Stocktake Sale on now: wide range of books at up to 70% off!
Register      Login
Australian Energy Producers Journal Australian Energy Producers Journal Society
Journal of Australian Energy Producers
 

Business Poster B2: Strategic decision making to achieve a path to net zero

Kris Cejka A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Decision Frameworks, Perth, WA, Australia.

* Correspondence to: Kris@decisionframeworks.com

The APPEA Journal 62 - https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ21438
Published: 3 June 2022

Abstract

Poster B2

With continued changes to global policy and implementation of greenhouse gas emissions reductions, organisations are increasingly creating goals for net zero emissions. Not knowing where carbon policy is heading and what incentives and penalties will be makes it difficult to make decisions on projects while trying to achieve a path to net zero. Many avenues are currently being investigated from carbon capture and storage (CCS) to operational equipment replacement and leak reduction. There are no standard business models, and this presents significant challenges which need to be understood. Though new, they are not novel, as the industry knows how to face challenges which include evolving policies and tax implications. This paper showcases how energy companies can structure, evaluate and communicate CCS decision making using the Decision Quality process. The fundamentals of Decision Quality are applied to describe a case study which focuses on the challenge for organisations with greenhouse gas emissions, considering which facilities to prioritise, which technologies to cost-effectively capture, how to transport and ultimately how to reuse or store the emissions. The Decision Quality – Scenario Thinking process will be instrumental in understanding the uncertain scenarios in the global carbon arena. We will define the solution space of viable alternative strategies and provide unique insight into the impact of the key risks and uncertainties on the alternatives in play – answering the question, under what terms and conditions might each alternative be viable? Using structured decision techniques, insights into CCS strategies and what it will take to achieve will be gained.

To access the poster click the link on the right. To read the full paper click here

Keywords: CCS, CCUS, CO2 carbon capture and storage, Decision Analysis, Decision Quality, greenhouse gas, Scenario Planning, Scenario Thinking, strategic planning, strategy, strategy table, structured decision, uncertainty.

Kris Cejka received his BS in Geology & Geophysics from the University of Wisconsin and MBA from the University of San Francisco. Kris is a subject matter expert in Decision Quality with expertise in coaching teams and facilitating and evaluating complex decisions. He has extensive experience in decision analysis, strategic planning, commercial negotiations, litigation strategy, as well as corporate strategy, portfolio management, acquisition and divestiture. Kris is currently a Senior Consultant at Decision Frameworks in Perth. He previously worked for Chevron USA as a Senior Global Decision Analyst and worked to develop projects in the USA, China, Vietnam, Brazil and others. Kris transitioned with Chevron to Australia and was responsible for developing decisions for portfolio, high-value investments, new ventures and commercial opportunities, and led the decision and economic function for the Asia Pacific region. Kris is a Fellow of the Society of Decision Professionals and President of the Australasia Chapter.