Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > CP > AR07436
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 59(8)

Canola (Brassica napus L.) seedbank declines rapidly in farmer-managed fields in South Australia

Jeanine Baker A B and Christopher Preston A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Cooperative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management and School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Plant and Food Science Unit, University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: jeanine.baker@brs.gov.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59(8) 780-784 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR07436
Submitted: 17 October 2007  Accepted: 16 May 2008   Published: 29 July 2008

Abstract

Canola is an important crop in southern Australia, where it is used as part of the crop rotation to manage cereal diseases, improve wheat yields, and assist in integrated weed management programs. The potential release of herbicide-tolerant transgenic cultivars into Australia has raised concerns that volunteer canola may itself become an uncontrollable weed. This study examined the persistence of the canola seedbank in farmer-managed fields in 3 geographical areas of the South Australian cropping region for up to 3.5 years after the last canola crop was grown. In total, 66 fields from minimum- and no-tillage farms were sampled for number of canola seed/m2 and the percentage of those that germinated. ANOVA analysis indicated that time since the last harvest and cultivation method were both significant factors affecting the number of seed/m2 present. Neither time since harvest nor cultivation method was significant for number of germinated canola seeds, although time since harvest approached significance at the 5% level. This demonstrates that the canola seedbank and the number of volunteers decline rapidly in managed cropping systems in southern Australia. Therefore, it is unlikely that herbicide-tolerant canola will become a major weed if volunteers are managed carefully.

Additional keywords: decay, minimum tillage, no tillage, gene flow.


Acknowledgments

We thank the CRC for Australian Weed Management who funded this study, the farmers who allowed us access to their farming records and fields, and the anonymous reviewers whose comments helped focus the study.


References


Beckie HL , Hall LM , Warwick SI (2001) Impact of herbicide-resistant crops as weeds in Canada. In ‘Proceedings of the 2002 British Crop Protection Conference—Weeds’. pp. 135–142. (British Crop Protection Council: Farnham, UK)

Begg GS, Hockaday S, McNicol JW, Askew M, Squire GR (2006) Modelling the persistence of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Ecological Modelling 198, 195–207.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Borger C , Minkey D , Spafford Jacob H (2002) Weed seed predation in a low rainfall cropping zone of Western Australia, spatial variation of weed seed predation. In ‘Proceedings of the 13th Australian Weeds Conference’. Perth, WA. pp. 403. (Council of Australian Weed Science Societies: Perth, W. Aust.)

Chadoeuf R, Darmency H, Maillet J, Renard M (1998) Survival of buried seeds of interspecific hybrids between canola hoary mustard and wild radish. Field Crops Research 58, 197–204.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Colton RT , Sykes JD (1992) ‘Canola.’ AgFacts 52. (NSW Department of Agriculture: Orange, NSW)

Crawley MJ, Hails RS, Rees M, Kohn D, Buxton J (1993) Ecology of transgenic oilseed rape in natural habitats Nature 363, 620–623.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

D’Emden FH, Llewellyn RS (2006) No-tillage adoption decisions in southern Australian cropping and the role of weed management. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 563–569.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gruber S, Pekrun C, Claupein W (2005) Life cycle and potential gene flow of volunteer canola in different tillage systems. Weed Research 45, 83–93.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gulden RH (2003) Secondary seedbank dormancy and the seedbank ecology of B. napus L. in western Canada. PhD Thesis (submitted), Department of Plant Science, University of Saskatoon, Canada. Available at: http://library2.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-09052003-101649/unrestricted/GULDEN_PhD.pdf

Gulden RH, Thomas AG, Shirtliffe SJ (2004) Secondary dormancy, temperature, and burial depth regulate seedbank dynamics in canola. Weed Science 52, 382–388.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hails RS, Rees M, Kohn DD, Crawley MJ (1997) Burial and seed survival in Brassica napus subsp. oleifera and Sinapis arvensis including a comparison of transgenic and non-transgenic lines of the crop. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 264, 1–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Legere A , Simard MI , Thomas AG , Pageau D , Lajeunesse J , Warwick SI , Derksen DA (2001) Presence and persistence of volunteer canola in Canadian cropping systems. In ‘Proceedings of the 2001 British Crop Protection Conference—Weeds’. Brighton, UK. pp. 143–148. (British Crop Protection Council: Farnham, UK)

Linder CR (1998) Potential persistence of transgenes, Seed performance of transgenic canola and wild × canola hybrids. Ecological Applications 84, 1180–1195. open url image1

Linder CR, Schmitt J (1995) Potential persistence of escaped transgenes. Performance of transgenic oil-modified Brassica seeds and seedlings. Ecological Applications 5, 1056–1068.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lopez-Granados F, Lutman P (1998) Effect of environmental conditions on the dormancy and germination of volunteer canola seed Brassica napus. Weed Science 464, 419–423. open url image1

Lutman PJW, Berry K, Payne RW, Simpson E, Sweet JB, Champiom GT, May MJ, Wightman P, Walker K, Lainsbury M (2005) Persistence of seeds from crops of conventional and herbicide tolerant canola Brassica napus. Proceedings of the Royal Society. B Biological Sciences 272, 1909–1915.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lutman PJW, Freeman SE, Pekrun C (2003) The long-term persistence of seeds of canola (Brassica napus) in arable fields. Journal of Agricultural Science 141, 231–240.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Morgan CL, Ladbrooke ZL, Bruce DM, Child R, Arthur AE (2000) Breeding oilseed rape for pod shattering resistance. Journal of Agricultural Science 135, 347–359.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Norton R (2003) Conservation farming systems and canola. Report, University of Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

OGTR (2003) General release of roundup ready canola Brassica napus in Australia. Risk assessment and risk management plan. [Online]. Available at: www.ogtr.gov.au/pdf/ir/dir020finalrarmp.pdf

Pahkala K, Sankari H (2001) Seed loss as a result of pod shatter in spring rape and spring turnip rape in Finland. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 10, 209–216. open url image1

Pekrun C, Lane PW, Lutman PJW (2005) Modelling seedbank dynamics of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Agricultural Systems 84, 1–20.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pekrun C, Lutman PJ, Baeumer K (1997) Induction of secondary dormancy in canola seeds Brassica napus L. by prolonged inhibition under conditions of water stress or oxygen deficiency in darkness. European Journal of Agronomy 6, 245–255.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pekrun C, Lutman PJW, Buchse A, Albertini A, Claupein W (2006) Reducing potential gene escape in time by appropriate post-harvest tillage—evidence from field experiments with canola at 10 sites in Europe. European Journal of Agronomy 25, 289–298.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pekrun CJ, Hewitt JD, Lutman PJ (1998) Cultural control of volunteer canola Brassica napus. Journal of Agricultural Science 130, 155–163.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pessel FD, Lecomte J, Emeriau V, Krouti M, Messean A, Gouyon PH (2001) Persistence of canola Brassica napus L. outside of cultivated fields. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1026–1027, 841–846. open url image1

Spafford Jacob H, Minkey DM, Gallagher RS, Borger CP (2006) Variation in postdispersal weed seed predation in a crop field. Weed Science 54, 148–155.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Stanley ML , Potter T (1999) Canola industry in South Australia. In ‘Proceedings of the 10th GCIRC International Canola Seed Congress’. Canberra, ACT, 26–29 September. p. 128. (The Regional Institute Ltd.: Gosford, NSW)