Mapping quantitative trait loci for resistance to Pratylenchus thornei from synthetic hexaploid wheat in the International Triticeae Mapping Initiative (ITMI) population
R. S. Zwart A , J. P. Thompson A C , J. G. Sheedy A and J. C. Nelson BA Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, PO Box 2282, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
B Department of Plant Pathology, 4024 Throckmorton Hall, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: john.thompson@dpi.qld.gov.au
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57(5) 525-530 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05177
Submitted: 18 May 2005 Accepted: 7 December 2005 Published: 17 May 2006
Abstract
Root-lesion nematode (Pratylenchus thornei) is a serious pathogen of wheat in many countries. The International Triticeae Mapping Initiative (ITMI) population of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) was assessed for resistance to P. thornei to determine the chromosome locations of the resistance genes. The ITMI population is derived from a cross between the resistant synthetic hexaploid wheat W-7984 and a susceptible bread wheat cultivar Opata 85. Two years of phenotypic data for resistance to P. thornei were obtained in replicated glasshouse trials. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis was performed using available segregation and map data for 114 RILs. A QTL on chromosome 6DS showed consistent effects for reduced nematode numbers (partial resistance) across years and accounted for 11% and 23% of the phenotypic variation. A second QTL for P. thornei resistance on chromosome 2BS accounted for an additional 19% and 5%. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers associated with the QTLs are physically located in regions rich in major genes at the distal ends of the short chromosome arms of 6D and 2B. SSR markers with potential for marker-assisted selection of P. thornei resistance effective in different genetic backgrounds have been identified.
Additional keywords: root-lesion nematodes, bread wheat, molecular markers, MAS, composite interval mapping, QTL Cartographer, W-7984, Opata 85.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank T. G. Clewett for technical assistance, Dr P. J. Sharp, University of Sydney, Australia, and Dr K. J. Chalmers, University of Adelaide, Australia, for providing seed of the ITMI population, and Dr P. S. Brennan for suggesting an investigation of P. thornei resistance in this population. This work was supported by the Grains Research and Development Corporation of Australia.
Berry DA
(1987) Logarithmic transformations in ANOVA. Biometrics 43, 439–456.
| PubMed |
Churchill GA, Doerge RW
(1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138, 963–971.
| PubMed |
Dilbirligi M,
Erayman M,
Sandhu D,
Sidhu D, Gill KS
(2004) Identification of wheat chromosomal regions containing expressed resistance genes. Genetics 166, 461–481.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Erayman M,
Sandhu D,
Sidhu D,
Dilbirligi M,
Baenziger PS, Gill KS
(2004) Demarcating the gene-rich regions of the wheat genome. Nucleic Acids Research 32, 3546–3565.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Krawetz JE, Boston RS
(2000) Substrate specificity of a maize ribosome-inactivating protein differs across diverse taxa. European Journal of Biochemistry 267, 1966–1974.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Lander ES,
Green P,
Abrahamson J,
Barlow A,
Daly MJ,
Lincoln SE, Newburg L
(1987) MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1, 174–181.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Langridge P,
Lagudah ES,
Holton TA,
Appels R,
Sharp P, Chalmers KJ
(2001) Trends in genetic and genome analyses in wheat: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 1043–1077.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Li WL,
Faris JD,
Chittoor JM,
Leach JE,
Hulbert SH,
Liu DJ,
Chen PD, Gill BS
(1999) Genomic mapping of defense response genes in wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98, 226–233.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Marino CL,
Nelson JC,
Lu YH,
Sorrells ME,
Leroy P,
Lopes CR, Hart GE
(1996) Molecular genetic maps of the group 6 chromosomes of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.). Genome 39, 359–366.
Nelson JC,
Sorrells ME,
Van Deynze AE,
Lu YH,
Atkinson M,
Bernard M,
Leroy P,
Faris JD, Anderson JA
(1995a) Molecular mapping of wheat: major genes and rearrangements in homoeologous groups 4, 5, and 7. Genetics 141, 721–731.
| PubMed |
Nelson JC,
Van Deynze AE,
Autrique E,
Sorrells ME,
Lu YH,
Merlino M,
Atkinson M, Leroy P
(1995b) Molecular mapping of wheat. Homoeologous group 2. Genome 38, 516–524.
Nelson JC,
Van Deynze AE,
Autrique E,
Sorrells ME,
Lu YH,
Negre S,
Bernard M, Leroy P
(1995c) Molecular mapping of wheat. Homoeologous group 3. Genome 38, 525–533.
Proctor JR, Marks CF
(1974) The determination of normalizing transformations for nematode count data from soil samples and of efficient sampling schemes. Nematologica 20, 395–406.
Röder MS,
Korzun V,
Wendehake K,
Plaschke J,
Tixier MH,
Leroy P, Ganal MW
(1998) A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics 149, 2007–2023.
| PubMed |
Schmidt AL,
McIntyre CL,
Thompson JP, Liu CJ
(2005) Quantitative trait loci for root lesion nematode (Pratylenchus thornei) resistance in Middle-Eastern landraces and their potential for introgression into Australian bread wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1059–1068.
| Crossref |
Shah MS, Hassan A
(2005) Distribution of genes and recombination on wheat homoeologous group 6 chromosomes: a synthesis of available information. Molecular Breeding 15, 45–53.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Singh RP,
Nelson JC, Sorrells ME
(2000) Mapping Yr28 and other genes for resistance to stripe rust in wheat. Crop Science 40, 1148–1155.
Somers DJ,
Isaac P, Edwards K
(2004) A high-density microsatellite consensus map for bread wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109, 1105–1114.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Song QJ,
Shi JR,
Singh S,
Fickus EW,
Costa JM,
Lewis J,
Gill BS,
Ward R, Cregan PB
(2005) Development and mapping of microsatellite (SSR) markers in wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110, 550–560.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Sourdille P,
Singh S,
Cadalen T,
Brown-Guedira GL,
Gay G,
Qi L,
Gill BS,
Dufour P,
Murigneux A, Bernard M
(2004) Microsatellite-based deletion bin system for the establishment of genetic-physical map relationships in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Functional & Integrative Genomics 4, 12–25.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Thompson JP,
Brennan PS,
Clewett TG,
Sheedy JG, Seymour NP
(1999) Progress in breeding wheat for tolerance and resistance to root-lesion nematode (Pratylenchus thornei). Australasian Plant Pathology 28, 45–52.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thompson JP, Haak MI
(1997) Resistance to root-lesion nematode (Pratylenchus thornei) in Aegilops tauschii Coss., the D-genome donor to wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 48, 553–559.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Deynze AE,
Dubcovsky J,
Gill KS,
Nelson JC,
Sorrels ME,
Dvorák J,
Gill BS,
Lagudah ES,
McCouch SR, Appels R
(1995) Molecular-genetic maps for group 1 chromosomes of Triticeae species and their relation to chromosomes in rice and oat. Genome 38, 45–59.
Vanstone VA,
Rathjen AJ,
Ware AH, Wheeler RD
(1998) Relationship between root-lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei) and performance of wheat varieties. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38, 181–188.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zwart RS,
Thompson JP, Godwin ID
(2004a) Genetic analysis of resistance to root-lesion nematode (Pratylenchus thornei Sher and Allen) in wheat. Plant Breeding 123, 209–212.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zwart RS,
Thompson JP, Godwin ID
(2005) Identification of quantitative trait loci for resistance to two species of root-lesion nematode (Pratylenchus thornei and P. neglectus) in wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 345–352.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |