Yield components of maize as affected by short shading periods and thinning
A. Cerrudo A B , J. Di Matteo A , E. Fernandez A , M. Robles A , L. Olmedo Pico A and F. H. Andrade A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A INTA Balcarce-Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, CC 276, 7620 Balcarce, Argentina.
B Corresponding author. Email: acerrudo@balcarce.inta.gov.ar
Crop and Pasture Science 64(6) 580-587 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP13201
Submitted: 30 March 2013 Accepted: 15 July 2013 Published: 30 August 2013
Abstract
Maize (Zea mays) grain yield has been described to be particularly susceptible to environmental conditions around silking; however, a better temporal description of the effect of resource deprivation during this period is needed. Additionally, yield progress and the subsequent increase in the demand of assimilates may result in source limitation during the grain-filling period in current hybrids. This work assessed the effect of (i) short (~5 days) and intense shading stresses imposed at different times, and (ii) thinning during the effective grain-filling period, on yield components of an Argentinean, widespread hybrid. Grain yield was affected by resource availability during an extended period from ~300 growing degree-days (GDD) before silking to ~780 GDD after silking (base temperature = 8°C). Kernel number (KN) was reduced by shading treatments imposed within a relatively extended period of ~700 GDD centred on silking. Within this period, we establish a critical period of ~30 days around silking (i.e. –200 to 250 GDD after silking), in which KN susceptibility was maximal. The variation in KN during this period of 450 GDD was mainly accounted for by resource availability and not by timing of treatment imposition within this window. A direct relationship between KN and weight per kernel (KW) for shading treatments imposed from 0 to 200 GDD after silking indicated that compensation of KN reduction by KW increase might not be expected when stress occurred immediately after silking. Kernel number and KW presented an inverse relationship when shading took place after 200 GDD after silking. In addition, thinning after the onset of the effective grain-filling period increased KW. The results indicate that, even in the undisturbed crop, KW was limited by source capacity during grain filling. It is suggested that there is a need to reconsider current agronomic practices and breeding strategies, focusing on the source capacity during the grain-filling period.
Additional keywords: ear demand, kernel number, kernel weight, shade, sink, stress, thinning.
References
Andrade FH, Ferreiro MA (1996) Reproductive growth of maize, sunflower and soybean at different source levels during grain filling. Field Crops Research 48, 155–165.| Reproductive growth of maize, sunflower and soybean at different source levels during grain filling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Andrade FH, Vega C, Uhart S, Cirilo A, Cantarero M, Valentinuz O (1999) Kernel Number Determination in Maize. Crop Science 39, 453–459.
| Kernel Number Determination in Maize.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Andrade FH, Calviño P, Cirilo A, Barbieri P (2002) Yield responses to arrow rows depend on increased radiation interception. Agronomy Journal 94, 975–980.
| Yield responses to arrow rows depend on increased radiation interception.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Borrás L, Gambín BL (2010) Trait dissection of maize kernel weight: Towards integrating hierarchical scales. Field Crops Research 118, 1–12.
| Trait dissection of maize kernel weight: Towards integrating hierarchical scales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Borrás L, Otegui ME (2001) Maize kernel weight response to postflowering source–sink ratio. Crop Science 41, 1816–1822.
| Maize kernel weight response to postflowering source–sink ratio.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Borrás L, Slafer GA, Otegui ME (2004) Seed dry weight response to source–sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal. Field Crops Research 86, 131–146.
| Seed dry weight response to source–sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Capristo P, Rizzalli R, Andrade FH (2007) Ecophysiological yield components of maize hybrids with contrasting maturity. Agronomy Journal 99, 1111–1118.
| Ecophysiological yield components of maize hybrids with contrasting maturity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cirilo AG, Andrade FH (1994) Sowing date and maize productivity: I. Crop growth and dry matter partitioning. Crop Science 34, 1039–1043.
| Sowing date and maize productivity: I. Crop growth and dry matter partitioning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cirilo AG, Andrade FH (1996) Sowing date and kernel weight in maize. Crop Science 36, 325–331.
| Sowing date and kernel weight in maize.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Claassen MM, Shaw RH (1970) Water deficit effects on corn II. Grain components. Agronomy Journal 62, 652–655.
| Water deficit effects on corn II. Grain components.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
De Mendiburu F (2009) Agricolae, Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, R package version 1.0–7. The R Project for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae
Duvick DN (1997) What is yield? In ‘Developing drought and low N-tolerant maize. Proceedings of the Symposium’. 25–29 March 1996, CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico. (Eds GO Edmeades, M Bänziger, HR Mickelson, CB Peña-Valdivia) pp. 332–335. (CIMMYT: México, DF)
Echarte L, Luque S, Andrade FH, Sadras VO, Cirilo A, Otegui ME, Vega C (2000) Response of maize kernel number to plant density in Argentinean hybrids released between 1965 and 1995. Field Crops Research 68, 1–8.
| Response of maize kernel number to plant density in Argentinean hybrids released between 1965 and 1995.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Echarte L, Andrade FH, Sadras VO, Abbate PE (2006) Kernel weight and its response to source manipulations during grain filling in Argentinean maize hybrids released in different decades. Field Crops Research 96, 307–312.
| Kernel weight and its response to source manipulations during grain filling in Argentinean maize hybrids released in different decades.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fischer KS, Palmer FE (1984) Tropical maize. In ‘The physiology of tropical field crops’. (Eds PR Goldsworthy, NM Fisher) pp. 213–248. (Wiley: New York)
Gambín BL, Borrás L, Otegui ME (2006) Source–sink relations and kernel weight differences in maize temperate hybrids. Field Crops Research 95, 316–326.
| Source–sink relations and kernel weight differences in maize temperate hybrids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grant RF, Jackson BS, Kiniry JR, Arkin GF (1989) Water deficit timing effects on yield components in maize. Agronomy Journal 81, 61–65.
| Water deficit timing effects on yield components in maize.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hall AJ, Lemcoff J, Trápani N (1981) Water stress before and during flowering in maize and its effect on yield, its components, and their determinants. Maydica 26, 19–38.
Jia SF, Li CF, Dong ST, Zhang JW (2011) Effects of shading at different stages after anthesis on maize grain weight and quality at cytology level. Agricultural Sciences in China 10, 58–69.
| Effects of shading at different stages after anthesis on maize grain weight and quality at cytology level.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jones RJ, Setter TL (2000) Hormonal regulation of early kernel development. Physiology and modeling kernel set in maize. CSSA Special Publication 29, 25–42.
| Hormonal regulation of early kernel development. Physiology and modeling kernel set in maize.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jones RJ, Simmons SR (1983) Effect of altered source–sink ratio on growth of maize kernels. Crop Science 23, 129–134.
| Effect of altered source–sink ratio on growth of maize kernels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jones RJ, Schreiber BMN, Roessler JA (1996) Kernel sink capacity in maize: genotypic and maternal regulation. Crop Science 36, 301–306.
| Kernel sink capacity in maize: genotypic and maternal regulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kiniry JR, Ritchie JT (1985) Shade-sensitive interval of kernel number in maize. Agronomy Journal 77, 711–715.
| Shade-sensitive interval of kernel number in maize.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lee EA, Tollenaar M (2007) Physiological basis of successful breeding strategies for maize grain yield. Crop Science 47, S-202–S-215.
| Physiological basis of successful breeding strategies for maize grain yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lee EA, Staebler MA, Tollenar M (2002) Genetic variation in physiological discriminators for cold tolerance – Early autotrophic phase of maize development. Crop Science 42, 1919–1929.
Luque SF, Cirilo AG, Otegui ME (2006) Genetic gains in grain yield and related physiological attributes in Argentine maize hybrids. Field Crops Research 95, 383–397.
| Genetic gains in grain yield and related physiological attributes in Argentine maize hybrids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Motulsky HJ, Christopoulos A (2003) ‘Fitting models to biological data using linear and non-linear regression: A practical guide to curve fitting.’ (GraphPad Software: San Diego, CA)
Otegui ME (1995) Prolificacy and grain yield components in modern Argentinean maize hybrids. Maydica 40, 371–376.
Otegui ME, Bonhomme R (1998) Grain yield components in maize. I. Ear growth and kernel set. Field Crops Research 56, 247–256.
| Grain yield components in maize. I. Ear growth and kernel set.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ouattar S, Jones RJ, Crookston RK (1987) Effect of water deficit during grain filling on the pattern of maize kernel growth and development. Crop Science 27, 720–730.
Reddy VM, Daynard TB (1983) Endosperm characteristics associated with rate of grain filling and kernel size in corn. Maydica 28, 339–355.
Ritchie SW, Hanway JJ (1982) How a corn plant develops. Special Report No. 48. Iowa State University of Science and Technology Cooperative Extension Service, Ames, IA.
Sarlangue T, Andrade FH, Calviño PA, Purcell LC (2007) Why do maize hybrids respond differently to variations in plant density? Agronomy Journal 99, 984–991.
| Why do maize hybrids respond differently to variations in plant density?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Soil Survey Staff (2010) ‘Keys to Soil Taxonomy.’ 11th edn (USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service: Washington, DC)
Steel RGD, Tome JH (1960) ‘Principles and procedures of statistics.’ (McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York)
Tollenaar M, Lee EA (2011) Strategies for enhancing grain yield in maize. Plant Breeding Reviews 34, 37–82.
| Strategies for enhancing grain yield in maize.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tollenaar M, Dwyer LM, Stewart DW (1992) Ear and kernel formation in maize hybrids representing three decades of grain yield improvement in Ontario. Crop Science 32, 432–438.
| Ear and kernel formation in maize hybrids representing three decades of grain yield improvement in Ontario.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tollenaar M, Ying J, Duvick DN (2000) Genetic gain in corn hybrids from the Northern and Central Corn Belt. In ‘Proceedings 55th Corn Sorghum Research Conference’. Chicago, IL. 5–8 Dec. 2000. pp. 53–62. (ASTA: Washington, DC)
Uhart SA, Andrade FH (1991) Source–sink relationship in maize grown in a cool temperate area. Agronomie 11, 863–875.
| Source–sink relationship in maize grown in a cool temperate area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Westgate ME, Boyer JS (1986) Reproduction at low silk and pollen water potentials in maize. Crop Science 26, 951–956.
| Reproduction at low silk and pollen water potentials in maize.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ying J, Lee EA, Tollenaar M (2000) Response of maize leaf photosynthesis to low temperature during the grain filling period. Field Crops Research 68, 87–96.
| Response of maize leaf photosynthesis to low temperature during the grain filling period.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
