Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Digestion of a ground and pelleted diet in the stomach and intestines of young sheep from two breeds

DE Margan, GJ Faichney, NM Graham and JB Donnelly

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33(3) 617 - 627
Published: 1982

Abstract

Some aspects of digestion were studied in small groups of fistulated wether lambs from two breeds, Dorset Horn and Corriedale. The Iambs were given a ground and pelleted diet of equal parts hay and concentrates once daily at two levels of intake. At the same liveweight (25 kg), the higher intake was associated with reduced digestion of organic matter (OM) and fibre in the whole gastro-intestinal tract; rumen mean retention times were also reduced, as was the proportion of OM digestion which occurred in the rumen. An increase in the amount of protein entering the intestines appeared to be composed of both undegraded dietary protein and microbial protein. Despite a reduction in the digestibility of non-ammonia nitrogen in the intestines, more crude protein was digested there per unit of digestible OM intake (25.9 v..23.6%; P < 0.05). Differences between the breed groups were smaller than those associated with level of feeding. Nevertheless, particularly at lower relative intakes, rumen mean retention times were longer, rumen digesta content was greater, and rumen OM and fibre digestion tended to be greater in the Dorset Horn lambs; crude protein digestion in the intestines per unit of digestible OM intake also tended to be less at the low intakes. More than three-quarters of the cellulose digestion but less than half the hemicellulose digestion occurred in the rumen. The proportion of the urea synthesized that was degraded in the gastrointestinal tract (0.24-0.30) was consistently lower in these lambs than has been reported for adult sheep.

https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9820617

© CSIRO 1982

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions