A simplified method for characterising agronomic services provided by species-rich grasslands
Michel Duru A B , Pablo Cruz A and Jean Pierre Theau AA UMR1248 INRA-ENSAT AGIR (Agrosystèmes et développement territorial), Chemin de Borde Rouge, BP 52627, 31326 Castanet Tolosan, France.
B Corresponding author. Email: mduru@toulouse.inra.fr
Crop and Pasture Science 61(5) 420-433 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP09296
Submitted: 15 October 2009 Accepted: 25 March 2010 Published: 12 May 2010
Abstract
In order to encourage farmers and their advisors to promote species-rich grasslands, the agronomic services they can provide should be demonstrated. Methods based on functional ecology are promising, but difficult to use in an applied context. Thus, we aimed to construct a simplified method, tailored for non-researchers, for assessing grassland agronomic services. We assess them by focusing on the grass species that was coupled to a leaf dry matter content (LDMC) database. These simplifications are supported by several hypotheses tested in our paper: (i) trade-offs between agronomic properties; (ii) mass ratio hypothesis; and (iii) functional convergence and divergence between grass and dicotyledonous species. The results were based on 37 vegetation records taken in the south of France (central Pyrenees, from 650 to 1250 m. a.s.l.) for calculating the proportion of grass species and the aggregated LDMC of grass species (LDMCgw), weighting species values by their abundance. LDMC of grass species was taken from field measurements and from a database. The two methods were compared. The latter avoids tedious field measurements, and we found that it was at least as good as the former for assessing agronomic productivity and quality, and the same was true for a LDMC diversity index. Reducing the list of grass species to the two dominant ones did not significantly alter the LDMCgw. There were significant differences between the grass and dicotyledonous components coexisting within a plant community for the digestibility of the plant components (higher for dicots) and in the date at which ceiling yield occurred (earlier for dicots), but no significant effect for productivity. For assessing agronomic services, we proposed corrections based on the grass : dicotyledon ratio. The hypotheses used for designing the method were verified. Finally, agronomic services such as herbage productivity and quality provided by species-rich grasslands can be evaluated by recording dominant grass species and the proportion of grass in the herbage. However, taking account of the difference in sensitivity to the environment for agronomic properties and plant species composition, the main use of the method is for ranking plant communities within a given area and a given year, rather than for providing absolute values of these agronomic properties.
Additional keywords: dicotyledon, digestibility, grass, growth, leaf dry matter content, nitrogen, plant trait, trade-off.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the EU project VISTA (Vulnerability of Ecosystem Services to Land Use Change in Traditional Agricultural Landscapes) (Contract No. EVK2-2001-15 000356), and the PSDR ‘Climfourel’ project (INRA and Midi Pyrenees region).
Al Haj Khaled R,
Duru M,
Theau JP,
Plantureux S, Cruz P
(2005) Variation of leaf traits through seasons and N-availability levels and its consequences for ranking grassland species. Journal of Vegetation Science 16, 391–398.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Andrieu N,
Josien E, Duru M
(2007) Relationships between diversity of grassland vegetation, field characteristics and land use management practices assessed at the farm level. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 120, 359–369.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ansquer P,
Al Haj Khaled R,
Cruz P,
Theau JP,
Therond O, Duru M
(2009b) Characterizing and predicting plant phenology in species-rich grasslands. Grass and Forage Science 64, 57–70.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ansquer P,
Duru M,
Theau JP, Cruz P
(2008) Functional traits as indicators of fodder provision over a short time scale in species-rich grasslands. Annals of Botany 103, 117–126.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Ansquer P,
Duru M,
Theau JP, Cruz P
(2009a) Convergence in plant traits between species within grassland communities simplifies their monitoring. Ecological Indicators 9, 1020–1029.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Ansquer P,
Theau JP,
Cruz P,
Viegas J,
Al Haj Khaled R, Duru M
(2004) Caractérisation de la diversité fonctionnelle des prairies à flore complexe: vers la construction d’outils de gestion (Characterizing the functional diversity of grasslands with a complex flora: towards the creation of tools for management). Fourrages 179, 353–368.
Aufrère J
(1982) Etude de la prévision de la digestibilité des fourrages par une méthode enzymatique. Annales de Zootechnie 31, 111–130.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Balent G, Duru M
(1984) Influence des modes d’exploitation sur les caractéristiques et l’évolution des surfaces pastorales. Agronomie 4, 113–124.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Biston R, Dardenne P
(1985) Application de la spectrométrie de réflexion dans le proche infra-rouge. Prévision de la qualité des fourrages en vue de leur exploitation rationnelle. Bulletin Recherches Agronomiques de Gembloux 20, 23–41.
