The Use of the ‘Ammonium Diffusion’ Method for δ15N-NH4+ and δ15N-NO3− Measurements: Comparison with Other Techniques
Mathieu Sebilo A C , Bernhard Mayer B , Micheline Grably A , Daniel Billiou A and André Mariotti AA UMR BIOMCO, Université Pierre et Marie Curie—INRA-CNRS, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France.
B Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Calgary, Calgary, T2N 1N4, Canada.
C Corresponding author. Email: mathieu.sebilo@ccr.jussieu.fr
Environmental Chemistry 1(2) 99-103 https://doi.org/10.1071/EN04037
Submitted: 16 April 2004 Accepted: 7 July 2004 Published: 21 October 2004
Environmental Context. Nitrogen is an essential element for all living organisms, and its biogeochemical cycle is connected to the cycling of carbon, sulfur, phosphorous, oxygen, and trace metals. Measurement of the isotopic composition of ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3−) containing samples provides a better understanding of the nitrogen cycle. While the established ‘ammonium diffusion’ measurement has many advantages, it is not easy for inexperienced people to prepare samples. This paper shows how the method can be simplified, ideally for samples freshly collected from the field.
Abstract. Several methods have been developed for nitrogen isotope measurements on ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3−) in solid or aqueous samples. We have tested the accuracy and reproducibility of the ammonium diffusion method for δ15N measurements on NH4+ and NO3− and compared this technique to other established methods. Our results show that the ammonium diffusion technique is capable of generating accurate and reproducible δ15N values for minute quantities of NH4+-N and NO3−-N in aqueous samples, if sufficient care is taken to minimize nitrogen blanks and to optimize the extraction procedure. Hence, the ammonium diffusion method offers an attractive alternative to more labour-intensive and costly methods for determining nitrogen isotope ratios of NH4+ and NO3− in aqueous samples.
Keywords. : analysis — nitrogen — MS — speciation
[1]
B. Fry,
W. Brand,
F. J. Mersch,
K. Tholke,
R. Garritt,
Anal. Chem. 1992, 64, 288.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |