Evaluating the accuracy of the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM) simulating growth, development, and herbage nutritive characteristics of forage crops grown in the south-eastern dairy regions of Australia
K. G. Pembleton A E , R. P. Rawnsley A , J. L. Jacobs B , F. J. Mickan C , G. N. O’Brien C , B. R. Cullen D and T. Ramilan DA Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 3523, Burnie, Tas. 7320, Australia.
B Victorian Department of Primary Industries, 78 Henna Street, Warrnambool, Vic. 3280, Australia.
C Victorian Department of Primary Industries, 1301 Hazeldean Road, Ellinbank, Vic. 3821, Australia.
D Melbourne School of Land and Environment, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: Keith.Pembleton@utas.edu.au
Crop and Pasture Science 64(2) 147-164 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP12372
Submitted: 24 April 2012 Accepted: 16 April 2013 Published: 5 June 2013
Abstract
Pasture-based dairy farms are a complex system involving interactions between soils, pastures, forage crops, and livestock as well as the economic and social aspects of the business. Consequently, biophysical and farm systems models are becoming important tools to study pasture-based dairy systems. However, there is currently a paucity of modelling tools available for the simulation of one key component of the system—forage crops. This study evaluated the accuracy of the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM) in simulating dry matter (DM) yield, phenology, and herbage nutritive characteristics of forage crops grown in the dairy regions of south-eastern Australia. Simulation results were compared with data for forage wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), oats (Avena sativa L.), forage rape (Brassica napus L.), forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench), and maize (Zea mays L.) collated from previous field research and demonstration activities undertaken across the dairy regions of south-eastern Australia. This study showed that APSIM adequately predicted the DM yield of forage crops, as evidenced by the range of values for the coefficient of determination (0.58–0.95), correlation coefficient (0.76–0.94), and bias correction factor (0.97–1.00). Crop phenology for maize, forage wheat, and oats was predicted with similar accuracy to forage crop DM yield, whereas the phenology of forage rape and forage sorghum was poorly predicted (R2 values 0.38 and 0.80, correlation coefficient 0.62 and –0.90, and bias correction factors 0.67 and 0.28, respectively). Herbage nutritive characteristics for all crop species were poorly predicted. While the selection of a model to explore an aspect of agricultural production will depend on the specific problem being addressed, the performance of APSIM in simulating forage crop DM yield and, in many cases, crop phenology, coupled with its ease of use, open access, and science-based mechanistic methods of simulating agricultural and crop processes, makes it an ideal model for exploring the influence of management and environment on forage crops grown on dairy farms in south-eastern Australia. Potential future model developments and improvements are discussed in the context of the results of this validation analysis.
Additional keywords: brassicas, crop modelling, dry matter production, cereals, dairy, forage crops.
References
Asseng S, Keating BA, Fillery IRP, Gregory PJ, Bowden JW, Turner NC, Palta JA, Abrecht DG (1998) Performance of the APSIM-wheat model in Western Australia. Field Crops Research 57, 163–179.| Performance of the APSIM-wheat model in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Asseng S, van Keulen H, Stol W (2000) Performance and application of the APSIM Nwheat model in the Netherlands. European Journal of Agronomy 12, 37–54.
| Performance and application of the APSIM Nwheat model in the Netherlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barlow R (2008) ‘National feedbase stocktake report.’ (Dairy Australia Limited: Melbourne)
Bell LW, Hargreaves JNG, Lawes RA, Robertson MJ (2009) Sacrificial grazing of wheat crops: identifying tactics and opportunities in Western Australia’s grainbelt using simulation approaches. Animal Production Science 49, 797–806.
| Sacrificial grazing of wheat crops: identifying tactics and opportunities in Western Australia’s grainbelt using simulation approaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bryant JR, Ogle G, Marshall PR, Glassey CB, Lancaster JAS, García SC, Holmes CW (2010) Description and evaluation of the Farmax Dairy Pro decision support model. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 13–28.
| Description and evaluation of the Farmax Dairy Pro decision support model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXktlCitLk%3D&md5=7c2198f5bbb4473aabcc6c1cc873294bCAS |
Carberry PS, Muchow RC, McCown RL (1989) Testing the CERES-Maize simulation model in a semi-arid tropical environment. Field Crops Research 20, 297–315.
| Testing the CERES-Maize simulation model in a semi-arid tropical environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapman DF, Kenny SN, Beca D, Johnson IR (2008a) Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia. 1. Physical production and economic performance. Agricultural Systems 97, 108–125.
| Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia. 1. Physical production and economic performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapman DF, Kenny SN, Beca D, Johnson IR (2008b) Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia. 2. Inter-annual variation in forage supply, and business risk. Agricultural Systems 97, 126–138.
| Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia. 2. Inter-annual variation in forage supply, and business risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapman DF, Kenny SN, Lane N (2011) Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia: 3. Estimated economic value of additional home-grown feed. Agricultural Systems 104, 589–599.
| Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia: 3. Estimated economic value of additional home-grown feed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cullen BR, Eckard RJ, Callow MN, Johnson IR, Chapman DF, Rawnsley RP, Garcia SC, White T, Snow VO (2008) Simulating pasture growth rates in Australian and New Zealand grazing systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 761–768.
| Simulating pasture growth rates in Australian and New Zealand grazing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cullen BR, Johnson IR, Eckard RJ, Lodge GM, Walker RG, Rawnsley RP, McCaskill MR (2009) Climate change effects on pasture systems in south-eastern Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 933–942.
| Climate change effects on pasture systems in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
DairySA (2009) ‘South East Forage Innovation Project: Future Dairy Partner Farm: Stage 2, Berko Pastoral Co.’ Future dairy, Dairy Australia, Horizon Farming. (Dairy Australia Ltd: Melbourne)
Deen W, Cousens R, Warringa J, Bastiaans L, Carberry P, Rebel K, Riha S, Murphy C, Benjamin LR, Cloughley C, Cussans J, Forcella F, Hunt T, Jamieson P, Lindquist J, Wang E (2003) An evaluation of four crop: weed competition models using a common data set. Weed Research 43, 116–129.
| An evaluation of four crop: weed competition models using a common data set.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Farré I, Robertson MJ, Walton GH, Asseng S (2002) Simulating phenology and yield response of canola to sowing date in Western Australia using the APSIM model. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 1155–1164.
| Simulating phenology and yield response of canola to sowing date in Western Australia using the APSIM model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Freer M, Moore AD, Donnelly JR (1997) GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises-II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS. Agricultural Systems 54, 77–126.
| GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises-II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greenwood KL, Mundy GN, Kelly KB (2008) On-farm measurement of the water use and productivity of maize. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 274–284.
| On-farm measurement of the water use and productivity of maize.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greenwood KL, Lawson AR, Kelly KB (2009) The water balance of irrigated forages in northern Victoria, Australia. Agricultural Water Management 96, 847–858.
| The water balance of irrigated forages in northern Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harrell DM, Wilhelm WW, McMaster GS (1998) Scales 2: Computer program to convert among developmental stage scales for corn and small grains. Agronomy Journal 90, 235–238.
| Scales 2: Computer program to convert among developmental stage scales for corn and small grains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Isbell RF (2002) ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
Jacobs JL, Ward GN (2011) Effect of nitrogen application on dry matter yields, nutritive characteristics and mineral content of summer-active forage crops in southern Australia. Animal Production Science 51, 77–86.
| Effect of nitrogen application on dry matter yields, nutritive characteristics and mineral content of summer-active forage crops in southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jacobs JL, Hill J, Jenkin T (2009a) Effect of different grazing strategies on dry matter yields and nutritive characteristics of whole crop cereals. Animal Production Science 49, 608–618.
| Effect of different grazing strategies on dry matter yields and nutritive characteristics of whole crop cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jacobs JL, Hill J, Jenkin T (2009b) Effect of stage of growth and silage additives on whole crop cereal silage nutritive and fermentation characteristics. Animal Production Science 49, 595–607.
| Effect of stage of growth and silage additives on whole crop cereal silage nutritive and fermentation characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXntVGktbw%3D&md5=c7ae6a609c1b05071bd93f31abe4e8bcCAS |
Jeffrey SJ, Carter JO, Moodie KM, Beswick AR (2001) Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data. Environmental Modelling & Software 16, 309–330.
| Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnson IR, Chapman DF, Snow VO, Eckard RJ, Parsons AJ, Lambert MG, Cullen BR (2008) DairyMod and EcoMod: biophysical pasture-simulation models for Australia and New Zealand. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 621–631.
| DairyMod and EcoMod: biophysical pasture-simulation models for Australia and New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keating BA, Carberry PS, Hammer GL, Probert ME, Robertson MJ, Holzworth D, Huth NI, Hargreaves JNG, Meinke H, Hochman Z, McLean G, Verburg K, Snow V, Dimes JP, Silburn M, Wang E, Brown S, Bristow KL, Asseng S, Chapman S, McCown RL, Freebairn DM, Smith CJ (2003) An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 267–288.
| An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lancashire PD, Bleiholder H, van den Boom T, Langeluddeke P, Stauss R, Weber E, Witzenberger A (1991) A uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds. Annals of Applied Biology 119, 561–601.
| A uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Larcombe MT (1989) The effects of manipulating reproduction on the productivity and profitability of dairy herds with graze pasture. PhD Thesis, The University of Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Lawson AR, Greenwood KL, Kelly KB (2009) Irrigation water productivity of winter-growing annuals is higher than perennial forages in northern Victoria. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 407–419.
| Irrigation water productivity of winter-growing annuals is higher than perennial forages in northern Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Li FY, Snow VO, Holzworth DP (2011) Modelling the seasonal and geographical pattern of pasture production in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 331–352.
| Modelling the seasonal and geographical pattern of pasture production in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McCown RL, Moore AD, Holzworth D (1993) APSIM + GrazPlan: versatile software for simulating grain-grazing systems. In ‘Farming – From Paddock to Plate. Proceedings of the 7th Australian Agronomy Conference’. Adelaide, S. Aust. (Eds GK McDonald, WD Bellotti) (Australian Society of Agronomy) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/1993/index.htm
Mickan FJ, O’Brien GN (2010) Adaptive forage planning discussion. Night 3 Field Day notes. March 2010. Dairy Extension Centre, Ellinbank, Vic.
Mickan FJ, O’Brien GN (2011) Adaptive forage planning discussion. Day/Night 4 Field Day notes. March 2011. Dairy Extension Centre: Ellinbank, Vic.
Neilsen JE (2005) Efficient use of water on spring sown forage brassicas. PhD Thesis, University of Tasmania, Tas.
Peake A, Whitbread A, Davoren B, Braun J, Limpus S (2008) The development of a model in APSIM for the simulation of grazing oats and oaten hay. In ‘Global issues. Paddock action. Proceedings of 14th Agronomy Conference’. Adelaide, S. Aust. (Ed. M Unkovich) (Australian Society of Agronomy/The Regional Institute Ltd: Gosford, NSW) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2008/
Pembleton KG, Rawnsley RP, Donaghy DJ, Chamberlain PL (2006) Potential of tropical forages for the Tasmanian dairy industry. In ‘Proceedings of the 13th Australian Society of Agronomy Conference’. Perth, W. Aust. (Eds N Turner, T Acuna) (Australian Society of Agronomy/The Regional Institute Ltd: Gosford, NSW) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2006/
Pembleton KG, Rawnsley RP, Donaghy DJ (2011) Yield and water-use efficiency of contrasting lucerne genotypes grown in a cool temperate environment. Crop & Pasture Science 62, 610–623.
| Yield and water-use efficiency of contrasting lucerne genotypes grown in a cool temperate environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pritchard K, Havilah E, McRae C, Thompson P (1991) Fodder crops. In ‘Feedbase 2000: A workshop to determine the priorities for research into soils, pastures and fodder crops in Australian dairy production systems’. (Eds B Bartsch, W Mason) pp. 47–58. (Dairy Research and Development Corporation: East Melbourne)
Probert ME, Carberry PS, McCown RL, Turpin JE (1998) Simulation of legume-cereal systems using APSIM. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 317–327.
| Simulation of legume-cereal systems using APSIM.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rawnsley RP (2007) A review of fodder crops grown in Tasmania. Invited Paper. In ‘Grasslands Society of Southern Australia 16th Annual Conference’. Launceston, Australia. (Ed. S Campbell) pp. 31–37. (Grasslands Society of Southern Australia, Tasmanian Branch)
Rawnsley RP, Donaghy DJ, Fergusson M (2007) Monitoring yield, field quality and water use efficiency of irrigated summer forage crops (maize and turnips) on commercial dairy farms. Final Report to DairyTas. Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research, Burnie, Tas.
Rawnsley RP, Cullen BR, Turner LR, Donaghy DJ, Freeman M, Christie KM (2009) Potential of deficit irrigation to increase marginal irrigation response of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) on Tasmanian dairy farms. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 1156–1164.
| Potential of deficit irrigation to increase marginal irrigation response of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) on Tasmanian dairy farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ritchie JT (1991) Wheat phasic development. In ‘Modeling plant and soil systems’. pp. 31–54. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI)
Ritchie SW, Hanway JJ, Benson GO (1986) ‘How a corn plant develops.’ Revised edn (Iowa State University, Cooperative Extension Service: Ames, IA)
Robertson MJ, Holland JF, Kirkegaard JA, Smith CJ (1999) Simulating growth and development of canola in Australia. In ‘Proceedings of the 10th International Rapeseed Congress’. Canberra, Australia. (Eds N Wratten, PA Salisbury) (The Regional Institute Inc.: Gosford, NSW) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/gcirc/
Robertson MJ, Watkinson AR, Kirkegaard JA, Holland JF, Potter TD, Burton W, Walton GH, Moot DJ, Wratten N, Farre I, Asseng S (2002a) Environmental and genotypic control of time to flowering in canola and Indian mustard. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 793–809.
| Environmental and genotypic control of time to flowering in canola and Indian mustard.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson MJ, Carberry PS, Huth NI, Turpin JE, Probert ME, Poulton PL, Bell M, Wright GC, Yeates SJ, Brinsmead RB (2002b) Simulation of growth and development of diverse legume species in APSIM. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 429–446.
| Simulation of growth and development of diverse legume species in APSIM.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson MJ, Gaydon D, Hall DJM, Hills A, Penny S (2005) Production risks and water use benefits of summer crop production on the south coast of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 597–612.
| Production risks and water use benefits of summer crop production on the south coast of Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shamudzarira Z, Robertson MJ (2002) Simulating response of maize to nitrogen fertilizer in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Experimental Agriculture 38, 79–96.
| Simulating response of maize to nitrogen fertilizer in semi-arid Zimbabwe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Soengas P, Cartea ME, Velasco P, Padilla G, Ordas A (2008) Morphologic and agronomic diversity of Brassica napus crops. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 133, 48–54.
Tedeschi LO (2006) Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models. Agricultural Systems 89, 225–247.
| Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Turpin JE, Robertson MJ, Haire C, Bellotti WD, Moore AD, Rose I (2003) Simulating fababean development, growth, and yield in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 39–52.
| Simulating fababean development, growth, and yield in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Walker R, Simpson G (2006) ‘Dairy Predict. A dairy feedbase and enterprise planning tool.’ (The State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries: Brisbane, Qld)
Wang E, van Oosterom EJ, Meinke H, Asseng S, Robertson MJ, Huth NI, Keating BA, Probert ME (2003) The new APSIM-Wheat model – performance and future improvements. In ‘Solutions for a better environment. Proceedings of the 11th Australian Agronomy Conference’. Geelong, Vic. (Eds M Unkovich, G O’Leary) (Australian Society of Agronomy) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2003/index.htm
Wastney ME, Palliser CC, Lile JA, Macdonald KA, Penno JW, Bright KP (2002) A whole farm model applied to a dairy system. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 62, 120–123.
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.
| A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |