Effects of plant population and row spacing on grain yield of aerial-sown and drill-sown rice
B. W. Dunn
A D , T. S. Dunn A , J. H. Mitchell B and J. Brinkhoff C
A NSW Department of Primary Industries, Yanco Agricultural Institute, Yanco, NSW 2703, Australia.
B School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.
C University of New England, Applied Agricultural Remote Sensing Centre, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: brian.dunn@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Crop and Pasture Science 71(3) 219-228 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP19421
Submitted: 14 October 2019 Accepted: 17 January 2020 Published: 1 April 2020
Journal compilation © CSIRO 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Objective guidelines about plant population are essential to ensure that yield potential of rice grain is not compromised. Drill-sowing of rice is increasing in popularity in many rice-growing regions of the world in response to a requirement for increased water productivity, but little information is available on row-spacing widths required to maximise grain yield potential. This research investigated the impacts of plant population on grain yield and yield components for aerial- and drill-sown rice, and the effects of row-spacing width for drill-sown rice grown in a temperate environment. Ten aerial-sown and five drill-sown experiments were conducted in south-eastern Australia over three seasons using four semi-dwarf rice varieties. Plant populations ranged from 7 to 396 plants m–2.
Plant populations as low as 30 plants m–2 were able to achieve grain yields >12 t ha–1 but only when the plants were uniformly distributed. At a population of ~100 plants m–2, the impact of plant-stand distribution was negligible. Grain yield was maintained across a large range of plant populations, mainly through compensatory effects of more tillers per plant and more grains per panicle at lower plant populations.
For aerial-sown rice, maximum grain yield (up to 14.9 t ha–1) was always achieved with a minimum plant population of 100 plants m–2, and likewise for drill-sown rice provided the row spacing was ≤27 cm. At equivalent plant populations, 36-cm row spacing produced lower grain yield than narrower row spacings. When large gaps existed between plants within the rows, neighbouring plants could not compensate for the gap at the wider 36-cm row spacing, and grain yield was reduced. A practical optimal plant population of 100–200 plants m–2 was found to be suitable for the semi-dwarf varieties used in this study for both aerial- and drill-sowing methods.
References
Bond JA, Walker TW, Bollich PK, Koger CH, Gerard P (2005) Seeding rates for stale seedbed rice production in the midsouthern United States. Agronomy Journal 97, 1560–1563.| Seeding rates for stale seedbed rice production in the midsouthern United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bond JA, Walker TW, Bushring NW (2009) Impact of nitrogen rate on the performance of three rice cultivars seeded at varying densities. Research Report Vol. 24, No. 5. Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA.
Chaudhary RC, Nanda JS, Tran DV (2002) ‘Guidelines for identification of field constraints to rice production.’ (Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome)
Counce PA, Wells BR (1990) Rice plant population density effect on early-season nitrogen requirement. Journal of Production Agriculture 3, 390–393.
| Rice plant population density effect on early-season nitrogen requirement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dunn BW (2018) Delaying permanent water in drill sown rice. Primefact 1238. 3rd edn. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW. Available at: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/438955/delaying-permanent-water-on-drill-sown-rice.pdf
Dunn BW, Ford R (2018) Management of drill sown rice. Primefact 1253 3rd edn. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW. Available at: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/445312/management-of-drill-sown-rice.pdf
Dunn BW, Gaydon DS (2011) Rice growth, yield and water productivity responses to irrigation scheduling prior to the delayed application of continuous flooding in southeast Australia. Agricultural Water Management 98, 1799–1807.
| Rice growth, yield and water productivity responses to irrigation scheduling prior to the delayed application of continuous flooding in southeast Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ella ES, Dionisio-Sese ML, Ismail AM (2010) Proper management improves seedling survival and growth during early flooding in contrasting rice genotypes. Crop Science 50, 1997–2008.
| Proper management improves seedling survival and growth during early flooding in contrasting rice genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hardke J, Wamishe Y, Lorenz G, Bateman N (2016) Rice stand establishment. In ‘Arkansas rice production handbook’. Ch. 4. (University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture: Little Rock, AR, USA) Available at: https://www.uaex.edu/publications/pdf/mp192/chapter-4.pdf
Harrell DL, Blanche SB (2010) Tillage, seeding and nitrogen rate effects on rice density, yield, and yield components of two rice cultivars. Agronomy Journal 102, 592–597.
| Tillage, seeding and nitrogen rate effects on rice density, yield, and yield components of two rice cultivars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jones DB, Snyder GH (1987) Seeding rate and row spacing effects on yield and yield components of drill-seeded rice. Agronomy Journal 79, 623–626.
| Seeding rate and row spacing effects on yield and yield components of drill-seeded rice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McDonald DJ (1994) Technical rice technology for the 21st century: and Australian example. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34, 877–888.
| Technical rice technology for the 21st century: and Australian example.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
NSW DPI (2012) Ricecheck recommendations: a management guide for improving yields, grain quality, profits and sustainability. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW
Ottis BV, Talbert RE (2005) Rice yield components as affected by cultivar and seeding rate. Agronomy Journal 97, 1622–1625.
| Rice yield components as affected by cultivar and seeding rate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rengasamy P, Greene RSB, Ford GW, Mehanni AH (1984) Identification of dispersive behaviour and the management of red-brown earths. Australian Journal of Soil Research 22, 413–431.
| Identification of dispersive behaviour and the management of red-brown earths.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sheehy JE, Dionora MJA, Mitchell PL (2001) Spikelet numbers, sink size and potential yield of rice. Field Crops Research 71, 77–85.
| Spikelet numbers, sink size and potential yield of rice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Troldahl D (Ed.) (2018) Rice growing guide 2018. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW. Available at: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/829330/RGG-accessible-22Aug2018.pdf
Troldahl D, Stevens M (Eds) (2019) Rice crop protection guide 2019–20. NSW DPI Management Guide. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW. Available at: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/1186083/Rice-CPG-2019-FINAL-24Oct-.pdf
