Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > CP > AR04086
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 56(1)

The effect of water quality on cattle performance on pasture

H. A. Lardner A D , B. D. Kirychuk B , L. Braul B , W. D. Willms C and J. Yarotski B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Western Beef Development Centre, PO Box 1150, Humboldt, Saskatchewan, S0K 2A0, Canada.

B Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration, 1800 Hamilton Street, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4P 4L2, Canada.

C Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, PO Box 3000, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1J 4B1, Canada.

D Corresponding author. Email: blardner@agr.gov.sk.ca

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56(1) 97-104 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR04086
Submitted: 13 April 2004  Accepted: 13 December 2004   Published: 31 January 2005

Abstract

In western Canada, dugouts are the primary source of water for beef cattle during the summer months. Over time, drought conditions and/or direct access by grazing animals have a negative effect on water constituents and overall water quality. A study was conducted to determine the effects of improvements in water quality on cattle performance. The effect of pasture water quality on weight gain of beef cattle was assessed with 44 Hereford yearling steers over 5 years and 40 Angus cow–calf pairs over 3 years. From 1999 to 2003, cattle were allocated to 1 of 4 treatments, which comprised untreated dugout water pumped to a trough, aerated water pumped to a trough, and coagulated and chlorinated water pumped to a trough, all compared with direct access by livestock to the water source. Data were collected on livestock weight gains, water consumption, fecal parasites, environmental conditions, water chemistry, biological constituents, and forage production and quality. Water treatment by aeration or coagulation tended to improve steer weight gains (P < 0.05) over untreated water from a dugout in 3 of 5 years. Daily weight gains tended to be improved slightly by simply pumping water to a trough without treatment. Water aerated and pumped to a trough in early summer tended to produce greater (P < 0.05) weight gains in calves than those drinking directly from the dugout. The effect of treatment on improving cattle weight gains appeared to be related to improved water palatability, which increased water and feed consumption. Water chemistry and biological constituents analysed did not identify significant differences among treatments. These results suggest that improving water quality with aeration and pumping to a trough will improve weight gain 9–10% over a 90-day grazing period in most years.

Additional keywords: weight gain, aeration, coagulation, steer.


Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jonathan Pierce, Cheryl Guenther, Adrienne Worley, and Russel Kirzinger at the Termuende Research Farm, and numerous staff at Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration (PFRA) office Watrous, SK, for assisting in animal management, data collection, and laboratory analysis. The PFRA Rural Water Development Program, Agri-Food Innovation Fund, Ducks Unlimited Canada, and the Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada Matching Investment Initiative Fund provided funding for this research. Appreciation is expressed to the Saskatchewan Horned Cattle Purchases Fund and Heartland Livestock for supplying the cattle for this study.


References


Ali S, Goonewardene LA, Basarab JA (1994) Estimating water consumption and factors affecting intake in grazing cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 74, 551–554. open url image1

Anderson BC (1987) Abdominal cryptosporidiosis in cattle. Veterinary Pathology 24, 235–238.
| PubMed |
open url image1

Barrio JP, Bapat ST, Forbes JM (1989) The effect of drinking water on food-intake responses to manipulation of rumen osmolality in sheep. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 51, 98–102. open url image1

Beaver EE, Williams JE, Hannah SM, Miller SJ (1989) Influence of breed and environment on DM digestibility, water consumption, ruminal and blood parameters for Brangus and Angus steers. Nutrition Reports International 40, 831–842. open url image1

Ensminger, ME , Oldfield, JE ,  and  Heinemann, WW (1990). ‘Feeds and nutrition.’ (Ensminger Publishing Company: Clovis, CA)

Hicks RB, Owens FN, Gill DR, Martin JJ, Strasia CA (1988) Water intake by feedlot steers. Animal Science Research Report No.125. Agricultural Experimental Station, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK.

Holechek JL (1980) The effects of vegetation type and grazing system on the performance, diet and intake of yearling cattle. PhD thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.

Hyder DN, Bement RE, Norris JJ (1968) Sampling requirements of the water-intake method of estimating forage intake by grazing cattle. Journal of Range Management 21, 392–397. open url image1

Meyer EA (1985) The epidemiology of giardiasis. Parasitology Today 1, 101–105.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

National Research Council (1996). ‘Nutrient requirements of beef cattle.’ 7th edn . (National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC)

Olfert, ED , Cross, BM ,  and  McWilliam, AA (1993). ‘Guide to the care and use of experimental animals.’ Vol. 1, 2nd edn . (Canadian Council on Animal Care: Ottawa, ON)

Olson ME, McAllister TA, Cheng K-J (1996) The influence of water-borne diseases on production in ruminants. ‘Meeting future challenges. Water resources and agriculture: Protecting our future’. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Animal Science Annual Meeting 1996.. (Ed. LM Rode ) pp. 121–138. (CSAS: Lethbridge, AB, Canada)


Olson ME, McAllister TA, Deselliers L, Morck DW, Cheng K-J, Buret A, Ceri H (1995) Effects of giardiasis on production in a domestic ruminant (lamb) model. American Journal of Veterinary Research 56, 1470–1474.
| PubMed |
open url image1

Pandey HN, Novsarkar AE, Jana DN, Joshi HC, Nautiyal LP (1989) Drinking water requirements of lactating crossbred cows during summer under free choice feeding system. Indian Journal of Animal Production Management 5, 61–66. open url image1

Roubicek, CB (1969). ‘Water metabolism. Animal growth and nutrition.’ pp. 353–373. (Lea and Febiger: Philadelphia, PA)

Saskatoon Institute of Pedology (1992). ‘Saskatchewan soil survey.’ (University of Saskatchewan: Saskatoon, SK)

SAS (1999). ‘User’s guide, Version 7.’ Vol. 2, 5th edn . (Statistical Analysis System Inst. Inc.: Cary, NC)

Steel, RGD , Torrie, JH ,  and  Dickey, DA (1997). ‘Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach.’ 3rd edn . (McGraw-Hill Co.: New York)

Utley PR, Bradley NW, Boling JA (1970) Effect of restricted water intake on feed intake, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen metabolism in steers. Journal of Animal Science 31, 130–135.
| PubMed |
open url image1

Willms WD, Colwell DD, Kenzie O (1994) Water from dugouts can reduce livestock performance. Research Station Weekly Newsletter No. 3099, Agriculture & Agric.-Food Canada Research Station, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.

Willms WD, Kenzie O, Quinton D, Wallis P (1996) The water source as a factor affecting livestock production. ‘Meeting future challenges. Water resources and agriculture: protecting our future’ Proceeding of the 1996 Canadian Society of Animal Science Annual Meeting.. (Ed. LM Rode ) (CSAS: Lethbridge, AB, Canada)


Willms WD, Kenzie OR, McAllister TA, Colwell D, Veira D, Wilmshurst JF, Entz T, Olson ME (2002) Effects of water quality on cattle performance. Journal of Range Management 55, 452–460. open url image1