Cornelissen JHC,
Lavorel S,
Garnier E,
Diaz S,
Buchmann N,
Gurvich DE,
Reich PB,
ter Steege H,
Morgan HD,
van der Heijden MGA,
Pausas JG, Poorter H
(2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany 51, 335–380.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cornwell WK, Ackerly D
(2009) Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California. Ecological Monographs 79, 109–126.
| Crossref |
Diaz S,
Lavorel S,
de Bello F,
Quetier F,
Grigulis K, Robson TM
(2007) Land change science special feature: incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 20 684–20 689.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Duru M
(1997) Leaf and stem in vitro digestibility for grasses and dicotyledons of meadow plant communities in spring. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 74, 175–185.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Duru M
(2008) Improvement of time-driven models of lamina cocksfoot digestibility by a process-based model to take account of plant N nutrition and defoliation. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 194, 401–412.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Duru M,
Al Haj Kaled R,
Ducourtieux C,
Theau JP,
Quadros FLF, Cruz P
(2009) Do plant functional types based on leaf dry matter content allow characterizing native grass species and grasslands for herbage growth pattern? Plant Ecology 201, 421–433.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Duru M,
Cruz P,
Al Haj Kaled R,
Ducourtieux C, Theau JP
(2008) Relevance of plant functional types based on leaf dry matter content for assessing digestibility of native grass species and species-rich grassland communities in spring. Agronomy Journal 100, 1622–1630.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fleury P,
Dubeuf B, Jeannin B
(1996) Forage management in dairy farms: a methodological approach. Agricultural Systems 52, 199–212.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garnier E,
Cortez J,
Billès G,
Navas ML,
Roumet C,
Debussche M,
Laurent G,
Blanchard A,
Aubry D,
Bellmann A,
Neill C, Toussaint JP
(2004) Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85, 2630–2637.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garnier E,
Lavorel S,
Ansquer P,
Castro H,
Cruz P,
Dolezal J,
Eriksson O,
Fortunel C,
Freitas H,
Golodets C,
Grigulis K,
Jouany C,
Kazakou E,
Kigel J,
Kleyer M,
Lehsten V,
Leps J,
Meier T,
Pakeman R,
Papadimitriou M,
Papanastasis VP,
Quested H,
Quetier F,
Robson M,
Roumet C,
Rusch G,
Skarpe C,
Sternberg M,
Theau JP,
Thebault A,
Vile D, Zarovali MP
(2007) Assessing the effects of land-use change on plant traits, communities and ecosystem functioning in grasslands: a standardized methodology and lessons from an application to 11 European sites. Annals of Botany 99, 967–985.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Garnier E,
Navas ML,
Austin MP,
Lilley JM, Gifford RM
(1997) A problem for biodiversity-productivity studies: how to compare the productivity of multispecific plant mixtures to that of monocultures? Acta Oecologica 18, 657–670.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gauch HGJ,
Hwang TG, Fick GW
(2003) Model evaluation by comparison of model-based predictions and measured values. Agronomy Journal 95, 1442–1446.
Grime JP
(1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology 86, 902–910.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gross N,
Suding KN,
Lavorel S, Roumet C
(2007) Complementarity as a mechanism of coexistence between functional groups of grasses. Journal of Ecology 95, 1296–1305.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hacker JB, Minson DJ
(1981) The digestibility of plant parts. Herbage Abstracts 51, 459–482.
Hodgson JG,
Montserrat-Marti G,
Cerabolini B,
Ceriani RM,
Maestro-Martinez M,
Peco B,
Wilson PJ,
Thompson K,
Grime JP,
Band SR,
Bogard A,
Castro-Díez P,
Charles M,
Jones G,
Pérez-Rontomé MC,
sCaccianiga M,
Alard D,
Bakker JP,
Cornelissen JHC,
Dutoit T,
Grootjans AP,
Guerrero-Campo J,
Gupta PL,
Hynd A,
Kahmen S,
Poschlod P,
Romo-Díez A,
Rorison IH,
Rosén E,
Schreiber K-F,
Tallowin J,
de Torres Espuny L, Villar-Salvador P
(2005) A functional method for classifying European grasslands for use in joint ecological and economic studies. Basic and Applied Ecology 6, 119–131.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holdaway RJ, Sparrow AD
(2006) Assembly rules operating along a primary riverbed-grassland successional sequence. Journal of Ecology 94, 1092–1102.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hunt R,
Hodgson JG,
Thompson K,
Bungener P,
Dunnett NP, Askew AP
(2004) A new practical tool for deriving a functional signature for herbaceous vegetation. Applied Vegetation Science 7, 163–170.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huston MA, DeAngelis DL
(1994) Competition and coexistence. The effects of resource transport and supply rates. American Naturalist 144, 954–977.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kleyer M,
Bekker RM,
Knevel IC,
Bakker JP,
Thompson K, Sommenschein M
(2008) The LEDA Trait database: a database of life-history traits of the Northwest European flora. Journal of Ecology 96, 1266–1274.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lavorel S,
Grigulis K,
McIntyre S,
Williams NSG,
Garden D,
Dorrough J,
Berman S,
Quetier F,
Thebault A, Bonis A
(2008) Assessing functional diversity in the field – methodology matters! Functional Ecology 22, 134–147.
Lavorel S,
McIntyre S,
Landsberg J, Forbes TDA
(1997) Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 12, 474–478.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lehsten V, Kleyer M
(2007) Turnover of plant trait hierarchies in simulated community assembly in response to fertility and disturbance. Ecological Modelling 203, 270–278.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lemaire C,
Avice JC,
Kim TH, Ourry A
(2005) Development changes in shoot N dynamics of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in relation to leaf growth dynamics as a function of plant density and hierarchical position within the canopy. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 935–943.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Lepš J,
de Bello F,
Lavorel S, Berman S
(2009) Quantifying and interpreting functional diversity of natural communities: practical considerations matter. Preslia 78, 481–501.
Martin G,
Cruz P,
Theau JP,
Jouany C,
Fleury P,
Granger S,
Faivre R,
Balent G,
Lavorel S, Duru M
(2009) A multi-site study to classify semi-natural grassland types. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 129, 508–515.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mason WH,
MacGillivray K,
Steel JB, Wilson JB
(2003) An index of functional diversity. Journal of Vegetation Science 14, 571–578.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meinzer FC
(2003) Functional convergence in plant responses to the environment. Oecologia 134, 1–11.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Mokany K, Ash J
(2008) Are traits measured on pot grown plants representative of those in natural communities? Journal of Vegetation Science 19, 119–126.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mokany K,
Ash J, Roxburgh S
(2008) Functional identity is more important than diversity in influencing ecosystem processes in a temperate native grassland. Journal of Ecology 96, 884–893.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pakeman RJ, Quested H
(2007) Sampling plant functional traits: what proportion of the species need to be measured? Applied Vegetation Science 10, 91–96.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reich PB
(1993) Reconciling apparent discrepancies among studies relating life span, structure and function of leaves in contrasting plant life forms and climates: the blind men and the elephant retold. Functional Ecology 7, 721–725.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roche P,
Diaz-Burlinson N, Gachet S
(2004) Congruency analysis of species ranking based on leaf traits: which traits are the more reliable? Plant Ecology 174, 37–48.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schmitzberger I,
Wrbka T,
Steurer B,
Aschenbrenner G,
Peterseil J, Zechmeister HG
(2005) How farming styles influence biodiversity maintenance in Austrian agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environnement 108, 274–290.
| Crossref |
Semenova GV, van der Maarel E
(2000) Plant functional types – a strategic perspective. Journal of Vegetation Science 11, 917–922.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Suding KN,
Lavorel S,
Chapin FS,
Cornelissen JH,
Diaz S,
Garnier E,
Goldberg DE,
Hooper DU,
Jackson ST, Navas ML
(2008) Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Global Change Biology 14, 1125–1140.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vanclay F
(2004) Social principles for agricultural extension to assist in the promotion of natural resource management. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 213–222.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vile D,
Shipley B, Garnier E
(2006) Ecosystem productivity can be predicted from potential relative growth rate and species abundance. Ecology Letters 9, 1061–1067.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Weiher E,
Van der Werf A,
Thompson K,
Roderick M,
Garnier E, Eriksson O
(1999) Challenging Theophrastus: a common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 10, 609–620.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White TA,
Barker DJ, Moore KJ
(2004) Vegetation diversity, growth, quality and decomposition in managed grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 101, 73–84.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilson PJ,
Thompson K, Hodgson JG
(1999) Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies. New Phytologist 143, 155–162.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Appendix 1
|
