Dip angle-compensated one-way wave equation migration
Weijia Sun 1 2 3 Binzhong Zhou 1 Li-Yun Fu 21 CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering, PO Box 883, Kenmore, Qld 4096, Australia.
2 Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 9825, Beijing 100029, China.
3 Corresponding author. Email: swj@mail.iggcas.ac.cn
Exploration Geophysics 41(2) 137-145 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG09027
Submitted: 29 May 2009 Accepted: 25 January 2010 Published: 7 June 2010
Abstract
Conventional migration algorithms based on one-way wave equations in a Cartesian coordinate system often under estimate amplitudes, especially at large propagation or reflection angles. This has a deleterious effect on seismic images and should be corrected. We illustrate the nature of the problem by working in the more natural spherical coordinate system and offer two simple solutions to the problem: (1) a wave combination scheme where the wave extrapolation is done independently for each Cartesian coordinate and the resulting wavefields are summed and (2) a simple wave projection scheme whereby the conventional one-way propagator is corrected by means of a factor 1/cos(θ), where θ is the angle of the wave measured from the vertical axis or the reflector angle. The wave combination scheme is applicable to waves with propagation angles beyond 90°, but will roughly triple the computation time compared with conventional one-way propagators in the 3D case. The wave projection scheme is more economical and can easily be implemented in the wavenumber (or slowness) domain at no extra computational cost. These schemes are valid both in depth-dependent media and in laterally heterogeneous media. In addition, the proposed amplitude-preserving schemes can be applied to all methods based on the conventional one-way wave equation. We then develop and implement the second approach to demonstrate its validity by means of numerical examples.
Key words: dip angle correction, one-way wave equation, post-stack migration.
Acknowledgements
The research was supported by Australian Coal Association Research Program (ACARP) and the post-graduate program (W.S.) of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). Professor Stewart Greenhalgh and Dr Peter Hatherly are thanked for their constructive review of the paper and corrections of the English expressions, which largely improved the quality of this manuscript.
Angus, D. A., 2007, True amplitude corrections for a narrow-angle one-way elastic wave equation: Geophysics 72, T19–T26.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chun, J. H., and Jacewitz, C. A., 1981, Fundamentals of frequency domain migration: Geophysics 46, 717–733.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
de Hoop, M. V., Rousseau, J. H. L., and Wu, R.-S., 2000, Generalization of the phase-screen approximation for the scattering of acoustic waves: Wave Motion 31, 43–70.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ristow, D., and Rühl, T., 1994, Fourier finite-difference migration: Geophysics 59, 1882–1893.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhang, Y., Zhang, G., and Bleistein, N., 2005, Theory of true-amplitude one-way wave equations and true-amplitude common-shot migration: Geophysics 70, E1–E10.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhang, Y., Xu, S., Bleistein, N., and Zhang, G., 2007, True-amplitude, angle-domain, common-image gathers from one-way wave-equation migrations: Geophysics 72, S49–S58.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
1 Please note that we have not used different symbols for the wavefields u in the different domains, but we let the arguments of the function aid in determination of the corresponding domain.