Negative apparent resistivity in dipole–dipole electrical surveys
Hyun-Key Jung 1 Dong-Joo Min 2 5 Hyo Sun Lee 1 Seokhoon Oh 3 Hojoon Chung 41 Exploration Geophysics and Mining Engineering Department, Korea Institute of Geoscience & Mineral Resources, 92 Gwahang-no, Yuseung-gu, Daejeon, 305-350, Korea.
2 Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Seoul National University, 599 Gwanangno, Seoul, 151-744, Korea.
3 Department of Geosystem Engineering, Kangwon National University, 192-1 Hyoja-Dong, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, 200-701, Korea.
4 Human & Earth Inc., 513-22, Sangdaewon-dong, Jungwon-gu, Sungnam, Kyeonggi, 462-120, Korea.
5 Corresponding author. Email: spoppy@snu.ac.kr
Exploration Geophysics 40(1) 33-40 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08111
Submitted: 19 November 2008 Published: 27 February 2009
Abstract
In field surveys using the dipole–dipole electrical resistivity method, we often encounter negative apparent resistivity. The term ‘negative apparent resistivity’ refers to apparent resistivity values with the opposite sign to surrounding data in a pseudosection. Because these negative apparent resistivity values have been regarded as measurement errors, we have discarded the negative apparent resistivity data. Some people have even used negative apparent resistivity data in an inversion process, by taking absolute values of the data. Our field experiments lead us to believe that the main cause for negative apparent resistivity is neither measurement errors nor the influence of self potentials. Furthermore, we also believe that it is not caused by the effects of induced polarization. One possible cause for negative apparent resistivity is the subsurface geological structure. In this study, we provide some numerical examples showing that negative apparent resistivity can arise from geological structures.
In numerical examples, we simulate field data using a 3D numerical modelling algorithm, and then extract 2D sections. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that the negative apparent resistivity can be caused by geological structures modelled by U-shaped and crescent-shaped conductive models. Negative apparent resistivity usually occurs when potentials increase with distance from the current electrodes. By plotting the voltage-electrode position curves, we could confirm that when the voltage curves intersect each other, negative apparent resistivity appears. These numerical examples suggest that when we observe negative apparent resistivity in field surveys, we should consider the possibility that the negative apparent resistivity has been caused by geological structure.
Key words: dipole–dipole array, electrical resistivity method, negative apparent resistivity, pseudosection, 3D numerical modelling.
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by the Basic Research Project of the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) funded by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy of Korea, the Brain Korea 21 project of Seoul National University (SNU) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) of Korea, and the Korea Research Foundation Grant funded by the Korea Government (MOEHRD, Basic Research Promotion Fund) (KRF-2006–003-D00709). We thank two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and helpful suggestions.
Cho, I.-K., Kim, J.-J., Chung, S.-H., and Suh, J.-H., 2002, Negative apparent resistivity in resistivity method: Mulli-tamsa 5, 199–205.[in Korean]
Spitzer, K., 1995, A 3-D finite difference algorithm for DC resistivity modeling using conjugate gradient methods: Geophysical Journal International 123, 903–914.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |