Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction for grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa) genotypes for general and specific adaptation to salt stress locations

S. L. Krishnamurthy; B. M. Lokeshkumar; Suman Rathor; A. S. Warraich; N. M. Vinaykumar; P. C. Sharma

doi:10.1071/CP23219

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Previous Next Contents Vol 75(12)

Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction for grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa) genotypes for general and specific adaptation to salt stress locations

S. L. Krishnamurthy

^A ^* , B. M. Lokeshkumar ^A , Suman Rathor ^A , A. S. Warraich ^A , N. M. Vinaykumar ^B and P. C. Sharma ^A ^*

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

^A ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, India.

^B Kuvempu University, Shankaraghatta, Shimogga, India.

^* Correspondence to: krishnagene@gmail.com, pcsharma.knl@gmail.com

Handling Editor: Mohd. Kamran Khan

Crop & Pasture Science 75, CP23219 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP23219

Submitted: 21 August 2023 Accepted: 16 November 2024 Published: 6 December 2024

Abstract

Context

Salt stress is one of the major, ever-increasing abiotic stresses that hinders rice production across arable land around the world. In order to sustain the production of rice (Oryza sativa) in these salt-affected areas, high-yielding stable salt tolerant genotypes must be identified.

Aims

The additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model was carried out to identify high-yielding stable rice genotypes under both saline and alkali stress.

Methods

Nineteen promising rice genotypes including five standard checks were evaluated using randomized block design under nine salt stress environments using three replications in 2017 and 2018.

Key results

The AMMI model II is thought to be the best model for genotype identification based on prediction accuracy with high GEI_S and low GEI_N (genotype and environment interaction noise). According to AMMI model II, six genotypes were identified as the top performers under salt stress: one genotype (CSR RIL-01-IR 165) yielded the best in three environments; another genotype (CSR 2711-17) yielded highly in in two environments; and the remaining three genotypes (RP5989-2-4-8-15-139-62-6-9, RP 6188-GSR IR1-8-S6-S3-S1, RP6189-HHZ17-Y16-Y3-SAL1) as well as one control genotype (CHK2) yielded well in single environments.

Conclusions

Based on AMMI stability study, genotypes RP5989-2-4-8-15-139-62-6-9, CSR2711-17, CSR RIL-01-IR 165, CSR-2748-4441-195, CSR-2748-4441-193), and CSRRIL-01-IR 75 were determined to be higher yielding and more stable than the national control genotype (CSR23).

Implications

The high-yielding stable genotypes identified in this study could be planted for salt-affected areas to sustain the production of rice.

Keywords: adaptation, alkalinity, AMMI, G × E interaction, mega environments, rice, salinity, stability.

References

Agahi K, Ahmadi J, Oghan HA, Fotokian MH, Orang SF (2020) Analysis of genotype × environment interaction for seed yield in spring oilseed rape using the AMMI model. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 20(1), e26502012.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Akbarpour O, Dehghani H, Sorkhi B, Gauch HG (2014) Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) based on AMMI model using developed SAS program. Journal of Agricultural Science & Technology 16, 909-920.
| Google Scholar |

Ali S, Gautam RK, Mahajan R, Krishnamurthy SL, Sharma SK, Singh RK, Ismail AM (2013) Stress indices and selectable traits in SALTOL QTL introgressed rice genotypes for reproductive stage tolerance to sodicity and salinity stresses. Field Crops Research 154, 65-73.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Anandan A, Eswaran R, Sabesan T, Prakash M (2009) Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions analysis of yield performances in rice genotypes under coastal saline environments. Advances in Biological Research 3(1-2), 43-47.
| Google Scholar |

Annicchiarico P (1997) Joint regression vs AMMI analysis of genotype-environment interactions for cereals in Italy. Euphytica 94, 53-62.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cornelius PL (1993) Statistical tests and retention of terms in the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model for cultivar trials. Crop Science 33(6), 1186-1193.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

de Leon ND, Jannink J-L, Edwards JW, Kaeppler SM (2016) Introduction to a special issue on genotype by environment interaction. Crop Science 56(5), 2081-2089.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ebdon JS, Gauch HG, Jr. (2002a) Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of national turfgrass performance trials: I. Interpretation of genotype × environment interaction. Crop Science 42, 489-496.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ebdon JS, Gauch HG, Jr. (2002b) Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of national turfgrass performance trials: II. Cultivar recommendations. Crop Science 42, 497-506.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties 1. Crop Science 6(1), 36-40.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

FAO and ITPS (2015) Status of world’s soil resources – main report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils, Rome, Italy.

Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14(6), 742.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gauch HG (1992) AMMI analysis of yield trials. In ‘Genotype-by-environment interaction’. (Eds MS Kang, HG Gauch) pp. 1–40. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA)

Gauch HG, Jr. (2006) Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science 46(4), 1488-1500.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gauch HG (2008) MATMODEL VERSION 3.0: Open source software for AMMI and related analysis. Crop and Soil Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Gauch HG, Jr. (2013) A simple protocol for AMMI analysis of yield trials. Crop Science 53(5), 1860-1869.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gauch HG, Jr., Piepho H-P, Annicchiarico P (2008) Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: further considerations. Crop Science 48(3), 866-889.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ghaed-Rahimi L, Heidari B, Dadkhodaie A (2014) Genotype × environment interactions for wheat grain yield and antioxidant changes in association with drought stress. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 61(2), 153-171.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hassani M, Heidari B, Dadkhodaie A, et al. (2018) Genotype by environment interaction components underlying variations in root, sugar and white sugar yield in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Euphytica 214, 79.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Islam MR, Sarker MRA, Sharma N, Rahman MA, Collard BCY, Gregorio GB, Ismail AM (2016) Assessment of adaptability of recently released salt tolerant rice varieties in coastal regions of South Bangladesh. Field Crops Research 190, 34-43.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Krishnamurthy SL, Sharma SK, Gautam RK, Kumar V (2014) Path and association analysis and stress indices for salinity tolerance traits in promising rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Cereal Research Communications 42(3), 474-483.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Krishnamurthy SL, Pundir P, Singh YP, Sharma SK, Sharma PC, Sharma DK (2015) Yield stability of rice lines for salt tolerance using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis - AMMI. Journal of Soil Salinity and Water Quality 7(2), 98-106.
| Google Scholar |

Krishnamurthy SL, Sharma PC, Sharma SK, Batra V, Kumar V, Rao LVS (2016a) Effect of salinity and use of stress indices of morphological and physiological traits at the seedling stage in rice. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 54(12), 843-850.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |

Krishnamurthy SL, Sharma SK, Sharma DK, Sharma PC, Singh YP, Mishra VK, Burman D, Maji B, Bandyopadhyay BK, Mandal S, Sarangi SK, Gautam RK, Singh PK, Manohara KK, Marandi BC, Singh DP, Padmavathi G, Vanve PB, Patil KD, Thirumeni S, Verma OP, Khan AH, Tiwari S, Shakila M, Ismail AM, Gregorio GB, Singh RK (2016b) Analysis of stability and G × E interaction of rice genotypes across saline and alkaline environments in India. Cereal Research Communications 44(2), 349-360.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Krishnamurthy SL, Gautam RK, Sharma PC, Sharma DK (2016c) Effect of different salt stresses on agro-morphological traits and utilisation of salt stress indices for reproductive stage salt tolerance in rice. Field Crops Research 190, 26-33.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Krishnamurthy SL, Sharma PC, Sharma DK, Ravikiran KT, Singh YP, Mishra VK, Burman D, Maji B, Mandal S, Sarangi SK, Gautam RK, Singh PK, Manohara KK, Marandi BC, Padmavathi G, Vanve PB, Patil KD, Thirumeni S, Verma OP, Khan AH, Tiwari S, Geetha S, Shakila M, Gill R, Yadav VK, Roy SKB, Prakash M, Bonifacio J, Ismail A, Gregorio GB, Singh RK (2017) Identification of mega-environments and rice genotypes for general and specific adaptation to saline and alkaline stresses in India. Scientific Reports 7(1), 7968.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Krishnamurthy SL, Sharma PC, Sharma DK, Singh YP, Mishra VK, Burman D, Maji B, Mandal S, Sarangi SK, Gautam RK, Singh PK, Manohara KK, Marandi BC, Chattopadhyay K, Padmavathi G, Vanve PB, Patil KD, Thirumeni S, Verma OP, Khan AH, Tiwari S, Geetha S, Gill R, Yadav VK, Roy B, Prakash M, Anandan A, Bonifacio J, Ismail AM, Singh RK (2021) Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analyses of yield performance in rice genotypes for general and specific adaptation to salt stress in locations in India. Euphytica 217, 20.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Krishnamurthy SL, Rathor S, Lokeshkumar BM, Warriach AS, Vinaykumar NM, Sharma PC, Gautam RK, Singh RK (2024) Genetic improvement of rice for inland saline and alkaline areas of North-Western India. In ‘Genetic improvement of rice for salt tolerance’. (Eds RK Singh, M Prakash, RK Gautam, SL Krishnamurthy, S Thirumeni) pp. 77–100. (Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd) 10.1007/978-981-99-3830-8

Kumar BMD, Shadakshari YG, Krishnamurthy SL (2010) Genotype x Environment interaction and stability analysis for grain yield and its components in Halugidda local rice mutants. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1(5), 1286-1289.
| Google Scholar |

Kumar BMD, Gangaprsad S, Krishnamurthy SL, Mallikarjunaiah H (2011) Stability analysis of puttabatta rice mutants. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 24(4), 527-528.
| Google Scholar |

Kumar J, Bratap A, Kumar S (2015) ‘Phonemics in crop plants: trends, options and limitations.’ (Springer: New York, NY, USA)

Lin CS, Binns MR (1988) A superiority measure of cultivar performance for cultivar × location data. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 68, 193-198.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mohammadi R, Mendioro MS, Diaz GQ, Gregorio GB, Singh RK (2013) Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with yield and yield components under reproductive stage salinity stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Genetics 92(3), 433-443.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Nachit MM, Nachit G, Ketata H, Gauch HG, Jr, Zobel RW (1992) Use of AMMI and linear regression models to analyze genotype-environment interaction in durum wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 83(5), 597-601.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Perkins JM, Jinks JL (1968) Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability IV. Non-linear interactions for multiple inbred lines. Heredity 23(4), 525-535.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Qin H, Li Y, Huang R (2020) Advances and challenges in the breeding of salt-tolerant rice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21(21), 8385.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Sa’diyah H, Hadi AF (2016) AMMI model for yield estimation in multi-environment trials: a comparison to BLUP. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 9, 163-169.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Shahid SA, Zaman M, Heng L (2018) Introduction to soil salinity, sodicity and diagnostics techniques. In ‘Guideline for salinity assessment, mitigation and adaptation using nuclear and related techniques’. (Eds M Zaman, SA Shahid, L Heng) pp. 1–42. (Springer: Cham, Switzerland)

Shahriari Z, Heidari B, Dadkhodaie A (2018) Dissection of genotype × environment interactions for mucilage and seed yield in Plantago species: application of AMMI and GGE biplot analyses. PLoS ONE 13(5), e0196095.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Sharma DK, Thimmappa K, Chinchmalatpure AR, Mandal AK, Yadav RK, Chaudhury SK, Kumar S, Sikka A (2015) Assessment of production and monetary losses from salt-affected soils in India. Technical Bulletin, ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryna, India. p. 99.

Yan W, Holland JB (2010) A heritability-adjusted GGE biplot for test environment evaluation. Euphytica 171(3), 355-369.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Yan W, Rajcan I (2002) Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science 42(1), 11-20.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z (2000) Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science 40(3), 597-605.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Yan W, Kang MS, Ma B, Woods S, Cornelius PL (2007) GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Science 47(2), 643-653.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Yang R-C, Crossa J, Cornelius PL, Burgueño J (2009) Biplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction: proceed with caution. Crop Science 49, 1564-1576.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |