Physiological characteristics and forage accumulation of grazed Marandu palisade grass (Brachiaria brizantha) growing in monoculture and in silvopasture with Eucalyptus urograndis
H. L. B. do Nascimento A , B. C. Pedreira B F , L. E. Sollenberger C , D. H. Pereira D , C. A. de S. Magalhães B and F. H. M. Chizzotti E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Instituto Federal do Mato Grosso, Guarantã do Norte, MT 78520-000, Brazil.
B Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, PO Box 343, Sinop, MT 78550-970, Brazil.
C University of Florida, PO Box 110500, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
D Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, PPGZ, Sinop, MT 78557-267, Brazil.
E Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-900, Brazil.
F Corresponding author. Email: bruno.pedreira@embrapa.br
Crop and Pasture Science 70(4) 384-394 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP18403
Submitted: 30 August 2018 Accepted: 26 February 2019 Published: 20 April 2019
Abstract
Adoption of silvopasture is increasing, but proper design and management of pasture–tree associations is required to sustain pasture productivity. Our objective was to compare agronomic and physiological characteristics of Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. Ex A.Rich.) Stapf. (palisade grass) cv. Marandu growing in monoculture, or in silvopasture with Eucalyptus urograndis, in the Brazilian Amazon biome. Trees were planted in triple rows (intra-row spacing 3 m, inter-row spacing 3.5 m), referred to as a grove, with three groves per 2-ha silvopasture experimental unit. Space between groves was 30 m, and tree density was 270 ha–1. From October 2015 to September 2016, all experimental units were stocked continuously with cattle by using a variable stocking rate to maintain a Marandu canopy height of 30 cm. In the silvopasture, sampling occurred at 4, 7.5 and 15 m into the non-treed area from the outer tree row in a grove. Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) reaching the Marandu canopy averaged 21% less for silvopasture than for grass monoculture; however, forage accumulation was not different between systems, nor were Marandu stomatal conductance, water-use efficiency (WUE), transpiration rate, transpiration ratio and leaf temperature. In silvopasture, PAR and forage accumulation were 33% and 29% less, respectively, at the 4-m distance than the 15-m distance from the edge row of trees, associated with lower transpiration rate and transpiration rate and greater WUE. We conclude that Marandu palisade grass can tolerate PAR reduction in silvopasture up to ~20% without reduction in forage accumulation, supporting its potential use in agroforestry systems for cattle production in the Brazilian Amazon Biome.
Additional keywords: chlorophyll, grazing systems, photosynthesis.
References
Adewopo JB, Silveira ML, Xu S, Gerber S, Sollenberger LE, Martin T (2014) Management intensification impacts on soil and ecosystem carbon stocks in subtropical grasslands. Soil Science Society of America Journal 78, 977–986.| Management intensification impacts on soil and ecosystem carbon stocks in subtropical grasslands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, De Moraes Gonçalves JL, Sparovek G (2013) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22, 711–728.
| Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ballaré CL, Pierik R (2017) The shade-avoidance syndrome: Multiple signals and ecological consequences. Plant, Cell & Environment 40, 2530–2543.
| The shade-avoidance syndrome: Multiple signals and ecological consequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Boote KJ, Jones JW (1987) Equations to define canopy photosynthesis from quantum efficiency, maximum leaf rate, light extinction, leaf area index, and photon flux density. In ‘Progress in photosynthesis research. Vol. 4. Proceedings VII International Congress on Photosynthesis’. 10–15 August 1986, Providence, RI, USA. (Ed. J Biggins) pp. 415–418. (Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)
Broom DM (2017) Components of sustainable animal production and the use of silvopasture systems. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 46, 683–688.
| Components of sustainable animal production and the use of silvopasture systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
de Andrade CMS, Valentim JF, Carneiro JDC, Vaz FA (2004) Growth of tropical forage grasses and legumes under shade. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 39, 263–270.
| Growth of tropical forage grasses and legumes under shade.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dias-Filho MB (2002) Photosynthetic light response of the C4 grasses Brachiaria brizantha and B. humidicola under shade. Scientia Agrícola 59, 65–68.
| Photosynthetic light response of the C4 grasses Brachiaria brizantha and B. humidicola under shade.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Domiciano LF, Mombach MA, Carvalho P, Da Silva BNMF, Pereira DH, Cabral LS, Lopes LB, Pedreira BC (2018) Performance and behaviour of Nellore steers on integrated systems. Animal Production Science 58, 920–929.
| Performance and behaviour of Nellore steers on integrated systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Embrapa (2017) Automatic weather station. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation. Available at: https://www.embrapa.br/agrossilvipastoril/estacao-meteorologica (accessed 5 January 2019).
Euclides VPB, Montagner DB, Barbosa RA, Nantes NN (2014) Pasture and grazing management of Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst) Stapf and Panicum maximum Jacq. Ceres 61, 808–818.
| Pasture and grazing management of Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst) Stapf and Panicum maximum Jacq.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Geremia EV, Crestani S, Mascheroni JDC, Carnevalli RA, Mourão GB, da Silva SC (2018) Sward structure and herbage intake of Brachiaria brizantha cv. Piatã in a crop-livestock-forestry integration area. Livestock Science 212, 83–92.
| Sward structure and herbage intake of Brachiaria brizantha cv. Piatã in a crop-livestock-forestry integration area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gobbi KF, Garcia R, Ventrella MC, Neto AFG, Rocha GC (2011) Specific leaf area and quantitative leaf anatomy of signalgrass and forage peanut submitted to shading. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40, 1436–1444.
| Specific leaf area and quantitative leaf anatomy of signalgrass and forage peanut submitted to shading.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hetherington AM, Woodward FI (2003) The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424, 901–908.
