Register      Login
Exploration Geophysics Exploration Geophysics Society
Journal of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Traveltime estimation of first arrivals and later phases using the modified graph method for a crustal structure analysis

Ryuji Kubota 1 4 Eiichiro Nishiyama 1 Kei Murase 1 Junzo Kasahara 2 3
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 Kawasaki Geological Engineering Co., Ltd., Mita-Kawasaki bldg., 2-11-15 Mita, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8337, Japan.

2 Faculty of Science, University of Shizuoka, Japan.

3 JGI Inc., Meikei Building, 1-5-21, Otsuka, Bunkyo, Tokyo 112-0021, Japan.

4 Corresponding author. Email: kubotar@kge.co.jp

Exploration Geophysics 40(1) 105-113 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08104
Submitted: 7 October 2008  Accepted: 26 November 2008   Published: 27 February 2009

Abstract

The interpretation of observed waveform characteristics identified in refraction and wide-angle reflection data increases confidence in the crustal structure model obtained. When calculating traveltimes and raypaths, wavefront methods on a regular grid based on graph theory are robust even with complicated structures, but basically compute only first arrivals. In this paper, we develop new algorithms to compute traveltimes and raypaths not only for first arrivals, but also for fast and later reflection arrivals, later refraction arrivals, and converted waves between P and S, using the modified wavefront method based on slowness network nodes mapped on a multi-layer model. Using the new algorithm, we can interpret reflected arrivals, Pg-later arrivals, strong arrivals appearing behind Pn, triplicated Moho reflected arrivals (PmP) to obtain the shape of the Moho, and phases involving conversion between P and S. Using two models of an ocean-continent transition zone and an oceanic ridge or seamount, we show the usefulness of this algorithm, which is confirmed by synthetic seismograms using the 2D Finite Difference Method (2D-FDM). Characteristics of arrivals and raypaths of the two models differ from each other in that using only first-arrival traveltime data for crustal structure analysis involves risk of erroneous interpretation in the ocean-continent transition zone, or the region around a ridge or seamount.

Key words: forward modelling, graph method, later phase, PmP, P-S conversion, theoretical traveltime.


Acknowledgments

We express our sincere thanks to Drs. A. Nishizawa and K. Kaneda of the Japan Coast Guard for their useful comments and suggestions. We also thank the members of Japan Continental Shelf Survey Co., Ltd, Kawasaki Geological Eng. Co., Ltd, and JGI Inc. for giving many valuable suggestions. We also great thank two anonymous reviewers. Their critical comments greatly improved the paper.


References

Čhervený V. , Molotkov I. A. , and Pšenčík I. , 1977, Ray method in seismology: Praha, Univ. Karlova.

Dijkstra, E. W., 1959, A note on two problems in connexion with graphs: Numerische Mathematik 1, 269–271.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Kasahara J. , 1993, “An introduction to computerized geoscience,” University of Tokyo Press, 239 pp.

Kasahara J. , Kubota R. , Tanaka T. , Mizohata S. , Nishiyama E. , Nishizawa A. and Kaneda K. , 2007, New precise method for the crustal structure analysis using OBS and control sources, Abstract of 2007 JGU, O135–007.

Korenaga, J., Holbrook, W. S., Kent, G. M., Kelement, P. B., Detrick, R. S., Larsen, C., Hopper, J. R., and Dahl-Jensen, T., 2000, Crustal structure of the Southeast Greenland Margin from joint refraction and reflection seismic tomography: Journal of Geophysical Research 105(B9), 21591–21614.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Larsen S. , 2000, “E3D” 2D/3D Elastic Finite-Difference Wave Propagation Code: UCRL. (http://www.seismo.unr.edu/ftp/pub/louie/class/455/e3d/)

Moghaddam, P. P., and Kasahara, J., 2003, Accuracy investigation of seismic reciprocity using 3D FDM code: Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 84, Abstract S41E-0128, 2003.
Saito H. , 1989, Traveltimes and raypaths of first arrival seismic waves, Computation method based on Huygens’ Principle: 59th Annual International Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstracts, 244–247.

Tsuruga T. , Kasahara J. , Nishiyama E. , Murase K. , Kubota R. , and Nishizawa A. , 2007, Evaluation of efficiencies of P-S conversion in the oceanic crust and Vp/Vs estimation: Japan Geoscience Union Meeting, Abstract, O135–008.

Tsuruga, K., Kasahara, J., Kubota, R., Nishiyama, E., Kamimura, A., Yoshihiro Naito, Y., Honda, H., Oikawa, N., Tamura, Y., Nishizawa, A., and Kaneda, KK, 2008, Evaluation and interpretation of the effect of heterogeneously inserted thin/thick, high/low velocity layers in OBS/Air-gun structure study: Exploration Geophysics (Butsuri-Tansa) 61, 1–14.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vidale, J. E., 1988, Finite-difference calculation of travel times: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 78, 2062–2076.


Vinje, V., Iversen, E., and Gjoystadal, H., 1993, Travel time and amplitude estimation using wave front construction: Geophysics 58, 1157–1166.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zelt, C. A., and Ellis, R. M., 1988, Practical and efficient ray tracing in two-dimensional media for rapid traveltime and amplitude forward modelling: Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics 24, 16–31.


Zhang, J., and Toksöz, M. N., 1998, Nonlinear refraction travel time tomography: Geophysics 63, 1726–1737.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhang, J., ten Brink, U. S., and Toksöz, M. N., 1998, Nonlinear refraction and reflection travel time tomography: Journal of Geophysical Research 103(B12), 29743–29757.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |