Testing the primer-plant concept: wheat yields can be increased on alkaline sodic soils when an effective primer phase is used
J. G. Nuttall A D , S. L. Davies B C , R. A. Armstrong A and M. B. Peoples BA Primary Industries Research Victoria, Private Bag 260, Horsham, Vic. 3401, Australia.
B CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
C Current address: Department of Agriculture and Food WA, PO Box 110, Geraldton, WA 6531, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: james.nuttall@dpi.vic.gov.au
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59(4) 331-338 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR07287
Submitted: 2 August 2007 Accepted: 23 January 2008 Published: 8 April 2008
Abstract
The primer-plant concept was tested for wheat (Triticum aestivum) grown on an alkaline sodic soil taken from the southern Mallee of Victoria. This concept relates to use of species of plants with high natural adaptation to hostile subsoils, being able to modify the soil environment and leave biopores for the benefit of subsequent annual crops. For the experiment reported here, wheat was sown into large (0.3 m diam. by 1.0 m length) intact soil cores (collected from a cropping paddock near Birchip in the southern Mallee region of Victoria, Australia) following either birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus), canola (Brassica napus), chicory (Cichorium intybus), lucerne (Medicago sativa), safflower (Carthamus tinctorius), sulla (Hedysarum coronarium), or tall wheatgrass (Thinopyrum ponticum). At the conclusion of the priming phase [270 days after sowing (DAS)], all the different crops extracted c. 145 mm of stored water, the exception being canola (120 mm). Lucerne and birdsfoot trefoil produced the least above-ground biomass (26 g/pot), and safflower the most (115 g/pot). Greater early vigour and water extraction (49 mm) occurred for subsequent wheat crops after birdsfoot trefoil than with wheat after all other species (39 mm). This translated to a 15% yield advantage for wheat after birdsfoot trefoil compared with lucerne. Wheat after sulla yielded 12% more due to increased grain number and kernel size compared with wheat after lucerne. It was proposed that the difference in yield related to the root systems of species tested. Birdsfoot trefoil and sulla were characterised by intensive branching, which potentially produced a fine mosaic of residual biopores. Lucerne, in contrast, which was assumed to have similar break-crop effects, had a large taproot with fewer branches leaving fewer, larger residual root channels than either of the other legumes. It is believed that the fine biopores allowed more rapid and thorough exploration of the bulk soil by the crop roots.
Additional keywords: salinity, biopores, subsoil constraints.
Acknowledgments
The Grains Research and Development Corporation funded this research, through CSIRO project CSP343. The Department of Primary Industries (DPI), Victoria, provided equipment and infrastructure to run this experimental work. Thanks also to the DPI technicians Melanie Baker and Graham Price for assistance with sample processing.
Angers DA, Caron J
(1998) Plant-induced changes in soil structure: processes and feedbacks. Biogeochemistry 42, 55–72.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bee GA, Laslett G
(2002) Development of a rainfed lucerne-based farming system in the Mediterranean climatic region of southwestern Australia. Agricultural Water Management 53, 111–116.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bernstein L
(1975) Effects of salinity and sodicity on plant growth. Annual Review of Phytopathology 13, 295–312.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cartwright B,
Zarcinas BA, Spouncer LR
(1986) Boron toxicity in South Australian barley crops. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 37, 351–359.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chan KY,
Oates A,
Swan AD,
Hayes RC,
Dear BS, Peoples M
(2006) Agronomic consequences of tractor wheel compaction on a clay soil. Soil and Tillage Research 89, 13–21.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cresswell HP, Kirkegaard JA
(1995) Subsoil amelioration by plant roots—the process and the evidence. Australian Journal of Soil Research 33, 221–239.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dear BS,
Moore GA, Hughes SJ
(2003) Adaptation and potential contribution of temperate perennial legumes to the southern Australian wheatbelt: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 1–18.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Delroy ND, Bowden JW
(1986) Effects of deep ripping, the previous crop, and applied nitrogen on the growth and yield of a wheat crop. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 26, 469–479.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ford GW,
Martin JJ,
Rengasamy P,
Boucher SC, Ellington A
(1993) Soil sodicity in Victoria. Australian Journal of Soil Research 31, 869–909.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hamblin AP,
Tennant D, Cochrane H
(1982) Tillage and the growth of a wheat crop in a loamy sand. Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 887–897.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hamza MA, Anderson WK
(2002) Improving soil physical fertility and crop yield on a clay soil in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 615–620.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hobson KB,
Armstrong RD,
Nicolas M,
Connor DJ, Materne M
(2006) Response of lentil (Lens culinaris) germplasm to high concentrations of soil boron. Euphytica 151, 371–382.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulugalle NR, Finlay LA
(2003) EC1:5/exchangeable Na, a sodicity index for cotton farming systems in irrigated and rainfed Vertosols. Australian Journal of Soil Research 41, 761–769.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Incerti M, O’Leary GJ
(1990) Rooting depth of wheat in the Victorian Mallee. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30, 817–824.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kingsbury RW,
Epstein E, Pearcy RW
(1984) Physiological response to salinity in selected lines of wheat. Plant Physiology 74, 417–423.
| PubMed |
Lesturgez G,
Poss R,
Hartmann C,
Bourdon E, Ratana-Anupap S
(2004) Roots of Stylosanthes hamata create macropores in the compact layer of a sandy soil. Plant and Soil 260, 101–109.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Maas EV, Hoffman GJ
(1977) Crop salt tolerance—current assessment. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, American Society of Civil Engineers 103, 115–134.
McCallum MH,
Kirkegaard JA,
Green T,
Cresswell HP,
Davies SL, Angus JF
(2004) Evidence of improved macro-porosity following perennial pasture on a duplex soil. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 299–307.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Munns R,
Husain S,
Rivelli A,
James RA,
Condon AG,
Lindsay MP,
Lagudah ES,
Schachtman DP, Hare RA
(2002) Avenues for increasing salt tolerance of crops, and the role of physiologically based selection traits. Plant and Soil 247, 93–105.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Naidu R, Rengasamy P
(1993) Ion interactions and constraints to plant nutrition in Australian sodic soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 31, 801–819.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nuttall JG,
Armstrong RD, Connor DJ
(2003a) Evaluating physicochemical constraints of Calcarosols on wheat yield in the Victorian southern Mallee. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 487–497.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nuttall JG,
Armstrong RD, Connor DJ
(2005) The effect of boron tolerance, deep ripping with gypsum, and water supply on subsoil water extraction of cereals on an alkaline soil. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 113–122.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nuttall JG,
Armstrong RD,
Connor DJ, Matassa VJ
(2003b) Interrelationships between edaphic factors potentially limiting cereal growth on alkaline soils in north-west Victoria. Australian Journal of Soil Research 41, 277–292.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rasse DP, Smucker AJM
(1998) Root recolonization of previous root channels in corn and alfalfa rotations. Plant and Soil 204, 203–212.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rengasamy P, Olsson KA
(1991) Sodicity and soil structure. Australian Journal of Soil Research 29, 935–952.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rochester IJ,
Peoples MB,
Hulugalle NR,
Gault RR, Contable GA
(2001) Using legumes to enhance nitrogen fertility and improve soil condition in cotton cropping systems. Field Crops Research 70, 27–41.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sadras VO,
O’Leary GJ, Roget DK
(2005) Crop response to compacted soil: capture and efficiency in the use of water and radiation. Field Crops Research 91, 131–148.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Seaney RR, Henson PR
(1970) Birdsfoot trefoil. Advances in Agronomy 22, 119–157.
Stienezen M,
Waghorn GC, Douglas GB
(1996) Digestibility and effects of condensed tannins on digestion of sulla (Hedysarum coronarium) when fed to sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 39, 215–221.
Stirzaker RJ,
Passioura JB, Wilms Y
(1996) Soil structure and plant growth: impact of bulk density and biopores. Plant and Soil 185, 151–162.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Volkmar KM
(1996) Effects of biopores on the growth and N-uptake of wheat at three levels of soil moisture. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 76, 453–458.
Yunusa IAM, Newton PJ
(2003) Plants for amelioration of subsoil constraints and hydrological control: the primer-plant concept. Plant and Soil 257, 261–281.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zarcinas BA, Cartwright B
(1987) Acid dissolution of soils and rocks for the determination of boron by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. Analyst 112, 1107–1112.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |