Selection for efficient lean growth in a pig herd
CP McPhee
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
32(4) 681 - 690
Published: 1981
Abstract
A pig herd was selected for 6 years by using an economic index combining growth rate, food conversion efficiency and carcass leanness. These three traits were all measured in a performance test which permitted appetite variation between pigs to be expressed. Boars selected with an intensity of 118 were used for 6 months, and sows with an intensity of 114 were kept for two farrowings. An unselected control herd was maintained concurrently. To measure selection response, selected (S) and control (C) pigs were compared as they grew from 25 to 90 kg liveweight on ad lib. and restricted feeding during the last 2 years of selection. The following significant (P < 0.05) responses occurred in the selection herd: (i) A slight increase in growth rate on restricted feed, balanced by a similar decrease on ad lib, feeding. (ii) A decline in food conversion ratio of 5 % (C, 2.79; S, 2.65) due mainly to a reduction in appetite. (On ad lib. feeding, food intake per day declined by 6 % (C, 2.30 kg/d; S, 2.16 kg/d.)). (iii) A decline in average subcutaneous fat depth by 11 % (C, 27.8 mm; S, 24.7 mm) and in fat dissected from the ham by 7 % (C, 2.80 kg; S, 2.61 kg). (iv) An increase in estimated lean in the carcass by 2% (C, 30.3 kg; S, 31.0 kg). (v) A decline in dressing percentage of the carcass by 1 % (C, 77.1 %; S, 76.2 %). There was no change in eye muscle area or carcass length. The results are discussed in terms of changes in the ratio of food intake to lean growth. In the group fed ad lib., this ratio declined by 7 %, mainly because of a decline in food intake. On restricted feeding it fell by 6 %, mainly owing to an increase in lean growth. That portion of the selection effort absorbed in reducing food intake may have been more profitably directed to increasing lean growth by suppressing appetite variation during performance testing, rather than allowing it to be expressed.https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9810681
© CSIRO 1981