Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Energy Producers Journal Australian Energy Producers Journal Society
Journal of Australian Energy Producers
 

Concurrent 29. Oral Presentation for: Integrating underground gas storage experience for CCS optimisation

Zis G. Katelis A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A GaffneyCline, Sydney, Australia.

* Correspondence to: zis.katalis@gaffneycline.com

The APPEA Journal 63 - https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ22413
Published: 2 June 2023

Abstract

Presented on Thursday 18 May: Session 29

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) sites require diligent assessments to account for potential leakage over time. Leakage pathways include both natural and engineered (e.g. wells) invoking the requirement for a structured technical analysis as part of a risk inventory. This paper focuses on lessons learnt from underground gas storage (UGS) sites to guide CCS technical workflows to handle natural geological risk elements. UGS facilities have been operating for over a 100 years. Their injection and withdrawal histories, by their very nature, test the complex changes that occur to the reservoir and cap-rock over time and provide valuable insight to demonstrate the feasibility of CCS and its potential for long-term storage. Geomechanical assessment of the reservoir and cap-rock requires an inventory of core material, log and seismic data with the aim of selecting the appropriate data to model the ability of that formation to contain a column of CO2. As supercritical CO2 is injected into the formation and pore pressure builds, the geomechanics of the reservoir needs diligent review to assess the potential to trigger failure on the cap-rock and pre-existing faults and fractures. UGS injection/withdrawal histories assist in the reservoir and overburden static and dynamic modelling along with designing a measurement, monitoring and verification process for CCS sites. Technical workflows, from seismic and static modelling to geomechanics and dynamic simulation and back to seismic for containment monitoring, are discussed that have been refined by UGS experience to benefit the selection of potential CCS sites.

To access the Oral Presentation click the link on the right. To read the full paper click here

Keywords: carbon capture and storage, CO2, core, cushion gas, fluid substitution modelling, geomechanics, maximum pressure, salt cavern, seismic, SHmax, Shmin, supercritical, tracers, underground gas storage, uniaxial compressive strength, working gas.

Zis G. Katelis (zis.katalis@gaffneycline.com), GaffneyCline Technical Director. Zis has 25+ years of experience working on seismic processing, interpretation projects and workflows, log data integration as well as contributing to and leading integrated technical studies. With GaffneyCline since July 2007, he has managed and contributed to reserves and resource assessments and technical and commercial studies for conventional and unconventional reservoirs and gas storage projects. Zis has had prior assignments in Singapore, Thailand, Middle East, Indonesia, China and Australia with GaffneyCline, as an independent consultant and SLB. He has been based in Sydney since 2010. He has been professionally involved with SPE, is a SEAPEX member in addition to being a SPE 2022 APOGCE Technical Committee member. He received a BSc. (Hons.) in Geophysics from Monash University, Australia.