| The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12931178PubMed |
Johnson SE, Sollenberger LE, Bennett JM (1994) Yield and reserve status of rhizoma peanut growing under shade. Crop Science 34, 757–761.
| Yield and reserve status of rhizoma peanut growing under shade.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Klingman DL, Miles SR, Mott GO (1943) The cage method for determining consumption and yield of pasture herbage. Journal - American Society of Agronomy 35, 739–746.
| The cage method for determining consumption and yield of pasture herbage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Klute A (1986) Water retention: laboratory methods. In ‘Methods of soil analysis. I. Physical and mineralogical methods’. (Ed. CA Black) pp. 635–662. (ASA: Madison, WI, USA)
Knapp AK (1993) Gas exchange dynamics in C3 and C4 grasses: consequence of differences in stomatal conductance. Ecology 74, 113–123.
| Gas exchange dynamics in C3 and C4 grasses: consequence of differences in stomatal conductance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Knapp AK, Smith WK (1990) Stomatal and photosynthetic responses to variable sunlight. Physiologia Plantarum 78, 160–165.
| Stomatal and photosynthetic responses to variable sunlight.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lawson T, Blatt MR (2014) Stomatal size, speed, and responsiveness impact on photosynthesis and water use efficiency. Plant Physiology 164, 1556–1570.
| Stomatal size, speed, and responsiveness impact on photosynthesis and water use efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24578506PubMed |
Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) ‘SAS for mixed models.’ (SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA)
Ocheltree TW, Nippert JB, Prasad PVV (2012) Changes in stomatal conductance along grass blades reflect changes in leaf structure. Plant, Cell & Environment 35, 1040–1049.
| Changes in stomatal conductance along grass blades reflect changes in leaf structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pedreira BC, Pedreira CGS, Lara MAS (2015) Leaf age, leaf blade portion and light intensity as determinants of leaf photosynthesis in Panicum maximum Jacq. Grassland Science 61, 45–49.
| Leaf age, leaf blade portion and light intensity as determinants of leaf photosynthesis in Panicum maximum Jacq.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Peters M, Herrero M, Fisher M, Erb K-H, Rao I, Subbarao GV, Castro A, Arango J, Chará J, Murgueitio E, Hoek R, Laderach P, Hyman G, Tapasco J, Strassburg B, Paul B, Ricon A, Schultze-Kraft R, Fonte S, Searchinger T (2013) Challenges and opportunities for improving eco-efficiency of tropical forage-based systems to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales 1, 156–167.
| Challenges and opportunities for improving eco-efficiency of tropical forage-based systems to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Raes L, Speelman S, Aguirre N (2017) Farmers’ preferences for PES contracts to adopt silvopasture systems in Southern Ecuador, revealed through a choice experiment. Environmental Management 60, 200–215.
| Farmers’ preferences for PES contracts to adopt silvopasture systems in Southern Ecuador, revealed through a choice experiment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28474210PubMed |
Ramachandran Nair PK, Nair VD, Kumar BM, Showalter J (2010) Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Advances in Agronomy 108, 237–307.
| Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Santos DC, Guimarães Júnior R, Vilela L, Pulrolnik K, Bufon VB, França AFS (2016) Forage dry mass accumulation and structural characteristics of Piatã grass in silvopastoral systems in the Brazilian savannah. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 233, 16–24.
| Forage dry mass accumulation and structural characteristics of Piatã grass in silvopastoral systems in the Brazilian savannah.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sbrissia AF, Da Silva SC (2008) Tiller size/density compensation in Marandu palisadegrass swards. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37, 35–47.
| Tiller size/density compensation in Marandu palisadegrass swards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Soil Survey Staff (2017) ‘Soil survey manual.’ (United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC)
Sollenberger LE, Kohmann MM, Dubeux JCB, Silveira ML (2019) Grassland management affects delivery of regulating and supporting ecosystem services. Crop Science 59, 441–459.
| Grassland management affects delivery of regulating and supporting ecosystem services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Taiz L, Zieger E (2009) ‘Plant physiology.’ (Artmed: Porto Alegre, Brazil)
Valladares F, Niinemets Ü (2008) Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 39, 237–257.
| Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wang J, Huang H, Jia S, Zhong X, Li F, Zhang K, Shi Z (2017) Photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence reaction to different shade stresses of weak light sensitive maize. Pakistan Journal of Botany 49, 1681–1688.
Ward DA, Woolhouse HW (1986) Comparative effects of light during growth on the photosynthetic properties of NADP‐ME type C4 grasses from open and shaded habitats. II. Photosynthetic enzyme activities and metabolism. Plant, Cell & Environment 9, 271–277.
| Comparative effects of light during growth on the photosynthetic properties of NADP‐ME type C4 grasses from open and shaded habitats. II. Photosynthetic enzyme activities and metabolism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wolfinger R (1993) Covariance structure selection in general mixed models. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 22, 1079–1106.
| Covariance structure selection in general mixed models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhang D, Du G, Sun Z, Bai W, Wang Q, Feng L, Zheng J, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Yang S, Yang N, Feng C, Cai Q, Evers JB, van der Werf W, Zhang L (2018) Agroforestry enables high efficiency of light capture, photosynthesis and dry matter production in a semi-arid climate. European Journal of Agronomy 94, 1–11.
| Agroforestry enables high efficiency of light capture, photosynthesis and dry matter production in a semi-arid climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zolin CA, Paulino J, Matos S, Augusto C, Magalhães DS (2016) Soil and water losses under crop-forest integration and in soybean-corn succession. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 51, 1223–1230.
| Soil and water losses under crop-forest integration and in soybean-corn succession.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
