Economic impacts of chickpea grain classification: how ‘seed quality is Queen’ must be considered alongside ‘yield is King’ to provide a princely income for farmers
Jennifer A. Wood
A B and J. Fiona Scott A
A NSW Department of Primary Industries, Tamworth Agricultural Institute, 4 Marsden Park Road, Calala, NSW 2340, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: jenny.wood@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Crop and Pasture Science 72(2) 136-145 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP20282
Submitted: 3 August 2020 Accepted: 7 December 2020 Published: 2 March 2021
Abstract
Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) are a high value crop for farmers, but price penalties will be imposed or grain rejected whenever the standards are not met by growers whose crops suffer grain defects in a particular season. Australian chickpeas are renowned for their high quality and are generally in high demand globally because of good farming practice and strict grain quality standards. However, small quantities of defective seed in grain loads can reduce the price paid to individual farmers, with significant financial impacts. Information is scarce on the types of defects causing price penalties and there is no information on the magnitude of those penalties. An online farmer survey was conducted to capture information on the types of grain defects, price penalties imposed and load rejections with respect to the delivery of their 2017 chickpea crop. Here we show that the cost to individual chickpea farmers affected by price penalties or load rejections ranged from AU$743 to $1 293 750. Furthermore, the total cost of seed defects was calculated to be $154.2 million in that season, equating to a revenue loss of 23.7% of gross value of production in Australia. Chickpea seed defects also contributed to additional costs including seed cleaning, further transport costs and harvest delays, with subsequent risk of yield losses and further quality defects. Too often, crop yields are the focus while seed quality is overlooked as an essential driver of farmer profitability. We demonstrate how important seed quality is to farmer profitability; if ‘yield is King’ then seed quality is certainly Queen. We suggest that farmers prioritise harvest of their chickpea crops ahead of harvest of cereal crops to minimise the risk of chickpea seed defects and seed loss, and to maximise profits from this higher value crop. Additional surveys over several seasons are warranted to refine information on the types of seed defects occurring in chickpea and their financial impacts on farmers, and they could be expanded to other crops and countries. We suggest that misclassification of seed defects needs further exploration, as does research into minimising the major causes of seed defects. Improvements to grain classification systems globally should be sought to provide better support for farmer profitability so that they can continue to feed the world.
Keywords: food security, GVP, high value crops, legume, price penalty, seed markings.
References
ABARES (2017) Australian crop report. December. CC BY 4.0. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Canberra. http://data.daff.gov.au/data/warehouse/aucrpd9abcc003/aucrpd9aba_20171205_cLBGH/AustCropRrt20171205_v1.0.1.pdf (accessed 25 October 2019).ABARES (2019). Agricultural commodity statistics 2019. December. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Canberra. (accessed 25 October 2019)
Abawi GY (1993) A simulation model of wheat harvesting and drying in northern Australia. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 54, 141–158.
| A simulation model of wheat harvesting and drying in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016) 2015–16 Agricultural Census data. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra. https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/D3310114.nsf/Home/Census?OpenDocument&ref=topBar (accessed 25 October 2019).
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2017) 7121.0 – Agricultural Commodities, Australia, state/territory and ASGS (Statistical Area 4) regions (2015–16). Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/7121.0 (accessed 25 October 2019).
Banks J (1999) High moisture levels increase yield and quality. Farming Ahead 94, 39–40.
Behere PB, Bhise MC (2009) Farmers’ suicide: across culture. Indian Journal of Psychiatry 51, 242–243.
| Farmers’ suicide: across culture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20048446PubMed |
Bentley FR, Daskalova N, White B (2017) Comparing the reliability of Amazon Mechanical Turk and SurveyMonkey to traditional market research surveys. In ‘Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems’. pp. 1092–1099. (Association for Computing Machinery: Denver, CO, USA)
Berger JD, Turner NC, Siddique KHM, Knights EJ, Brinsmead RB, Mock I, Edmondson C, Khan TN (2004) Genotype by environment studies across Australia reveal the importance of phenology for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) improvement. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 1071–1084.
| Genotype by environment studies across Australia reveal the importance of phenology for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bolland MDA (1984) Grain losses due to delayed harvesting of barley and wheat. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 24, 391–395.
| Grain losses due to delayed harvesting of barley and wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bryant L, Garnham B (2014) Economies, ethics and emotions: farmer distress within the moral economy of agribusiness. Journal of Rural Studies 34, 304–312.
| Economies, ethics and emotions: farmer distress within the moral economy of agribusiness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Canadian Grain Commission (2019) Official Grain Grading Guide, August 2019. Canadian Grain Commission, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. https://grainscanada.gc.ca/en/grain-quality/official-grain-grading-guide/official-grain-grading-guide-2019-en.pdf (accessed 22 July 2020).
Crawford SD, Couper MP, Lamias MJ (2001) Web surveys. Perceptions of burden. Social Science Computer Review 19, 146–162.
| Web surveys. Perceptions of burden.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dusunceli F, Wood JA, Gupta A, Yadav M, Yadav SS (2007) International trade. In ‘Chickpea breeding and management’. (Eds SS Yadav, RJ Redden, W Chen, B Sharma) pp. 555–575. (CABI International: Wallingford, UK)
FAO (2020) FAOSTAT ‘Data’ database. Statistics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data (accessed 22 February 2021).
FAO-WHO (2019) Codex Alimentarius International Food Standards: standard for certain pulses (CXS 171-1989), Adopted 1989, Amended 2019. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome; World Health Organization, Geneva. http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FCXS%2B171-1989%252FCXS_171e.pdf (accessed 22 July 2020).
Government of India (2016) Quality specifications for procurement of pulses. Food Corporation of India, New Delhi. http://fci.gov.in/qualities.php?view=9 (accessed 22 July 2020).
Johansson R, Effland A, Coble K (2017) Falling response rates to USDA crop surveys: why it matters. farmdoc daily 7, 9
Jones TL, Baxter MAJ, Khanduja V (2013) A quick guide to survey research. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 95, 5–7.
| A quick guide to survey research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23317709PubMed |
Jue A (2019) What’s a typical survey response rate? FocusVision. https://www.focusvision.com/blog/ (Accessed 23 July 2020)
Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J (2003) Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 15, 261–266.
| Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12803354PubMed |
Kiely KM, Leach LS, Olesen SC, Butterworth P (2015) How financial hardship is associated with the onset of mental health problems over time. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 50, 909–918.
| How financial hardship is associated with the onset of mental health problems over time.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25683473PubMed |
Manfreda KL, Berzelak N, Vehovar V (2011) Nonresponse in web surveys. In ‘International encyclopedia of statistical science’. (Ed. M. Lovric) pp. 984–987. (Springer: Berlin)
McHugh ML (2013) The chi-square test of independence. Biochemia Medica 23, 143–149.
| The chi-square test of independence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23894860PubMed |
Miller J (2006) Online marketing research. In ‘The handbook of marketing research: uses, misuses, and future advances’. pp. 110–131. (SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA)
Nawi NM, Chen G, Zare D (2010) The effect of different climatic conditions on wheat harvesting strategy and return. Biosystems Engineering 106, 493–502.
| The effect of different climatic conditions on wheat harvesting strategy and return.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
OECD (2017) ‘Agricultural policy monitoring and evaluation 2017.’ (OECD Publishing: Paris)
Pennings JM, Irwin SH, Good DL (2002) Surveying farmers: a case study. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 24, 266–277.
Pulse Australia (2015) Chickpea production: Southern and Western Regions. Pulse Australia. http://www.pulseaus.com.au/growing-pulses/bmp/chickpea/southern-guide (Accessed 25 October 2019)
Pulse Australia (2019) Australian pulse Standards 2019/2020. Pulse Australia. http://www.pulseaus.com.au/storage/app/media/uploaded-files/Pulse%20Standards%20201920%20V2%20FINAL.pdf (Accessed 25 October 2019)
Reeve I (2001) Australian farmers’ attitudes to rural environmental issues: 1991–2000. Report to Land & Water Australia. Institute for Rural Futures, Armidale, NSW.
Smith CB (1997) Casting the net: surveying an Internet population. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 3, JCMC316
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1994) ‘Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research.’ 3rd edn. (W. H. Freeman: San Francisco, CA, USA)
Sturgeon R, Morrissette PJ (2010) A qualitative analysis of suicide ideation among Manitoban farmers/Une analyse qualitative de l’idéation suicidaire chez les agriculteurs Manitobains. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy 44, 191–207.
Tullberg J, Rogers I (1982) Time costs in extensive agriculture. In ‘Agricultural engineering conference 1982: resources, efficient use and conservation; preprints of papers’. pp. 57–61. (Institution of Engineers Australia: Barton, ACT)
USDA (2007) Official United States Standards for Grain, Sept 2007. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. https://www.gipsa.usda.gov/fgis/usstandards.aspx (Accessed 22 July 2020)
Van Selm M, Jankowski NW (2006) Conducting online surveys. Quality & Quantity 40, 435–456.
| Conducting online surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wood J (2019) What causes and how can we manage grain quality defects in chickpeas. In ‘Grains research update: driving profit through research’. Goondiwindi. pp. 56–64. (Grains Research & Development Corporation: Canberra, ACT)
Wood JA, Knights EJ, Harden S (2008) Milling performance in desi-type chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): effects of genotype, environment and seed size. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 88, 108–115.
| Milling performance in desi-type chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): effects of genotype, environment and seed size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wood JA, Tan HT, Collins HM, Yap K, Khor SF, Lim WL, Xing X, Bulone V, Burton RA, Fincher GB, Tucker MR (2018) Genetic and environmental factors contribute to variation in cell wall composition in mature desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cotyledons. Plant, Cell & Environment 41, 1–14.
| Genetic and environmental factors contribute to variation in cell wall composition in mature desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cotyledons.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wood JA, Egan NE, Keir CF, Miller JC, Pengilley GC, Hobson KB (2020) Characterisation of seed marking types in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): tiger stripe and other blemishes. Legume Science e29
| Characterisation of seed marking types in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): tiger stripe and other blemishes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
