions using a minimum number of simulation cases. The efficacy and power of this approach is demonstrated using CO2 injection and migration models for a carbon storage project located in offshore Western Australia, which is in the early development stage. The ability to test potential sensitivities rapidly has proven to be critical in refining and defining the project’s ultimate carbon capture and storage development plan.
Keywords: carbon storage, CCS, CCUS, CO2, plume modelling, probabilistic, SRMS, storage resource.
Mr David Tang received a BEng in Petroleum Engineering in 2011 and a MEngSc in Project Management in 2016 from the University of New South Wales. He was undertaking a MDataSc at the University of Western Australia before taking a sabbatical to become a father. Prior to joining CO2CRC in 2022, he was an experienced Reservoir Engineer working in the oil and gas industry. He now consults to industry on carbon storage development projects via CO2Tech and is actively involved in carbon and hydrogen storage research. His broad education has helped to develop novel solutions to storage challenges in the subsurface. |
References
Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources (2021) ‘Offshore Greenhouse Gas Guideline for Declaration of Identified Greenhouse Gas Storage Formation (including under a Cross-boundary Greenhouse Gas Assessment Permit) and Notification of an Eligible Greenhouse Gas Storage Formation.’ (Australian Government)
Society of Petroleum Engineers (2017) CO2 Storage Resources Management System. (SPE) Available at https://www.spe.org/en/industry/co2-storage-resources-management-system/
Society of Petroleum Engineers (2022) Guidelines for Applications of the CO2 Storage Resources Management System. (SPE) Available at https://doi.org/10.2118/9781613998786