Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 3. Relevance of APSIM to commercial crops
P. S. Carberry A F , Z. Hochman B , J. R. Hunt C , N. P. Dalgliesh A , R. L. McCown A , J. P. M. Whish A , M. J. Robertson D , M. A. Foale B , P. L. Poulton A and H. van Rees C EA Agricultural Production Systems Research Unit (APSRU), CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
B Agricultural Production Systems Research Unit (APSRU), CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, 306 Carmody Road, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.
C Birchip Cropping Group, PO Box 85, Birchip, Vic. 3483, Australia.
D CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Private Bag 5, PO Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.
E Cropfacts P/L, 69 Rooney Rd, RSD Strathfieldsaye, Vic. 3551, Australia.
F Corresponding author. Email: peter.carberry@csiro.au
Crop and Pasture Science 60(11) 1044-1056 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP09052
Submitted: 8 February 2009 Accepted: 20 July 2009 Published: 19 October 2009
Abstract
Crop simulation models relevant to real-world agriculture have been a rationale for model development over many years. However, as crop models are generally developed and tested against experimental data and with large systematic gaps often reported between experimental and farmer yields, the relevance of simulated yields to the commercial yields of field crops may be questioned. This is the third paper in a series which describes a substantial effort to deliver model-based decision support to Australian farmers. First, the performance of the cropping systems simulator, APSIM, in simulating commercial crop yields is reported across a range of field crops and agricultural regions. Second, how APSIM is used in gaining farmer credibility for their planning and decision making is described using actual case studies.
Information was collated on APSIM performance in simulating the yields of over 700 commercial crops of barley, canola, chickpea, cotton, maize, mungbean, sorghum, sugarcane, and wheat monitored over the period 1992 to 2007 in all cropping regions of Australia. This evidence indicated that APSIM can predict the performance of commercial crops at a level close to that reported for its performance against experimental yields. Importantly, an essential requirement for simulating commercial yields across the Australian dryland cropping regions is to accurately describe the resources available to the crop being simulated, particularly soil water and nitrogen.
Five case studies of using APSIM with farmers are described in order to demonstrate how model credibility was gained in the context of each circumstance. The proposed process for creating mutual understanding and credibility involved dealing with immediate questions of the involved farmers, contextualising the simulations to the specific situation in question, providing simulation outputs in an iterative process, and together reviewing the ensuing seasonal results against provided simulations.
This paper is distinct from many other reports testing the performance and utility of cropping systems models. Here, the measured yields are from commercial crops not experimental plots and the described applications were from real-life situations identified by farmers. A key conclusion, from 17 years of effort, is the proven ability of APSIM to simulate yields from commercial crops provided soil properties are well characterised. Thus, the ambition of models being relevant to real-world agriculture is indeed attainable, at least in situations where biotic stresses are manageable.
Additional keywords: APSIM, crop simulation model, validation, decision support systems, commercial yield.
Acknowledgments
We thank the many farmers and agribusiness advisers involved in FARMSCAPE and Yield Prophet® projects for their enthusiastic and vital participation. The financial support provided by GRDC and other funders across many research projects is greatly appreciated.
Ahern CR
(1988) Comparison of models for predicting available water capacity of Burdekin soils Queensland. Australian Journal of Soil Research 26, 409–423.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Angus JF, van Herwaarden AF
(2001) Increasing water use and water use efficiency in dryland wheat. Agronomy Journal 93, 290–298.
Asseng S,
Keating BA,
Fillery IRP,
Gregory PJ,
Bowden JW, Turner NC
(1998) Performance of the APSIM-wheat model in Western Australia. Field Crops Research 57, 163–179.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bange MP,
Carberry PS,
Marshall J, Milroy SP
(2005) Row configuration as a tool for managing rain-fed cotton systems: review and simulation analysis. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 65–77.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Carberry PS,
Hochman Z,
McCown RL,
Dalgliesh NP,
Foale MA,
Poulton PL,
Hargreaves JNG,
Hargreaves DMG,
Cawthray S,
Hillcoat N, Robertson MJ
(2002) The FARMSCAPE approach to decision support: Farmers’, Advisers’, Researchers’ monitoring, simulation, communication, and performance evaluation. Agricultural Systems 74, 141–177.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cornish PS, Murray GM
(1989) Rainfall rarely limits the yield of wheat in southern NSW. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 29, 77–83.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dalgliesh NP,
Foale MA, McCown RL
(2009) Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 2. Pragmatic provision of soil information for paddock-specific simulation and farmer decision making. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 1031–1043.
Davidson BR
(1962) Crop yields in experiments and on farms. Nature 194, 458–459.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dobermann A, Cassman KG
(2002) Plant nutrient management for enhanced productivity in intensive grain production systems of the United States and Asia. Plant and Soil 247, 153–175.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Evans LT, Fischer RA
(1999) Yield potential: its definition, measurement, and significance. Crop Science 39, 1544–1551.
French RJ, Schultz JE
(1984a) Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. I. The relation between yield, water use and climate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 743–764.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
French RJ, Schultz JE
(1984b) Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. II. Some limitations to efficiency. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 765–775.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hochman Z,
Carberry PS,
McCown RL,
Dalgliesh NP,
Foale MA, Brennan LE
(2002) APSIM in the marketplace: a tale of kitchen tables, boardrooms and courtrooms. Acta Horticulturae 566, 21–33.
Hochman Z,
Dalgliesh NP, Bell K
(2001) Contributions of soil and crop factors to plant available soil water capacity of annual crops on black and grey Vertosols. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 955–961.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hochman Z,
Holzworth DP, Hunt JR
(2009a) Potential to improve on-farm wheat yield and WUE in Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 708–716.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hochman Z,
van Rees H,
Carberry PS,
Hunt JR,
McCown RL,
Gartmann A,
Holzworth D,
van Rees S,
Dalgliesh NP,
Long W,
Peake AS,
Poulton PL, McClelland T
(2009b) Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 4. Yield Prophet®, helps farmers monitor and manage crops in a variable climate. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 1057–1070.
Huang J,
Pray C, Rozelle S
(2002) Enhancing the crops to feed the poor. Nature 418, 678–684.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Jeffrey SJ,
Carter JO,
Moodie KB, Beswick AR
(2001) Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data. Environmental Modelling & Software 16, 309–330.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnston RM,
Barry SJ,
Bleys E,
Bui EN,
Moran CJ,
Simon DAP,
Carlile P,
McKenzie NJ,
Henderson BL,
Chapman G,
Imhoff M,
Maschmedt D,
Howe D,
Grose C,
Schoknecht N,
Powell B, Grundy M
(2003) ASRIS: The database. Australian Journal of Soil Research 41, 1021–1036.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jones JW,
Hoogenboom G,
Porter CH,
Boote KJ,
Batchelor WD,
Hunt LA,
Wilkens PW,
Singh U,
Gijsman AJ, Ritchie JT
(2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 235–265.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keating BA,
Carberry PS,
Hammer GL,
Probert ME,
Robertson MJ,
Holzworth D,
Huth NI,
Hargreaves JNG,
Meinke H,
Hochman Z,
McLean G,
Verburg K,
Snow V,
Dimes JP,
Silburn M,
Wang E,
Brown S,
Bristow KL,
Asseng S,
Chapman S,
McCown RL,
Freebairn DM, Smith CJ
(2003) An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 267–288.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keating BA,
Robertson MJ,
Muchow RC, Huth NI
(1999) Modelling sugarcane production systems. 1. Development and performance of the sugarcane module. Field Crops Research 61, 253–271.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kingwell R, Pannell D
(2005) Economic trends and drivers affecting the Wheatbelt of Western Australia to 2030. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 553–561.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Martin RJ,
McMillan MG, Cook JB
(1988) Survey of farm management practices of the northern wheat belt of New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 28, 499–509.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McCown RL,
Carberry PS,
Hochman Z,
Dalgliesh NP, Foale MA
(2009) Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 1. Changing intervention concepts during 17 years of action research. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 1017–1030.
McCown RL,
Hammer GL,
Hargreaves JHG,
Holzworth DP, Freebairn DM
(1996) APSIM: a novel software system for model development, model testing and simulation in agricultural systems research. Agricultural Systems 50, 255–271.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mercau JL,
Dardanelli JL,
Collino DJ,
Andriani JM,
Irigoyen A, Satorre EH
(2007) Predicting on-farm soybean yields in the pampas using CROPGRO-soybean. Field Crops Research 100, 200–209.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson MJ,
Carberry PS,
Huth NI,
Turpin JE,
Probert ME,
Poulton PL,
Bell M,
Wright GC,
Yeates SJ, Brinsmead RB
(2002) Simulation of growth and development of diverse legume species in APSIM. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 429–446.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson MJ,
Carberry PS, Lucy M
(2000) Evaluation of a new cropping option using a participatory approach with on-farm monitoring and simulation: a case study of spring-sown mungbeans. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 1–12.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson MJ, Kirkegaard JA
(2005) Water-use efficiency of dryland canola in an equi-seasonal rainfall environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1373–1386.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rockström J, Falkenmark M
(2000) Semi-arid crop production from a hydrological perspective – gap between potential and actual yields. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 19, 319–346.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sadras V,
Baldock J,
Roget D, Rodriguez D
(2003) Measuring and modelling yield and water budget components of wheat crops in coarse-textured soils with chemical constraints. Field Crops Research 84, 241–260.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sadras VO, Angus JF
(2006) Benchmarking water use efficiency of rainfed wheat in dry environments. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 847–856.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sinclair TR, Seligman N
(2000) Criteria for publishing papers on crop modelling. Field Crops Research 68, 165–172.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stöckle CO,
Donatelli M, Nelson R
(2003) CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 289–307.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stone RC, Auliciems A
(1992) SOI phase relationships with rainfall in eastern Australia. International Journal of Climatology 12, 625–636.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van Ittersum MK, Donatelli M
(2003) Modelling cropping systems – highlights of the symposium and preface to the special issues. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 187–197.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van Ittersum MK,
Leffelaar PA,
van Keulen H,
Kropff MJ,
Bastiaans L, Goudriaan J
(2003) On approaches and applications of the Wageningen crop models. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 201–234.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van Keulen H
(2007) Quantitative analyses of natural resource management options at different scales. Agricultural Systems 94, 768–783.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whish JPM,
Butler G,
Castor M,
Cawthray S,
Broad I,
Carberry P,
Hammer G,
McLean G,
Routley R, Yeates S
(2005) Modelling the effects of row configuration on sorghum yield reliability in north-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 11–23.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whish JPM,
Castor P, Carberry PS
(2007) Managing production constraints to the reliability of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) within marginal areas of the northern grains region of Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 396–405.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |