Sensitivity of sensor-based nitrogen rates to selection of within-field calibration strips in winter wheat
Stanisław M. Samborski A E , Dariusz Gozdowski B , Olga S. Walsh C , Peter Kyveryga D and Michał Stępień A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Agronomy Department, Nowoursynowska Street 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
B Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Department of Experimental Design and Bioinformatics, Nowoursynowska Street 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
C University of Idaho, SW Idaho Research and Extension Center, 29603 U of I Lane, Parma, ID 83660-6590, USA.
D Iowa Soybean Association, 1255 SW Prairie Trail Pkwy, Ankeny, IA 50023, USA.
E Corresponding author. Email: stanislaw_samborski@sggw.pl
Crop and Pasture Science 68(2) 101-114 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP16380
Submitted: 15 October 2016 Accepted: 17 January 2017 Published: 10 February 2017
Abstract
Active optical sensors (AOSs) are used for in-season variable-rate application of nitrogen (N). The sensors measure crop reflectance expressed as vegetative indices (VIs). These are transformed into N recommendations during on-site calibration of AOSs—‘familiarising’ the sensors with the crop N status of the representative part of a field. The ‘drive-first’ method is often used by growers to calibrate AOSs. Due to large spatial variation of crop N status within fields, it is difficult to identify the most representative sample strip for AOS calibration. Seven site-years were used to evaluate the sensitivity of sensor-based N prescriptions for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to selection of sample strips for AOS calibration that fall into extreme, very low or very high values of 95th percentiles of amber normalised difference VI (NDVI) values. A Crop Circle ACS-210 sensor was used to collect canopy reflectance values, expressed as amber NDVI, at the beginning of wheat stem elongation. Our study showed that the sample-strip selection significantly affected sensor-based N prescriptions. The drive-first method may result in under- or over-applications of N and in lower N-use efficiency. One way to overcome this problem is to collect whole field NDVI values during pesticide application before sensor-based N application. The NDVI values from the entire field then can be used to choose the most representative sample strips for AOS calibration.
Additional keywords: plant-available water, soil texture, yield potential.
References
Ag Leader® INTEGRA Operator Manual (2015) Firmware Version 4.0. Ag Leader PN 4002083-Eng Rev. O. 2015 Ag Leader Technology, Ames, IA, USA. Available at: https://support.agleader.com/kbp/index.php?View=afile&EntryID=1543&AttachID=3742Bausch WC, Brodahl MK (2012) Strategies to evaluate goodness of reference strips for in-season, field scale, irrigated corn nitrogen sufficiency. Precision Agriculture 13, 104–122.
| Strategies to evaluate goodness of reference strips for in-season, field scale, irrigated corn nitrogen sufficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blackmer TM, Schepers JS (1995) Use of a chlorophyll meter to monitor nitrogen status and schedule fertigation for corn. Journal of Production Agriculture 8, 56–60.
| Use of a chlorophyll meter to monitor nitrogen status and schedule fertigation for corn.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bouroubi Y, Tremblay N, Vigneault P, Bélec C, Adamchuk V (2013) Estimating nitrogen sufficiency index using a natural local reference approach. In ‘Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics: Information for Sustainable Agriculture’. pp. 71–75. (IEEE) http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6621882/
Bramley R, Cock S, Adams M, Corner R (1999) ‘Designing your on-farm experiments: how precision agriculture can help.’ (GRDC: Canberra, ACT)
Bundy LG, Andraski TW (2004) Diagnostic for site-specific nitrogen recommendations for winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 96, 608–614.
| Diagnostic for site-specific nitrogen recommendations for winter wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clay DE, Kharel TP, Reese Ch, Beck D, Carlson CG, Clay SA, Reicks G (2012) Winter wheat crop reflectance and nitrogen sufficiency index values are influenced by nitrogen and water stress. Agronomy Journal 104, 1612–1617.
| Winter wheat crop reflectance and nitrogen sufficiency index values are influenced by nitrogen and water stress.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Crop Sensor Isaria (2013) Easy, efficient agricultural systems by CLAAS. CLAAS Agrosystems KGaA mbH & Co KG, Gütersloh, Germany. Available at: http://app.claas.com/2013/university-symposia/download/newport/CLAAS_Crop_Sensor.pdf
CropSpec™ Operators’s Manual (2009) Topcon Positioning Systems, Inc. Livermore, CA, USA. Part No. AGA3946 Rev 1.0, 2009.
DEFRA Nitrates Directive Team (2013) Guidance on complying with the rules for Nitrate Vulnerable Zones in England for 2013 to 2016. Department of Environment Food & Rural Affairs, UK. Available at: www.gov.uk/defra (accessed 15 October 2016).
Delin S, Berglund K (2005) Management zones classified with respect to drought and waterlogging. Precision Agriculture 6, 321–340.
| Management zones classified with respect to drought and waterlogging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Falzon G, Lamb DW, Schneider D (2012) The dynamic aerial survey algorithm architecture and its potential use in airborne fertilizer applications. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 5, 1772–1779.
| The dynamic aerial survey algorithm architecture and its potential use in airborne fertilizer applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fitzgerald G, Rodriguez D, O’Leary G (2010) Measuring and predicting canopy nitrogen nutrition in wheat using a spectral index – The Canopy Chlorophyll Content Index (CCCI). Field Crops Research 116, 318–324.
| Measuring and predicting canopy nitrogen nutrition in wheat using a spectral index – The Canopy Chlorophyll Content Index (CCCI).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Franzen D, Kitchen N, Holland K, Schepers J, Raun W (2016) Algorithms for in-season nutrient management in cereals. Agronomy Journal 108, 1775–1781.
| Algorithms for in-season nutrient management in cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Griffin TW, Florax RJGM, Lowenberg-DeBoer J (2006) Field-scale experimental designs and spatial econometric methods for precision farming: Strip-trial designs for rice production decision making. In ‘Proceedings Annual Meeting’. 5–8 February 2006, Orlando, FL. (Southern Agricultural Economics Association). Available at: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/35367/1/sp06gr01.pdf (accessed 15 October 2016)
Holland KH, Schepers JS (2010) Derivation of a variable rate nitrogen application model for in-season fertilization of corn. Agronomy Journal 102, 1415–1424.
| Derivation of a variable rate nitrogen application model for in-season fertilization of corn.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holland KH, Schepers JS (2011) Active-crop sensor calibration using the virtual reference concept. In ‘Precision Agriculture 2011. Proceedings 8th European Conference on Precision Agriculture’. (Ed. JV Stafford) pp. 469–479. (Czech Centre for Science and Society: Prague)
Holland KH, Schepers JS (2013) Use of a virtual-reference concept to interpret active crop canopy sensor data. Precision Agriculture 14, 71–85.
| Use of a virtual-reference concept to interpret active crop canopy sensor data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
IUSS Working Group WRB (2007) ‘World Reference Base for soil resources 2006.’ Update 2007. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. (FAO: Rome)
Johnson GV, Raun WR (2003) Nitrogen response index as a guide to fertilizer management. Journal of Plant Nutrition 26, 249–262.
| Nitrogen response index as a guide to fertilizer management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhtlCmt7w%3D&md5=7d5f6967420be35868094a848dbc65e3CAS |
Kitchen NR, Sudduth KA, Drummond ST, Scharf PC, Palm HL, Roberts DF, Vories ED (2010) Ground-based canopy reflectance sensing for variable-rate nitrogen corn fertilization. Agronomy Journal 102, 71–84.
| Ground-based canopy reflectance sensing for variable-rate nitrogen corn fertilization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhvFSktbo%3D&md5=24903cf303b9cfb5bc7e1a36d2688b32CAS |
Kyveryga PM, Blackmer TM, Caragea PC (2011) Categorical analysis of spatial variability in economic yield response of corn to nitrogen fertilization. Agronomy Journal 103, 796–804.
| Categorical analysis of spatial variability in economic yield response of corn to nitrogen fertilization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pachepsky YA, Timlin DJ, Rawls WJ (2001) Soil water retention as related to topographic variables. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65, 1787–1795.
| Soil water retention as related to topographic variables.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xht1Smu7k%3D&md5=83dfd3a88c4216ed74de24f5dd0af0b0CAS |
Pena-Yewtukhiw EM, Schwab GJ, Murdock LM (2006) Univariate distribution analysis to evaluate variable rate fertilization. Agronomy Journal 98, 554–561.
| Univariate distribution analysis to evaluate variable rate fertilization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Peterson TA, Blackmer TM, Francis DD, Schepers JS (1993) G93-1171. Using a chlorophyll meter to improve N management. University of Nebraska. Available at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2349&context=extensionhist (accessed 15 October 2016)
Roberts DC, Brorsen BW, Taylor RK, Solie JB, Raun WR (2011) Replicability of nitrogen recommendations from ramped calibration strips in winter wheat. Precision Agriculture 12, 653–665.
| Replicability of nitrogen recommendations from ramped calibration strips in winter wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roberts DC, Brorsen BW, Solie JB, Raun WR (2013) Is data needed from every field to determine in-season precision nitrogen recommendations in winter wheat? Precision Agriculture 14, 245–269.
| Is data needed from every field to determine in-season precision nitrogen recommendations in winter wheat?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Romano N, Palladino M (2002) Prediction of soil water retention using soil physical data and terrain attributes. Journal of Hydrology 265, 56–75.
| Prediction of soil water retention using soil physical data and terrain attributes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW (1974) Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In ‘Proceedings Third ERTS Symposium’. Washington, DC, 10–14 Dec. 1973. pp. 309–317. (NASA SP-351, Goddard Space Flight Ctr.: Greenbelt, MD)
Samborski SM, Tremblay N, Fallon E (2009) Strategies to make use of plant sensors-based diagnostic information for nitrogen recommendations. Agronomy Journal 101, 800–816.
| Strategies to make use of plant sensors-based diagnostic information for nitrogen recommendations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXps1OmtL8%3D&md5=b7450d3703f96974d646871b99ea1318CAS |
Samborski S, Gozdowski D, Dobers ES, Stępień M (2010) The use of a ground based remote sensor for winter wheat GY prediction in northern Poland. In ‘Proceedings 10th International Conference on Precision Agriculture’. Denver, CO. 18–21 July. (CD-ROM) (Colorado State University, International Plant Nutrition Institute, and Foundation for Agronomic Research)
Scharf PC, Lory JA (2009) Calibrating reflectance measurements to predict optimal sidedress nitrogen rate for corn. Agronomy Journal 101, 615–625.
| Calibrating reflectance measurements to predict optimal sidedress nitrogen rate for corn.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXmt1Wgtr8%3D&md5=ee5a7e2d054c237caf5b099c6b97a046CAS |
Schepers JS, Shanahan JF (2009) Managing nitrogen with active sensors. In ‘Proceedings 13th Annual Symposium on Precision Agriculture in Australia’. (Eds MG Trotter, EB Garraway, DW Lamb) pp. 2-10. (University of New England: Armidale, NSW) http://sydney.edu.au/agriculture/pal/documents/Symposium_2009.pdf
Schröder JJ, Neeteson JJ, Enema O, Struik PC (2000) Does the crop or the soil indicate how to save nitrogen in maize production? Reviewing the state of the art. Field Crops Research 66, 151–164.
| Does the crop or the soil indicate how to save nitrogen in maize production? Reviewing the state of the art.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shapiro CA, Schepers JS, Francis DD, Shanahan JF (2006) Using a chlorophyll meter to improve N management. University of Nebraska. Available at: http://extensionpublications.unl.edu/assets/pdf/g1632.pdf (accessed 26 July 2016)
Shaver TM, Khosla R, Westfall DG (2011) Evaluation of two crop canopy sensors for nitrogen variablity determination in irrigated maize. Precision Agriculture 12, 892–904.
| Evaluation of two crop canopy sensors for nitrogen variablity determination in irrigated maize.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stępień M, Samborski S, Gozdowski D, Dobers ES, Chormański J, Szatyłowicz J (2015) Assessment of soil texture class on agricultural fields using ECa, NDVI and topographic properties. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 178, 523–536.
| Assessment of soil texture class on agricultural fields using ECa, NDVI and topographic properties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sutton MA, Howard CM, Erisman JW, Billen G, Bleeker A, Grennfelt P, van Grinsven Grizzetti B (2011) ‘The European nitrogen assessment. Sources, effects and policy perspectives.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)
Sylvester-Bradley R, Berry P, Blake J, Kindred D, Spink J, Bingham I, McVittie J, Foulkes J, Edwards C, Dodgson G, Boys E, Geary F (2015) ‘The wheat growth guide.’ p. 32. (AHDB Cereals and Oilseeds: Kenilworth, UK) Available at: www.hgca.com (accessed 13 December 2016).
Wilcox RR, Erceg-Hurn DM, Clark F, Carlson M (2014) Comparing two independent groups via the lower and upper quantiles. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 84, 1543–1551.
| Comparing two independent groups via the lower and upper quantiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yara UK Limited (2013) ‘N Sensor. Complete solution to precision farming.’ (Yara UK: Grimsby, UK)
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak GF (1974) A decimal code for growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.
| A decimal code for growth stages of cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zillmann E, Graeff S, Link J, Batchelor WD, Claupein W (2006) Assessment of cereal nitrogen requirements derived by optical on-the-go sensors on heterogeneous soils. Agronomy Journal 98, 682–690.
| Assessment of cereal nitrogen requirements derived by optical on-the-go sensors on heterogeneous soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
