Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Unveiling of suppressed genes in interspecific and backcross populations derived from mutants of Cicer species

F. Oncu Ceylan A , Alper Adak A , Duygu Sari A , Hatice Sari A and Cengiz Toker https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7042-1132 A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.

B Corresponding author. Email: toker@akdeniz.edu.tr

Crop and Pasture Science 70(3) 254-262 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP18504
Submitted: 30 October 2018  Accepted: 11 February 2019   Published: 25 March 2019

Abstract

Although many interspecific crosses in Cicer species have successfully been carried out to improve the population in cultivated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), interspecific and backcross populations derived from mutants of Cicer species have not been studied for revealing suppressed genes responsible for heterotic effects and transgressive segregations. Therefore, the study aimed (i) to estimate heterosis (here, offspring superior to mid-parent value) and heterobeltiosis (offspring superior to better parent) for yield and yield components in the F1; (ii) to decipher transgressive segregation (extreme phenotypes) in F2 and backcross populations; and (iii) to reveal suppressed genes in interspecific and backcross populations (C. arietinum × F1 and C. reticulatum Ladiz.× F1) derived from interspecific crosses between a mutant of C. arietinum and a mutant of C. reticulatum. Heterobeltiosis was found for seed and biological yields, number of branches, and number of pods per plant in F1 progeny; heterosis was determined for the additional traits of 100-seed weight and harvest index. Heterobeltiosis and heterosis for yield and yield components in F1 progeny prompted transgressive segregation for these traits in F2 and backcross populations. In the backcrosses, C. arietinum × F1 crosses produced greater seed size and more pods per plant than C. reticulatum × F1, suggesting that C. arietinum × F1 backcrossing could improve yield components and lead to large seed size. Most of the high-yielding progeny in F2 and C. arietinum × F1 populations had double-podded nodes. It was concluded that the suppressed genes in a mutant of C. reticulatum or a mutant of C. arietinum played a crucial role in increasing transgressive segregations and allowing the cultivated chickpea to gain increased yield and yield components as well as large seed size.

Additional keywords: Cicer reticulatum, herbicide resistance, mutation, pre-breeding.


References

Abbo S, Berger J, Turner NC (2003) Evolution of cultivated chickpea: four bottlenecks limit diversity and constrain adaptation. Functional Plant Biology 30, 1081–1087.
Evolution of cultivated chickpea: four bottlenecks limit diversity and constrain adaptation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Adak A, Sari D, Sari H, Toker C (2017) Gene effects of Cicer reticulatum on qualitative and quantitative traits in the cultivated chickpea. Plant Breeding 136, 939–947.
Gene effects of Cicer reticulatum on qualitative and quantitative traits in the cultivated chickpea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barcaccia G, Tavoletti S, Mariani A, Veronesi F (2003) Occurrence, inheritance and use of reproductive mutants in alfalfa improvement. Euphytica 133, 37–56.
Occurrence, inheritance and use of reproductive mutants in alfalfa improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Berger J, Abbo S, Turner NC (2003) Ecogeography of annual wild Cicer species. Crop Science 43, 1076–1090.
Ecogeography of annual wild Cicer species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Berrada A, Shivakumar B, Yaduraju N (2007) Chickpea in cropping systems. In ‘Chickpea breeding and management’. (Eds S Yadav, B Redden, W Chen, B Sharma) pp. 193–212. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

Caballo C, Castro P, Gil J, Izquierdo I, Millan T, Rubio J (2018) STMS (sequence tagged microsatellite site) molecular markers as a valuable tool to confirm controlled crosses in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) breeding programs. Euphytica 214, 231
STMS (sequence tagged microsatellite site) molecular markers as a valuable tool to confirm controlled crosses in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) breeding programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cobos M, Winter P, Kharrat M, Cubero J, Gil J, Millan T, Rubio J (2009) Genetic analysis of agronomic traits in a wide cross of chickpea. Field Crops Research 111, 130–136.
Genetic analysis of agronomic traits in a wide cross of chickpea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Coffman FA (1933) Heterosis: Specific not general in nature. Science 77, 114–115.

Dahiya B, Solanki I, Kumar R (1985) Germination rate and its genetics in chickpea. International Chickpea Newsletter 13, 6–8.

De Melo RC, Trevisani N, Pereira TCV, Guidolin AF, Coimbra JLM (2017) Heterozygosity level and its relationship with genetic variability mechanisms in beans. Ciência Agronômica 48, 480–486.

Devasirvatham V, Gaur PM, Mallikarjuna N, Tokachichu RN, Trethowan RM, Tan DK (2012) Effect of high temperature on the reproductive development of chickpea genotypes under controlled environments. Functional Plant Biology 39, 1009–1018.
Effect of high temperature on the reproductive development of chickpea genotypes under controlled environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

FAOSTAT (2019) FAOSTAT: crops. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed 8 February 2019).

Gaur PM, Singh MK, Samineni S, Sajja SB, Jukanti AK, Kamatam S, Varshney RK (2016) Inheritance of protein content and its relationships with seed size, grain yield and other traits in chickpea. Euphytica 209, 253–260.
Inheritance of protein content and its relationships with seed size, grain yield and other traits in chickpea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jaiswal H, Singh B, Singh A, Singh R (1986) Introgression of genes for yield and yield traits from C. reticulatum into C. arietinum. International Chickpea Newsletter 14, 5–8.

Kahraman A, Pandey A, Khan MK, Lindsay D, Moenga S, Vance L, Bergmann E, Carrasquilla-Garcia N, Shin MG, Chang PL (2017) Distinct subgroups of Cicer echinospermum are associated with hybrid sterility and breakdown in interspecific crosses with cultivated chickpea. Crop Science 57, 3101–3111.
Distinct subgroups of Cicer echinospermum are associated with hybrid sterility and breakdown in interspecific crosses with cultivated chickpea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kamble GC, Petkar HJ (2015) Biotechnological study of comparative mutagenicity on morphological and phenological traits in wild chickpea. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences 5, 38–42.

Kazan KMFJ, Muehlbauer FJ, Weeden NE, Ladizinsky G (1993) Inheritance and linkage relationships of morphological and isozyme loci in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86, 417–426.
Inheritance and linkage relationships of morphological and isozyme loci in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Koseoglu K, Adak A, Sari D, Sari H, Ceylan FO, Toker C (2017) Transgressive segregations for yield criteria in reciprocal interspecific crosses between Cicer arietinum L. and C. reticulatum Ladiz. Euphytica 213, 116
Transgressive segregations for yield criteria in reciprocal interspecific crosses between Cicer arietinum L. and C. reticulatum Ladiz.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kumar J, Abbo S (2001) Genetics of flowering time in chickpea and its bearing on productivity in semiarid environments. Advances in Agronomy 72, 107–138.
Genetics of flowering time in chickpea and its bearing on productivity in semiarid environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ladizinsky G, Adler A (1976) The origin of chickpea Cicer arietinum L. Euphytica 25, 211–217.
The origin of chickpea Cicer arietinum L.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Maluszynski M, Szarejko I, Barriga P, Balcerzyk A (2001) Heterosis in crop mutant crosses and production of high yielding lines using double haploid systems. Euphytica 120, 387–398.
Heterosis in crop mutant crosses and production of high yielding lines using double haploid systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mugabe D, Ma Y, Coyne CC, McGee R (2017) Identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling cold tolerance in chickpea recombinant RIL population (CRIL2) from Cicer arietinum L. × Cicer reticulatum. In ‘Proceedings Biannual Meeting of the North American Pulse Improvement Association’. East Lansing, MI, November 2017. (North American Pulse Improvement Association)

Ocampo B, Robertson LD, Singh KB (1998) Variation in seed protein content in the annual wild Cicer species. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 78, 220–224.
Variation in seed protein content in the annual wild Cicer species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rennie R, Dubetz S (1986) Nitrogen-15-determined nitrogen fixation in field-grown chickpea, lentil, fababean, and field pea. Agronomy Journal 78, 654–660.
Nitrogen-15-determined nitrogen fixation in field-grown chickpea, lentil, fababean, and field pea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rieseberg LH, Archer MA, Wayne RK (1999) Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83, 363–372.
Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10583537PubMed |

Robertson LD, Singh K, Ocampo B (1995) ‘A catalog of annual wild Cicer species.’ (ICARDA: Aleppo, Syria)

Rubio J, Moreno MT, Cubero JI, Gil J (1998) Effect of the gene for double pod in chickpea on yield, yield components and stability of yield. Plant Breeding 117, 585–587.
Effect of the gene for double pod in chickpea on yield, yield components and stability of yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Salimath P, Toker C, Sandhu J, Kumar J, Suma B, Yadav S, Bahl P (2007) Conventional breeding methods. In ‘Chickpea breeding and management’. (Eds S Yadav, B Redden, W Chen, B Sharma) pp. 369–390. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

Singh KB, Ocampo B (1997) Exploitation of wild Cicer species for yield improvement in chickpea. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95, 418–423.
Exploitation of wild Cicer species for yield improvement in chickpea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Singh KB, Saxena MC (1993) ‘Breeding for stress tolerance in cool-season food legumes.’ (Wiley: Chichester, UK)

Singh BD, Jaiswal HK, Singh RM, Singh AK (1984) Isolation of early-flowering recombinants from the interspecific cross between Cicer arietinum and C. reticulatum. International Chickpea Newsletter 11, 14–16.

Singh KB, Ocampo B, Robertson L (1998) Diversity for abiotic and biotic stress resistance in the wild annual Cicer species. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 45, 9–17.
Diversity for abiotic and biotic stress resistance in the wild annual Cicer species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Singh S, Gumber R, Joshi N, Singh K (2005) Introgression from wild Cicer reticulatum to cultivated chickpea for productivity and disease resistance. Plant Breeding 124, 477–480.
Introgression from wild Cicer reticulatum to cultivated chickpea for productivity and disease resistance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Singh M, Kumar K, Bisht IS, Dutta M, Rana MK, Rana JC, Bansal KC, Sarker A (2015) Exploitation of wild annual Cicer species for widening the gene pool of chickpea cultivars. Plant Breeding 134, 186–192.
Exploitation of wild annual Cicer species for widening the gene pool of chickpea cultivars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Singh M, Rani S, Malhotra N, Katna G, Sarker A (2018) Transgressive segregations for agronomic improvement using interspecific crosses between C. arietinum L. × C. reticulatum Ladiz and C. echinospermum Davis species. PLoS One 13, e0203082
Transgressive segregations for agronomic improvement using interspecific crosses between C. arietinum L. × C. reticulatum Ladiz and C. echinospermum Davis species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30589898PubMed |

Stewart G, Dalley CL (1932) A cumulative transgressive segregation in wheat. Agronomy Journal 24, 755–764.
A cumulative transgressive segregation in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Talip M, Adak A, Kahraman A, Berger J, Sari D, Sari H, Penmetsa R, von Wettberg E, Cook D, Toker C (2018) Agro-morphological traits of Cicer reticulatum Ladizinsky in comparison to C. echinospermum PH Davis in terms of potential to improve cultivated chickpea (C. arietinum L.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 65, 951–962.
Agro-morphological traits of Cicer reticulatum Ladizinsky in comparison to C. echinospermum PH Davis in terms of potential to improve cultivated chickpea (C. arietinum L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Toker C (2014) Mutagenesis for resistance to abiotic stresses: chickpea as model crop. In ‘Mutagenesis: exploring novel genes and pathways’. (Eds NB Tomlekova, MI Kozgar, MR Wani) pp. 215–238. (Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Toker C, Lluch C, Tejera NA, Serraj R, Siddique KHM (2007) Abiotic stresses. In ‘Chickpea breeding and management’. (Eds S Yadav, B Redden, W Chen, B Sharma) pp. 474–496. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

Toker C, Uzun B, Ceylan FO, Ikten C (2014) Chickpea. In ‘Alien gene transfer in crop plants. Vol. 2. Achievements and impacts’. (Eds A Pratap, J Kumar) pp. 121–151. (Springer: New York)

Upadhyaya HD, Kumar S, Gowda C, Singh S (2006) Two major genes for seed size in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 147, 311–315.
Two major genes for seed size in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van der Maesen LJG (1980) Growing wild chickpeas. International Chickpea Newsletter 2, 3–4.

van Oss R, Abbo S, Eshed R, Sherman A, Coyne CJ, Vandemark GJ, Zhang HB, Peleg Z (2015) Genetic relationship in Cicer sp. expose evidence for gene flow between the cultigen and its wild progenitor. PLoS One 10, e0139789
Genetic relationship in Cicer sp. expose evidence for gene flow between the cultigen and its wild progenitor.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26447951PubMed |

von Wettberg EJ, Chang PL, Başdemir F, Carrasquila-Garcia N, Korbu LB, Moenga SM, Bedada G, Greenlon A, Moriuchi KS, Singh V (2018) Ecology and genomics of an important crop wild relative as a prelude to agricultural innovation. Nature Communications 9, art no. 649
Ecology and genomics of an important crop wild relative as a prelude to agricultural innovation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29440741PubMed |

Yasar M, Ceylan F, Ikten C, Toker C (2014) Comparison of expressivity and penetrance of the double podding trait and yield components based on reciprocal crosses of kabuli and desi chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 196, 331–339.
Comparison of expressivity and penetrance of the double podding trait and yield components based on reciprocal crosses of kabuli and desi chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |