Phenotyping of traits imparting drought tolerance in lentil
J. Kumar A D , P. S. Basu B , E. Srivastava A , S. K. Chaturvedi A , N. Nadarajan A and S. Kumar CA Division of Crop Improvement, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur - 208 024, India.
B Division of Crop Physiology, Biochemistry and Microbiology, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur - 208 024, India.
C International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo, Syria.
D Corresponding author. Email: jitendra73@gmail.com
Crop and Pasture Science 63(6) 547-554 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP12168
Submitted: 24 April 2012 Accepted: 24 July 2012 Published: 18 September 2012
Abstract
Lentil is one of most important pulse crops in South Asia, and invariably encounters terminal moisture stress, leading to forced maturity and lower yield. A long and prolific root system is known to enhance capacity of the plant to extract water from the lower soil strata and thus help avoid the water stress. We assessed genetic variation for 12 traits among 43 lentil genotypes comprising improved varieties and promising breeding lines. The average root length at the 65-day plant stage ranged from 42 to 83 cm. Two genotypes (EC 208362 and VKS 16/11) with shorter root length and poor dry root weight (DRW) and three genotypes (DPL 53, JL 1, and IPL 98/193) with longer root length and high DRW were identified with stable performance over the years. Relationship of root traits with seed yield under rainfed conditions was non-significant in our study. The SPAD value (chlorophyll content) showed significantly positive correlation with DRW (r = 0.45**) and root length (r = 0.44**) and thus can be used as selection criterion for phenotyping root traits which are otherwise difficult to measure in the field. In drought-prone environments, early flowering and maturity, seedling vigour, and high SPAD value, biological yield, and harvest index were identified as key traits for higher seed yield in lentil. Our results revealed significant genetic variability for these traits in lentil germplasm. Indian genotypes adapted to rainfed conditions were shown to have longer roots and higher DRW. The three genotypes (DPL 53, JL 1, and IPL 98/193) identified with superior root traits either originated from or have in their ancestries at least one parent adapted to rainfed conditions. These genotypes can be utilised for the development of mapping populations to identify QTLs associated with these traits for marker-assisted breeding of drought-tolerant, high-yielding varieties of lentil.
Additional keywords: lentil, morphological diversity, rainfed, root traits.
References
AICRP (2010–11) Project Coordinator’s Report on MULLaRP, Rabi 2009–2010. Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India.Ali-Khan ST, Snoad B, Arthur AE (1977) Root and shoot development in peas (II Effects of temperature and genotypes environment interactions in six root and shoot characters of seedlings). Annals of Applied Biology 85, 137–146.
Bharadwaj SN, Sharma PN, Nath V (1971) Varietal difference in drought tolerance of field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 41, 894–900.
Brown SC, Gregory PJ, Cooper PJM, Keatinge JDH (1989) Root and shoot growth and water use of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grown in dryland conditions: effects of sowing date and genotype. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 113, 41–49.
| Root and shoot growth and water use of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grown in dryland conditions: effects of sowing date and genotype.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Erskine W, Sarker A, Kumar S (2011) Crops that feed the world 3. Investing in lentil improvement toward a food secure world. Food Security 3, 127–139.
| Crops that feed the world 3. Investing in lentil improvement toward a food secure world.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
FAOSTAT (2010) ‘Production statistics.’ (Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome)
Fouad M, Imtiaz M, Kumar S, Malhotra R (2011) Breeding food legumes for enhanced drought and heat tolerance to cope with climate change. In ‘Food Security and Climate Change in Dry Areas. Proceedings of International Conference’. (Eds M Solh, MC Saxena) pp. 244–254. (ICARDA: Aleppo, Syria)
Gahoonia TS, Ali O, Sarker A, Rahman MM, Erskine W (2005) Root traits, nutrient uptake, multi-location grain yield and benefit–cost ratio of two lentil (Lens culinaris, Medikus.) varieties. Plant and Soil 272, 153–161.
| Root traits, nutrient uptake, multi-location grain yield and benefit–cost ratio of two lentil (Lens culinaris, Medikus.) varieties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXks1ekurc%3D&md5=d657c450bcd86a8dcc78c0d8363c7755CAS |
Gahoonia TS, Ali O, Sarker A, Nielsen NE, Rahman MM (2006) Genetic variation in root traits and nutrient acquisition of lentil (Lens culinaris, Medikus.) genotypes. Journal of Plant Nutrition 29, 643–655.
| Genetic variation in root traits and nutrient acquisition of lentil (Lens culinaris, Medikus.) genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XjtlChu7s%3D&md5=3ff4555e8b7d5d1d90d2d92bd0dc675eCAS |
Gaur PM, Krishnamurthy L, Kashiwagi J (2008) Improving drought-avoidance root traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)—Current status of research at ICRISAT. Plant Production Science 11, 3–11.
| Improving drought-avoidance root traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)—Current status of research at ICRISAT.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gregory PJ (1988) Root growth of chickpea, faba bean, lentil, and pea and effects of water and salt stress. In ‘World crops: cool-season food legumes’. (Ed. RL Summerfield) pp. 857–867. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: London)
Gregory PJ, Saxena NP, Arihara J, Ito O (1994) Root form and function in relation to crop productivity in cool season food legumes. In ‘Expanding the production and use of cool season food legumes’. (Eds FJ Muehlbauer, WJ Kaiser) pp. 809–820. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: London)
IAEA (2008) ‘Field estimation of soil water content: a practical guide to methods, instrumentation and sensor technology.’ (International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria)
ICARDA (1984) ‘Legume Program Annual Report, 1983.’ pp. 154–155. (International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas: Aleppo, Syria)
ICRISAT (1992) ‘Legume Program Annual Report.’ pp. 17–21. (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics: Patancheru, India)
Jensen FH (1985) Root and shoot characters and their relationship in peas. Pisum Newsletter 17, 34–35.
Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Upadhyaya HD, Krishna H, Chandra S, Vadez V, Serraj R (2005) Genetic variability of drought-avoidance root traits in the mini-core germplasm collection of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 146, 213–222.
| Genetic variability of drought-avoidance root traits in the mini-core germplasm collection of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Crouch JH, Serraj R (2006) Variability of root length density and its contribution to seed yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought stress. Field Crops Research 95, 171–181.
| Variability of root length density and its contribution to seed yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought stress.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kumar S, Ali M (2006) GE interaction and its breeding implications in pulses. The Botanica 56, 31–36.
Looker C (1978) Studies of the growth and development of roots in Vicia faba L. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham, UK.
Mia WM, Yamaguchi A, Kono Y (1996) Root system structure of six food legume species: Inter- and intraspecific variation. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 65, 131–140.
| Root system structure of six food legume species: Inter- and intraspecific variation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nagarajarao Y, Mallick S, Singh CG (1980) Moisture depletion and root growth of different varieties of chickpea under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 25, 289–293.
Nageswara Rao RC, Wright CG (1994) Stability of the relationship between specific leaf area and carbon isotope discrimination across environments in peanut. Crop Science 34, 98–103.
| Stability of the relationship between specific leaf area and carbon isotope discrimination across environments in peanut.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Onim JFM (1983) Association between grain yield and drought resistance in marginal rainfall areas in Kenya. In ‘More food from better technology’. (Eds JC Holmes, WM Tahor) pp. 864–872. (FAO: Rome)
Passioura JB (1982) The role of root system characteristics in the drought resistance of crop plants. In ‘Drought resistance in crops with emphasis on rice’. (Eds JC Holmes, WM Tahor) pp. 71–82. (IRRI: Los Baños, The Philippines)
Payne RW, Murray DA, Harding SA, Baird DB, Soutar DM (2011) ‘An introduction to Genstat for Windows.’ 14th edn (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK)
Sarker A, Erskine W, Singh M (2005) Variation in shoot and root characteristics and their association with drought tolerance in lentil landraces. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52, 89–97.
| Variation in shoot and root characteristics and their association with drought tolerance in lentil landraces.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Saxena NP (2003) Management of drought in chickpea—a holistic approach. In ‘Management of agricultural drought—agronomic and genetic options’. (Ed. NP Saxena) pp. 103–122. (Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt Ltd: New Delhi)
Silim SN, Saxena MC, Erskine W (1993) Adaptation of lentil to the Mediterranean environment. I. Factors affecting yield under drought conditions. Experimental Agriculture 27, 155–175.
Sponchiado BN, White JW, Castillo JA, Jones PG (1989) Root growth of common bean cultivars in relation to drought tolerance with contrasting soil types. Experimental Agriculture 25, 249–257.
| Root growth of common bean cultivars in relation to drought tolerance with contrasting soil types.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Subbarao GV, Johansen C, Slinkard AE, Nageswara Rao RC, Saxena NP, Chauhan YS (1995) Strategies for improving drought resistance in grain legumes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 14, 469–523.
Upadhyaya HD, Kashiwagi J, Varshney RK, Gaur PM, Saxena KB, Krishnamuthy L, Gowda CLL, Pundir RPS (2011) Phenotyping chickpeas and pigeonpeas for adaptation to drought. In ‘Drought phenotyping in crops: from theory to practice’. (Eds P Monneveux, JM Ribaut) pp. 345–356. (CGIAR Generation Challenge Programme: Texcoco, Mexico)
Varshney RK, Pazhamala L, Kashiwagi J, Gaur PM, Krishnamurthy L, Hoisington D (2011) Genomics and physiological approaches for root traits breeding to improve drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L). In ‘Root genomics’. (Eds CA de Oliveira, RK Varshney) pp. 233–250. (Springer: Germany)
Wright GC, Nageswara Rao RC, Farquhar GD (1994) Water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in peanut under water deficit conditions. Crop Science 34, 92–97.
| Water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in peanut under water deficit conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
