Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Soil sulfur—crop response calibration relationships and criteria for field crops grown in Australia

Geoffrey C. Anderson A D , Ken I. Peverill B and Ross F. Brennan C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Agriculture and Food, Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, WA 6151, Australia.

B K I P Consultancy Services Pty Ltd, 4 Collier Court, Wheelers Hill, Vic. 3150, Australia.

C Department of Agriculture and Food, 44 Albany Highway, Albany, WA 6330, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: geoff.anderson@agric.wa.gov.au

Crop and Pasture Science 64(5) 523-530 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP13244
Submitted: 9 January 2013  Accepted: 11 July 2013   Published: 22 August 2013

Abstract

Accurate definition of the sulfur (S) soil test–crop grain yield increase (response) relationship is required before soil S test measurements can be used to if there are likely to be responses to S fertilisers. An analysis was done using the Better Fertiliser Decision for Crops (BFDC) National Database using a web application (BFDC Interrogator) to develop calibration relationships between soil S tests (KCl-40 and MCP) using a selection of sampling depths and grain relative yields (RY). Critical soil test values (CSTV) and critical soil test ranges (CSTR) were defined at RY 90%. The ability of the KCl-40 extractable S soil test to predict grain yield response to applied S fertiliser was examined for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown in Western Australia (WA), New South Wales (NSW), and Victoria and canola (Brassica napus L.) grown in WA and NSW. A smaller dataset using MCPi-extractable S was also assessed.

The WA-grown wheat KCl-40 S CSTV, using sampling depth to 30 cm for soil types Chromosols (Coloured), Chromosols (Sesqui-Nodular), Kandosols (Grey and Yellow), Tenosols (Brown and Yellow), and Tenosols (Grey, Sesqui-Nodular), was 2.8 mg kg–1 with an associated CSTR 2.4–3.2 mg kg–1 and a correlation coefficient (r) 0.87. Similarly, KCl-40 S CSTV was defined using sampling depth to 10 cm for these selected soil types and for wheat grown on Vertosols in NSW. The accuracy of the KCl-40 S CSTV for canola grown in WA was improved using a sampling to a depth of 30 cm instead of 10 cm for all soil types. The canola KCl-40 S CSTV using sampling depth to 30 cm for these soil types was 7.2 mg kg–1 with an associated CSTR 6.8–7.5 and an r value 0.70. A similar KCl-40 S CSTV of 7.0 mg kg–1 was defined using a sampling depth of 10 cm, but the CSTR was higher (6.4–7.7 mg kg–1) and the r value lower (0.43). A lower KCl-40 S CSTV of 3.9 mg kg–1 or 31.0 kg ha–1 using a sampling depth of 60 cm was defined for canola grown in NSW using a limited number of S-rate calibration treatment series. Both MCPi (r = 0.32) and KCl-40 (r <0.20) soil S test–NSW canola response relationships using a 0–10 cm sampling depth were weak.

The wheat KCl-40 S CSTR of 2.4–3.2 mg kg–1 can be used widely on soil types where soil sulfate is not leached during the growing season. However, both the WA canola CSTR of 6.4–7.2 mg kg–1 using a sampling depth of 30 cm and NSW canola CSTR of 25–39 kg ha–1 or 3.1–4.9 mg kg–1 using a sampling depth of 60 cm can be considered in regions outside of WA and NSW.

Additional keywords: canola, critical soil test range (CSTR), critical soil test value (CSTV), KCl-40 and MCP extractable soil S, soil testing, wheat.


References

Anderson GC, Blair GJ, Lefroy RDB, Chinoim N (1994) The development of a soil test for S. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 15, 83–95.

Anderson GC, Fillery IRP, Ripper FH, Leach BJ (2006) Sulfur mineralisation in a coarse-textured soil after different sulfate fertilisation histories and yield responses of wheat and lupin. Australian Journal of Soil Research 44, 165–174.
Sulfur mineralisation in a coarse-textured soil after different sulfate fertilisation histories and yield responses of wheat and lupin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XivVSmtrw%3D&md5=ba267b5aea7d4f2a9589bc9a0df3a971CAS |

Barrow NJ (1966) The residual value of the phosphorus and sulfur components of superphosphate on some Western Australian soils. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 6, 9–15.
The residual value of the phosphorus and sulfur components of superphosphate on some Western Australian soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaF28XktVOitLo%3D&md5=0d9379a7cd7095d93dd6bbc02acb20b8CAS |

Blair G (2010) Responses to sulphate and elemental S in six provinces in China and the utility of mono-calcium phosphate extractable S in predicting soil S status. In ‘The 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World’. 1–6 August, Brisbane, Qld. (Eds RJ Gilkes, N Prakongkep) pp. 248–250. (IUSS) (DVD-ROM) www.iuss.org

Blair GJ, Chinoim N, Lefroy RDB, Anderson GC, Crocker GJ (1991) A soil sulfur test for pasture and crops. Australian Journal of Soil Research 29, 619–629.
A soil sulfur test for pasture and crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXmsFGjtr4%3D&md5=db131431eba4700fbdc978353aa53e7dCAS |

