Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Soil phosphorus tests I: What soil phosphorus pools and processes do they measure?

Philip W. Moody A E , Simon D. Speirs B , Brendan J. Scott C and Sean D. Mason D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Science Delivery, DSITIA, Dutton Park, Qld 4102, Australia.

B Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University), Narellan, NSW 2567, Australia.

C Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.

D School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: Phil.Moody@science.dsitia.qld.gov.au

Crop and Pasture Science 64(5) 461-468 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP13112
Submitted: 5 April 2013  Accepted: 12 June 2013   Published: 22 August 2013

Abstract

The phosphorus (P) status of 535 surface soils from all states of Australia was assessed using the following soil P tests: Colwell-P (0.5 m NaHCO3), Olsen-P (0.5 m NaHCO3), BSES-P (0.005 m H2SO4), and Mehlich 3-P (0.2 m CH3COOH + 0.25 m NH4NO3 + 0.015 m NH4F + 0.013 m HNO3 + 0.001 m EDTA). Results were correlated with soil P assays selected to estimate the following: soil solution P concentration (i.e. 0.01 m CaCl2 extractable P; Colwell-P/P buffer index); rate of P supply to the soil solution (i.e. P released to FeO-impregnated filter paper); sorbed P (i.e. Colwell-P); mineral P (i.e. fertiliser reaction products and/or soil P minerals estimated as BSES-P minus Colwell-P); the diffusive supply of P (i.e. P diffusing through a thin gel film, DGT-P); and P buffer capacity (i.e. single-point P buffer index corrected for Colwell-P, PBICol). Across all soils, Colwell-P and BSES-P were highly correlated with FeO-P (r = 0.76 and 0.58, respectively). Colwell-P was moderately correlated with mineral P (r = 0.24), but not solution P. Olsen-P and Mehlich-P were both highly correlated with FeO-P (r = 0.80 and 0.78, respectively) but, in contrast to Colwell-P and BSES-P, also showed moderate correlations with soil solution P (r = 0.29 and 0.34, respectively) and diffusive P supply (r = 0.31 and 0.49, respectively). Correlation coefficients with mineral P were r = 0.29 for Olsen-P and r = 0.17 for Mehlich-P. Soils were categorised according to their pH, clay activity ratio, content of mineral P and CaCO3 content, and the relationships between the empirical soil P tests examined for each soil category. Olsen-P and Colwell-P were correlated across all soil categories (r range 0.66–0.90), and a widely applicable linear equation was obtained for converting one soil test to the other. However, the correlations between other soil tests varied markedly between soil categories and it was not possible to develop such widely applicable conversion equations. Multiple step-up linear regressions were used to identify the key soil properties affecting soil solution P, P buffer capacity, and diffusive P supply, respectively. For all soil categories, solution P concentration (measured by CaCl2-P) increased as rate of P supply (measured as FeO-P) increased and P buffer capacity decreased. As an assay of sorbed P, Colwell-P alone did not significantly (P > 0.05) explain any of the variability in soil solution P, but when used in the index (Colwell-P/P buffer index), it was highly correlated (r = 0.74) with CaCl2-P. Soil P buffer capacity was dependent on different properties in different soil categories, with 45–65% of the variation in PBI accounted for by various combinations of Mehlich-Al, Mehlich-Fe, total organic C, clay content, clay activity ratio, and CaCO3 content, depending on soil category. The diffusive supply of P was primarily determined by rate of P supply (measured as FeO-P; r range 0.34–0.49), with significant (P < 0.05) small improvements due to the inclusion of PBICol and/or clay content, depending on soil category. For these surface soil samples, key properties of pH, clay activity ratio, clay content, and P buffer capacity varied so widely within individual Australian Soil Orders that soil classification was not useful for inferring intrinsic surface soil P properties such as P buffer capacity or the relationships between soil P tests.

Additional keywords: P buffer capacity, P diffusion.


References

Barrow NJ (1984) A mechanistic model for describing the sorption and desorption of phosphate by soil. Journal of Soil Science 34, 733–750.
A mechanistic model for describing the sorption and desorption of phosphate by soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barrow NJ (2000) Towards a single-point method for measuring phosphate sorption for soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 38, 1099–1113.
Towards a single-point method for measuring phosphate sorption for soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXot1Wjs7g%3D&md5=ac71535602e07c1e1133f23f53db8456CAS |

Bertrand I, Holloway RE, Armstrong RD, McLaughlin MJ (2003) Chemical characteristics of phosphorus in alkaline soils from southern Australia. Australian Journal of Soil Research 41, 61–76.
Chemical characteristics of phosphorus in alkaline soils from southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXitVygsrg%3D&md5=4f2659a34103e5d79b2360d9a06447caCAS |

Bloesch PM (2012) Prediction of the CEC to clay ratio using mid-infrared spectroscopy. Soil Research 50, 1–6.
Prediction of the CEC to clay ratio using mid-infrared spectroscopy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XisVyksbo%3D&md5=29b1110b52e4a3f78e051f015a3571a3CAS |

Colwell JD (1963) The estimation of the phosphorus fertilizer requirements of wheat in southern New South Wales by soil analysis. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 3, 190–198.
The estimation of the phosphorus fertilizer requirements of wheat in southern New South Wales by soil analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaF2cXnvVOhsQ%3D%3D&md5=f8483c002701cb0667a8852dd419f4b9CAS |

Conyers MK, Moody PW (2009) A conceptual framework for improving the P efficiency of organic farming without inputs of soluble P fertiliser. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 100–104.
A conceptual framework for improving the P efficiency of organic farming without inputs of soluble P fertiliser.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXitlyrs7k%3D&md5=67cf87b7ac4add94b30a04a37c7ffbf4CAS |

Dalal RC, Hallsworth EG (1976) Evaluation of the parameters of soil phosphorus availability factors in predicting yield response and phosphorus uptake. Soil Science Society of America Journal 40, 541–546.
Evaluation of the parameters of soil phosphorus availability factors in predicting yield response and phosphorus uptake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE28XlsVWrsro%3D&md5=31f9bea0ff8e772aafffb8777ce98d99CAS |

Eldridge SM (2003) Sugar Soils: A guide to characterising Australian Sugarcane Soils. CRC Sugar Technical Publication. CRC for Sustainable Sugar Production, Townsville.

Holford ICR, Cullis BR (1985a) Effects of phosphate buffer capacity and yield response curvature and fertilizer requirements of wheat in relation to soil phosphate tests. Australian Journal of Soil Research 23, 417–427.
Effects of phosphate buffer capacity and yield response curvature and fertilizer requirements of wheat in relation to soil phosphate tests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holford ICR, Cullis BR (1985b) An evaluation of eight soil phosphate extractants on acidic wheat-growing soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 23, 647–653.
An evaluation of eight soil phosphate extractants on acidic wheat-growing soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL28XjtlCktw%3D%3D&md5=02e050e78a806cca4587f859dc287788CAS |

Isbell RF (2002) ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ Revised edn (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Kerr HW, von Stieglitz CR (1938) The laboratory determination of soil fertility. Technical Communication No. 9. Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations, Queensland.

Lindsay WL, Stephenson HF (1959) Nature of the reactions of monocalcium phosphate monohydrate in soils: II. Dissolution and precipitation reactions involving iron, aluminium, manganese, and calcium. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 23, 18–22.
Nature of the reactions of monocalcium phosphate monohydrate in soils: II. Dissolution and precipitation reactions involving iron, aluminium, manganese, and calcium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaG1MXps1ehtg%3D%3D&md5=19afdf6318c3de52774d7774242055fbCAS |

Mason S, McNeill A, McLaughlin MJ, Zhang H (2010) Prediction of wheat response to an application of phosphorus under field conditions using diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) and extraction methods. Plant and Soil 337, 243–258.
Prediction of wheat response to an application of phosphorus under field conditions using diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) and extraction methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhsVWmtb3I&md5=d59a1f4b143d72f725428bd5f1b70cebCAS |

Mehlich A (1984) Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: A modification of Mehlich 2 extractant. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 15, 1409–1416.
Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: A modification of Mehlich 2 extractant.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL2MXhvVChsro%3D&md5=f24e430c3f2ee181a2496dc6b06fcdadCAS |

Menon RG, Hammond LL, Sissingh HA (1988) Determination of plant-available phosphorus by the iron hydroxide-impregnated filter paper (Pi) soil test. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52, 110–115.

Moody PW (2011) Environmental risk indicators for soil phosphorus status. Soil Research 49, 247–252.
Environmental risk indicators for soil phosphorus status.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moody PW, Haydon GF, Dickson T (1983) Mineral nutrition of soybeans grown in the South Burnett region of south-eastern Queensland. 2. Prediction of grain yield response to phosphorus with soil tests. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 23, 38–42.

Moody PW, Dickson T, Aitken RL (1997) Soil phosphorus tests and grain yield responsiveness of maize (Zea mays) on Ferrosols. Australian Journal of Soil Research 35, 609–613.
Soil phosphorus tests and grain yield responsiveness of maize (Zea mays) on Ferrosols.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nye PH (1980) Diffusion of ions and uncharged solutes in soils and clays. Advances in Agronomy 31, 225–272.
Diffusion of ions and uncharged solutes in soils and clays.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Circular No. 939. US Department of Agriculture, Washinton, DC.

Rayment GE, Lyons DJ (2011) ‘Soil chemical methods – Australasia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Six L, Smolders E, Merckx R (2013) The performance of DGT versus conventional soil phosphorus tests in tropical soils- maize and rice responses to P application. Plant and Soil 366, 49–66.
The performance of DGT versus conventional soil phosphorus tests in tropical soils- maize and rice responses to P application.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXmtlCms78%3D&md5=1f37f5718d49d7581a8c9feee9b19987CAS |

Speirs SD, Scott BJ, Moody PW, Mason SD (2013) Soil phosphorus tests II: A comparison of soil test–crop response relationships for different soil tests and wheat. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 469–479.

Wang X, Lester DW, Guppy CN, Lockwood PV, Tang C (2007) Changes in phosphorus fractions at various soil depths following long-term P fertiliser application on a black vertosol in south-eastern Queensland. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45, 524–532.
Changes in phosphorus fractions at various soil depths following long-term P fertiliser application on a black vertosol in south-eastern Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |