Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Use of grain size distribution parameters to explain variation in small grain screenings of wheat in multi-environment trials involving new cultivars

D. L. Sharma A F , B. J. Shackley B , M. Amjad A , C. M. Zaicou-Kunesch C , M. F. D’Antuono D and W. K. Anderson E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Cropping Systems, Department of Agriculture and Food, Lot 12 York Rd, Northam, WA 6401, Australia.

B Department of Agriculture and Food, 10 Dore St, Katanning, WA 6317, Australia.

C Department of Agriculture and Food, 20 Gregory St, Geraldton, WA 6530, Australia.

D Department of Agriculture and Food, 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, WA 6151, Australia.

E Department of Agriculture and Food, 444 Albany Highway, Albany, WA 6330, Australia; School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

F Corresponding author. Email: dsharma@agric.wa.gov.au

Crop and Pasture Science 60(7) 658-666 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP08297
Submitted: 5 September 2008  Accepted: 5 May 2009   Published: 14 July 2009

Abstract

The proportion of small grain screenings is a worldwide problem for wheat growers in water-limited environments and is known to be influenced by both genetic and environmental factors including crop management. This paper follows our previous finding that parameters μ (reflecting point of majority mass of the grain size distribution) and 1/α (reflecting the slope of grain size distribution up to the majority point) of a skew-Laplace distribution can be used to differentiate the tendency of cultivars to produce small grains. The variability of these parameters over environments (15 Cultivar × Time of sowing and 2 Cultivar × Plant population × Nitrogen rates experiments) was investigated in order to indicate their utility in breeding cultivars and managing wheat crops.

The estimated values of both μ and 1/α varied over experiments but the relative cultivar ranking remained similar. Of the genetic and management factors, cultivar had more effect on variance of μ than of 1/α, while applied nitrogen level significantly influenced 1/α. We conclude that: (i) cultivars can be grouped according to their μ and 1/α values; (ii) cultivars owing their lower screenings to high 1/α need a careful optimising of nitrogen inputs, while breeding for high μ is likely to provide stability against small grain screenings; (iii) both the parameters were associated with kernel weight and grains/spike but not grains/m2; and (iv) future research establishing the relationship of 1/α with specific kernel position within the plant will be useful in proposing an ideal ear and plant structure for minimising small grain screenings. When using parameters of the suggested grain size distribution, we suggest the following relevant points be considered: (i) 1/α is not a linear slope, it is related to ‘skewness’; (ii) the peak at majority mass (MM) reflects the tendency to concentrate grain mass and therefore provides an opportunity to increase skewness (1/α) despite a lower μ and a lower mean grain weight; (iii) there is a point up to which skewness of grain size distribution can sufficiently protect against high screenings and is highly dependent upon the value of μ; and (iv) 1/α is a potentially useful parameter nonetheless, because in practice, grain weight may be reduced as number of grains/area is increased in pursuit of high yield through breeding and agronomic practices.

Additional keywords: grain weight distribution, skew-Laplace distribution, rainfed agriculture.


Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Chapman Valley, Avondale, Merredin, and Esperance Downs Research Support Units for sowing and harvesting field experiments and to Bruce Haig, Melaine Kupsch, and Anne Smith for technical support in the data collection. Additional financial support from farmers through the Grains Research and Development Corporation is gratefully acknowledged.


References


Abbate PE, Andrade FH, Culot JP (1995) The effects of radiation and nitrogen on number of grains in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 124, 352–360. (accessed 18 June 2003).

Barr AR, Jefferies SP, Ward P, Tasker SD, Hoppo TM, Dube A, Lewis J (1994) Registration of Australian winter cereal cultivars. Avena sativa (oats) cv. Potoroo. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34, 706–707.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Conry MJ (1997) Effect of fertiliser N on the grain yield and quality of spring malting barley grown on five contrasting soils in Ireland. Biology and Environment 97, 185–196. open url image1

Eagles HA, Bedggood AG, Panozzo JF, Martin PJ (1995) Cultivar and environmental effects on malting quality in barley. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 831–844.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Fischer RA (1985) Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105, 447–461.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fischer RA (1993) Irrigated spring wheat and timing and amount of nitrogen fertilizer. II. Physiology of grain yield response. Field Crops Research 33, 57–80.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Frederick JR, Camberato JJ (1995) Water and nitrogen effects on winter wheat in the southeastern coastal plain: I. grain yield and kernel traits. Agronomy Journal 87, 521–526. open url image1

Genstat (2008) ‘Genstat ® statistical package for Windows.’ (VSN International: UK) Available at: www.genstat.com

Gonzalez FG, Slafer GA, Miralles DJ (2003) Grain and floret number in response to photoperiod during stem elongation in fully and slightly vernalized wheats. Field Crops Research 81, 17–27.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jantasuriyarat C, Vales MI, Watson CJW, Riera-Lizarazu O (2004) Identification and mapping of genetic loci affecting the free-threshing habit and spike compactness in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108, 261–273.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Jeuffroy MH, Bouchard C (1999) Intensity and duration of nitrogen deficiency on wheat grain number. Crop Science 39, 1385–1393. open url image1

Ketata H, Edward LH, Smith EL (1976) Inheritance of eight agronomic characters in a winter wheat Cross. Crop Science 16, 19–22. open url image1

Miralles DJ, Slafer GA (1995) Individual grain weight responses to genetic reduction in culm length in wheat as affected by source–sink manipulations. Field Crops Research 43, 55–66.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Richards RA (1988) A tiller inhibitor gene in wheat and its effect on plant growth. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39, 749–757.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sadras V, Roget D, O’Leary G (2002) On-farm assessment of environmental and management factors influencing wheat grain quality in the Mallee. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 811–820.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sharma DL, Anderson WK (2004) Small grain screenings in wheat: interactions of cultivars with seasons, site, and management practices. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 797–809.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sharma DL, D’Antuono MF, Anderson WK (2006) Small grain screenings in wheat. Using the grain size distribution for predicting cultivar responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 771–779.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sibony M, Pinthus MJ (1988) Floret initiation and development in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Annals of Botany 61, 473–479. open url image1

Snape JW, Butterworth K, Whitechurch E, Worland AJ (2001) Waiting for fine times: genetics of flowering time in wheat. Euphytica 119, 185–190.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Sofield I, Evans LT, Cook MG, Wardlaw IF (1977) Factors influencing the rate and duration of grain filling in wheat. Functional Plant Biology 4, 785–797.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Stoddard FL (1999) Variation in grain mass, grain nitrogen, and starch B-granule content within wheat heads. Cereal Chemistry 76, 139–144.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Wang Z, Yin Y, He M, Zhang Y, Lu S, Li Q, Shi S (2003) Allocation of photosynthates and grain growth of two wheat cultivars with different potential grain growth in response to pre- and post-anthesis shading. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 189, 280–285.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Whingwiri EE, Kemp DR (1980) Spikelet development and grain yield of the wheat ear in response to applied nitrogen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 637–641.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1