Blair GJ, Anderson GC, Crestani M, Lewis DC (1997) Soil sulfur fertiliser responses and rainfall sulfur accessions at trial sites in the National Reactive Phosphate Rock Project. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 37, 995–1001.
Soil sulfur fertiliser responses and rainfall sulfur accessions at trial sites in the National Reactive Phosphate Rock Project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXislCjsLk%3D&md5=c4298ecd66e6c414274a225acb2e7b84CAS |

Bole JB, Pittman UJ (1984) Availability of subsoil sulphates to barley and rapeseed. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 64, 301–312.
Availability of subsoil sulphates to barley and rapeseed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXmtV2rur8%3D&md5=993c4120dbcd824a1552051db76f9f2cCAS |

Bolland MDA, Russell WK (2010) Changes in chemical properties of 48 intensively grazed, rain-fed dairy paddocks on sandy soils over 11 years of liming in south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Soil Research 48, 682–692.
Changes in chemical properties of 48 intensively grazed, rain-fed dairy paddocks on sandy soils over 11 years of liming in south-western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhsVCjsbnJ&md5=f48eb41026d433b007a5807ec3eb8c8cCAS |

Brennan RF, Bolland MDA (2006) Soil and tissue tests to predict the sulfur requirements of canola in south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1061–1068.
Soil and tissue tests to predict the sulfur requirements of canola in south-western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XmsFWms7c%3D&md5=418132f78485f84bb23a6c5205546369CAS |

Dyson CB, Conyers MK (2013) Methodology for online biometric analysis of soil test–crop response datasets. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 435–441.

Ercoli L, Arduini I, Mariotti M, Lulli L, Masoni A (2012) Management of sulphur fertiliser to improve durum wheat production and minimise S leaching. European Journal of Agronomy 38, 74–82.
Management of sulphur fertiliser to improve durum wheat production and minimise S leaching.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XitF2lsLc%3D&md5=d3f31ea0f7e0b5deb0cbdbc7e19337dcCAS |

Hocking PJ, Pinkerton A, Good A (1996) Recovery of field-grown canola from sulfur deficiency. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 36, 79–85.
Recovery of field-grown canola from sulfur deficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XjtFKmtL8%3D&md5=d06ea2b3923a96863f89029db6c3fed4CAS |

Isbell RF (2002) ‘The Australian Soil Classification (revised edition).’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Lester DW, Dowling CW (2001) Grain sorghum—a yield response to N or S? In ‘Science and technology: Delivering results for agriculture? Proceedings of the 10th Australian Agronomy Conference’. January 2001, Hobart, Tasmania. (Eds B Rowe, D Donaghy, N Mendham). (Australian Society of Agronomy) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2001/1/c/lester.htm

Mason MG (1998) Sulfur. In ‘Soil guide: a handbook for understanding and managing agricultural soils’. Bulletin No. 4343. (Ed. G Moore) pp. 181–183. (Agriculture Western Australia: South Perth, W. Aust.)

McArthur WM (2004) ‘Reference soils of south-western Australia.’ (Department of Agriculture, Western Australia (for Australian Soil Science Society, WA Branch): South Perth, W. Aust.)

Moss HJ, Randall PJ, Wrigley CW (1983) Alteration to grain, flour and dough quality in three wheat types with variation in soil sulfur supply. Journal of Cereal Science 1, 255–264.
Alteration to grain, flour and dough quality in three wheat types with variation in soil sulfur supply.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Peverill KI (1977) The availability of phosphorus and sulphur in soil. PhD Thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia.

Probert ME, Jones RK (1977) The use of soil analysis for predicting the response to sulphur of pasture legumes in the Australian tropics. Australian Journal of Soil Research 15, 137–146.
The use of soil analysis for predicting the response to sulphur of pasture legumes in the Australian tropics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE2sXltVWjtbk%3D&md5=90155ae5b67a5531d4f7fb8d3f7868cbCAS |

Rayment GE, Lyons DJ (2011) ‘Soil chemical methods—Australasia.’ Australian Soil and Land Survey Handbooks Series. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Robson AD, Osborne LD, Snowball K, Simmons WJ (1995) Assessing sulfur status in lupins and wheat. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35, 79–86.
Assessing sulfur status in lupins and wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXmsVGnurw%3D&md5=d830775acdd9b60bf189b54b7b90cf57CAS |

Spencer K (1966) Soil properties in relation to the sulphur and phosphorus status of some basaltic soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 4, 115–130.
Soil properties in relation to the sulphur and phosphorus status of some basaltic soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaF2sXpsVejsQ%3D%3D&md5=6bacec34babb38c3e99480500bf15251CAS |

Stern H, de Hoedt G, Ernst J (2012) Objective classification of Australian climates. Australian Government, Bureau of Meteorology. Available at: www.bom.gov.au/climate/environ/other/koppen_explain.shtml

Till AR (2010) ‘Sulphur and sustainable agriculture.’ 1st edn (International Fertilizer Industry Association: Paris)

Watmuff G, Reuter DJ, Speirs SD (2013) Methodologies for assembling and interrogating N, P, K, and S soil test calibrations for Australian cereal, oilseed and pulse crops. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 424–434.

Zhang H, Turner NC, Poole ML (2004) Yield of wheat and canola in the high rainfall zone of south-west of Australia in years with and without water logging. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 461–470.
Yield of wheat and canola in the high rainfall zone of south-west of Australia in years with and without water logging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |