Iron Humate as a Multifunctional Sorbent for Inorganic and Organic Pollutants
Pavel JanošUniversity of Jan Evangelista Purkyně, Faculty of the Environment, 400 96 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic. Email: janos@fzp.ujep.cz
Environmental Chemistry 2(1) 31-34 https://doi.org/10.1071/EN04055
Submitted: 27 June 2004 Accepted: 30 November 2004 Published: 21 March 2005
Environmental Context. Humic substances can be used during treatment of wastewater, groundwater, leachates, and soil in various environmental engineering technologies, in which these abundant natural macromolecules can substitute for activated carbon and other, more expensive, organic and inorganic adsorbents. Moreover, toxic organic compounds can, once immobilized on the humates, become incorporated into the humate chemical structure and thereby circumvent the need for desorption. However, the complex chemical nature and inhomogeneous physical form of these materials means absorption mechanisms will be complicated and no single mechanism describes the process; in this study metals, organochlorines, and dyes are shown to be absorb differently.
Abstract. Iron humate, produced from low-rank brown coal, can be used as an effective sorbent for substances as different as metal ions and low-polarity organic compounds (chlorophenols). The sorption capacities ranged from 0.024 to 0.324 mmol g–1 for metal ions and from 0.016 to 0.037 mmol g–1 for chlorophenols. Evidently, different mechanisms are responsible for the sorption of various chemical pollutants from aqueous solutions. Multimode sorption mechanisms play an important role also in the sorption of ionic compounds such as basic dyes in the presence of oppositely charged surfactants.
Keywords. : chlorinated organics — dyes — humic substances — metals — water treatment
Acknowledgements
Severočeske Doly, Bilina, is thanked for providing iron humate for this study. Financial support from the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (Grants No. 203/03/0922 and 104/03/1248) is gratefully acknowledged.
[1]
P. Bose,
M. A. Bose,
S. Kumar,
Adv. Environ. Res. 2002, 7, 179.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |